Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Official claims MİT ‘warned’ Dink Armenian journalist upon request of General Staff

January 4, 2016 By administrator

237326An official from the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) claimed during his 2014 testimony that Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, who was assassinated in 2007, was invited to the İstanbul Governor’s Office in 2004 to be “warned” over some of his controversial reports upon a request from the General Staff, the media has revealed.

The meeting was attended by Dink, former İstanbul Vice Governor Ergun Güngör and two MİT officials.

The details of the testimony given by Özel Yılmaz — one of the two MİT officials who attended the meeting — on Dec. 22, 2014 to İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor Gökalp Kürkçü, who is overseeing an ongoing investigation into the killing of Dink, was recently revealed to media outlets.

According to a report in the Radikal daily on Monday, Yılmaz claimed in his testimony the meeting was held on the orders of the General Staff. Yılmaz reportedly told the prosecutor an official from the General Staff had called former MİT Undersecretary Şenkal Atasagun and requested that MİT “warn” Dink over his reports about the ethnic origin of Sabiha Gökçen, the adopted daughter of the founder of the Turkish Republic.

Yılmaz also reportedly claimed Atasagun appointed former MİT İstanbul Regional President Hüseyin Kubilay Günay to coordinate the meeting to warn Dink. Yılmaz also claimed during his testimony the MİT officials accidentally bumped into Dink when they were at the İstanbul Governor’s Office to collect some documents that Dink had provided to the governor’s office. Yılmaz also claimed he spoke to Dink about a prison sentence given to Dink over his reports, in which Dink alleged that Gökçen was of Armenian origin.

This testimony by Yılmaz has been questioned because it has some contradictions. Dink had not yet been handed down any prison sentence at that time when the meeting was held in 2014, contrary to what Yılmaz told the prosecutor.

In 2005, Dink was given a six-month suspended prison sentence after he was accused of denigrating “Turkishness” in writings about the identity of Turkish citizens of Armenian origin.

The MİT official said they did not go to the governor’s office to meet with Dink, but to collect the abovementioned documents. “When we were sitting in Güngör’s office, Dink came into the room. When we attempted to leave, Dink told us: ‘Please don’t bother. I can leave.’ Güngör presented us as his relatives and Dink told him our presence [in the room] would not be a problem for him. Later, we could not say we were actually MİT officials so as not to create any problems for Güngör.”

The details of the testimony given by Güngör on Dec. 9, 2014 were also revealed in the Radikal daily on Monday. According to the report, Güngör’s testimony also refutes some parts of Yılmaz’s testimony. Güngör said the meeting was held on a request by MİT, adding the governor’s office had no active role in the meeting except hosting it. Güngör also said the meeting was organized by Yılmaz and another MİT official, refuting Yılmaz’s claim that they accidentally bumped into Dink at the governor’s office.

Güngör also said Dink was invited to the meeting to be warned of “possible danger if he continues to make controversial statements.” He also said he introduced the two MİT officials as his relatives because MİT had requested in advance that he not reveal the identities of its officials.

A report published on news portal internethaber.com on Monday also claimed new footage has recently emerged on the assassination of Dink. According to the report, the footage shows six gendarmerie intelligence officers also in front of the Agos newspaper’s building at the time of the murder.

The report also pointed out the İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office had already detected that signals were received from telephones belonging to six gendarmerie intelligence officers around the scene where Dink was shot at the time of the incident.

The news portal also says if the prosecutor’s office confirms that those six individuals detected in the footage were actually gendarmerie intelligence officers, this proves Dink’s murder was committed under the supervision of the gendarmerie.

Dink was shot and killed by ultranationalist hitman Ogün Samast in broad daylight outside the office of the Agos newspaper, where he worked, on Jan. 17, 2007. Samast was given a 22-year prison sentence, while a key suspect in the case, Yasin Hayal, was given a life sentence for inciting Samast to commit murder.

