The Armenian law enforcement system has become a tool of growing political persecution and a servant of the Prime Minister’s arbitrariness, all with the permission of the US and EU ambassadors, in fact, Pashinyan’s deputies in Armenia. The loyalty and blind service with which investigators, prosecutors and police have been serving Pashinyan for four years have no definition or justification. Almost excluding the prospect of a change of government, they probably think that not only will they not answer for directly supporting the Prime Minister, but they will also be encouraged. In this case, it is not about inaction, but, on the contrary, about exceeding official powers.

The ranks of law enforcement agencies are surprisingly strong and invulnerable, in contrast to, for example, the internal political crisis that arose after the announcement of the army last year. At that time, as it is known, Pashinyan tried to arrest Onik Gasparyan and his deputies at all costs, but the investigators and prosecutors were quite reasonable, not initiating criminal cases against the highest officers. In those days, in February-March 2021, the General Staff, in fact, the Armenian army was not completely under Pashinyan’s control, and the officer corps demanded his resignation. And since the army did not obey the Prime Minister, the other law enforcement agencies, seeing this, showed some caution.

The NSS and other law enforcement agencies could not carry out the Prime Minister’s order to change the highest military force that came out against him at any cost, at that time Pashinyan was unspeakably weak, and they did not support the weak leader. For weeks, the Prime Minister could not dismiss the Chief of General Staff, moreover, the Artsakh Defense Army also joined his demand for his resignation. It is clear that those calls were not a demand of one day or one person, and the Armenian army was speaking in the person of dozens of generals. No matter how much Pashinyan issued orders from the platform during the gathering of his supporters, insisted that Gasparyan’s powers were terminated, at first he was unwavering, he did not leave. It was not clear who would dare to arrest the current head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces in his office if he did not resign. It would be logical to assume that the one with the largest army would win in that resistance,

After all, it was not the conflict between the deserter Pashinyan and Colonel-General Gasparyan, but the conflict between the government and the armed forces. The army had stated that as a result of the inefficient management of this government group, the state was collapsing, that is, it had registered the current situation. However, As a result of his short-sighted steps, Onik Gasparyan was eventually removed from office, and almost all the high-ranking military men who joined the statement are now neutralized, moreover, some of them have come to terms with Pashinyan’s rule. As a result, from his role as the head of security, the Ministry of Defense has become another link in satisfying the ambitions of the ruling party elite, which has undermined the same security.

Instead of standing up immediately after the defeat and pointing out the real culprit, the army command preferred to shelter Pashinyan under his roof, but when he decided to speak, he became the victim of the revenge of the leader he had saved. The same fate awaits Prosecutor General Arthur Davtyan, NSS Director Armen Abazyan, Police Chief Vahe Ghazaryan, Chairman of the Investigative Committee Argishti Kyaramyan and Chairman of the Anti-Corruption Committee Sasun Khachatryan. All these figures will be sacrificed at the right time as scapegoats who once saved Pashinyan’s skin ․ Onik Gasparyan is a witness.

David Sargsyan

Ամբողջական հոդվածը կարող եք կարդալ այս հասցեով՝ : https://hraparak-am.translate.goog/post/0355c23604bf898edcf0b8e216027952?_x_tr_sl=hy&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc

© 2008 – 2021 «Հրապարակ օրաթերթ»

No document was signed between Armenia and Azerbaijan at the meeting hosted by European Council President Charles Michel in Brussels on Sunday, opposition member Edgar Ghazaryan, a former chief of the Constitutional Court staff, said on Monday, referring to the statement following the talks between Nikol Pashinyan and Ilham Aliyev.

“None of the documents signed by Nikol Pashinyan to date has undergone domestic ratification procedures,” he wrote on Facebook.

“The Republic of Armenia has made no commitments to Azerbaijan, any other country or international organization. All the anti-Armenian documents have been signed personally by Nikol Pashinyan. It also applies to the agreements reached.

“As long as Pashinyan stays in power, he can implement them. After his ouster, Armenia will have no obligation to implement the agreements,” Ghazaryan stated.

