Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

Friends of the ANCA Western Region Hold Successful Reception in Support of Congressman Adam Schiff’s US Senate Campaign

By

(Glendale, California) — On Wednesday, June 28, 2023, the Friends of the Armenian National Committee of America Western Region (ANCA Western Region), hosted a reception in support of Congressman Adam Schiff’s US Senate campaign. Throughout his career in Congress, Rep. Schiff has been a tireless advocate for the Armenian-American community, consistently standing up for justice and human rights for the people of Armenia and Artsakh. In February, the ANCA Western Region endorsed Schiff for United States Senate.

The reception was held at the Glen Arden Club in Glendale to support Congressman Schiff’s campaign efforts and to give members of the community the opportunity to meet the Congressman and discuss issues of concern. The event was attended by nearly one hundred supporters, donors, community leaders including Bishop Torkom Donoyan, Prelate of the Western Prelacy and members of the Prelacy Board of Trustees, representatives of leading Armenian-American community organizations including the Armenian Cultural Foundation Board and Chapters, the Armenian Educational Foundation, the Armenian American Museum, SEIU Armenian Caucus, and ANCA Western Region Board, staff, committees and interns. Schiff represents California’s 30th congressional district, which is centered in the San Gabriel Valley east of Los Angeles and includes Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, West Hollywood, and other Los Angeles neighborhoods, many of which are cities that house large populations of Armenian-American constituents. 

“We’re very proud and happy to have, amongst us, Congressman Adam Schiff. For over two decades now, Congressman Schiff has been a true champion of the Armenian Cause in Congress. He has been our voice, the voice of our community in the Federal government. He has persistently and consistently advocated for our Cause,” said ANCA Western Region Board Chair, Nora Hovsepian, Esq. “During these difficult times when the Armenian Nation is in deep crisis, when Artsakh and Armenia are facing existential threats from our enemies, Adam Schiff has once again taken the lead, advocating within the State Department, the Executive Branch, offering and leading many resolutions in Congress in order to bring our issues to the forefront. It is largely due to this advocacy that the Federal government has taken a very proactive role in leading negotiations, and it is up to us as Armenian-Americans to call on our government to use this role to advocate for true American ideals of democracy, human rights and self-determination – the same ideals that the Armenian People also deserve and espouse.”

Congressman Schiff has served for many years in leading the bipartisan Congressional Armenian Caucus, and currently serves as one of its co-chairs, advocating with successive U.S. Administrations for the Armenian Cause. He stood shoulder to shoulder with over 166,000 Armenian-Americans at the Centennial Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide in Los Angeles in 2015, where he vowed to continue his mission in pursuing justice for the 1.5 million victims of the Armenian Genocide. His persistent efforts in this regard finally came to fruition in 2019 when the U.S. Congress officially recognized the Armenian Genocide. The ANCA Western Region maintains an excellent relationship with the Congressman, having recognized him multiple times for championing Armenian-American issues, including his Advocate for Justice Award at the 2022 ANCA Western Region Awards Gala. 

Consistently representing the largest concentration of Armenian-Americans in the United States since 2001, he has been a leading voice in Congress for every aspect of the Armenian Cause, including advocating for increased aid to Armenia and Artsakh and holding Azerbaijan accountable for its anti-Armenian aggression. In addition, he has been a strong supporter of the U.S.- Armenia Strategic Partnership and has worked to strengthen economic and cultural ties between the two countries. After Congressman Schiff laid the groundwork for congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide, President Biden’s full recognition followed in 2021 – the first-ever formal recognition by any President of the United States.

Most recently, on the 108th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, Congressman Adam Schiff introduced a bold resolution recognizing the independence of Artsakh and right of its people to self-determination, while simultaneously condemning Azerbaijan’s ongoing aggression against the Armenian people.

“Thank you to the ANCA Western Region for your extraordinary leadership. You serve as a tremendous advocate, and the community is fortunate to have an organization that is so capable, so articulate, so passionate and devoted in that position. I want to thank the (Armenian-American) community for your support, and for welcoming me as part of your family. I will continue to use my platform in the United States Senate to represent you and to advocate for the Armenian People because I believe that the United States has a moral obligation to prevent genocide, to prevent ethnic cleansing and to protect human rights and the right to self-determination which is so important especially for the Armenians of Artsakh,” said Representative Schiff.

The Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region is the largest and most influential Armenian-American grassroots advocacy organization in the Western United States. Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters throughout the Western United States and affiliated organizations around the country, the ANCA Western Region advances the concerns of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.

Hitler could have declared instead of committing suicide: I am not guilty, Field Marshal Paulus is guilty

By

Nikol Pashinyan, who is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Armenia, at least in a war situation, is trying to blame the defeat of his army on the leadership of the high-ranking military, the Defense Ministry, and the General Staff.

In the NA investigative committee investigating the circumstances of the 44-day war, he says that there were commanders who ordered the troops to retreat, as a result of which we lost territory, there were commanders who spread panic among the troops, the leadership of the Defense Forces and the commanders of the Armed Forces misrepresented him and inaccurately presented the situation on the front. And he is flawless, he did everything for the army and victory. He gave whatever the army needed, whatever they wanted, and bought everything from weapons to household goods. What is he guilty of? that the formation of the army led the army to defeat and put both itself and the country in a bad situation. Pashinyan speaks as if he wants to say: if I didn’t want Armenia to win the war, I would still negotiate from the position of the winner.

Logically, everything seems right. Only, if we proceed according to Pashinyan’s logic, then the same Ministry of Defense and General Staff can present their excuses. For example, they can say that we ordered the commanders of defense regions and military units not to retreat, on the contrary, we set the task of capturing new territories, and they reported to us that everything is very good on the front, we are attacking, the enemy is retreating in panic, we we win Well, we too, sitting in the Ministry of Defense and the General Assembly, believed in those reports and forwarded them above. What is our fault that they gave us wrong information from the front, we performed our duties flawlessly, the middle-ranking soldiers are to blame.