A retrial started in September 2014 when the İstanbul 5th High Criminal Court complied with a ruling from the Supreme Court of Appeals in May 2013 overturning a lower court’s ruling that acquitted the suspects in the Dink murder case of charges of forming a terrorist organization. This decision paved the way for the trial of some public officials on charges of voluntary manslaughter.

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: dink, MIT, murder, Turkey

Turkey: 26 police officers to stand trial in Dink case

December 16, 2015 By administrator

Hürriyet Photo

Hürriyet Photo

ISTANBUL – Doğan News Agency,

An indictment of the investigation into negligence of public officials in the killing of prominent Armenian-Turkish journalistHrant Dink in Istanbul has been approved by the court.

A total of 26 police officers, including both current and former police chiefs, will be tried as the indictment in the nine-year-long investigation into negligence of public employees in the shooting death of Dink was recognized by the Istanbul 14th Court for Serious Crimes on Dec. 15 following its Dec. 9 approval by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

The 26 police officers were charged with one count each of “forming or heading an armed terrorist group,” “membership of an armed terrorist group,” “power abuse on duty,” “manipulating, destroying and/or concealing official documents,” “deliberate murder,” “fabricating official documents by public employees” and “deliberate murder on negligence” in the case filed into negligence of public officials at the time of the assassination. All of the 26 were on duty at the time of Dink’s murder.

The move comes a week after the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office on Dec. 9 approved the indictment prepared against the 26 police officers into “negligence on public duty” in the shooting death of Dink, the editor-in-chief of weekly Agos, who was shot dead outside his office in Istanbul’s Şişli district on Jan. 19, 2007.

The indictment prepared by prosecutor Gökalp Kökçü was presented to the Istanbul 14th Court for Serious Crimes after it had been rejected by deputy chief prosecutor Orhan Kapıcı twice.

Having been rejected twice before, lawyers representing the Dink family expressed the reaction against the indictment in the investigation returning to Kökçü. The return means that cases will likely not be opened against the suspects.

The Istanbul Chief Prosecutor’s Office returned the indictment to Kökçü in early November, arguing that “evidence of voluntary manslaughter concerning some of the suspects was not revealed.”

However, Hakan Bakırcıoğlu, a Dink family lawyer, said on Nov. 4 that not opening a case against former police chiefs Ahmet İlhan Güler, Celalettin Cerrah, Reşat Altay, Engin Dinç and other suspects, would exclude their integral responsibility in Dink’s murder.

Recalling the first two versions of the indictment, the latest one drafted in late October, Bakırcıoğlu said the two indictments charged former police chiefs Ali Fuat Yılmazer, Ramazan Akyürek, Tamer Bülent Demirel and Osman Gülbel each with “voluntary manslaughter,” Engin Dinç, Reşat Altay and Ahmet İlhan Güler each with “voluntary manslaughter due to negligence” and Sabri Uzun and Celalettin Cerrah each with “malpractice.”

“Despite resistance and barriers in front of the interrogation and investigation of public servants who took part in Dink’s murder, they were interrogated and investigated by the prosecutor [in charge of the case],” Bakırcıoğlu said.

All the names of the suspects implicated in the investigation were reported to have been on duty in police departments in Istanbul, Ankara and the Black Sea province of Trabzon at the time of Dink’s murder.

Dink was shot dead outside his office building in Istanbul’s Şişli district on Jan. 19, 2007, by 17-year-old Ogün Samast.

Relatives and followers of the case have claimed government officials, police, military personnel and members of Turkey’s National Intelligence Agency (MİT) played a role in Dink’s murder by neglecting their duty to protect the journalist.

December/16/2015

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: 26 police, dink, İstanbul, Trial

Istanbul: Dink murder cited as ‘sub-crime’ in new indictment

December 10, 2015 By administrator

dnk.thumbThe 2007 killing of prominent Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink has been stated as a “sub-crime aimed at achieving the goals of a terrorist organization” in the indictment probing alleged negligence of 26 public officials, daily Hürriyet has reported.

