Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church

November 24, 2025 By administrator Leave a Comment

By Harut Sassounian

Last week, I came across a disturbing 8-page document described as a “White Paper” titled “Clarifying Church-State Relations in Armenia: A Rebuttal to the Narrative of Religious Persecution under Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.” It is dated Sept. 5, 2025.

This is a blatant attempt by the Pashinyan regime to whitewash its shameful attacks on the Armenian Apostolic Church, making unfounded allegations about Church leaders and the political opposition.

Strangely, this document, prepared at the request of the Prime Minister, is posted only on the website of “Save the Persecuted Christians,” an organization based in Washington, D.C. It is not even posted on the Prime Minister’s website. Most probably, the public relations firm Mercury Public Affairs, hired in April by the Armenian government, prepared the White Paper.

This propaganda document makes a number of baseless statements against the Armenian Apostolic Church and the political opposition. For example, it claims that those opposed to Pashinyan are accusing him of making “a deliberate effort to ‘Islamize’ Armenia by bringing in 300,000 Muslim Azeris.” No source is provided for this claim. Even if someone had made such an allegation, the White Paper generalizes it to the entire opposition. Nevertheless, it is a fact that Pashinyan has made endless concessions to Pres. Aliyev, including handing over Artsakh to Azerbaijan, ceding parts of the territory of the Republic of Armenia, changing the constitution, agreeing to disband the Minsk Group of mediators, and reducing the defense budget.

The White Paper further asserts that “the use of incendiary language and misinformation undermines democratic discourse and distracts from Armenia’s urgent security and governance challenges.” This is precisely what Pashinyan and his partner, Anna Hakobyan, have been doing for months through embarrassing posts on their Facebook pages. Furthermore, the White Paper accuses businessman Samvel Karapetyan of having “direct ties with the Kremlin,” thus appearing to excuse his arrest and justify the confiscation of his multi-million-dollar business interests in Armenia. Karapetyan had simply expressed his support for the Catholicos. Armenia’s Prime Minister does not respect freedom of expression, which is the bedrock of any democratic society.

In another objectionable statement, the White Paper criticizes the Catholicos for publicly calling for Pashinyan’s resignation, adding: “Yet, no law-enforcement measures have been taken in response to these statements.” Is expressing one’s opinion a crime?

More importantly, the White Paper misrepresents Armenia’s constitution by stating that “Pashinyan’s government has promoted a policy agenda that emphasizes civilian supremacy over clerical institutions, in line with constitutional principles of secular governance.” On the contrary, the constitution provides for separation of Church and State, which bars the government from meddling in internal Church affairs. Those who say that the Church is meddling in politics are mistaken. Clergymen have the same rights as every other citizen — to vote and run for office. Furthermore, any Armenian, including clergymen, who sees that political leaders are leading the country to destruction, has a patriotic duty to speak up to save the country.

Pashinyan ordered the arrests of three high-ranking clergymen under the pretext that they were engaged in illegal acts He sent police onto the grounds of Holy Etchmiadzin, posted pornographic words referring to his sexual organ on his Facebook page, confessed that he was married neither by the Church nor by secular authorities, urged his followers to “converge” on Etchmiadzin and “liberate” the Catholicosate, and attended Mass celebrated by defrocked “priests” who are desecrating the Church. That alone is sufficient reason to excommunicate Pashinyan from the Armenian Apostolic Church.

Meanwhile, Pashinyan’s partner, Anna Hakobyan, on her Facebook page described high-ranking Armenian clergymen as “the country’s chief pedophiles” and “black-vested maniac perverts.” This is a wholly inappropriate way of addressing the clergy, particularly without presenting any evidence for such claims. She would have been sued for libel if Armenia’s judges were not under Pashinyan’s thumb.

The White Paper desperately tries to argue that Pashinyan is against the Catholicos but not against the Armenian Church by claiming that the public trust in the Church is “high, around 60%, whereas confidence in its top leadership drops sharply.” While the approximate 60% figure is accurate, the White Paper presents no evidence that public confidence in Church leadership is low. The White Paper does not mention that Pashinyan’s approval rating plummeted from a high of 82% when he came to power in 2018 to a little over 10% now.