The middle-ranking military personnel can also find their own excuses for their failures and the retreat and defeat of the troops, and so continue to reduce the responsibility to the squad commanders and rank-and-file soldiers, who did not show the necessary self-sacrifice and in many cases retreated to save their lives, instead of covering the barrel of the enemy’s machine gun with their chests. or failed to shoot down a drone with a machine gun, and many were treacherously killed in order to avoid responsibility in the future.
Only, apart from Pashinyan, no one will be able to speak in that committee and present his truth. Not because they won’t be called, but because nobody is interested. In reality, these excuses have no value when there is no responsibility. If that defeat is to blame and responsible, it is first of all the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, and then others, including the senior staff. Pashinyan was the head of the country for almost two and a half years before the start of the war, and he himself appointed or at least had the right to change those people, the head of the Ministry of Defense, the head of the General Staff and other high-ranking military personnel. If he didn’t change it, it means he considered them competent.

If we are to be guided by Pashinyan’s logic, in 1940, French Prime Minister Paul Reynaud should have declared that he was not responsible for France’s defeat, but Defense Minister Edouard Daladier, especially since Daladier held the position of Prime Minister before him. But Reynaud not only did not give up responsibility, but seeing that France was losing, he submitted his resignation, but continued to support Charles de Gaulle in the struggle for the liberation of France. In general, the leader of any defeated country can shift the responsibility to whoever he wants, exonerating himself from it. For example, the leader of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler, could have declared instead of committing suicide: “What is my fault for the defeat, if Field Marshal Paulus of my army was surrounded and surrendered?”

It’s just that it’s hard to remember a case when the commanders of the armies of the defeated countries, instead of taking responsibility for the defeat, continued to cling to power and, contrary to all norms of political responsibility and human morality, shamelessly started blaming everyone, trying to justify themselves. Pashinyan would not be Pashinyan if he did not justify himself, but even made himself a hero. He behaves in the commission session as though we lost Artsakh as a result of the defeat, but we kept Meghri instead, and that is already a big victory. Pashinyan says that in 1999, Robert Kocharyan negotiated the option of handing over Meghri and receiving Artsakh in return. And he did the exact opposite: he handed over Artsakh and kept Meghri. What is more important for Armenia now: Meghri or Artsakh? If honey so he has done a bigger job for Armenia than Kocharyan. It doesn’t matter that Kocharyan handed over Meghri or Artsakh, the important thing is that Vagharshak Harutyunyan said something like that, being Kocharyan’s opponent. It is true that Azerbaijan occupied territories from Armenia, but it was done to provoke a change of power in Armenia.

And since he managed to keep the power, it means that the enemy’s plans have failed. What is more important, that Armenia has lost territories, or that the hostile plans to provoke a change of power in Armenia have failed? Of course, the failure of the change of power is more important, at least for him. What is the benefit to him from Black Lake or the territories of Nerkin Hand and Khoznavar, but staying in power in Yerevan is a daily income?

Pashinyan can say whatever comes to his mind as long as he has power, when he loses power, other people will speak for him and reveal the truth. Although revealing the truth and condemning it will painfully not restore the losses of Armenia and the Armenian people, neither human nor territorial. Although there is not much to reveal. it is clear to everyone that in 2020, Armenia lost the war, and at that time the weak, greedy and lying Nikol Pashinyan took the position of supreme commander in Armenia.

Avetis Babajanyan

Macron “I have put more pressure on Aliyev and I will put more pressure on him than Pashinyan himself. “The question is Pashinyan”.

By

“I remain decisive regarding Artsakh”, confirms the French president

During his three-day visit to Marseille, French President Emmanuel Macron had a meeting with various influential circles of Marseille (economic, artistic, political, community, sports, cultural, commercial, scientific-educational, etc.), whom he personally invited.

That evening, at his meeting with the representatives of the Armenian community in Marseille, which was also attended by MP Saprina Akresti-Rupash, responding to the appeal addressed to him, “Mr. President, we expect a more powerful initiative, practical and not only moral”, said the following. “I have put more pressure on Aliyev and I will put more pressure on him than Pashinyan himself. The question is Pashinyan. I am the only one who has a clear position and message on the issue of Artsakh.”

To this answer to the president, the representative of the Central Committee of the ARF Western Europe, Hrach Varjapetian said. “Mr. President, as French citizens, we turn to you as our president, as well as co-chairman of the Minsk Group, and we expect you to show practical support to our compatriots from Artsakh.

We know that our friend Murat Papazian, Co-Chairman of the Coordinating Council of French-Armenian Organizations, has discussed with you the alarming and deeply worrying situation in Artsakh on various occasions, we turn to you with the same demand and the same level. It should also be clear that any conversation or intention to see the centuries-old Armenian Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan is unacceptable for us.”

President Macron from the conclusion. “Don’t doubt my determination regarding Artsakh and Armenia in general. I will continue my efforts, even if I am almost the only one in the international family with this agenda. You also know that France sent its military attaché to its embassy in Armenia for the first time, which must mean something, right? We will do our best.”

“Negotiations or pressure on Armenia?”: shelling in NK during negotiations in Washington

By

Azerbaijan Shelling and Murdering Armenian during Negotiations in Washington

“The situation can be defined as follows: either there are no negotiations, or the use of force is part of these ‘negotiations’,” political observer Hakob Badalyan believes.

During the meeting between the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, which began on June 27, Baku used a UAV in Nagorno-Karabakh, which killed four soldiers. The Armenian Defense Ministry reports that the Azerbaijani Armed Forces once again fired at the Armenian-American plant under construction in Yeraskh. In connection with these incidents, NK demanded that the Armenian delegation “immediately stop negotiations until a full-fledged truce is established both on the line of contact with NK and on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.”

According to Badalyan, Azerbaijan cannot ignore the US, it can simply be sure that there will be a reaction to its actions. The analyst believes that the lack of reaction means “at least a loyal attitude towards the use of force by Azerbaijan.”

This is the second round of Mirzoyan-Bayramov talks mediated by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. It was scheduled for June 12, but was postponed at the request of Baku. The first round of negotiations took place on May 1-4. Following the meeting, a joint statement was not signed, the parties limited themselves to a press release, which stated that “positions on some key issues still diverge.”

Shelling in parallel with the talks in Washington

The Armenian-Azerbaijani talks, mediated by Secretary of State Antony Blinken, will continue until June 29.

It is reported that on the first day the Blinken-Bayrams meeting, trilateral negotiations, as well as bilateral discussions of the Armenian and Azerbaijani delegations took place.