The indictment recently approved by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office probing the suspects, who are all current and former police chiefs, stated that a public case had to be filed into the assassination of Dink.

The indictment referred to U.S.-based Islamic cleric Fethullah Gülen, a former ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) who they now accuse of heading a terrorist organization. It said the officials being investigated were suspected of having links to the Gülen movement.

The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office on Dec. 9 approved the indictment prepared against 26 police chiefs into “negligence on public duty” in the killing of Dink, the former editor-in-chief of weekly Agos who was shot dead outside his office in Istanbul’s Şişli district on Jan. 19, 2007.

The 26 suspects could be tried on “negligence of public duty” charges if the court recognizes the indictment. The court is expected to announce its decision within 15 days.

All the names of the suspects implicated in the investigation are reported to have been on duty in police departments in Istanbul, Ankara and the Black Sea province of Trabzon at the time of Dink’s murder.

Dink was shot dead by 17-year-old Ogün Samast, who traveled to Istanbul from Trabzon before the murder.

Relatives and followers of the case have long claimed that government officials, police, military personnel and members of the National Intelligence Agency (MİT) played a role in Dink’s murder by neglecting their duty to protect the journalist.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: dink, İstanbul, murder, sub-crime

Turkey: Indictment accepted for Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink’s murder case

December 9, 2015 By administrator

hrnt.thumbIstanbul Public Prosecutor’s Office accepted an indictment against 26 suspects on Wednesday in the murder case of Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink and referred it to Istanbul 14th High Criminal Court, Daily Sabah reports.

The Criminal Court will decide whether to approve of the indictment or return it. In case of an approval, the 26 suspects will stand a trial at the court.

Terror and Organized Crimes Prosecutor Gökalp Kökçü submitted the indictment to Istanbul the Public Prosecutor’s Office in October, requesting the arrests of alleged suspects, for forming an organization to commit crimes, deliberate killing, and forgery on documents.

Suspects include the former Istanbul Police Department Chief, Celalettin Cerrah and former Istanbul Police Intelligence Department Head, Engin Dinç.

The indictment submitted by Kökçü for approval was returned two times by the prosecutor’s office due to incomplete documents, but was finally approved on Wednesday.

Dink, then editor-in-chief of the Armenian Agos newspaper, was shot dead by a teenager on Jan. 19, 2007 outside his office in Istanbul. Dink drew the ire of hardline Turkish nationalists in his lifetime, as he was one of the most outspoken voices calling for a debate to start on the controversial Armenian genocide issue. He received numerous death threats before his murder and faced several lawsuits for “denigrating Turkishness,” an act punishable with prison terms, for his articles and editorials on the mass deaths of Armenians in 1915.

The role of police officers and public officials in the plot to kill the Dink had come to light as a new investigation focused on an alleged cover-up of the murder by officials linked to the Gülen Movement, which is accused of attempts to overthrow the government.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: dink, indictment, Turkey

Turkey: Prosecutor’s office shielding suspects in Dink murder from investigation, lawyer says

December 4, 2015 By administrator

 (AP Photo/Emrah Gurel)

(AP Photo/Emrah Gurel)

Hakan Bakırcıoğlu, a lawyer representing the family of slain Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, has claimed that İstanbul Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Orhan Kapıcı returned an indictment to him for removal of the names of three suspects, among them the National Police Department’s intelligence unit head, Engin Dinç.

An indictment that had already been revised by Gökalp Kökçü, the public prosecutor overseeing an ongoing investigation of state officials who face charges of misconduct and negligence in the murder of Dink in 2007, was again returned to Bakırcıoğlu by the İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office in November for allegedly including some pro-government police officers as suspects and demanding a prison sentence of up to 25 years for Dinç.

