Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan: Armenia Is Being Palestinianized — And Our Leaders Are Complicit

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Since 2020, I warned that talk of “enclaves” would turn Armenia into another Palestine—surrounded on all sides, roads and borders in enemy hands. Now, village after village in Tavush is gone, and Syunik faces dismemberment through a so-called “corridor.” This is not diplomacy—it is national suicide.

Our homeland is being carved into a pawn for foreign powers, a Pan-Turkic pipeline, a hub for drugs and money laundering, and a testing ground for cultural and spiritual sabotage. The Armenian Apostolic Church is under attack, our sovereignty is dissolving, and the sellout government smiles as it signs our death warrant.

This is no longer politics. This is a civilizational war. There is no middle ground—either the traitors fall, or Armenia does.

“The U.S. is in a Silent Civil War”

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Deep cultural and political polarization

  • Red vs. Blue, rural vs. urban, progressive vs. conservative.
  • Increasing hostility online and offline.
  • People no longer just disagree — they distrust and dehumanize each other.

Media echo chambers

  • People live in different “information realities.”
  • Social media amplifies conflict and outrage.
  • Algorithms push division for profit.

Institutional breakdown or mistrust

  • Faith in government, elections, courts, police, and media is at historic lows.
  • Both sides believe the other is “breaking the system.”

Nonviolent conflict turning personal

  • Families divided.
  • Violence in protests.
  • Political violence (like Jan. 6 or attacks on judges) is viewed as justifiable by some.

Not in the traditional sense of North vs South or organized militias

  • A society fractured along ideological lines
  • Where peaceful coexistence is constantly strained
  • And where people see their fellow citizens as enemies…

Then yes, you could call it a “cold” or “silent” civil war.

Impact of USDA’s Data Demand on CalFresh Recipients

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Orange County, Calif. (July 29, 2025) — The County of Orange Social Services Agency (SSA) continues to monitor changes to how the federal government obtains our clients’ data. 

Per reports from CalMatters, NPR, KTLA and the LA Times, the state of California has sued to challenge the transfer of data of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients. SNAP — known as CalFresh in California — helps low-income families put food on their tables.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has demanded data be turned over by July 30, to include: 

  • Social Security Numbers
  • Dates of Birth
  • Addresses
  • Immigration statuses
  • Purchase histories

While various outlets have reported that this unprecedent ask is another part of the federal government’s immigration enforcement efforts, regulations prohibit undocumented immigrants from receiving CalFresh. Families with mixed immigration statuses, however, may receive benefits, e.g., an undocumented mother may apply for CalFresh on behalf of her child, who is an American citizen.

As with Medi-Cal, our agency only uses client personal information to determine eligibility for CalFresh, and that information is stored in a state-run database. Again, the County of Orange was not involved in the decision to transfer any client data and we caution clients that disenrolling from benefits will not retroactively remove their personal information from the state-run database.

We acknowledge that this new development could further discourage Orange County residents from applying for and using the benefits they are legally entitled to, which will not just affect our clients. Research shows that CalFresh/SNAP to be one of the most powerful anti-hunger programs, particularly benefiting young children, while injecting $1.54 into the economy for every $1 spent on benefits.

SSA remains committed to serving the most vulnerable in our community, creating a stronger Orange County through supports and services that develop self-sufficiency for our clients.

Understanding America’s Credit Crisis

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Living Paycheck to Paycheck: The Hidden Cost of America’s Credit Culture

76% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.
This alarming statistic reflects more than just personal spending habits—it exposes the deeper design of an economy built on borrowing, consumerism, and financial misunderstanding.

“In traditional Asian culture, people earn a dollar and spend twenty cents.
In traditional American culture, people earn a dollar and spend two.”

How is that even possible?
The answer: credit.

The Illusion of Wealth: America’s Credit Trap

The modern U.S. economy runs on credit. If you make $50,000 a year, you’re often encouraged—not discouraged—to spend $60,000, $70,000, or more. Thanks to credit cards, personal loans, buy-now-pay-later programs, and store financing, Americans regularly live far beyond their actual means.