ARAR Foundation:

The joint statement of the partners who implemented programs for the homeland with Avetik Chalabyan
The content of the accusation against Avetik Chalabyan և the circumstances, the decision of his arrest in court by many, both in Armenia and in the Diaspora, to put it mildly, are suspicious and unacceptable. The decision to imprison him for two months, in fact, means that the RA judicial system considers Avetik Chalabyan dangerous from the point of view of justice.
We, the undersigned, personally recognizing Avetik, highly appreciating his patriotic activities and investments, professional skills and business connections in the world, consider that what happened to him is not only a certain attitude to political dissent, but also a great blow to repatriation, security and Armenia’s reputation.
We guarantee that Avetik not only does not pose a threat to our country and people, but the presence of people like him in our lives inspires hope that we can have a qualitatively and morally different Armenia.
We call on the Armenian authorities to reconsider their decisions and release Avetik Chalabyan as soon as possible.

1. Davit Pakhchanyan, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of “Arar” Foundation, Co-Founder of “Ayb” Educational Foundation, Businessman
2. Arthur Alaverdyan, member of the Board of Trustees of “Arar” Foundation, businessman
3. Manuk Hergnyan, Member of the Board of Trustees of the Arar Foundation
4. Igor Zargaryan, member of the Board of Trustees of “Arar” Foundation, businessman
5. Armen Khachikyan, director of “Arar” foundation, sociologist
6. Aram Pakhchanyan, teacher
7. Arthur Janibekyan, producer
8. David Yang, co-founder of ABBYY, iiko, Yva.ai, Plazius companies, “Ayb” educational foundation, candidate of sciences
9. Ruben Vardanyan, Public figure
10. Vardan Marashlyan, Director of the Return to Armenia Foundation
11. Avetik Kerobyan, Expert in the field of technology
12. Ruben Harutyunyan, businessman, benefactor in the fields of education and culture
13. Priest Mesrop Aramyan
14. Varuzhan Avetikyan, lawyer
15. Ara Chalabyan, lecturer at the American University
16. Harutyun Pakhchanyan, Director of Armber CJSC
17. George Tabakyan, co-founder of “Sahman” NGO
18. Aram Kaifajyan, Financier
19. Raffi Kasarjyan – Member of the Board of Trustees of the Return to Armenia Foundation
20. Artavazd Minasyan, co-founder of “Crisp” company
21. David Sahakyan, Education Manager
22. Arthur Berd, Candidate of Sciences, businessman
23. Armine Arustamyan, Chief Financial Officer of EcoHealth (CFO, EcoHealth)
24. Arsen Galstyan, businessman, doctor, citizen
25. Leon Ghazaryan, investor
26. Karen Musaelyan, Investment Risk Expert, Candidate of Science
27. Karo Sargsyan, Founder of “Spetstorg” Commercial Organization JSC (АО ТК “Спецторг”)
28. Yulia Danielyan, businesswoman
29. Hayk Grigoryan, Investment Manager
30. Ruben Simonyan, businessman
31. Sona Koshetsyan, Head of Educational Programs
32. Vahe Amirbekyan, Google Company, Director, Supporter of Humanitarian, Educational and Technological Initiatives in Armenia
33. Erik Hayrapetyan, General Director of Ernst & Young CJSC
34. Vardan Babikyan, General Director of “Prodexgroup” LLC
35. Hayk Shekyan, businessman
36. Artak Hovhannisyan, EPAM Business Development Director
37. Tigran Buniatyan, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the “Fortress” Foundation, businessman
38. Tigran Karapetyan, businessman
39. Garegin Gorgyan, lecturer
40. Tatul Khudatyan, lawyer
41. Khachatur Gasparyan, Director of Intra Mental Health Center, Psychologist
42. Tevan Poghosyan, President of the International Center for Human Development
43. Aram Mehrabyan, Director of Printinfo Publishing House
44. Artashes Vardanyan, Product Manager of ScholarshipOwl
45. Avet Mirakyan, Director of SFI Holding
46. ​​Narek Ashughatoyan, lawyer
47. Alexander Khachaturyan, partner of TK & Partners law firm
48. Vazgen Sarukhanyan, Lawyer
49. Aharon Nuroyan, Lawyer, Germany
50. Gagik Arzumanyan, economist
51. Arthur Dadasyan, Founder and General Director of “Ideal Group”
52. Ashot Danielyan, Businessman
53. Emma Marashlyan, Photographer
54. Vahe Korkov
55. Ashot Iskandaryan, economist
56. Seyran Baghdasaryan, Public figure
57. Gorg Mkhitaryan, Businessman
58. Zhenya Azizyan ․ mathematician
59. S. Hovhannisyan, economist
60. Iren Koseyan, Dermatologist
61. Karen Ghazaryan, investor
62. Vahan Vardanyan, Business և Da Vinci Capital Venture Partners
63. Aram Manukyan
64. Anna Karapetyan, former MP, lawyer
65. Movses Dzavaryan, businessman
66. Vakhtang Abrahamyan, Financier
67. Arman Jilavyan, Head of the Aurora Humanitarian Foundation
68. Karen Simonyan, Member of the Board of Trustees of the “Fortress” Foundation
69. Artak Apitonyan, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, former Deputy Foreign Minister
70. Ruben Karapetyan, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor
71. Sean Kabakyan
72. Igor Aznauryan, Academician of the Academy of Medical Sciences,
73. Aaron P.