Bakırcıoğlu claimed on Friday that the İstanbul Public Prosecutor’s Office wants to protect the three suspects whose names were mentioned in the indictment prepared by prosecutor Kökçü. “The actual reason why these indictments are being returned to the public prosecutor is because they want [Kökçü] to prepare an indictment that won’t include the names of Reşat Altay, Engin Dinç and Ahmet İlhan Güler,” Bakırcıoğlu said.

After Kapıcı returned the indictment, Bakırcıoğlu filed a petition to the Terrorism and Organized Crime Bureau of the İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office and informed them of Kapıcı’s justification that there isn’t enough evidence to support the claims filed against Altay, Dinç and Güler. Bakırcıoğlu added that the decision to return the indictment has no legal basis and it is against the law. He also said in the petition there is sufficient evidence to support claims filed against the suspects.

Bakırcıoğlu explained that only a court can return an indictment to the prosecutor who prepared it, in accordance with Article 174 of the Code on Criminal Procedure (CMK), which includes the article on returning indictments. “The indictment, dated Oct. 20, 2015 and prepared by prosecutor Gökalp Kökçü, must be submitted to the İstanbul 5th High Criminal Court as it is,” Bakırcıoğlu said.

Dink was shot and killed by Ogün Samast, an ultranationalist teenager, in 2007. Samast and 18 others were brought to trial. Since then, the lawyers for the Dink family and the co-plaintiffs in the case have presented evidence indicating that Samast did not act alone. Another suspect, Yasin Hayal, was sentenced to life in prison for inciting Samast to commit murder.

The retrial started in September 2014 when the İstanbul 5th High Criminal Court complied with a May 2013 ruling from the Supreme Court of Appeals, overturning a lower court’s ruling that acquitted the suspects in the Dink murder case of charges of forming a terrorist organization. This decision paved the way for the trial of public officials on charges of voluntary manslaughter.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: dink, murder, Turkey

Turkey, Hrank Dink Case Public officials in the bill of indictment

October 25, 2015 By administrator

Hrant Dink, assassinated by Turks

Hrant Dink, assassinated by Turks

Many of the 25 public officials who are included in a bill of indictment as part of Dink case are accused of murder in the first degree, leadership or membership of an armed crime enterprise, destroying the official documents and some of them are accused of murder by omission and some others are accused of official misconduct.

On October 20, the prosecutor of The Bureau of Terror and Crime Organizations of İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office Gökalp Kürkçü prepared a bill of indictment about 25 public officials. In this bill of indictment, which might be added to the case that is tried by Istanbul 5th High Penal Court, it is demanded that 25 public officials stand trial.

Cerrah, Güler, etc.

Provincial Police Chief of Istanbul Celalettin Cerrah, Chief of Intelligence Office of Provincial Security Directorate of Istanbul Ahmet İlhan Güler, Provincial Police Chief of Trabzon Reşat Altay, Chief of Intelligence Office of Provincial Security Directorate of Trabzon Faruk Sarı are among the public officials that are demanded to be on trial.

Many of the 25 public officials who are included in the bill of indictment of Dink case are accused of murder in the first degree, leadership or membership of an armed crime enterprise, destroying the official documents and some of them are accused of murder by omission and some others are accused of official misconduct.

Prosecutor Gökalp Kökçü sent the bill of indictment to İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office for approval. If it would be approved by İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, it would be sent to Istanbul 5th High Penal Court which will start the trials of these public officials if it accepts the bill of indictment.

Turkey’s intelligence office’s (MİT) position

One of the lawyers of Dink family, Hakan Bakırcıoğlu said, in his previous statements, that the officials from Provincial Security Directorate of Istanbul and Governorship of Istanbul haven’t taken protection measures, though they had information about the assassination plan; officials from Provincial Security Directorate of Trabzon and Provincial Gendarmerie Command of Trabzon haven’t conducted operations against the crime organization which was planning Dink’s assassination and the officials from the Directorate of Intelligence haven’t organized these processes of taking protection measures and conducting operations. He added that these officials facilitated the assassination by willfully omitting their responsibilities.