During a conversation with Blinken, the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister said that “for the successful completion of the peace process, it is important to avoid provocative steps.” But, on the first day of negotiations in Washington, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces opened fire on the Armenian-American plant under construction in Yeraskh, and later the situation escalated in NK.

The Prime Minister of Armenia called on the international community to “take practical steps” to ensure the rights and security of the population of Nagorno-Karabakh. On Twitter, he wrote about the “high risk of destabilization in the South Caucasus.”

“Immediately stop negotiations”

The parliament of the unrecognized NKR adopted a statement demanding the Armenian delegation in Washington:

“Immediately stop the ongoing negotiations until a full-fledged truce is established on the line of contact with Artsakh and on the borders of the Republic of Armenia and documentary guarantees of its observance are provided. Otherwise, the continuation of negotiations will mean encouraging the aggressive behavior of the Azerbaijani side and privilege at the international level.”

The deputies called on the UN Security Council and the leaders of the co-chairing countries of the OSCE Minsk Group

  • “to take concrete practical steps,
  • impose sanctions against Azerbaijan,
  • curb his aggressive tendencies,
  • not be limited to expressions of sympathy, appeals and recommendations.”

Commentary by political observer Hakob Badalyan

Are negotiations possible in such an atmosphere?

“I can’t imagine what negotiations can be like in a situation where one of the parties is negotiating simultaneously with the use of force or the threat of its use. And this circumstance is not worthy of a targeted assessment by any of the mediators in the negotiations, in general by the international community.

Are negotiations possible in such a situation, or is it just an attempt to dictate conditions, where Yerevan has only one thing left to do – resist?

Negotiations should involve a certain balance of power. I mean not only military strength but also the atmospheric balance in general.”

Azerbaijan cannot ignore the US

“The shelling in Yeraskh has been going on for several days, by and large, they have not stopped. After the first shelling, when two workers were injured, the US expressed deep concern at the level of a tweet from a State Department spokesman.

But this did not bother Azerbaijan. The shooting in the direction of the plant continued even after its owners planted the flags of Armenia and the United States on the territory.

I think that Azerbaijan cannot ignore the US, it can only be sure whether the US will react or not. That’s why I’m talking about signs of loyalty. As an indicator of the effectiveness of efforts to achieve peace, I consider it important to call Azerbaijan to account for the use of force or its threat. When we do not see this, I strongly doubt the effectiveness of the peace process.”

“HAYAQVE” is a civil-legislative initiative that formulated a draft to criminalize any act that acknowledges Artsakh as part of another state on behalf of the Republic of Armenia,

By

“HAYAQVE” is a civil-legislative initiative that formulated a draft to criminalize any act that acknowledges Artsakh as part of another state on behalf of the Republic of Armenia, as well as includes the criminalization of actions that undermine the significance of the Armenian Genocide. According to this draft, any official representing the Republic of Armenia who recognizes Artsakh as part of another state or denies the Armenian Genocide shall face a prison sentence ranging from 10 to 15 years.

The basis for this initiative is derived from the Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Armenia, the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, and the decision of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Armenia dated July 8, 1992. In order to participate, individuals are required to sign the petition at local government institutions such as regional administration, city halls, and district administration and their signature needs to be confirmed with passport data.

The Central Electoral Commission has designated a 60-day period, ending on August 19 of this year, for collecting signatures. The collection of signatures will commence on June 29 with a symbolic opening ceremony at the Yerevan Center district headquarters located at Teryan 44. There is also an electronic signature option, which has already been launched. You can get information on how to sign electronically from “Hayaqve” social media pages. It is mandatory to present a passport when signing the petition. You are not restricted to signing at your place of registration; you can sign in any village, city, region, or district. You can sign on working days from 09:00 to 18:00. All citizens of the Republic of Armenia who are 18 years and older are eligible to sign. Once 50,000 signatures are obtained, the bill must be included in the National Assembly’s agenda for a vote. If the National Assembly rejects the bill, an additional 300,000 signatures will be collected, and the project will be subjected to a referendum. Four communities outside of Yerevan, namely Amasia, Sisian, Spitak, and Dilijan, have refused to provide space for a signature collection despite it being constitutionally mandated.

Source: 301

Armenia: “Publication”. He is a fool, illiterate, sick, liar. the generals respond to Pashinyan

By

Lusine Shahverdyan,

Yesterday, with the participation of Nikol Pashinyan in the commission investigating the circumstances of the 44-day war, “What would the poor neighbor do?” another episode of the series. In this series, the main character, with heartbreaking, self-contradictory statements, tried to convince that everyone is to blame for the defeat of the war, except for him, on whose head they are trying to break the jug and bowl of decades.

After the war, Nikol Pashinyan’s main mission has become to justify himself, to put the blame on others, and he is so entangled in his lies that he makes contradictory statements about the same thing, but he does not give up. Ditsuk announced yesterday that he was informed that the probability of war is 30 percent, while on November 10, 2020, he publicly assured that they were aware that there would be a war, but they did not know the day.

In the first series of the investigative commission’s presentation, Pashinyan, let’s remind, made a historical tour of the negotiation process, announcing that in the previous period they negotiated to leave Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan. Then people who are well aware of the negotiation process denied what he said line by line. But yesterday he made accusations in the same style against the generals of the army, making scandalous statements and revealing military secrets. Either the military has lost the war by mismanaging, spreading lies, or the lands have already been sold, giving orders to retreat, and sometimes refusing to participate in the most important operations. And he himself did everything for them: he gave medals and titles, provided weapons and money.

“One of the biggest problems recorded during the war was that our army had a problem with its methods of movement: large vehicles, large groups, high visibility. I know that debate still exists today. In many cases, we had victims not in battle, but while moving around,” says Pashinyan. During the war, Tiran Khachatryan, deputy chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, claims that it is a complete lie that we had more casualties while moving than on the battlefield. “If he can prove it, I promise to stand where he wants and say that whatever sin there is, whatever omission there is, I am guilty. Otherwise, let him stand up and say that he is to blame for everything. There is no such thing. Of course, there were lapses during the movements, but that the main losses were during them, I don’t know how to characterize the person making such a statement.