As your income increases, banks reward you—not with advice or education—but with higher credit limits, more loan offers, and tempting payment plans.

But this isn’t generosity. It’s profit.

Every time you swipe your card or take out a loan, someone earns interest. Your debt fuels someone else’s gains. This is how the system is designed: your overspending sustains economic growth.

The Real Crisis: Financial Illiteracy

What’s even more dangerous than debt is not understanding it. Most people are never taught how credit works, what compound interest means, or how quickly small debts can snowball. They only know this: I want it now. I can pay later.

But when “later” arrives, it comes with a heavy price:

  • Interest charges
  • Overdue fees
  • Anxiety
  • Financial instability

In a culture that glamorizes spending but never teaches budgeting, saving, or investing, it’s no wonder so many Americans are living on the edge.

An Economy Built on Consumption

This isn’t just a personal failing—it’s a systemic design. Roughly 70% of U.S. GDP is driven by consumer spending. The entire economy relies on people continuing to buy, even if it means drowning in debt to do it.

Credit isn’t inherently bad—used wisely, it can fund opportunity, investment, and growth. But without knowledge and discipline, it becomes a trap. And right now, millions are stuck in it.

The Bottom Line

Until we address two core problems—a credit-dependent economy and widespread financial illiteracy—the cycle won’t break. Americans will continue living paycheck to paycheck, fueling a system that enriches others while impoverishing themselves.

The solution isn’t just to earn more.
It’s to learn more.

Because in today’s economy, what you don’t know about money can cost you far more than you think.


“Nikol Pashinyan Joins the Ranks of 7 World Leaders Accused of Betrayal, Surrender, and Controversial Concessions”

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

1. Vidkun Quisling – Norway

During World War II, Quisling collaborated with Nazi Germany and helped facilitate the German occupation of Norway. After the war, he was executed for high treason. His name became synonymous with “traitor” across Europe.

2. Wang Jingwei – China

A high-ranking Chinese official who broke away from the main Nationalist government, Wang formed a puppet regime under Japanese occupation in Nanjing during the Second Sino-Japanese War. He is widely regarded as a national traitor in Chinese history.

3. Marshal Philippe Pétain – Vichy France

Once a World War I hero, Pétain became the head of the Vichy government that collaborated with Nazi Germany after France’s defeat in 1940. He was condemned after the war for betraying the French Republic and sentenced to death, later commuted to life imprisonment.

4. Neville Chamberlain – United Kingdom

The British Prime Minister signed the Munich Agreement in 1938, allowing Adolf Hitler to annex the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. Meant to avoid war, the move is widely seen as appeasement, and many believe it emboldened Hitler, leading directly to WWII.

5. Mikhail Gorbachev – Soviet Union

Gorbachev’s reforms—glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring)—were intended to modernize the Soviet Union but instead accelerated its collapse. While praised abroad, he was heavily criticized at home for presiding over the loss of Soviet territories and influence.

6. Anwar Sadat – Egypt

In 1979, Sadat signed the Camp David Accords, officially recognizing Israel and returning the Sinai Peninsula. While the peace treaty earned him a Nobel Prize, many in the Arab world viewed it as betrayal. He was assassinated in 1981 by extremists within his own military.

7. Nikol Pashinyan – Armenia

Following the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a Russian-brokered ceasefire with Azerbaijan, which resulted in Armenia ceding significant territory. Many Armenians accused him of surrender and betrayal, though others argued it prevented greater loss of life and further devastation.

Conclusion:

What one generation sees as betrayal, another may view as a painful but necessary compromise. These leaders faced impossible choices—some acted out of pragmatism, others out of self-interest or delusion. What they all share is the lasting impact of their decisions, and the fierce debates that continue long after their time.

The Myth of Authenticity: Why We’re All Just Playing a Role

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Authenticity is often praised as the highest virtue in our culture—“Just be yourself,” we’re told. But what if that very idea is a myth? What if no one is ever truly authentic?