Apoyan, financier, Moscow

74. David Harutyunyan, economist
75. Vahan Zanoyan, Writer, public speaker, economist
76. Adam Kablanyan, Investor
77. Father Hovhannes Hovhannisyan
78. Garik Hayrapetyan, International Cooperation Specialist
79. Ara Jabrayan,
80. Karen Harutyunyan, Candidate of Historical Sciences
81. Sergey Kalenjyan, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honored Economist of the Russian Federation
82. Varduhi Zakharyan, IT product manager
83. Konstantin Saroyan, Secretary General of the Eurasian Stock Exchange
84. Ruben Hayrapetyan, Doctor of Economics, Professor
85. Karen Karapetyan, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Technology Consultant
    Reminder. Avetik Chalabyan, co-founder of the ARAR Foundation and a public and political figure, was arrested on May 14 of this year without any credible evidence, with gross violations of criminal procedure. Avetik Chalabyan is accused of gross violations of criminal procedure without any credible evidence, without any credible evidence, the act envisaged by Article 163, Part 3, Clause 2 of the RA Criminal Code is decriminalized by the Criminal Code.

FreeAvetikChalabyan #FreedomAvetikChalabyan

By Harut Sassounian,

Pres. Ilham Aliyev and the Azeri media frequently disparage Armenian national hero Karekin Njteh for having associated with Nazi Germany during World War II.

However, Azeris never mention the affiliation of Mammad Rasulzade, the founding father of the independent Republic of Azerbaijan in 1918, with the Azerbaijani Legion which fought for Nazi Germany. Pres. Aliyev made no reference to Rasulzade in his 2017 speech, while naming the key figures of the First Republic of Azerbaijan.

In 2020, when Pres. Aliyev accused Njteh of being a Nazi, Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan shot back saying that Rasulzade “worked closely with Nazi Germany and the Nazi Party.” Pashinyan criticized Pres. Aliyev for glorifying Rasulzade. The Vice-Speaker of Azerbaijan’s Parliament Fezail Ibrahimli retorted at the plenary meeting of the parliament in May 2020, saying that Pashinyan’s accusation was “a delusion.”

While Pres. Aliyev keeps making critical comments about the statue of Karekin Njteh in Yerevan, he avoids recognizing that in Azerbaijan there are several Rasulzade streets and avenues, his statues are throughout the country, and his image is on postal stamps and banknotes. Rasulzade also has a municipality in Baku named after him. There is even the “Rasulzade Anatolian high school” in Ankara, Turkey.

Most people would not have been aware of Rasulzade’s concealed connection to Nazi Germany, if it were not for the mysterious last-minute cancelation of a documentary about his life which was to be aired on Azerbaijan State Television on January 31, 2022, the 138th anniversary of his birth. However, just one day before the air date, the documentary was cancelled without any explanation. As a result, Fakhraddin Hasanzade, a producer of the Azeri TV program, announced his resignation.

If aired, Rasulzade’s biographical documentary could have revived talk of his support for Hitler’s Azerbaijani Legion which was composed of 70,000 soldiers during World War II. The Armenian Legion had 11,600-33,000 soldiers, while the Georgian Legion had 30,000 soldiers, according to Wikipedia. The soldiers in all three Legions were prisoners of war who were captured by the Germans. They all hoped that a victory by Germany would liberate their homelands from Soviet occupation.

David Davidian, a lecturer at the American University of Armenia, wrote in World Geostrategic Insights: “Rasulzade established relations with the Nazis in the 1930’s while residing in Romania. At the outbreak of WWII, the German representatives notified Romanian authorities that Rasulzade was their political ally and asked that Rasulzade be issued documents permitting ease of diplomatic passage to Berlin. Rasulzade’s goal was to help Nazi Germany conquer the Caucasus or have Turkey as an ally of Germany do so, clearing the way for an independent Azerbaijan and probably destroying what remained of Armenia.”