In response to the question of CP member Hayk Sargsyan, whether the army had any restrictions during the war, whether the prime minister made a decision not to use any weapons, Pashinyan said. “There were weapons, the rights related to which did not fully and completely belong to Armenia”, and he promised to give details in the closed part of the session. However, it is obvious that he was trying to make it clear that the right to shoot “Iskander” did not belong to Armenians, Russia did not give “dabro”. And this idea was circulated by the Syrians with lightning speed, when finally the Prime Minister spoke about this, and “we all understand that the limiter was not Mauritania or Tajikistan, but Russia”.

Let’s remind that after the war, Nikol Pashinyan said that the Russian “Iskander” missile fired by them exploded by 10 percent. This statement became the cause of a scandal at one time, and Moscow reacted sharply.

Tiran Khachatryan, who reacted with laughter to Pashinyan’s statement, was also dismissed from the position of deputy head of the State Security Service on the same day. Yesterday, Khachatryan insisted in a conversation with us that it is absurd, there is no such thing, only one person has the right to order the use of any weapon of the Republic of Armenia, the supreme commander. “He was the only one who had the permission to fire or not to fire weapons, it is not only about “Iskander”, but, I emphasize, all weapons, only the supreme commander has that right.” Commenting on another statement of Pashinyan, Khachatryan assured that he did not know a single high-ranking military officer who spread information that the lands were sold: don’t fight, retreat. “Perhaps there were those who made such a statement among the demobilized, but the army is not responsible for that. They were definitely not among the active military.” What about placing the blame for the defeat on the generals and the army? “That person is undecided, mixes things up, makes deliberate manipulations, it is stupid to announce such a thing,” said the former deputy head of the State Security Service. Nikol Pashinyan also assured yesterday that what the army wanted, he gave. “As a political authority, I have set a simple task before the army: tell me what you need, and you will have it. They said: Su-30 is needed, a state-of-the-art plane, I said, if you need it, you will have it. What else do you need? Do you need a title, you will have it? Do you need a medal, you will have it? Do you need money, you will have it? Do you need food, you will have it? “As a political authority, I have set a simple task before the army: tell me what you need, and you will have it. They said: Su-30 is needed, a state-of-the-art plane, I said, if you need it, you will have it. What else do you need? Do you need a title, you will have it? Do you need a medal, you will have it? Do you need money, you will have it? Do you need food, you will have it? “As a political authority, I have set a simple task before the army: tell me what you need, and you will have it. They said: Su-30 is needed, a state-of-the-art plane, I said, if you need it, you will have it. What else do you need? Do you need a title, you will have it? Do you need a medal, you will have it? Do you need money, you will have it? Do you need food, you will have it?
“For example, the army needed money, the army wanted it, but he did not give it. Moreover, there were professional and detailed justifications as to why the money was needed, for what specific purpose it was supposed to serve, but it was never transferred to the army,” Tiran Khachatryan denied this. And what about SUs? “Regardless of who requested it and on what grounds they asked for the army to acquire SUs, a criminal case has been initiated regarding this issue, proceedings are underway, I myself am a witness in the framework of these proceedings, therefore, I cannot reveal details.”

Let’s remind that days after the war, on November 19, Movses Hakobyan announced that the acquired anti-aircraft guns are without ammunition, and no anti-aircraft missile is being produced. Pashinyan also expressed a remarkable idea that he has doubts that they did not resist the enemy in order to provoke a change of power in Armenia, especially in May 2021. Probably, he forgot that on May 21, during the pre-election campaign, he personally announced that he does not intend to start a war for 30 percent of Black Lake, that they have a peace agenda.

The next “accused” is Movses Hakobyan, who was the head of the Military Control Department during the war. “We have a criminal case that a high-ranking officer spread panic and issued an order, he said: go tell them that the land has been given, you will be dragged pointlessly, get out of here. There are episodes that I personally related to, when I myself was informed at the last moment about the decision to hand over an area. We are talking about the 7th defense region, the north of Artsakh. First of all, I forbade doing that, but the advice for that decision was illegally given by a very high-ranking military officer, who, I wonder, had the right to give such advice while in a bunker. The problem is that this area is still under Armenian control. Another thing that later events proved is that I, not being a soldier, do not understand anything, but a man, being a soldier, suggested to evacuate from that region, and further events showed that he was right. But that territory is still under Armenian control. Why were such orders issued?” Pashinyan stated.

Movses Hakobyan said that he does not want to comment on “sick people”. But we insisted that the response was that perhaps the commander of the Defense Ministry reported to Pashinyan that you made such a proposal. “I don’t think that the commander of the Defense Army is sick.” Didn’t you say something like that? “I don’t have that right. Send Nikol Pashinyan to kindergarten, let him come back after learning from there, so that he knows who has what rights and what authority to give orders. And if he insists, let him apply to the prosecutor’s office, I will only be happy if they open a case,” said Hakobyan, wondering if he said something like that, why no criminal case has been opened.

Nikol Pashinyan, whose wife, according to him, expressed moral support in the command bunker from the beginning to the end of the war, yesterday also questioned Mosi’s authority to be in the bunker. “Being with shoulder strap does not mean that you can go wherever you want, you still need a business trip, an order, an order. In relation to that person (he means Movses Hakobyan), it should be checked how authorized it was for him to be in that bunker.”

Hakobyan countered: “I had the right to be where I wanted, it was right for me to be there, and Nikol Pashinyan confirmed that. If you ask him, there is a decision document about it.” Yesterday, Pashinyan tried to disprove Mossi’s claims that the plan for armaments and military purchases has changed. He insisted that it has not changed and air defense systems have been acquired. “Among those mentioned, there may have been some funds that could not be obtained, because that is our plan that we must obtain. But someone else has their own sales plan, right? It does not always coincide with our acquisition plan. This was also the reason why we thought: well, at this moment, what alternative can we get,” he said. “If he said something like that, he is an idiot, an ignoramus. Ask the prime minister, on what basis did he get the rest, if the plan hasn’t changed,” Hakobyan countered.

We noticed that many people blame the generals, that if they had said a united speech at the time, Pashinyan would not be in power today and would not have made accusations against them. “I have done what I have to do, and no one should try to teach me what to do.”