Source: Agos

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: dink, hrnt, indictment, Turkey

Turkey Former police intel chief arrested in Dink murder case

May 29, 2015 By administrator

ISTANBUL – Anadolu Agency

n_83181_1A former Istanbul police intelligence chief was arrested late May 28 in the case of the murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink.

Ali Fuat Yılmazer, who was the Istanbul police intelligence chief when Dink was murdered in 2007, was arrested after being interrogated for a second time in the killing of Dink.

Istanbul’s 5th Penal Court ordered May 28 the arrest of Yılmazer on charges of “aiding and abetting premeditated murder,” and “forming a criminal organization.”

Ogün Samast assassinated Dink in broad daylight on a busy street outside of the office of bilingual Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos in Istanbul’s Şişli district on Jan. 19, 2007. Samast, who was 17 years old at the time, is serving his sentence of 22 years and 10 months in a high-security F-type prison in Kandıra, Kocaeli.

Yılmazer, who had first testified as a suspect in December 2014, has been under arrest since July 23, 2014, as part of an illegal wiretapping case into the “parallel state,” allegedly led by U.S.-based Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

The court’s decision stated Yılmazer had formed a secret unit named “C-5,” in which only some police captains and their deputies were allowed to work, inside the police department. It stated that the C-5 unit had started working on Nov. 23, 2012, after the approval of the Interior Ministry. In the decision, the unit is alleged to have looked into the cases of the Dink murder, the Father Santoro murder, the killing of a German and two Turks in the Zirve Publishing House and the coup plot cases of Ergenekon and Balyoz (Sledgehammer).

Source: hurriyetdailynews

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: arrested, dink, intel, police, Turkey

Turkish Ex-Minister May Face Trial over Dink Murder

April 7, 2015 By administrator

Former Turkish Interior Minister Muammer GulerISTANBUL (ArmRadio)—Former Turkish Interior Minister Muammer Güler, who was the governor of Istanbul when Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink was shot dead outside his newspaper’s office in Şişli, Istanbul, on Jan. 19, 2007, may be tried on the charge of negligence in preventing the murder, Today’s Zaman reports. However, as Today’s Zaman reports, Güler’s case file has mysteriously gone missing

Güler’s parliamentary immunity will automatically be lifted on June 7 when elections are held in Turkey. The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office had previously filed a complaint against Güler for negligence in preventing Dink’s murder when he was serving as İstanbul governor in 2007.

The complaint was sent to the Turkish Supreme Court of Appeals’ Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office for an investigation to be launched against Güler as he was a minister at the time of the complaint. However, sources within the Supreme Court of Appeals’ Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office recently stated that they had never received the complaint sent by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

As part of an ongoing investigation into Dink’s murder, various high-ranking state officials have testified as suspects based on allegations of negligence and misconduct directed at them. Among them are two former heads of the National Police Department’s intelligence unit — Sabri Uzun and Ramazan Akyürek — a former police chief, Ali Fuat Yılmazer, former Trabzon Police Chief Reşat Altay, former Trabzon Police intelligence branch chief Faruk Sarı and former İstanbul Deputy Governor Ergun Güngör. Other high-profile figures have been called to testify as suspects, including former Istanbul Police Chief Celalettin Cerrah and former İstanbul Police Department intelligence unit chief Ahmet İlhan Güler.

Dink was shot and killed by an ultranationalist teenager. The hitman, Ogün Samast, and 18 others were brought to trial. Since then, lawyers for the Dink family and the co-plaintiffs in the case have presented evidence indicating that Samast did not act alone. Another suspect, Yasin Hayal, was given a life sentence for inciting Samast to commit murder.