The most troubling aspect of the White Paper is that it was probably prepared by Mercury Public Affairs, a Washington PR firm hired by Pashinyan’s government for $600,000 a year to promote Armenia’s interests in the U.S. Congress and the Administration and to counter the lobbying and PR firms retained by Azerbaijan and Turkey. I infer Mercury’s involvement because the signed contract mentions that it was hired to “provide strategic communications and media relations services to Client [Republic of Armenia].”

However, rather than targeting Azerbaijan and Turkey or defending Armenia’s interests in Washington, Pashinyan has decided to use the expensive services of the PR firm to attack the Armenian Apostolic Church and its leadership.

Source: www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

Filed Under: News

Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent

November 24, 2025 By administrator Leave a Comment

Pashinyan is an agent, I will publish the document, the screens, the recordings. Karapetyan’s revelation You can read the full article at this address: https://yerkir.am/hy/article/2025/11/24/302986

Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan has released a scandalous video in which he spoke about how the US special services recruited Nikol Pashinyan back in 1999 and used him as an agent. He showed the folder on the table and noted that he could substantiate his words with written evidence that he had recently obtained.

“If someone wants to know who the person is who is considered an agent of influence by several states, then it is the leader of our country,” Arshak Karapetyan declared. “If that is not the case, then let him just explain how Ararat Mirzoyan was appointed Foreign Minister. This is in the case that the acting head was Armen Gevorgyan, well, let him say why he did not appoint Gevorgyan, but Mirzoyan. Let him say and we will see who was under the influence. If they continue, then they will tell me what really happened. They say: sovereign government, sovereign government. They were not a sovereign government then, nor now. Let them not sing songs,” Karapetyan said.

He said that he warned Pashinyan back on August 14, 2020, that a war was coming. “I noticed that he was taking screenshots, I myself started doing it myself, and I have all the conversations with him recorded. And perhaps it is time for us to start disseminating these recordings, including the recording when I tell him to trust my own intelligence data. I had to record myself to protect myself, I was the head of intelligence for 10 years. They can’t record me, I won’t respond,” Karapetyan noted.

“We have a report from one of the US embassy employees to his superiors that Pashinyan was recruited by that country’s intelligence agency back in 1999, as the editor of a newspaper,” the former minister presented and said that in that report, the embassy employee also described Nikol Pashinyan as an agent, wrote that he has low human standards, is terribly selfish, stingy, is in a psychologically unstable state, and in the end concluded that that’s exactly what they need him for. He also noted that Pashinyan received money from the US government in exchange for providing secret information.

Karapetyan also noted that he has accurate data that no weapons have been purchased in these years, that he will give everything to the Turks. And he called for a fight against this government. You can read the full article at this address: https://yerkir.am/hy/article/2025/11/24/302986

©️ 1991 – 2025 Yerkir Daily

Filed Under: News

November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away

November 8, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

November 9 is set to become a day of mourning in Armenian history — not only for the loss of territory but for the collapse of political accountability at the highest level of the state. The events surrounding the November 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh, and the subsequent agreements signed by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, represent a watershed moment in the erosion of Armenian sovereignty and national responsibility. On that day, decisions that would determine the future of Artsakh were made in secrecy, without consultation with Parliament, the foreign ministry, or the Armenian people.

The Historical Context

Nagorno-Karabakh, known to Armenians as Artsakh, has been an inseparable part of Armenian history for centuries. It has been a focal point of cultural, religious, and demographic identity. In the late 20th century, as the Soviet Union dissolved, tensions over Artsakh escalated into full-scale war. For decades, Armenian forces successfully defended the region, establishing a fragile but functioning state apparatus under constant threat.

By 2020, however, the geopolitical landscape had shifted. Azerbaijan, with military support and strategic backing from Turkey, launched a renewed offensive aimed at reclaiming control over Nagorno-Karabakh. While the conflict was undoubtedly challenging on the battlefield, the ultimate outcome was determined less by military might than by political collapse.