Pashinyan also spoke about the failed Lele Tepe operation. Let’s remind that he was accused of ordering to bring back the Lele Tepe hill occupied by the enemy during the April 2016 war at any cost, to show that Serzh Sargsyan gave it and he took it back, but the operation failed, we lost hundreds of victims. Yesterday, Pashinyan put the responsibility for this on the generals, particularly Seyran Ohanyan’s son Artur Ohanyan, although he did not name them. He said that the latter refused to participate in the operation, which was the reason for the failure.

We will look at other announcements later.

Router: Special Report: US, Swedish prosecutors study graft complaint naming son of Turkey’s Erdogan

By

By David Gauthier-Villars

June 26 (Reuters) – Anti-corruption authorities in the United States and Sweden are reviewing a complaint alleging that the Swedish affiliate of a U.S. company pledged to pay tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks if a son of Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan helped it secure a dominant market position in the country.

The proposed plan was detailed in communications and business documents seen by Reuters, as well as by a person familiar with the matter. Reuters is reporting this plan and the resulting preliminary probes for the first time.

Analysis: Lies, lies, lies

By

Vakhtang Siradeghyan

Nikol’s participation in the session of the RA National Assembly Committee, which allegedly revealed the reasons for our shameful defeat in the 44-day war, was the last official act of the pious operation to make him innocent. And, naturally, it was aimed at that segment of society that lacks the ability to analyze what it hears. And such, as we saw in relation to the 2021 electoral process, is the majority of society. That majority includes both those who still believe in Nicole and those who don’t. And, by and large, they don’t care about the fate of the state.
Let’s go back to Nicole’s testimony. I will not touch on their political and military aspects, as this has been done many times. Political by RPA Vice President Armen Ashotyan, military by generals. And many times the Nicolaitan hypocrisy lies and forgery have been presented. But that hasn’t stopped them from happening again and again. The same thing happened with the two questions I want to present. But unlike the political and military aspects, the phenomena I have chosen are simpler. And, accordingly, more understandable for the majority of the public.

The first phenomenon was the presence of Mrs. Anna Hakobyan in the command bunker of Artsakh. According to Nikoli, he was invited there for 10-15 minutes by the president of the Republic of Armenia Harutyunyan Arayik, in order to cheer up the present generals and colonels with his presence. Can you imagine the lady having to cheer on that kind of military? I think that this is another lie, because then the head of the Military Control Service of the RA Ministry of Defense, Colonel-General Movses Hakobyan, would not politely invite him out of the bunker. And if he tried, Harutyunyan Arayik would have intervened, saying that he was the one who invited. And the lady will come out soon. By the way, Nikol knows well the question of why he was there, because he himself sent him to Stepanakert. Otherwise, the service chief would not have appeared there on his own. And when Movses Hakobyan presented that episode in one of his interviews, nothing in that regard, no explanation came from either Yerevan or Stepanakert. So this was another lie by Nikola. It is believed that this is also why the colonel-general was dismissed, and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was opened against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also a political or in this case “family” based persecution. and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was initiated against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also one of the political or in this case “family” based persecutions. and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was initiated against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also one of the political or in this case “family” based persecutions.

The second refers to the male child of that family. When the latter volunteered and fell into the encirclement, according to Artur Ayvazyan (nickname: Manakh), several hundred soldiers were killed to get him out of there. Manakh, according to him, presented it to the NSS, but no question was raised in this regard. And Nikol again presented, in his opinion, a very sensual scene, that one of the soldiers stuck together under shelling died from shrapnel. The other was his child. I assume that this happened after the visits of that young man with his mother, Anna Hakobyan, to the Stepanakert cellars were recorded. And in order to nullify the negative impact caused by that information, Ashotik was “sent” to a military unit at his father’s suggestion. According to Nikoli, she did not know where her son was. I don’t think it’s true

The third lie, get caught, didn’t come from Nicole, Nicole just confirmed it. The author of that forgery is “nationally elected” Kristine Poghosyan from Kapka (or Nikola, whichever you prefer). The latter was interested in what is the difference between the Armenian and Ukrainian opposition. And in order not to put Nicole in a stupid position, assuming that Nicole might not know the answer to that question, she asked it herself. According to that lady, the “archaic” opposition to Ukrainian President Zelesku took up arms to defend Ukrainian independence from the very first days of the Russian invasion. And the Armenian opposition tried to remove Nikol from power. Of course, nothing like this happened during the war. And after the war, it had to happen, so that the war would not creep up to the present day.

So, for the information of the lady, I would like to say that as of mid-autumn 2022, 12 parties were closed at the initiative of the Security Service of Ukraine. All, of course, opposition. And Zelensky’s “archematic” opposition, head of the “Opposition Platform-For Life” faction of the Rada of Ukraine, the pro-Russian Viktor Medvedchuk was imprisoned and then exchanged with the “Azovs” captured by the Russians. Then he was also deprived of Ukrainian citizenship. And the members of the faction were naturally deprived of their mandates. Except for a few people who “converted” and found a place in the ruling faction. This is how the Ukrainian opposition defended the country’s independence.

H. C. Viktor Medvedchuk was considered the “man” of the Russian President, and for that reason Russian-speaking Russian and Ukrainian Telegram channels wrote about him for several months. Well, Mrs. Poghosyan did not know that there are people in our country who follow the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on a daily basis.

Nikol’s participation in the session of the RA National Assembly Committee, which allegedly revealed the reasons for our shameful defeat in the 44-day war, was the last official act of the pious operation to make him innocent. And, naturally, it was aimed at that segment of society that lacks the ability to analyze what it hears. And such, as we saw in relation to the 2021 electoral process, is the majority of society. That majority includes both those who still believe in Nicole and those who don’t. And, by and large, they don’t care about the fate of the state.
Let’s go back to Nicole’s testimony. I will not touch on their political and military aspects, as this has been done many times. Political by RPA Vice President Armen Ashotyan, and military by generals. And many times the Nicolaitan hypocrisy lies and forgery have been presented. But that hasn’t stopped them from happening again and again. The same thing happened with the two questions I want to present. But unlike the political and military aspects, the phenomena I have chosen are simpler. And, accordingly, more understandable for the majority of the public.