Davidian added: “In May 1942, Rasulzade participated in meetings between Nazis and representatives of Caucasian Muslim emigres and actively recruited legionnaires for the German Wehrmacht [armed forces of Nazi Germany] from among Azerbaijani POWs…. Interestingly, Rasulzade remained in Germany until 1947. He eventually resided in Turkey until he died in 1955.”

Rasulzade’s grandson, Rais Rasulzade, wrote in the autumn 1999 issue of Azerbaijan International magazine: “It wasn’t long until Hitler started looking for someone to represent him in the Transcaucasian region. He couldn’t find anyone suitable among the Armenians or Georgians but had heard that Rasulzade was highly educated and cultured.” According to his grandson, when Hitler met Rasulzade in Berlin, he asked him to give a speech to the Azeri soldiers in the Nazi German army.

In a document (WO 208/4367) located in the United Kingdom War Office archives, Hitler was quoted as saying on December 12, 1942: “The Georgians are not a Turkish people, rather a typical Caucasian tribe, probably even with some Nordic blood in them. Despite all explanations — either from [Alfred] Rosenberg [ideologist of Nazism] or from the military side — I don’t trust the Armenians, either. I consider the Armenian units to be just as unreliable and dangerous. The only ones I consider to be reliable are the pure Muslims, which means the real Turkish nations.”

In his article, Davidian reported that the Azerbaijani Field Battalion I./111 “participated in suppressing the August 1944 Warsaw Uprising that killed an estimated 40,000 [Polish] civilians.”

In conclusion, Davidian reminded the Azeris of the proverb: “Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at others.” I would like to add the biblical admonition: “You hypocrite! First remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye.”

Today’s statement totally disregards Artsakh’s natural right to self-determination of the indigenous people and the Azerbaijani genocide policy towards Artsakh’s security crisis is taking place and there is no guarantee. But what is happening is also the consequence of Armenian authorities consistently zeroing in on our fundamental theses of historical significance, starting with the fact that Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity has nothing to do with Artsakh’s They have justified or legalized Azerbaijani illegal armed deployments in Gegharkunik and Syunik, conceded our territorial jurisdiction. Roads in Syunik are built so that they are under Azerbaijani engagement. The facts of Azerbaijani crimes have been hidden from the outside world, internal society and the Diaspora and continue to hide. In order to right up their own mistakes and not to promote discontent, to retain positions, there is widespread pressure on anyone who speaks those facts. Tied our state’s hands in international mechanisms and made the country the victim of geopolitical interests. All this has freed Azerbaijan’s hands more to fill the world with falsehoods. Drugged and continue to drug people’s awareness.

Capitulation after Capitulation no single thing from all these fake meetings Has Armenia gained anything. whatever Azerbaijan wanted has been handed over by silver plate.

Judging by 2022 Following the meeting of Nikol Pashinyan, the President of the Council of the European Union in Brussels on May 22, 2012, mediated by the President of the European Union, Sultan Ilham, according to the announcements published on the official websites of the Armenian Government and the Council of the European Union.

1. The statements do not mention the possibilities for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, in particular, the basic principles of international law agreed upon by the conflicting parties as a result of years of work of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, ie non-use of force or threat, The only international measure with a settlement mandate, the OSCE Minsk Group.
2. The announcements do not reflect the results of 2021. Protocols on the immediate withdrawal of Azerbaijani illegal armed units from the territory of the Republic of Armenia since May 12, 2006.
3. The announcements do not reflect the year 2022. March 24, 2020 by the units of the illegal armed formation of Azerbaijan As a result of the gross violation of the requirements of the November 9, 2010 tripartite declaration, in the Republic of Artsakh, as a result of the intrusion into the responsibility zone of the Russian Federation peacekeeping troops, the illegal armed formation of the Azerbaijani records of return to starting positions.
4. There is no clear record in the statements about the immediate release of all Armenian captives and hostages illegally detained in occupier Azerbaijan and their return to the Republic of Armenia.

STEPAN HASAN-JALALYAN

political scientist

Ամբողջական հոդվածը կարող եք կարդալ այս հասցեով՝ : https://hraparak-am.translate.goog/post/10360e5e54d338ad948fd4dc1abd008d?_x_tr_sl=hy&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc

© 2008 – 2021 «Հրապարակ օրաթերթ»

On May 22, Nikol Pashinyan will leave for Brussels, where a regular meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev will take place under the auspices of European Council President Charles Michel.