Capitulation Behind Closed Doors

According to multiple reports and firsthand accounts from diaspora analysts, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan personally negotiated with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in November 2020. In these negotiations, Pashinyan refused to consult the Armenian Parliament or his own Foreign Minister. Entire swaths of Artsakh — including areas never occupied by Azerbaijani forces — were effectively handed over without resistance.

This departure from historical norms of wartime negotiation shocked both military experts and legal scholars. Traditionally, post-conflict settlements follow the realities on the ground: territories under control by the defending army form the basis for negotiation. In Pashinyan’s case, such principles were disregarded. The surrender of Artsakh was not contingent upon military outcomes but dictated entirely by the unilateral decisions of one leader.

Breaking Institutional Process

The implications of bypassing parliamentary and ministerial consultation are severe. As constitutional scholar Dr. Anahit Sargsyan notes, “Armenia’s system of governance relies on institutional checks to prevent arbitrary decisions with existential consequences. By ignoring these mechanisms, Pashinyan undermined both the rule of law and the nation’s security framework.”

Military strategist Colonel Vahan Petrosian, writing in a diaspora military review, observed: “Even if the Armenian army had been on the verge of losing certain positions, the proper process would have involved staggered withdrawal and negotiated armistice. Instead, a full surrender was executed in secrecy, eroding morale and trust in leadership.”

A Departure from the Laws of War

The November 2020 agreement stands out not merely for what was lost but for how it was lost. In every armed conflict, negotiations for peace or ceasefire usually correlate with control over territory. Pashinyan’s approach discarded that principle entirely. Areas that remained under Armenian defense were handed over; communities and cultural landmarks were abandoned without discussion. As historian Dr. Levon Harutyunyan notes, “What occurred was a political surrender masquerading as a diplomatic settlement. Armenia lost not just land, but its credibility as a sovereign actor.”

The Symbolism of November 9

September 9, therefore, is more than a calendar date; it is a symbol of systemic failure. It represents the day when political accountability was ignored, legal processes were bypassed, and the Armenian people were excluded from decisions determining their survival. The loss of Artsakh, in this framing, was not only military — it was a betrayal of trust.

Diaspora analyst Mariam Avetisyan writes: “This day will resonate across generations. It is a warning that the absence of consultation, oversight, and accountability can cost a nation its heartland, its culture, and its very identity.”

Cultural and Human Consequences

Beyond the political ramifications, the consequences for Armenian society and heritage are profound. Entire communities have been displaced. Religious sites, libraries, and historical landmarks face destruction or repurposing under Azerbaijani control. The forced evacuation of Armenian civilians from Artsakh represents not only a demographic shift but the erasure of centuries of history.

Legal analyst Hovhannes Minasyan emphasizes: “The international community recognizes the rights of populations under occupation and post-conflict transitions. However, Armenia’s failure to assert these rights during negotiations — and Pashinyan’s unilateral signing — has weakened any claim to restitution or future protection.”

Diaspora Response and Historical Memory

The Armenian diaspora has reacted with outrage and despair. Intellectuals, policymakers, and activists emphasize that November 9 must be embedded into the collective memory, not as a day of resignation but as a call for accountability and vigilance. Professor Aram Bedrosian, a diaspora historian, writes: “Memory is a form of resistance. Armenian society must not forget that Artsakh’s loss was political, not inevitable.”

The lessons are clear:

  • Concentration of power without oversight can endanger national survival.
  • Critical decisions on territorial integrity must include parliamentary, ministerial, and public consultation.
  • Leadership devoid of accountability risks surrendering a nation’s future.

Strategic Implications for Armenia

The political surrender of Artsakh also carries long-term strategic consequences. Russia’s mediation, while portrayed as stabilizing, effectively limited Armenia’s autonomy in negotiating borders, military presence, and civilian protections. Azerbaijan, emboldened by international acquiescence, now occupies a stronger geopolitical position. Analysts warn that future Armenian leaders may struggle to reclaim influence unless internal governance and accountability are restored.

Military analyst Colonel Petrosian notes: “Even a well-equipped army cannot compensate for political vulnerability. Armenia must rebuild institutional resilience before considering any future territorial negotiation.”