In truth, being human means being social, and to be social is to perform. From early childhood, we learn how to adapt, please others, say the right things, and present ourselves in ways that are acceptable or likable. We play roles to fit in, to survive, to be loved. In that sense, we are all actors—constantly shifting our behavior depending on context, company, and circumstance.

Even those who seem effortlessly real or raw are often just skilled at appearing authentic. They’ve learned how to create that impression, how to project sincerity. But make no mistake: they are still performing, still choosing what to show and what to conceal.

The truth is, no one ever says exactly what they’re thinking all the time. We filter ourselves. We calculate. We adjust. The polished version of ourselves that we present to the world is curated, whether consciously or not.

So, when we admire someone for being “authentic,” what we’re often admiring is their ability to act authentic in a way that resonates. But it’s still a performance.

And maybe that’s not a bad thing. Perhaps it’s simply what it means to be human.

From Revolution to Repression Pashinyan Has Reduced Armenians to ‘Toothless, Barking Dogs’

By

By Wally Sarkeesian

Pashinyan’s Rule: A Decade of Decline for Armenia?

Since his emergence on Armenia’s political stage in the late 2000s, Nikol Pashinyan has remained a polarizing figure. Critics argue that under the banner of reform, Pashinyan has systematically dismantled Armenia’s democratic institutions, weakened national sovereignty, and brought the country to the brink of political and cultural crisis.

A Controversial Past

Pashinyan first gained notoriety during the 2008 post-election protests, which resulted in the deaths of 10 people. He was sentenced to seven years in prison for his role in the unrest. Released in 2011 under an amnesty, he re-entered politics and by 2018 led a mass protest movement known as the Velvet Revolution. Though hailed by some as a democratic awakening, others argue the movement consolidated power in Pashinyan’s hands. During the ensuing election, he faced little to no serious competition, raising concerns about the fairness and openness of the democratic process.

Institutional Dismantling

Once in office, Pashinyan began dissolving key governmental institutions, including the Ministry of Diaspora. He pursued legal actions against former presidents and political rivals, often without presenting clear or conclusive evidence. Over time, he reshaped the judiciary by replacing judges and weakening independent legal oversight, leading many to believe Armenia’s legal system had been politically compromised.

The Artsakh Crisis

Perhaps the most devastating chapter of Pashinyan’s tenure came in 2020 with the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War. Accusations have surfaced that the conflict was mishandled—or even provoked—behind the scenes. The eventual defeat led to Armenia’s forced capitulation and the de facto transfer of Artsakh to Azerbaijan, triggering a mass exodus of ethnic Armenians. While Pashinyan portrayed the outcome as inevitable, critics allege he coordinated with Western powers, including the EU and the United States, to facilitate the handover. To date, the leadership of Artsakh remains imprisoned.

Normalizing with Turkey Amid Historical Denial

In parallel, Pashinyan has pursued controversial normalization talks with Turkey, a nation Armenia has long distrusted due to the unresolved trauma of the Armenian Genocide. Not only did Pashinyan attend President Erdoğan’s inauguration, but his government has also been accused of softening Armenia’s stance on genocide recognition—an act viewed by many as betrayal.

Cracking Down on Church and Civil Society

Domestically, Pashinyan has expanded the power of internal security forces, creating what some liken to a “personal police state” reminiscent of Erdoğan’s Turkey. Opposition leaders, clergy members, and even business owners have been arrested. Most recently, reports have emerged of the state targeting Armenian churches and jailing priests under various pretexts—raising alarm about religious repression in a traditionally devout society.

A Silenced Nation?

Despite mounting dissatisfaction, public protests have yielded little change. Demonstrations have been frequent but largely ineffective. Many Armenians now describe themselves as powerless—reduced to “toothless, barking dogs” in their own homeland, as one critic put it.