It should be reminded that Pashinyan left for Brussels in early April. After the trilateral meeting and agreement, Azerbaijani official sources and Charles Michel stated that the Minsk Group no longer has a role to play in the Artsakh issue, as the group no longer exists. The West in the person of Charles Michel The issue of Artsakh settlement is openly trying to take its hand. An agreement was reached in Brussels to set up commissions on demarcation and demarcation by the end of April and prepare for the signing of a peace treaty. The 5-point ultimatum presented by Azerbaijan, which is a precondition for this agreement, presupposes a cross on the status of Artsakh.

Then, on April 19, Pashinyan was summoned to Moscow, where he signed a whole package of documents, after which the Russian Foreign Ministry announced through its official representative that Moscow would not allow the West to take away the solution of the Artsakh problem. “The border demarcation and demarcation agreement will be implemented on the basis of Soviet military maps kept at the Russian Army General Staff and in accordance with the agenda proposed last year, mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs.” This means that Pashinyan gave his consent first to Brussels and then to the Kremlin.

After returning from Moscow, during a closed meeting with CP deputies, he said that Moscow is also not against the signing of a peace treaty, but, unlike the West, offers not to include the issue of Artsakh’s status in the peace treaty, but to leave its solution behind. It should be noted that after the meeting in Brussels and then in Moscow, time worked to the detriment of the peace treaty, and the street struggle of the opposition contributed to that. Despite the Brussels agreements, the demarcation process was not launched, the signing of the agreement was frozen. Recently, Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan clarified why the first meeting on the border demarcation between Armenia and Azerbaijan scheduled for May did not take place.

“The meeting did not take place, but I can assure you that we will continue our discussions on organizing this meeting. There are some technical details that the parties need to agree on. “And I hope that the meeting will finally take place in the coming days or weeks,” he said, answering reporters’ questions before the Armenia-EU Partnership Council meeting in Brussels. It should be noted that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for the work of this commission, and Ararat Mirzoyan, according to some information, does not agree with Pashinyan’s geopolitical tug-of-war, the dangerous game of serving one Europe, one Russia, especially against the background of tense relations between Russia and the West.

According to political scientist Armen Badalyan, the conflict of these geopolitical centers, naturally, leaves its impact on the settlement of Artsakh. “A month ago at the Brussels meeting there was no mention that Russia has its influence in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In Moscow, Armenia and Russia confirmed that the conflict should be resolved by Russian domination. that it will be the domination of the West. It should be noted that in this case the Minsk Group does not exist, and in this case each of the geopolitical centers is trying to take the key to resolving the conflict, “said the political scientist, emphasizing that the solutions put forward by the parties enter with each other.

“The Armenian authorities, for some reason, have decided to play on those contradictions, they hope to extend the term of their power with that game.” The political scientist is in a hurry to disappoint, maybe it succeeds in tactical terms, but it will not succeed in strategic terms. “Because they both understand that in this case, whoever they are playing with, he is playing a double game, both of them will tear him away from him as much as possible, but the time will come when both of them will give up that player, considering that the player does not serve their interests. is an opponent’s player. “This is not maneuvering, this has brought the interests of both sides against each other, with the sole purpose of keeping your power,” says Armen Badalyan, noting that after this double game, no one will take our state seriously anymore.

The political scientist emphasizes that both Russia and the West are in favor of peace in the region, but there is a conceptual difference between Russia and the West, according to Badalyan. According to Badalyan, the settlement is a matter of several months, after which Russia will deal with Artsakh. “Security and humanitarian issues are being settled for now, and the status will be closer in the future, because the peacekeeping troops have been there for 4 years, and if the status issue is resolved now, Russia will have to leave in 2 years, while it has no desire to leave Azerbaijan.” And if the status issue is resolved now, Russia has nothing to do there, that’s why Russia wants to delay as much as possible. to influence the policy of Azerbaijan through his army. And the West thinks that the status issue should be resolved the day before, that the Russian army should leave, after which the Zangezur corridor should be opened. “And Turkey, using that corridor, will join Azerbaijan, leave the Central Asian republics, and be able to influence the southern borders of Russia, having a platform in the abdominal part of Russia, will be able to influence the latter.” The political scientist emphasized that not only Russia but also neighboring Iran is against the Western concept, which hinted at carrying out a military coup in Armenia in the case of that scenario. If they go to the Central Asian republics and be able to influence the southern borders of Russia, having a platform in the abdominal part of Russia, they will be able to influence the latter. ” The political scientist emphasized that not only Russia but also neighboring Iran is against the Western concept, which hinted at carrying out a military coup in Armenia in the case of that scenario. If they go to the Central Asian republics and be able to influence the southern borders of Russia, having a platform in the abdominal part of Russia, they will be able to influence the latter. ” The political scientist emphasized that not only Russia but also neighboring Iran is against the Western concept, which hinted at carrying out a military coup in Armenia in the case of that scenario.