Lessons for Governance

September 9, therefore, should not only be remembered as a day of loss but as a blueprint for reform. Armenian governance requires:

  1. Strict adherence to constitutional procedures in matters of war and peace.
  2. Transparent consultation with legislative and ministerial bodies before signing treaties.
  3. Public communication to ensure national buy-in for existential decisions.

Failure to institutionalize these lessons risks repeating history — a risk Armenians cannot afford.

Conclusion: Accountability, Memory, and the Future

The loss of Artsakh is both a territorial and moral catastrophe. It is a stark reminder that sovereignty is fragile when leadership concentrates decision-making power and bypasses institutional safeguards. While military defeat was a factor, the decisive loss came from political capitulation — a surrender negotiated in secrecy by Nikol Pashinyan personally, without consultation, without debate, and without consent.

November 9 must remain engraved in Armenian consciousness: not as a symbol of hopelessness, but as a call to action. Political accountability, institutional resilience, and historical memory are the only paths to prevent future tragedies. The Armenian nation must ensure that leadership operates in service of the people — not in isolation, not in secrecy, and never again at the expense of its homeland.

Filed Under: Genocide, News

Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

November 6, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

We Live in the Future — But Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

We live in the 21st century with AI, quantum computing, blockchain, satellites, global markets, and massively networked societies…

…but we are still running our political life on the mental software of the Middle Ages. trusting one Man to lead us.

Kings were simply renamed “Presidents” and “Prime Ministers.”
Royal courts were renamed “Cabinets.”
Priests became “Media and Influencers.”
Empires became “Blocs and Alliances.”

The structure never fundamentally evolved.
The costumes changed — not the architecture.

Humanity upgraded the hardware… but never updated the Operating System.


Why this matters now

When one person controls the fate of an entire nation, it only takes one:

  • corrupt ego
  • foreign pressure
  • compromised elite network
  • wrong decision
  • psychological imbalance

…to destroy decades of progress.

One-person rule is inherently fragile.

Modern nations should never be dependent on a single individual.


Switzerland is the living proof

If you walk in the street in Switzerland and ask:
“Who is the President?”
Most citizens cannot answer.

That is not weakness — that is maturity.

The system is stronger than the individual.

But if you ask in unstable regions:
“Who is the dictator / the strong man leader?”

Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia and so on…personality cults
Everyone instantly knows.

That is structural immaturity.

The more famous your leader is, the weaker your institutions are.
The more boring your government is, the stronger your democracy is.


Armenia urgently needs this evolution

Armenia is surrounded by existential forces.
Armenia cannot afford political systems that depend on the psychology of one man.

Armenia should have been the FIRST nation to adopt a Switzerland-style model: direct democracy, distributed power, referendum-driven checks, weak central executive, strong canton/local autonomy.

Small nations with high threats MUST not concentrate power.


The future of democracy is distributed

The next generation political model will be:

  • Networked decision making
  • Liquid democracy (delegate on specific issues, revoke instantly)
  • AI-assisted corruption auditing
  • Zero “single-point-failure” leadership power

This is the real future.
Not personality cults.
Not strong-man fantasies.
Not savior leaders.


Conclusion

We cannot solve modern problems with medieval political software.

Societies must upgrade the governance OS the same way we upgraded technology.

Modern hardware requires modern leadership structures.

And the most advanced political systems in the world… are the ones where leadership becomes almost invisible — because the system itself is what is strong.

We don’t need stronger leaders.
We need stronger systems.

Medieval Software. Modern Hardware.
Time to update the OS of democracy.

Filed Under: News

Chronological: How Pashinyan Misled the Armenian People and Handed Artsakh to Azerbaijan — Step by Step

October 27, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

1. Initial Promises (2018–2019)
When Nikol Pashinyan first came to power after the 2018 “Velvet Revolution,” he presented himself as a democrat and a defender of national interests.
He repeatedly stated that he had no right to decide Artsakh’s fate because he was not elected by the people of Artsakh.
He emphasized that Artsakh must be a party to the peace talks and promised that no decision would be made without the will of the Artsakh people.