Conclusion

Pashinyan’s time in power has been marked by deep polarization, institutional collapse, and national crisis. Whether viewed as a reformer gone astray or a calculated opportunist, his legacy is likely to be one of the most contentious in Armenia’s modern history.

Armenia: Letter from the leader of the Sacred Struggle, political prisoner Bagrat Archbishop Galstanyan

By

Letter from the leader of the Sacred Struggle, political prisoner Bagrat Archbishop Galstanyan from the “Yerevan-Center” CEC in the NSS building.

Terrorist is looking for a “terrorist”…

It is true that “the thief is screaming, catch the thief”.

The terrorist who stole our homeland, life, biography, and honor is looking for a “terrorist”.

The Machine of Evil, with all its “inspiration,” continues to spray terror and threat to its satellites and slaves, whose “god” is the authority of their money and fraud, thus willing to extend the empire of lies they have built for a few more moments.

In a state of information, being in the field of unequal opportunities, in prison freedom, my only source of my limited information related to an external “prisoner” are my gifted and dedicated lawyers who are fighting for the truth in spirit. These past two days again with cynicism and lies, not turning each other in line, the terrorists of our lives and biography. They are especially violating all the rules and boundaries, and the blood of the innocents is being cheated.

I’m not going to talk about the amount of lying they are engaged in, ranging from apparently edited records and their combinations to the NA chair. I’m going to talk about what we want, for which, as I said, I don’t regret for a minute.

Just a very brief assessment that if I and our struggle sympathizers are terrorists and criminals, then it is a fact that 2018 is. Terrorists and criminals have taken over the power. No matter what you do or say, you are bloodstained to our heritage and history, our fathers, martyrs, and lost Artsakh. The subject of the homeland, forever tattooed on your foreheads.

I do not regret that I have struggled and I am fighting for a strong, powerful, and safe Armenia, whose borders do not change according to the wish of a “terrorist”.

I do not regret having fought and am fighting for the lost Artsakh’s hundreds of thousands of my deported sisters and brothers, homeless tombs and sanctuaries, brothers being served in hostile prisons.

I do not regret that I have struggled and struggle for the sake of the Holy Church, which lives freely and without persecution in its own homeland, with whose sacrifice the Armenian Statehood has also been upheld.

I do not regret struggling and am fighting for a healthy and dignified young generation free from the fear, stigma, laziness, intoxication and gambling that prevail in the ranks of today’s “government”.

I have no regrets in fighting and will fight for love, peace, justice and truth, which are the only and exclusive guarantees to the fortitude and existence of our national and public life.

I do not regret that I have fought and will fight for the value of the blood shed of our hero martyr fathers, brothers, children, mothers, sisters and daughters, to whom I have made an obligation to return their homeland, their own victory.

I am deeply sorry for our sympathizers and their families in detention at this moment who are in persecution embracing the Motherland, for which I sincerely apologize for the pain and distress caused.

According to the apostolic word, our bonds are our glory, by which you terrorists have enriched and valued our biography, a huge part of which you have robbed.

I have said it and I repeat it, whether I am alone or not, in prison or in the grave, I will fight until my Homeland and State is freed from evil, because Victory has no alternative…

U.S. Judge Dismisses $500 Million Lawsuit By Azeri Lawyer Against ANCA & 29 Others

By

By Harut Sassounian,

The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) announced last week that on April 14, 2025, a U.S. District Court dismissed a $500 million lawsuit filed by Aynur Baghirzade, an Azeri lawyer based in Laguna Beach, CA, against the ANCA and 29 others.

Baghirzade’s 198-page lawsuit “leveled unfounded accusations,” the ANCA stated. “The court struck the plaintiff’s [Baghirzade’s] Third Amended Complaint, dismissing this action, denying remaining motions as moot, and declaring the case closed.” She later tweeted that she intends to appeal the ruling.