The first phenomenon was the presence of Mrs. Anna Hakobyan in the command bunker of Artsakh. According to Nikoli, he was invited there for 10-15 minutes by the president of the Republic of Armenia Harutyunyan Arayik, in order to cheer up the present generals and colonels with his presence. Can you imagine the lady having to cheer on that kind of military? I think that this is another lie, because then the head of the Military Control Service of the RA Ministry of Defense, Colonel-General Movses Hakobyan, would not politely invite him out of the bunker. And if he tried, Harutyunyan Arayik would have intervened, saying that he was the one who invited. And the lady will come out soon. By the way, Nikol knows well the question of why he was there because he himself sent him to Stepanakert. Otherwise, the service chief would not have appeared there on his own. And when Movses Hakobyan presented that episode in one of his interviews, nothing in that regard, no explanation came from either Yerevan or Stepanakert. So this was another lie by Nikola. It is believed that this is also why the colonel-general was dismissed, and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was opened against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also a political or in this case “family” based persecution. and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was initiated against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also one of the political or in this case “family” based persecutions. and in the middle of 2021, a criminal case was initiated against him and two other colleagues for publishing some information that is a state secret. I think it was also one of the political or in this case “family” based persecutions.

The second refers to the male child of that family. When the latter volunteered and fell into the encirclement, according to Artur Ayvazyan (nickname: Manakh), several hundred soldiers were killed to get him out of there. Manakh, according to him, presented it to the NSS, but no question was raised in this regard. And Nikol again presented, in his opinion, a very sensual scene, that one of the soldiers stuck together under shelling died from shrapnel. The other was his child. I assume that this happened after the visits of that young man with his mother, Anna Hakobyan, to the Stepanakert cellars were recorded. And in order to nullify the negative impact caused by that information, Ashotik was “sent” to a military unit at his father’s suggestion. According to Nikoli, she did not know where her son was. I don’t think it’s true

The third lie, get caught, didn’t come from Nicole, Nicole just confirmed it. The author of that forgery is “nationally elected” Kristine Poghosyan from Kapka (or Nikola, whichever you prefer). The latter was interested in what is the difference between the Armenian and Ukrainian opposition. And in order not to put Nicole in a stupid position, assuming that Nicole might not know the answer to that question, she asked it herself. According to that lady, the “archaic” opposition to Ukrainian President Zelesku took up arms to defend Ukrainian independence from the very first days of the Russian invasion. And the Armenian opposition tried to remove Nikol from power. Of course, nothing like this happened during the war. And after the war, it had to happen, so that the war would not creep up to the present day.

So, for the information of the lady, I would like to say that as of mid-autumn 2022, 12 parties were closed at the initiative of the Security Service of Ukraine. All, of course, opposition. And Zelensky’s “archematic” opposition, head of the “Opposition Platform-For Life” faction of the Rada of Ukraine, the pro-Russian Viktor Medvedchuk was imprisoned and then exchanged with the “Azovs” captured by the Russians. Then he was also deprived of Ukrainian citizenship. And the members of the faction were naturally deprived of their mandates. Except for a few people who “converted” and found a place in the ruling faction. This is how the Ukrainian opposition defended the country’s independence.

H. C. Viktor Medvedchuk was considered the “man” of the Russian President, and for that reason Russian-speaking Russian and Ukrainian Telegram channels wrote about him for several months. Well, Mrs. Poghosyan did not know that there are people in our country who follow the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on a daily basis.

Armenia: Midicle horror story, a simple hernia surgery, she ends up in three hospitals.

By

Ճողվածքը վիրահատել են՝ առանց ցանց դնելու. կինը երկրորդ անգամ է վիրահատվել

Լեղապարկի վիրահատությունից հետո Լիլիթ Ա.-ի մոտ ճողվածք է առաջացել, որը նա որոշել է վիրահատել «Մեդլայն կլինիկ» բժշկական կենտրոնում։ 2022թ հունիսի 3-ին նրան վիրահատել է վիրաբույժ Սլավիկ Ամիրյանը։ Դրա հաջորդ օրը Լիլիթին դուրս են գրել։
Սակայն նրա վիճակը գնալով վատացել է. ցավերը շատացել են, իսկ ճողվածքը՝ մոտ 4-5 անգամ մեծացել։ Լիլիթը պատմում է, որ վիրաբույժին տեղյակ է պահել, մի քանի անգամ այցելել է «Մեդլայն կլինիկ», սակայն նրան ասել են, որ ամեն ինչ նորմալ է, պետք է մարզվել։
Բայց, քանի որ ճողվածքը շատ է մեծացել, Լիլիթը որոշել է այն նորից վիրահատել, բայց այս անգամ՝ մեկ այլ բուժհաստատությունում, որտեղ, ըստ Լիլիթի, ասել են, որ առաջին վիրահատության ժամանակ ցանց չի տեղադրվել, ինչն առավել տարածված է ճողվածքների վիրահատության ժամանակ։