2. The “Zero Point” Negotiations
Soon after, Pashinyan reversed his position, declaring that negotiations would begin from a “zero point” — effectively discarding years of diplomatic progress and the previous negotiation framework (including the Madrid Principles).
This confused both local and international observers and weakened Armenia’s position in talks.

3. Shifting Rhetoric (2019–2020)
In the National Assembly, Pashinyan began claiming that any solution must be equally acceptable to the peoples of Armenia, Artsakh, and Azerbaijan — a statement that many saw as legitimizing Azerbaijan’s claims and diluting Armenia’s bargaining power.
When asked what exactly was being negotiated, his vague response — “Whatever needs to be negotiated, we negotiate” — reflected growing inconsistency.

4. The 2020 War and Catastrophe
In September 2020, the 44-day war broke out.
Despite warnings, the government failed to prepare the army or secure foreign support.
The war became a disaster: over 4,000 Armenian soldiers were killed, tens of thousands displaced, and large parts of Artsakh were lost.
Many Armenians describe this as a new genocide — with Turkey, Pakistan, Israel, and extremist mercenaries openly supporting Azerbaijan.

5. The November 9, 2020 Ceasefire Agreement
Pashinyan signed the Moscow-brokered deal that ended the war — widely viewed as a capitulation.
Armenia lost Shushi, Hadrut, and most part of Artsakh, while Russian peacekeepers were deployed temporarily.
He announced the deal in the middle of the night without consulting the nation or Parliament.

6. The 2021 Elections and New Promises
During the 2021 snap elections, Pashinyan promised to bring back Shushi and Hadrut and to secure Artsakh’s status.
However, after being reelected, he gradually abandoned these promises — lowering expectations and shifting responsibility.

7. Recognition of Azerbaijan’s “Territorial Integrity” (2022–2023)
At meetings in Brussels and other international forums, Pashinyan officially recognized Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity — including Artsakh.
This statement effectively erased the decades-long struggle of Artsakh Armenians for self-determination and was seen as the final act of surrender.

8. The 2023 Exodus and Aftermath
In September 2023, Azerbaijan launched a final military operation in Artsakh.
Within days, over 150,000 Armenians were forced to flee their homes.
Artsakh ceased to exist as a self-governing entity — a tragic end many blame directly on Pashinyan’s policies and concessions.

Filed Under: Genocide, News

How Cheap Drones and Political Choices Reshaped Armenia’s Security Reality

October 15, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

What Armenian to do After Removing Pashinyan

Once the preserve of wealthy states, air power has been upended by low-cost, prop-driven drones built from commercial parts. Iran’s simple, mass-produced loitering munitions — especially the Shahid-136 — proved that cheap, saturating strikes can inflict strategic damage, forcing expensive, painful shifts in air-defense thinking.

A $20k–$50k kamikaze drone can compel defenders to expend interceptors costing orders of magnitude more, fundamentally changing the economics of conflict. Iranian advances came from sanctions-driven necessity — reverse engineering captured systems and scaling inexpensive designs. Platforms like the Mohajir-6 (mid-range strike), Shahid-129 (long-endurance strike), and Shahid-136 (expendable loitering munition) exemplify the swarm and saturation logic: individually slow and vulnerable drones become lethal in numbers, overwhelming layered defenses. Real-world use across the Middle East, Yemen, Syria, and Russia’s campaigns in Ukraine highlight their strategic utility against infrastructure.

For Armenia, this technological lesson intersects with political history. Many analysts argue that had Armenia not undergone the 2018 “Velvet Revolution” — which brought to power a government viewed by some as aligned with Western and Turkish interests — the fate of Artsakh might have been different. Without that shift, Armenia could have maintained a more traditional security posture and stronger deterrence, possibly preventing Azerbaijan’s 2020 advance. In this view, political disruption weakened national defense at a time when drone warfare was transforming the battlefield, allowing Azerbaijan, heavily supported by Turkish UAVs and advisors, to gain decisive air superiority.

