Eyes after the fight started between the government and the Congregation of the Hrant Dink murder case and the investigation was rejected. Overlooking the 
prosecutor conducting the investigation into Muammar Akkas seven years at the same time the privacy of the investigation conducted by the decision of the names of documents that provides information to savcısı.dosya are cited in this conflict. Subject, journalists Nedim Sener and Adem Yavuz Arslan asked.
UYGAR GÜLTEKİN
is uygargultekin@agos.com.t
Eyes after the fight started between the government and the Congregation of the Hrant Dink murder case and the investigation was rejected. December 17 prosecutors conducting the investigation Muammar Akkas seven years at the same time the privacy of the investigation conducted by the decision of the prosecutor. In the last hearing on January 7 of the Dink case lawyer Fethiye Cetin, “Developments has confirmed what we’re saying. Providing information to the file names of documents are cited in this conflict. All information and documents should be reconsidered, “he said. Fight started between the government and the Congregation Dink case in the light of the journalists Nedim Sener and Adem Yavuz Arslan asked.
Nedim Sener (Mail Newspaper Columnist):
Dink murder is the state’s fingerprint Erhan Tuncel’
* AKP-Jamaat Dink case when you look at the context of the fight does not work why?
Dink’s murder, the fact that a large part of the relevant facts of the murder, had appeared shortly after. Communitarian Ramazan Akyurek was written at the time of the Trabzon police Deputy Chief of Staff Intelligence, Erhan Tuncel, police told all about connections. Gendarmerie dimension Coates expression of workers and then admit that the lawsuit filed by two soldiers appeared significantly. Dink threatening from MIT member’s identity and the warrant appeared with his work we did. On the other hand, the police close the congregation was clear that the responsibility for the murder. They also have written in detail. Prime Ministry Inspection Board Report was also the same direction. Report a murder at the time of Intelligence Department Ramazan Akyurek with the “minority” that Hrant Dink and the ultranationalist ie Ergenekon defendants’ right terrorism “following the C Branch Manager Ali Fuat Yılmazer Besides, the name will be determined other officials responsible had kept. However, disinformation about the murder, evidence and guidance more police curfew walked out. Because murder will enlighten people were those responsible for the murder. These policemen carrying out the Ergenekon operation at that time was important names. Communitarian police saying I do not mean only Intelligence Agency, which regulates false documents in Istanbul, close to the congregation were people at the police who protect Dink. Today, the emerging picture clearly now, which is connected to these cops are extensions of the congregation in judgment. Offered investigations, lawsuits, and they have a say in decisions. Dink murder case “Organization” There is no decision in this relationship turns out to be effective as a result. Dink’s murder, which is responsible for the prosecution of police officers in the chain of relationships that is connected to the extensions in the courts if there is a step forward in the Dink murder can not be expected.
* Do you have a memorandum of understanding on the Dink case?
Of course, the myth of the General Staff of the Gendarmerie to the police, bureaucracy, politics, street of lynching campaign in the media until the Dink murder is murder a complete reconciliation of state institutions. Here is the only society does not agree.
* Community AKP fight, reflected in Dink’s case does? Or as mentioned Fethiye Çetin be considered to have a wider field of reconciliation?
Such an expectation does not make sense to me. AKP-Jamaat desperate fight is the job of placing their hopes. However, the table open for me; mitten, police, Gendarme, by name of the General Staff tried to be clear. Even the names of politicians mAsIndAki concealment of events, even in the middle. I’m looking for an impartial trial. On the other hand, this conflict of conscience because they do not expect you to wait for the results in the Supreme Court’s decision in Istanbul 14 From Trabzon High Criminal Court decided to merge on Wheels did not file. The prosecutor conducting the investigation of public officials not moving an inch for three years. One of the recent discussions with government officials around the prosecutor’s investigation also shifted the axis of the doubt that it can contain.
* Change the expression of Erhan Tuncel, a result of Jamaat-e-AKP fight me?
I said it before, but twice Erhan Tuncel, although not the only determinant expression changed a thousand times. The important thing is that Tuncel prove what they say. What if he gives expression to give the Trabzon Police relations with the obvious. From Tunceli of the murder, and know most of the developments so far. Erhan Tuncel, we do not know who or by whom this instruction is that given in the reference. Let’s not forget, in the planning of this murder is the state’s fingerprint Erhan Tuncel.
* Prosecutors Muammar Akkas, the Prime Minister and the government’s target for a while. Approximately three years is conducting an investigation into Dink case. In terms of what the investigation conducted by Akkas could be so healthy? How could continue the investigation?
The Prime Minister, Muammar Akkas parallel statist or state within a state from which the group has seen. Muammm obviously for the Akkas word “communitarian” brings to it. In fact, these allegations are true, the Akkas why this investigation conclude whether the answer in three years we have received. This communitarian said police in the investigation file there. Now, a prosecutor alleged communitarian communitarian police officers conducting investigations said to be impossible to get a result from the healthy. Sheath is inserted into the law of every kind of injustice we are going through a period. That’s why public officials axis can slide very easily in the investigation. But it is interesting civilian bureaucrats, MIT member, the police, the gendarmerie about anyone, including action was taken. However, no matter who a person is even accused can solve everything. An example is the trial of the Trabzon Gendarmerie. Ratio of two small-ranking soldier in the upper left to the responsibility of seeing that “we lie, our commanders know everything there” they said. The same did not happen for police, and MIT.