«Ես իրենց հարցնում եմ՝ ցանցո՞վ վիրահատություն է արվելու, քանի որ լսել էի, որ ցանցովն ավելի արդյունավետ է, իրենք ասում են, որ, հա. գրիժայի մեր բոլոր վիրահատություններն արվում են ցանցով»,-ասում է Լիլիթը։
Քանի որ իրեն ողնաշարից են ցավազրկել, Լիլիթը նկատել է, որ վիրահատության կեսից իրենց միացել է բուժհաստատության մեկ այլ վիրաբույժ՝ Վահան Պետրոսյանը, և նայելով Լիլիթին, ասել է, որ ինքն է լինելու նրա բժիշկը։ Հաջորդ օրը Լիլիթին դուրս են գրել։
Վիրահատությունից 15-20 օր անց Լիլիթը նույն տեղում նորից փքվածություն է զգում, զանգահարում է Վ. Պետրոսյանին։ Վերջինս ասում է՝ բնական է, երևի գազեր են և այլն, ոչինչ, կկարգավորվի կանցնի։ Որոշ ժամանակ անց, երբ վիճակը չի կարգավորվում, Լիլիթը նորից դիմում է Վ. Պետրոսյանին.
«Ինքն ինձ ասում է՝ գիտես ինչ, քանի որ Սլավիկ Ամիրյանն է քեզ ընդունել, իր պացիենտն ես, արի, իրեն դիմի, ես ուղղակի քեզ բուժող բժիշկն եմ, իրեն դիմի, թող ինքը քեզ նայի։ Մեզ մոտ կարգը էդպես ա, պիտի դիմես իրեն, դու իր պացիենտն ես»,-պատմում է Լիլիթը։
Սլավիկ Ամիրյանն էլ է զննում Լիլիթ, և ասում՝ ճողվածք չկա, ամեն ինչ նորմալ է, պետք է մարզվել։
Մոտ մեկ ամսից ճողվածքն ավելի է մեծանում, Լիլիթը նորից գնում է Ս. Ամիրյանի մոտ, ով, ըստ Լիլիթի, նորից ասում է, որ ամեն ինչ նորմալ է.
«Ինքն ինձ ասում է, իրենց բժշկական տերմիններով, որ վերին պատը բաց է թողած, չի ասում, որ նորից նույն գրիժան է,- պատմում է Լիլիթը։ -Ասեց՝ եթե շատ անհանգստացնի, կգաս, կվիրահատես»։
Այս այցից հետո Լիլիթը գնում է «Էրեբունի» ԲԿ, որտեղ վիրաբույժն ասում է, որ իր մոտ նորից ճողվածք կա, և նորից պետք է վիրահատել։ Լիլիթն այս մասին պատմում է Ս. Ամիրյանին, ով, ըստ նրա, խորհուրդ է տալիս նորից վիրահատել։
Մի ամսից՝ 2022թ դեկտմեբրին, Լիլիթը գնում է «Մեդլայն կլինիկ»՝ վիրահատության համար պայմանավորվելու. որոշում են վիրահատել տոներից հետո։ Լիլիթը պատմում է, որ տոները շատ դժվար է անցկացնում՝ ուժեղ ցավերով, քանի որ ճողվածքը նախկինից մոտ մի քանի անգամ ավելի մեծացած էր։
«Մեդլայն կլինիկ»-ում նորից խոսք է բացվում առաջին վիրահատության մասին.
«Ինքը (Սլավիկ Ամիրյանը, հեղ.) հարց է տալիս Պետրոսյանին (առաջին վիրահատությանը մասնակցած բժիշկն է, հեղ). հիշու՞մ ես՝ ինչ ցանց ենք դրել, ինքն էլ ասում է՝ չէ, չեմ հիշում»,-պատմում է Լիլիթը։ Նրան առաջարկում են զեղչով վիրահատել (270 000 ՀՀ դրամ՝ 350 000-ի փոխարեն), բայց Լիլիթը որոշում է այլ տեղ վիրահատել։
Երկրորդ բուժհաստատությունում Լիլիթին վիրահատում են 2023թ մարտին։
«Այստեղ (երկրորդ բուժհաստատությունում, հեղ.) բժիշկը զարմանում է, ասում է՝ այս ի՞նչ է քո վիճակը, ասում է՝ սետկա (ցանց) դրվա՞ծ է, ասում եմ՝ հա. նա արդեն երկրորդ մարդն էր, ով ինձ այդ հարցը տվեց, «Էրեբունի» ԲԿ-ից հետո, մոտս կասկած էր առաջացել։ Ես խնդրում եմ բժշկին, նախքան վիրահատությունը, ասում եմ՝ ինչ կլինի, որ ինձ վիրահատեք, ասեք՝ ցանց դրա՞ծ էր, թե՞ դրած չէր,-պատմում է Լիլիթը։- Վիրահատում են ու գալիս, ասում են, որ դրած չէր սետկան, ամուսնուս են նաև ասում, էնտեղ բոլորը տեղյակ էին, զարմացել էին, ասում էին՝ որտեղ ես արել վիրահատությունդ»։

Ճողվածքի չափերը՝ առաջին և երկրորդ վիրահատությունից առաջ
Լիլիթը պատմում է, որ երկրորդ վիրահատությունից հետո զանգել է նաև Սլավիկ Ամիրյանին, պատմել է, որ վիրահատվել է մեկ այլ տեղ, ու ասել են, որ ցանց դրված չի եղել։ Լիլիթի խոսքով՝ բժիշկը խնդրում է երկրորդ անգամ վիրահատած բժշկի կոնտակտները տալ, սակայն ինքը մերժում է։
Լիլիթը խոսում է նաև երկրորդ վիրաբույժ՝ Վ. Պետրոսյանի հետ, հայտնում, որ ցանց տեղադրված չի եղել։ Ըստ Լիլիթի, նա ասում է, որ ինքը չէ իրեն ընդունող բժիշկը։
«Ինքն ինձ ասում է, որ եթե պարզվի օրենքով էդ ամեն ինչը, որ դրված չի (ցանցը, հեղ.), ամեն ինչ կարգով կարվի։ Հետո ասում է՝ եթե դուք լինեիք իմ պացիենտը ի սկզբանե, ես լրիվ ուրիշ ձև կանեի, բայց, քանի որ իր պացիենտն եք, իր հետ հարցերը լուծեք»,-պատմում է Լիլիթը։
Նա ասում է, որ հիմա՝ երկրորդ վիրահատությունից հետո, լավ է զգում. ճողվածքը չի մեծացել, ցավեր էլ չունի։

«Ինչու՞ չպիտի դնեինք». Սլավիկ Ամիրյանը պնդում է՝ ցանց դրվել է
«Մեդլայն կլինիկ» բուժհաստատության վիրաբույժ Սլավիկ Ամիրյանը «Հետք»-ի հետ զրույցում ասաց, որ հիշում է դեպքը, և պնդում է, որ ցանց տեղադրվել է. բացառվում է, որ այն տեղադրված չլինի։ Ապա ուղարկեց հիվանդության նկարագրի այն հատվածը, որտեղ նշված է օգտագործված ցանցի համարը։
Այն հարցին՝ այդ դեպքում՝ որն է պատճառը, որ ճողվածքը մեծացել է, բժիշկը պատասխանեց, որ վիրահատվածների մոտ այն կարող է կրկնվել, և իրենք ցավում են, որ Լիլիթի մոտ կրկնվել է.
«Այսօրվա դրությամբ՝ համաշխարհային գրականության մեջ չկա մի տվյալ

Source: https://hetq.am/hy/article/157555?utm_content=buffere0961&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

The hernia was operated on without mesh. the woman was operated on for the second time

After the operation on the gall bladder, Lilit A. developed a hernia, which she decided to operate at “Medline Clinic” medical center. On June 3, 2022, surgeon Slavik Amiryan operated on him. The next day, Lilit was discharged.
However, his condition has worsened. the pains increased, and the hernia increased about 4-5 times. Lilit says that she informed the surgeon, and visited “Medline Clinic” several times, but was told that everything is normal, she should exercise.
But, because the hernia had grown so much, Lilith decided to have it operated on again, but this time at another medical facility, where, according to Lilith, they told her that no mesh was placed during the first operation, which is more common in hernia surgery.