Now, as the Pashinyan government moves toward a 15.2% defense budget cut in 2026, critics warn the cycle may repeat. The opposition insists Armenia must rebuild a deterrent force — especially in drones and electronic warfare — to avoid future losses. Cheap drones have democratized air power globally, and Armenia’s challenge is to adapt politically and technologically before history repeats itself.

Filed Under: News

Armenia’s Election System and What It Means for Voters

October 12, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

The way Armenia’s electoral system is set up (thanks to the geniuses in the previous government) is that to enter parliament, political parties must pass a 4% threshold (previously 5%), while multi-party alliances must pass 7–8% (previously 8%).

This system, while presented as a way to ensure stability, in practice favors larger parties—particularly Pashinyan’s Civil Contract Party—and makes it extremely difficult for smaller or “one-man” parties to gain representation. In the last election, nearly all of those smaller groups failed to reach the threshold, and their votes were effectively redistributed to the ruling party.

So, there are two fundamental things every voter should consider:

  1. Will the party or alliance I’m voting for realistically pass the threshold?
    If the answer is no, your vote will likely be wasted and will indirectly support the ruling party, since all sub-threshold votes get redistributed.
  2. Is the party or alliance I’m voting for genuinely in opposition to Pashinyan’s policies?
    Many of the smaller “opposition” figures—such as Aram Sargsyan, Arman Babajanyan, and Tigran Khzmalyan—are, in reality, aligned with the government’s positions in most cases: anti-Russian, heavily backed by Western money, pro-Turkish, and supportive of the same policies that have led the country to its current state.
    If the answer is yes, again, this effectively becomes another vote for Pashinyan’s continuation.

As for Arman Tatoyan, there’s still uncertainty about his stance on several issues, and more clarity is needed. At this stage, aside from Robert Kocharyan and Samvel Karapetyan, it’s unlikely that most of the smaller opposition figures will pass the 4% threshold on their own.

To have any real chance, these forces—the Republican Party (Serzh Sargsyan), Gagik Tsarukyan, Arman Tatoyan, ANC (Levon Ter-Petrosyan, Levon Zurabyan), Artur Vanetsyan, and others—must unite. Otherwise, their divided votes will once again go to waste and end up strengthening Pashinyan’s hold on power.

Filed Under: News

Armenia’s Future Is on the Line: “Do not Debate Pashinyan”

October 7, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

Armenia’s Future Is on the Line: “Do not Debate Pashinyan”

The coming election is not politics as usual — it is a fight for the very survival of the Armenian nation.

For years, since 2008, Nikol Pashinyan has deceived our people, divided our society, and led Armenia into loss and despair. Enough is enough.

Do not waste time debating him or his circle. They thrive on distraction, lies, and manipulation.

Instead, focus on unity, strength, and purpose. Build, organize, and stand together for Armenia’s future. Ignore the noise — let them speak to themselves while patriots act.

Armenia will rise again — but only if we stand together and act now.

The upcoming election in Armenia is not just another vote — it is a matter of life or death for the Armenian nation.

The opposition must completely ignore Pashinyan and his circle. There is no point in debating them — Pashinyan has already proven, since 2008, to be a master of deception and lies. His leadership has brought only loss, division, and destruction to the nation.

Do not engage with them. Do not waste energy debating them. Focus on rebuilding, organizing, and acting. Let them speak to themselves while the true patriots work to save Armenia.

Filed Under: News

The difference between a dictator and a traitor.

October 6, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

Dictators invade. They take what belongs to others. Erdogan invaded Cyprus — half of it remains under Turkish occupation. Turkey also invaded northern Syria and northern Iraq. Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Netanyahu continues the occupation of Palestine. That is what dictators do: they grab land.

But traitors are the opposite. A traitor doesn’t seize land — they give it away. Pashinyan handed over Artsakh, half of Armenia’s historic territory, to Turkish Azerbaijan. He surrendered hundreds of villages, lakes, and lands. And now he is partitioning Armenia itself to create a corridor for Turkey and Azerbaijan to cross.

That is the mark of a traitor. And that is the difference between dictators and traitors.