The ANCA noted that for months, Baghirzade had engaged in a “lengthy series of incendiary social media posts,” describing Armenia as “a carcinoma” that “shall be deleted from South Caucasus.” In multiple posts on X, she referred to herself as a “U.S. Immigration and Business attorney…. If the truth scares you I will terrify you….” She also wrote: “You fight a terrorist organization and find out that it has its own judges, police, state officials and even congressmen as members.” She added: “Imagine your power that people go and bribe judges to harm you….” She even ridiculed the Armenian Genocide, claiming Armenians shed “crocodile tears about the events back in 1915.”

In addition to her inflammatory rhetoric, Baghirzade posted numerous tweets raising concerns about her professionalism and mental state. For example, she criticized a policeman who issued her a ticket for traffic violation: “Just got a letter from police ‘fining’ me for illegal stop — another candidate to be a defendant.” She also wrote, “if police watches your steps and then relays this information to the terrorists — this is called a state backed terrorism.” In a direct attack on Federal Judge Robert Huie who dismissed her case, Baghirzade accused him of being “corrupt,” threatening to sue him!

Interestingly, when Baghirzade filed her case on June 21, 2024, she failed to pay the required $350 civil filing fee, claiming “in forma pauperis” — meaning she was too poor to pay the fee. The Judge rejected her request. She submitted a new request on July 2, 2024, which was also denied. The Court noted that her annual income of $50,952 exceeded the federal poverty threshold by 325%. The Judge imposed a $55 administrative fee on top of the initial $350.

Baghirzade sued the following 30 individuals and entities: “Alphabet Inc.; Aram Hamparian; Armen Sahakyan; Armenian National Committee of America; Armenian National Committee of America, Western Region; Attorney Search Network; Coco Su; Estrella Sanchez; Google, Inc.; Jake Baloian; Jeremy Stoppelman; Legal Match; Martindale-Nolo; Los Angeles County Bar Association; Orange County Bar Association; Seth Chavez; Teresa Vuki; Trudy Levindofske; Yelp, Inc.; YouTube; Sundar Pichai; Zartonk Media; Zaven Kouroghlian; Van Megerdichian; Ani Tchaglasian; Legalshield; Parker-Stanbury, LLP; Greystar California, Inc.; Kia America, Inc.; and ARF Eastern USA, Inc.

On Feb. 27, 2025, the Federal Court “dismissed Baghirzade’s Second Amended Complaint [which was 78-pages-long] pursuant to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.” The Court determined that her claims failed to meet the legal standard for federal claims and granted Plaintiff “leave to amend Claims One through Five to address the deficiencies described in this order.” The Court said that her lawsuit “is a failure to adequately plead a single cognizable federal claim against any one of the defendants she has sued.” The Judge further stated: “Plaintiff’s filings to date have consistently failed to comply with the applicable rules, but the Court has accepted them nonetheless — even without a request from Plaintiff to excuse the non-compliance. Failure to follow applicable rules or orders in the future may result in filings being stricken.”

On April 10, 2025, Baghirzade filed her Third Amended Complaint which was 198 pages long. In her latest filing, she had added as a new defendant, the “ARF Eastern USA, Inc., mentioning it 100 times,” even though she was told by the Judge that she could not add any new defendants. She alleged that the ARF had been “plotting for centuries to annex two regions of Azerbaijan” — a baseless claim, given that neither the ARF nor Azerbaijan had existed for ‘centuries.’ The Court stated that Baghirzade had not complied with its instructions. “None of her claims has survived dismissal.”

The Court further accused Baghirzade of suing “over 30 defendants, has amended her complaint more than once, and has failed to state a single claim against a single defendant that is not subject to dismissal. Plaintiff accuses Defendants of extensive criminal conduct, and her pleadings frequently adopt a tone of animus, hostility, suspicion, or sarcasm in referring to Defendants.” Her complaint “repeats and seeks to vindicate her past statements that another ethnic group’s home country is a ‘carcinoma’ and that ‘we have to delete [that ethnic group’s] project as soon as possible.’” Her complaint also “fancifully alleged that all Defendants — most of whom appear completely unrelated to each other, and some of which are public companies — conspired together for the single-minded purpose of harming her.”