“I ask them if the surgery will be done with a mesh, because I heard that it is more effective, they say, yes. All our hernia operations are done with mesh,” says Lilit.
As she was being sedated from her spine, Lilit noticed that in the middle of the operation, another surgeon of the medical facility, Vahan Petrosyan, joined them, and looking at Lilit, he said that he would be her doctor. Lilith was discharged the next day.
15-20 days after the operation, Lilit feels swelling again in the same place, and calls V. Petrosyan. The latter says it’s natural, maybe it’s gases, etc., nothing, it will be settled and it will pass. After some time, when the situation is not resolved, Lilit turns to V. Petrosyan.
“He tells me: you know what, because Slavik Amiryan accepted you, you are his patient, come, contact him, I am just the doctor treating you, contact him, let him take care of you. Our procedure is like this, you have to contact him, you are his patient,” Lilit says.
Slavik Amiryan also examines Lilit and says that there is no hernia, everything is normal, she needs to exercise.
About a month later, the hernia gets bigger, Lilit goes to S. again. At Amiryan, who, according to Lilit, says again that everything is normal.
“He tells me, in their medical terms, that the upper wall is open, he doesn’t say that it’s the same hernia again,” says Lilit. – He said, “If it bothers you a lot, you will come and operate.”
After this visit, Lilit goes to Erebuni Medical Center, where the surgeon says that she has a hernia again and needs to be operated on again. Lilit tells S. about this. Amiryan, who, according to him, advises to operate again.
In one month, in December 2022, Lilit goes to “Medline Clinic” to make an appointment for surgery. they decide to operate after the holidays. Lilit says that she spends the holidays very hard, with severe pain, because the hernia was several times larger than before.
At the “Medline Clinic” there is again talk about the first operation.
“He (Slavik Amiryan, ed.) asks Petrosyan (he is the doctor who participated in the first operation, ed.) a question. do you remember what net we put, he says no, I don’t remember,” Lilit says. They offer her to operate at a discount (270,000 AMD instead of 350,000), but Lilit decides to operate elsewhere.
Lilit will be operated on in the second medical institution in March 2023.
“Here (in the second medical facility, ed.) the doctor is surprised, he says: what is your condition? He says: is there a net? I say yes. he was already the second person who asked me that question, after “Erebuni” MC, I had a doubt. I ask the doctor, before the operation, I say, what will happen if you operate on me, tell me if there was a mesh or not,” Lilit says. They also tell my husband, everyone there knew, they were surprised, they said, “Where did you have your surgery?”

Hernia dimensions before the first and second surgery
Lilit says that after the second operation, she also called Slavik Amiryan, told her that she was operated on in another place, and was told that no mesh was placed. According to Lilit, the doctor asks to give the contacts of the doctor who operated the second time, but she refuses.
Lilit also speaks to the second surgeon, V. with Petrosyan, reports that no network was installed. According to Lilith, she says that she is not the doctor who admitted her.
“He himself tells me that if everything that is not established by the law is clarified (the network, ed.), everything will be done in order. Then he says, “If you were my patient from the beginning, I would have done it in a completely different way, but since you are his patient, solve the issues with him,” says Lilit.
He says that now, after the second operation, he feels well. the hernia has not grown, nor does it have pain.

“Why shouldn’t we put it?” Slavik Amiryan claims that he was put in a net
Slavik Amiryan, a surgeon at the “Medline Clinic” medical institution, said in a conversation with “Hetk” that he remembers the incident and claims that a mesh was installed. it is excluded that it is not installed. Then he sent the part of the disease description where the number of the network used is indicated.
To the question, in that case, what is the reason that the hernia has grown, the doctor answered that it can recur in those who have been operated on, and they are sorry that it has recurred in Lilith.
“As of today, there is no data in the world literature

Opinion: Nikol Pashinyan will be the first Armenian Politician in the 21st Century to betray his country by Collaborating with the enemy.

By

Pashinyan Attending Enemy Leader Victory Celebration

Throughout history, there have been various individuals who have been accused or perceived as betraying their countries. It is challenging to provide an exhaustive list, but here are a few notable examples:

  1. Vidkun Quisling: Quisling was a Norwegian politician who collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II. He established a puppet government and facilitated the German occupation of Norway. His name, “quisling,” has since become a synonym for a traitor or collaborator.
  2. Marshal Philippe Pétain: Pétain was a French military officer and politician who collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II. He headed the Vichy regime in France, which collaborated with the Nazis and implemented anti-Semitic policies.
  3. Robert Hanssen: Hanssen was an American FBI agent who spied for the Soviet Union and later Russia for more than 20 years. His actions compromised numerous intelligence operations and resulted in the deaths of multiple agents.
  4. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg: The Rosenbergs were American citizens who were convicted of espionage and treason for allegedly providing nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They were executed in 1953.

One prominent historical leader who is often associated with betraying his country is Benedict Arnold. Arnold was a general in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. Initially, he was considered a talented and brave officer who played a crucial role in several key American victories.

However, in 1780, Arnold’s loyalty to the American cause began to waver due to perceived slights and personal financial difficulties. He conspired with the British and planned to surrender the strategic fort of West Point, which he commanded, to the British forces. The plan was discovered, and Arnold’s co-conspirator, Major John André, was captured and executed, while Arnold managed to escape to British lines.

Benedict Arnold’s betrayal is widely regarded as a significant act of treason against the American Revolution, and his name has become synonymous with treachery in American history.

It’s important to note that each case of alleged betrayal should be evaluated based on the available evidence and legal proceedings. The perception of betrayal can vary depending on historical context and different perspectives.

Off course Pashinyan has to be captured and thoroughly investigated by a military tribunal