Filed Under: News

BREAKING: U.S. State Department Confirms President Trump’s Support for Returning Artsakh Refugees,

October 4, 2025 By administrator

By Wally Sarkeesian

U.S. State Department Confirms President Trump’s Support for Returning Artsakh Refugees, Releasing Armenian Hostages & Protecting Christian Holy Sites

In a major development following months of grassroots Armenian-American advocacy and bipartisan Congressional engagement, the Trump-Vance Administration has, in an unprecedented move, formally announced its commitment on the following issues regarding Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh): – Supporting the return of Artsakh’s displaced ethnic Armenian population to their indigenous homeland – Supporting the release of Armenian hostages illegally held in Azerbaijan –

Supporting the protection of Armenian Christian heritage sites in Artsakh This announcement was made in a September 25, 2025 letter from the U.S. State Department, signed by Paul D. Guaglianone of the Department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs. The letter outlines a newly articulated U.S. policy that directly addresses core priorities long advanced by the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) and the Congressional Armenian Caucus. The policy shift comes in response to a powerful bipartisan July 23 letter regarding the return of ethnic Armenians to Nagorno-Karabakh and the release of Armenian prisoners, which was spearheaded by 87 Members of Congress, addressed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and led by Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Brad Sherman (D-CA), and David Valadao (R-CA).

The Congressional letter urged the administration to support the return of Artsakh’s forcibly displaced Armenians, press for the release of Armenian prisoners held by Azerbaijan, and ensure the protection of Christian heritage sites in Nagorno-Karabakh. Details from the Letter In the September 25 letter to Congress, the U.S. State Department outlined a series of key U.S. commitments regarding Artsakh. The letter emphasized that the Administration is: – “Encouraging both Armenia and Azerbaijan to provide for the return of displaced ethnic Armenians to Nagorno-Karabakh in the context of a sustainable peace” – “Closely monitoring the trials of Armenian detainees held in Azerbaijan, with U.S. Embassy officials in Baku attending legal proceedings whenever possible” – “Calling on the Azerbaijani government to protect Armenian heritage sites in Nagorno-Karabakh” The letter contextualized these commitments as part of a broader diplomatic breakthrough—the August 8 summit hosted by President Trump, where Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev reconfirmed their intent to “sign and ratify a peace agreement” that had been agreed to in principle in March 2025. As part of that summit, both sides also committed to establish the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity”—a corridor that, as the letter notes, “respects Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” while providing Azerbaijan access to its exclave of Nakhichevan.

The State Department described this summit as a “momentous breakthrough” and “an unprecedented opportunity” to secure lasting peace and reconciliation in the region. The letter concluded by underscoring the Department’s commitment to “implementing this historic initiative.” ANCA’s Response: Advocacy in Action In a statement titled “ANCA Welcomes Trump’s Commitment to Returning Artsakh Refugees, Releasing Armenian Hostages, Protecting Christian Holy Sites,” the organization framed the letter as a breakthrough moment in U.S. policy. Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA, welcomed the administration’s response: “We welcome the commitments undertaken by the Trump-Vance Administration in its response to a bipartisan letter signed by 87 members of the Armenian Caucus, and are already working with our Congressional allies, coalition partners, and community activists to translate these commitments into concrete action.

Our hard-fought progress on each of these fronts – Artsakh refugees, Armenian hostages, and Christian churches – is a tribute to our collective resilience, our enduring resolve in the face of Yerevan’s indifference and Azerbaijan’s intense opposition.” Over the past several months: – Armenian American advocates sent more than 100,000 emails and calls through ANCA’s national, regional, and local platforms urging legislators to co-sign the Armenian Caucus letter – ANCA’s summer interns, Leo Sarkisian and Maral Melkonian Avetisyan, visited over 400 Congressional offices weekly, distributing fact sheets and making the case for a U.S.-backed right of return for Artsakh genocide survivors – These efforts were amplified during ANCA’s September 2025 fly-in Advocacy Days, which brought together activists from across the country The Armenian Caucus Letter: Backing Human Rights & Justice The Trump-Vance Administration’s new stance came in direct response to the bipartisan July 23 letter initiated by the Congressional Armenian Caucus, co-chaired by Frank Pallone, Gus Bilirakis, Brad Sherman, and David Valadao. The letter urged the administration to: – Ensure the collective, protected, and dignified return of forcibly displaced Armenians to their indigenous homeland of Artsakh – Take action consistent with international law and in pursuit of a just and lasting peace – Respond to Azerbaijan’s 2023 blockade and military assault, which displaced 120,000 Christian Armenians – Confront the systematic destruction of Armenian cultural and religious heritage sites, the ransacking of civilian property, and destruction of public infrastructure –