The retrial started in September of 2014, when the İstanbul 5th High Criminal Court complied with a ruling from the Supreme Court of Appeals in May of 2013 overturning a lower court’s ruling that acquitted the suspects in the Dink murder case of charges of forming a terrorist organization. This decision paved the way for the trial of public officials on charges of misconduct.

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: dink, Ex-Minister, murder, Turkey

PACE: draft report criticizes Turkey’s media environment, citing Dink assassination and Gezi Park

January 23, 2015 By administrator

202940_newsdetailThe Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) published a draft report, on Jan. 12 focusing on the deteriorating situation of journalists, independent media and freedom of speech in Turkey, among other countries; specifically citing in Turkey’s case the Hrant Dink investigation and the Gezi Park protests.

The draft report titled “Protection of media freedom in Europe” calls on Turkey to fully investigate the violent death of journalist Hrant Dink, the Turkish-Armenian journalist who was shot by 17-year-old Ogün Samast, on Jan. 19, 2007, in front of the Agos newspaper’s office, where he served as editor-in-chief.

The draft report states: “He [Dink] had received numerous death threats from nationalist Turks. Several people, including the young gunman who carried out the killing, were convicted in connection with the murder; but public officials, including members of the security forces, [who were] suspected of complicity or trying to impede the investigation, have escaped without punishment.”

Maintaining that “journalists in Turkey still face threats to their safety and professional independence from overly restrictive laws, [and] hundreds of questionable criminal investigations,” the draft report also cites “improper government interference with the work of the media, and intolerance of criticism on the part of the government” as the reasons for Turkey’s worsening media environment.

The report also underlines that “independent media monitoring organization Bianet reported that police assaulted at least 105 journalists while they were covering the events of the Gezi Park protests,” protests which erupted in May 2013 over government plans to destroy a park located in the Taksim district of İstanbul and build Ottoman-style military barracks in its place. “Police also detained 28 journalists, some of whom were held overnight and questioned,” states the draft.

According to the draft, “the assembly welcomes the considerable reduction in the number of journalists detained in Turkey but regrets the number of journalists who are still [being] prosecuted or detained.” The report states that although many journalists have been released from pre-trial detention because of judicial reforms, more than 20 journalists are still in prison in Turkey at the time of the writing of the report.

The most recent of these operations against independent media happened on Dec. 14, when police operations were carried out at the buildings of Turkey’s best-selling daily Zaman and the Samanyolu Broadcasting Group, both headquartered in İstanbul. Zaman Editor-in-Chief Ekrem Dumanlı as well as Samanyolu TV chief executive Hidayet Karaca, along with dozens of journalists, scriptwriters and police officers, were detained during the operations. Karaca was charged with heading a terrorist group based on a TV series that was broadcast years ago on the Samanyolu TV station and was later imprisoned pending trial.

Although the report in its current form fails to mention the Dec. 14 police operation, the largest against independent media in the history of the country, the finalized version is still to be published and the events of Dec. 14 are expected to be added via amendments.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: dink, gezi-park, media, PACE, Turkey

The Zoryan Institute Davutoglu: This gesture of denial policy will no longer be continued as long as the effects

January 23, 2015 By administrator

zorianPresident of the Zoryan Institute Greg Sarkissian, Ahmet Davutoglu, Hrant Dink’s response to the statement released by the death anniversary. Dink, the real killer is brought to justice, the other murders of Christian minorities, recalling how Davutoglu lawsuits Perinçek continue “to enhance mutual trust and cooperation can talk about,” he asked.

As far as transferring write a Human Rights Foundation of Turkey and Human Rights Association, Zoryan Institute, an organization of the International Genocide and Human Rights Studies Institutes in a joint letter documenting Perinçek racist and discriminatory actions in Perinchek case will be heard at the European Court of Human Rights in cooperation They presented.