The Judge further stated that Baghirzade’s third complaint, “over two-and-a-half times as long, appears to contain similar fanciful allegations while expanding the alleged conspiracy ever wider.” Like her second complaint, the third complaint “continues to ascribe events in her life — such as discovering flies in her apartment on one occasion, finding a cockroach in her hotel room, or having her car towed after parking in someone else’s spot in her building — to the malevolent conspiracy of Defendants without any factual basis for this ascription plausibly alleged.” Her third complaint “now sweeps even more broadly, accusing the Defendants of (among other things) international terrorism as well as engaging the U.S. Congress to persecute her. Plaintiff also adds numerous ‘non-party co-conspirators,’ including seven California state court judges or justices; the implication is that persons who have displeased Plaintiff are thereby part of a criminal conspiracy against her. In other words, Defendants are seemingly required to respond to expanding pleadings that diverge even further from plausibility. This factor weighs in favor of dismissal.”

Federal Judge Robert Huie had no choice but to dismiss Baghirzade’s lawsuit, stating: “Anything short of dismissal in these circumstances would disserve the interests of justice.”

These Are the Social Security Offices Expected to Close This Year, Musk call SS Ponzi Scheme

By

by MEG KINNARD / AP

WASHINGTON — Dozens of Social Security Administration offices across the country are slated to close this year due to actions taken by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency as part of the Trump administration’s unprecedented effort to shrink the size of government.

DOGE has published a list of nearly 800 federal real estate leases that it is seeking to cancel. The Associated Press has obtained an internal planning document from the General Services Administration, which manages federal real estate, which shows when nearly two-thirds of those cancellations are expected to go into effect.

Related: DOGE Lease Cancellations: Which Government Offices Could Close This Year

The offices are closing despite a new requirement that tighter identity-proofing measures be put in place to prevent fraud and abuse. These steps will require millions of recipients and applicants to visit agency field offices rather than interact with agency employees over the phone.

The AP also obtained more information about each lease on DOGE’s list through other publicly available datasets, including their addresses, the dates the leases had started and were originally expected to expire, and the landlords who own the properties.

Of the 47 Social Security Administration offices listed for closure, only some had anticipated dates for when those lease cancellations would take effect. Here’s a state-by-state breakdown of the 26 offices listed as expected to close this year, along with the termination date for each lease, according to the General Services data:

Alabama

634 Broad St., Gadsden: Sept. 30

Arkansas

965 Holiday Drive, Forrest City: April 25

4083 Jefferson Ave., Texarkana: May 25

Colorado

825 N. Crest Drive, Grand Junction: June 21

Florida

4740 Dairy Road, Melbourne: May 16

Georgia

1338 Broadway, Columbus: Sept. 30

Kentucky

825 High St., Hazard: April 24

Louisiana

178 Civic Center Drive, Houma: April 25

Mississippi

4717 26th St., Meridian: June 1

604 Yalobusha St., Greenwood: June 1

2383 Sunset Drive, Grenada: May 1

Montana

3701 American Way, Missoula: June 21

North Carolina

730 Roanoke Ave., Roanoke Rapids: Aug. 1

2123 Lakeside Drive, Franklin: June 23

2805 Charles Blvd., Greenville: June 24

1865 W. City Drive, Elizabeth City: June 24

North Dakota

1414 20th Ave. SW, Minot: June 21

Nevada

701 Bridger Ave., Las Vegas: June 1

New York

75 S. Broadway, White Plains: May 31

332 Main St., Poughkeepsie: July 31

Ohio

30 N. Diamond St., Mansfield: May 17

Oklahoma

1610 SW Lee Blvd., Lawton: April 25

Texas

1122 N. University Drive, Nacogdoches: May 7

8208 NE Zac Lentz Parkway, May 25

West Virginia

1103 George Kostas Drive, Logan: April 30

Wyoming

79 Winston Drive, Rock Springs: June 20