Uphold the December 2023 International Court of Justice ruling, which compels Azerbaijan to allow the safe and secure return of Artsakh’s Armenian population The letter stated: “The right of populations displaced by war to return to their homes is a fundamental principle of international law.” Spotlight on the Swiss Peace Initiative The Congressional letter also urged the U.S. to support the Swiss Peace Initiative for Nagorno-Karabakh—a diplomatic measure adopted by the Swiss Parliament aimed at establishing an international negotiation platform to mediate a safe, secure, and internationally guaranteed return for Armenians. This initiative was a central topic at a standing-room-only Congressional briefing on July 10, attended by over 200 Capitol Hill staffers, policy experts, and human rights advocates.

The event featured Swiss Parliamentarians Erich Vontobel and Lukas Reimann, Dr. John Eibner, President of Christian Solidarity International, Vartan Oskanian, Former Armenian Foreign Minister, Mark Milosch, Republican Staff Director for Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), Co-Chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, and was moderated by ANCA Policy Director Alex Galitsky. Full List of Congressional Signatories The bipartisan letter was co-signed by 87 Members of Congress, spanning both parties and representing dozens of states. Joining Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Brad Sherman (D-CA), and David Valadao (R-CA) in cosigning the letter were Representatives: Gabe Amo (D-RI), Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), Nanette Diaz Barragan (D-CA), Wesley Bell (D-MO), Ami Bera (D-CA), Don Beyer (D-VA), Nikki Budzinski (D-IL), Andre Carson (D-IN), Greg Casar (D-TX), Sean Casten (D-IL), Joaquín Castro (D-TX), Judy Chu (D-CA), Gil Cisneros (D-CA), Jim Costa (D-CA), Danny Davis (D-IL), Debbie Dingell (D-MI), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Dwight Evans (D-PA), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Charles Fleischmann (R-TN), Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX), Vince Fong (R-CA), Valerie Foushee (D-NC), Lois Frankel (D-FL), Laura Friedman (D-CA), Dan Goldman (D-NY), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Steven Horsford (D-NV), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Jonathan Jackson (D-IL), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Young Kim (R-CA), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Nick LaLota (R-NY), Doug LaMalfa (R-CA), John Larson (D-CT), George Latimer (D-NY), Mike Lawler (R-NY), Susie Lee (D-NV), Mike Levin (D-CA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Seth Magaziner (D-RI), Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), Sarah McBride (D-DE), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), James McGovern (D-MA), Rob Menendez (D-NJ), Grace Meng (D-NY), Dave Min (D-CA), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Kevin Mullin (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Chris Pappas (D-NH), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Scott Peters (D-CA), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Delia Ramirez (D-IL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Luz Rivas (D-CA), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Janice Schakowsky (D-IL), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Lateefah Simon (D-CA), Haley Stevens (D-MI), Tom Suozzi (D-NY), Eric Swalwell (D-CA), David Taylor (R-OH), Shri Thanedar (D-MI), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Dina Titus (D-NV), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Paul Tonko (D-NY), Lori Trahan (D-MA), Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), George Whitesides (D-CA), and Nikema Williams (D-GA). What Comes Next? While the September 25 letter represents a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy toward Artsakh, advocacy organizations and Congressional leaders stress that implementation is key.

ANCA is now mobilizing its national network, engaging policymakers, and working with civil society and diaspora leaders to: – Ensure the administration follows through – Protect Armenian rights on the ground – Hold Azerbaijan accountable for its treatment of Armenian civilians, detainees, and cultural heritage As ANCA made clear: This is a breakthrough—but the real work starts now.

Filed Under: News

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 676
  • Next Page »

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in