According to Armen Badalyan, the agreements of the first meeting in Brussels were postponed as a result of our internal political processes, particularly the struggle started by the opposition, now that the movement is weakening, Pashinyan allows himself to throw himself into the arms of the West again.

Lusine Shahverdyan

Ամբողջական հոդվածը կարող եք կարդալ այս հասցեով՝ : https://hraparak-am.translate.goog/post/167778a6c81b098d29d0584023334b0c?_x_tr_sl=hy&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc

© 2008 – 2021 «Հրապարակ օրաթերթ»

V.R. Rudolf Suren Hakobyan, director of the Armenian-Chinese joint venture “G & Profile” in 2021 In an interview with 168.am in June,

he said that he would apply to the leadership of the National Security Service (NSS) after the elections to find out how much money Nikol Pashinyan, a Swiss-Armenian businessman, received during his visit to Switzerland in 2018.

From Srmakesh. “And the most important thing is that according to the rumors hanging in the air, Vardan Srmakesh presented Anna Hakobyan with a luxurious private house,” said Rudolf Hakobyan. There is no information about the fate of this program, but Rudolf Hakobyan, this time together with Armenak Danielyan, has filed a new report against the Prime Minister’s family, this time Nikol Pashinyan will be the respondent, if, of course, a criminal case is initiated based on the program. The essence of the protest refers to the abolition of the RA Ministries of Culture and Agriculture by Nikol Pashinyan in order to weaken and destroy the state.

“Dear Mr. Davtyan, Nikol Pashinyan, 2018 “When he came to power, he soon began to dismantle and eliminate the activities of the Ministries of Culture and Agriculture,” reads the beginning of the protest addressed to Prosecutor General Arthur Davtyan.

The applicants then stated that prior to the abolition of the Ministry, the Ministry of Culture was the republican executive body that developed the Government’s policy in the field of culture. According to them, the general goal of the ministry was aimed at preserving, supplementing, popularizing cultural heritage and developing contemporary art.

A key place and role in the work of the Ministry was given to cooperation with foreign countries and international organizations. In addition, in accordance with the provisions of state programs of special significance for the Republic of Armenia, the RA Ministry of Culture has developed a number of important strategic programs. “Nikol Pashinyan, abolishing the Ministry of Culture, instead created the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia, that is, the Ministry of Culture turned into a non-important secondary institution. It should be noted that Georgia, Iran, Azerbaijan and Turkey, which border the Republic of Armenia, have Ministries of Culture, which are properly treated by the state in those countries.

“In fact, the RA Prime Minister discredited and discredited the Republic of Armenia in the international arena with his non-state action,” the statement submitted to the prosecutor reads. The applicants Rudolf Hakobyan and Armenak Danielyan also noted that the optimization of the Ministry of Agriculture was a big blow to the Armenian economy, as a result of which the Ministries of Economic Development and Investment were united. “Optimization of this sector leads to the impoverishment of the villagers and the destruction of the village, as the subsidy for agriculture has been significantly reduced, as a result of which it is already felt that the domestic agricultural products will give way to the agricultural products imported from abroad,” they said.

The above-mentioned facts, according to Rudolf Hakobyan և Armenak Danielyan, prove that Nikol Pashinyan’s actions were aimed at destroying the activities of state bodies, which led to the weakening of the state. They noted that Article 304 of the RA Criminal Code provides for these actions of Nikol Pashinyan, which refers to harm. “Taking into account the above, we ask you: 1. To characterize the activity of RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan as harmful. “To hold the RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan accountable,” Rudolf Hakobyan and Armenak Danielyan concluded their complaint to the prosecutor.

Source: https://168.am/2022/05/21/1707276.html?fbclid=IwAR2Kaj9HvKtDexcv5xl6P-d1aay6VK0MReahX38-ITDHbhypfD6qBtx8fSk