Sarkissian’s full statement follows:

“Your Excellency Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu:

As you said, “Hrant Dink of us broke up eight years”, suddenly and cruelly, was severed from family and friends. Your sincere wishes do not come to us patience, because your government has failed even after all this time, or to bring to justice those responsible for the killing or unwilling to act.

I have roots in Anatolia, a Canadian citizen Armenian, Hrant Dink was one I gave my very value. My roots, our roots are still there, in the land of our ancestors, in Anatolia, Hrant in the summer and as always mentioned. Also see the duality between you install your Hrant’s Armenian heritage and loyalty to Turkey so extremely disturbing. Hyphenated loyalty and love to all the people of Anatolia Hrant’s ancestors – Turks, Kurds, Alevis, Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, Jews, and all other people – was an integral part of their identity. Armenian heritage and there is a distinction between the countries with the loyalty of the people, did not need to make concessions in any way. Yet you with a biased assumption, you are saying it should be expected to yield a compromise between Turkey Hrant’s Armenian heritage and loyalty. The same assumption that ethnicity is what it is about someone who has never done Turkey, you accept what you say. Please remember that, these lands were his earth as you. This was also trying to Hrant’s statement. Unfortunately, they are the real killers, did not accept the message. That’s why they killed him.

In 1915, the anniversary of the assassination of Hrant shocking to see that the events are used as an opportunity to fade. Contrary to what you tell you, these events, “[s] Avash conditions referenced forced relocation policy in 1915, including [the cause] inhuman consequences”, not unlike the Armenian race all and even by a clear faith, the state apparatus to erase even the memory of the existence of the Armenian planned and implemented was the murder of 1.5 million Armenian citizens.

I, like you, will be established between the two peoples’ friendship and peace, “I hear the longing, all my heart” minds and open doors in the heart “I want to. So how can we achieve this? You, even after eight years, Dink’s actual killer, Ogun Samast or together to take photos in front of the Turkish flag in surrender to justice has not been paying the order entered, you can expect us how patience?

Hrant of January 19, 2015 the day that moment the death anniversary, a court in Turkey on 28 January about the denial of the Armenian Genocide in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Abilene attended the hearing will take place in case the lifting of the ban on travel to the East Perinçek abroad, how a show empathy format? The Government of Turkey Perinçek, namely in Turkey, Turkey’s court by you and convicted of being members of Ergenekon, defined as a terrorist organization armed determined to overthrow your own government man, how is advocating actually ECHR the denial of the Armenian Genocide “[k] arşılıkl the trust and cooperation of development [k] “You can talk about skin

PERİNÇEK threats

This person, then the Armenian Patriarch of Hrant’s assassination MUTAFYAN to, wrote a letter distributed in mosques demonstrated for Armenians in the funeral condemned the massive sympathy and a “war march against Turkey” as described. [1] in the Ergenekon case, the evidence, in May of 2007 by Perinchek sent to Armenian schools in Turkey, “Armenians in the tasks they have found our descent citizens, it is the desire to see as the defender of the Turkish state in social activities, against the separatists and defeatist thoughts now taking action of Armenian citizens our country is living compatriots and co-religionists of the born of necessity defense in the right direction, “otherwise,” how Armenians, how the census in the coffin was seen over time that there was Turkey again they will be obliged to make the Armenian citizen “was taking place in a letter from the threat. [2]

The Ergenekon case, the decision Istanbul court “Hrant Dink’s murder and [other Christian minorities] for murder among similarities carried out in different regions of Turkey” [3] found, that’s their prosecutors “different individual events not Ergenekon towards a common goal by Terrorist Organizations certain murders carried out in the framework of a plan “[4] that was supportive of the claim.

Requirements of the Istanbul court Talat Pasha Committee as well as the Ergenekon Perinçek in the terror organization “psychological warfare and propaganda” about the “leading role” is assumed that the Hrant Dink murder and other crimes, including anti-Armenian hatred and achieve that incite violence have the evidence taken into consideration, the government’s participation in the proceedings as interveners in this case on the side Perinçek is astonishing.