Adem Yavuz Arslan (Today Newspaper Ankara Representative):
‘Tunceli’ motivasyon’l to an unresolved case from the diversion route rush ‘
* Erhan Tuncel expression has changed in the last hearing. Erhan Tuncel How do you evaluate the new expression and the expression replacement?
Erhan Tuncel this case, the most critical of the names because the shooter selected Trabzon / Pelitli cells with the murder re-built and bakes, prepare and after the murder an organized way off the team link between Erhan Tuncel. Information and links on the merits of Erhan Tuncel. However Tunceli has a serious shift in axis. Because so far in his statement, his letter to journalists or 180 degrees opposite of what you say in an interview told.
* So what was so radical in the Tunceli has made a comeback?
Because in the previous expression ‘major roles in the murder, saying, “pointed out the Trabzon Gendarmerie, said he would share information document. Tunceli as a whole look to the statements ‘that fluctuates according to the spirit of the time’ able to see. The Ergenekon case is now in progress gendarmerie accused blames safety. Wind is blowing from side to account what determines whether certain crimes. While doing this, is overseeing the balance. This change in Tunceli naturally ‘with whom you met and what the bargain was’ begs the question. Because disappeared under the supervision of the period in which the claim that some institutions had often spoken. In Trabzon, while on the other hand is in contact Engin Dinc, today Intelligence Department. Tuncel, that sort of expression that if you look at the names and descriptions of radical change seems to be a target. There are many things to tell, Erhan Tuncel. Gendarmerie with traffic, he must not disclose this mission reap airports. But it seems Tunceli ‘yet unsolved case of a motivasyon’l deflect from route’ to another showdown ‘in the rush to prepare the ground.
* Failure to investigate public officials, to enlighten the crime, is not a major obstacle in front?
Armor of public officials regarding the murder of one of the biggest barriers to disclosure. But not the main factor alone. First I must note: The date of the murder of Dink’s Murder and only limited to a few months before you need to keep. This murder is actually a ‘national consensus murder’. Because NSC cooked ‘concept was a version of the enemy. It was like a shadow government threatened the National Security Council determines, in accordance with law gives instructions to public institutions, field extensions are also implemented that project. Was that over the years. In local bureaucrats ‘principal owner of the state’ familiar to these instructions to the letter warned. As a result, the Trabzon gendarmerie elements, constructions of this murder by questioning the safety of staff, we can not fully elucidate up the implementation. In Trabzon, the local elements to the end of course you will need to inquire. But the network, which organized the murder, the investigation of the case of Trabzon to Ankara, so they know how to lie.
* In recent days, the congregation of the AK Party has an ongoing debate over the judiciary. Out of this discussion, the Dink case and the investigation should be rebuilt m?
Dink Case of the state’s biggest flaw was to look in the mirror. If you look in the mirror, murder, prepare and implement plans that would see those in the capital. I-Jamaat government, not because of tension, as required by law per se in this case should be reconsidered because he’s still telling you to places to look (NSC, Special Forces, Mobilization Inspection Committees) not looking. On the other hand the government-Jamaat tension, not due to the government’s demands for more democracy. The government does not want a judgment can not control. He, operating outside their own knowledge, to conduct an investigation of a structure from being uncomfortable. This tension is maintained and up to the government to make new regulations and more closed structure at the disposal of the executive incurs. Its also clear that democracy is contributing.
* Dink’s murder, prosecutors regarding Muammar Akkas is conducting ongoing investigations. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in recent days, especially in the target. Dink murder investigation execution of Akkas healthy?
I think the Dink case since the very beginning Muammar Akkas should manage as a prosecutor. Because this lawsuit as though you can not execute doing. Keep an eye on the road and your courage will be full, murder is committed by the government, revealed that the decision taken in person so you can get from Ankara. Dink’s murder, if we want to illuminate all aspects from Trabzon to Ankara and from there take the NSC and the Chief of Staff and by the end of a line you have to walk on that line.
* In 2011, in an article “Those who would illuminate the murder of Dink began making operations. Some police chiefs see themselves as rivals to purge information for the person, even if the data did not refrain from distorting “you say. This situation may happen today?
One of the misfortunes of Dink’s Murder unfortunately this thread. Because a large portion of those who would murder illuminating to see their accounts fell to worry. Istanbul Police to close the error in the event organized easily forged documents. MIT has chosen to threaten rather than protect Dink. Governor’s Office, to mobilize protection board instead turned a blind eye. Dink’s Murder in the Istanbul Police Department, the Governor’s Office and the myth of the open defects while strangling agenda of discussion topics and Congregational Ramazan Akyurek they deflect. See acrobat file with the principles of tactics was abducted. And yet it is done. However, this murder was a state crime. However, if we look that way we could see the main perpetrators.
Source: Agos