My hope is that one day the truth of historical consciousness is to strengthen humanitarian values ​​Turkey must clarify the power to demand your government to embrace historical facts and civil society more effectively. Here, Cengiz Aktar “2015 entering” is important to remember what you said in the column entitled:

(…) On the Armenian Genocide, the Great Catastrophe of Anatolia, is the mother of taboo in this land. Anglophone, is not known, to realize that, unless confronted, unless hesaplaşılması curse will continue to be upon us. To break the centennial memorization, to hear the other, and thus an opportunity to understand but to begin mass treatment.

Such full of wisdom and truth, read the lyrics, Turkey put me on the basis of continued denial of your government demonstrates the growing awareness in civil society. Turkey is a strong argument showing racism inherent in the Human Rights Association of the Armenian case, civil society, the effectiveness of these issues already shows in nature: “the genocide of other Christian ethnic Armenians and Anatolia in Turkey denial, how in the country anti-democratic, anti-freedom of thought, hate predispose to crime and the closest witnesses that create an environment that violate human rights [to resolve it] … As a result, in Turkey Armenians Republican history along the ‘fifth column’ treated, the discriminated against, on the Republican period after they were threatened by various nationalist uprising and massacre were forced to live in a constant fear of their lives. “

Moreover, two Turkish human rights organization, Zoryan Institute, an organization of the International Genocide and Human Rights Studies Institutes of cooperation by the European Court of Human Rights on the – on the denial of genocide – related to Perinchek case, Perinçek discriminatory and racist actions and Turkey and presented a joint letter documenting the statement against Armenians in Switzerland. Such cooperation strengthens the contact between the two communities and us really genuine “friendship and peace horizon” görütüy correctly.

“Armenian cultural heritage of the Ottoman / Turkish culture in a way they deserve to have Armenian figure valuable contributions and claiming strongly” could be a valuable gesture towards building confidence in your commitment, but this gesture, the government will lose its impact as long as the community’s official policy to deny the Armenian Genocide.

My wish, as the Prime Minister of your country that you change your vehicle, your government and country to bring to the side of the actual date of 1915. It is only when this truth known “to heal the wounds and to re-establish friendships” will be possible.

Best Regards,
KM Greg Sarkissian,
President of the Institute of Zorya “

[1] Vatan, 26 July 2007, “Perinçek MUTAFYAN letters were distributed in mosques” access address http://www.gazetevatan.com/perincek-in-mutafyan-a-mektubu-camilerde-dagitildi-105788-gundem/ .

[2] Ergenekon case and stamped No. 319 783 File added by the Prosecutor signed a three-page document, page 193, 194 and 1915; see also. Milliyet, 19 May 2007, “Armenian schools threatened”, the access address http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2007/05/19/guncel/gun08.htm

[3] Ergenekon case Reasoned Decision, Volume 2 (A), Opinions, 6.2, Opinion of the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor, s.1720 / 6573.

[4] Zirve massacre case, the indictment, Chapter 1, “First Department of Assessment under the heading” p.23 / 1; see. http://haber.sat7turk.com/tag/zirve-iddianame-tam-metin/ ;

See also. Summit Publishing House Massacre Case, indictment, Chapter 1, p.85.

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: Davutoglu, dink, gesture, institute, zoryan

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan’s dirty election games have just started.
  • Peace Through Law: The Hereditary Rights of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians as the Foundation of a Legitimate Treaty.
  • A letter from Leading businessman of the United Arab Emirates. Khalaf Hamad Al Habtour, sent to Donald Trump
  • Anna Hakobyan prepared a heartbreaking text about the deprivations “Hraparak”
  • Endless Wars & Concentration of power in one man’s hand:

Recent Comments

  • Tina on Anna Hakobyan prepared a heartbreaking text about the deprivations “Hraparak”
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in