Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Robert Fisk conversation with the son of Soghomon Tehlirian, the man who assassinated the organiser of the Armenian genocid

June 20, 2016 By administrator

Soghomon Tehlirian story By Robert Fisk,

‘He was not what an assassin should be. He first told me the story of how he killed Mehmet Talaat Pasha when I was 10’

Soghomon Tehlirian Junior doesn’t have much time for those who want the Armenian genocide recognized by the world. “The Armenians keep trying to tip things out of the grave,” he says. “It’s three generations ago. It’s history. Everyone killed a lot of people. You can’t go back to the Spanish inquisition and the Roman Empire and bring it back. That’s not me. I never remember my father saying one bad word about the Turks. He just wanted to live his life in peace.”

I listen to the brisk, youthful voice of this 86-year-old Armenian talking to me down the phone from America and I have to shake my head to remember that his father, Soghomon Tehlirian, was the assassin who shot dead Mehmet Talaat Pasha, the Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire and organizer of the 1915 genocide of one and a half million Christian Armenians. 

He killed Taalat in a Berlin park in 1921 as part of the Armenians’ ‘Operation Nemesis’ to destroy all who had plotted the extermination of their people. So appalled was the German Weimar Republic’s  court by the evidence of the 20th century’s first industrial holocaust, that it took jurors at Tehlirian’s trial just two days to declare the Armenian assassin ‘not guilty’.

So Soghomon Tehlirian got off scot-free, went to make his fortune in Yugoslavia where his sons was born, and ended up in California. His younger son was 12 when the Germans invaded the Balkans in 1941.

“I saw the gun my father used to shoot Talaat Pasha, but when the Germans came, he threw it into the Danube,” he says. “When the Germans occupied Yugoslavia, owning a Luger pistol would have been a death sentence.”

The family story is both gruesome and tragic and Soghomon Tehlirian’s younger son has changed his family name to distance himself from history – and from the Turks who still regard his father as the world’s most famous “terrorist”. 

He asked The Independent not to reveal his new identity. “No names, no address… I’m out of it. You never know, if some crazy Turk finds out…” 

Tehlirian Junior’s older brother is now dead. His father died in America in 1960. It was a request that couldn’t be refused. But the surviving son’s memory of Soghomon Tehlirian is razor sharp.

“He was the most gentle, mild man you could ever meet, almost naïve. Me and my older brother had to force him to tell us what happened. He never liked to talk about it. He was a man of very few words. He used to write poetry and draw very well. 

“He was not what an assassin should be. He first told me the story of how he killed Talaat when I was 10.”

@mehmetk_ksk These are just few names of Armenian intellectuals Turks hang in Istanbul. pic.twitter.com/7WGTbhZf3T

— Wally Sarkeesian (@gagrulenet) June 4, 2016

For more than a century, the Armenians have blamed Talaat Pasha, the ruthless Ottoman interior minister, for organising and completing the genocide of the Christian Armenians of what is now Turkey. The male victims were shot into mass graves, beheaded beside rivers, or drowned. Their women were sent into the deserts of northern Syria on death marches which often ended in rape and starvation. Children were burned alive.

Talaat Pasha, like the Nazi war criminals who followed his example less than three decades later, sought sanctuary abroad after his country lost the First World War. He chose Berlin. And that is where Soghomon Tehlirian Senior was sent in 1921 to kill the tall, bearded man who lived quietly in the Charlottenberg district of the German capital.

“My father shared a room with a group of students,” his son remembers. “He said it was right across the street from Talaat. In photographs, Talaat had a moustache, but he had grown it into a full beard and he had two bodyguards.”

Talaat made the classic mistake of adopting a routine. “He went for a constitutional every day at 11.0 am. My father got behind him and called out his name, ‘Talaat’, and he turned round and my father shot him… I don’t know what happened to the bodyguards.  The people who saw all this grabbed my father and beat him and it was only the Berlin police who saved him from being lynched.  Later, I found out that he had also killed an Armenian Quisling in Istanbul who was spying for the Turks during the genocide.”

Indeed, in 1921 Tehlerian assassinated Hartyun Mkrtchian, who had helped Talaat round up the initial Armenian clergymen, journalists and lawyers for exile and death in April 1915. Vidkun Quisling was the Norwegian head of the Nazi occupation government in Oslo in 1940 – like the word ‘genocide’, his name did not exist as a noun until after the Second World War – and Quisling was also executed, albeit after a post-war trial.

By the time he killed Talaat, therefore, Tehlirian, who was born in Erzerum province in Turkey in 1896, already had the blood of an Armenian informer on his hands.  The 1921 Berlin court, trying him for Talaat’s murder but appalled by the evidence of the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Armenians – which the present German parliament acknowledged as genocide only this month – set Soghomon Tehlerian free after two days.

Popular Armenian history would have it that Tehlerian’s entire family – his father, mother, sisters and all three brothers – were murdered in front of him during the genocide. This is untrue. Soghomon Tehlirian was not in Armenia at the time. 

He was in Serbia, having moved there quite by chance on the very day in June 1914 that Gavrillo Principe shot the Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo, setting off the First World War.

“My father never had a sister,” his son says. “He and two of his brothers were in Serbia. It was his mother – my grandmother – who was killed in the genocide, along with his oldest brother Vasken, who would have been my uncle and who had been a medical student in Beirut. 

“My father went to Russia during the [Bolshevik] Revolution and joined General Antranik Ozanian’s Armenian army, which had been fighting alongside the Russian Tsar’s army against the Turks. I have a photograph of my father in a fur hat with [bandoliers of] bullets draped round him. The Russian front was then in [the Armenian city of] Van. I don’t know if he knew then what had happened to his mother and brother but he did find his 12-year old niece, lost in the woods in western Armenia. Her name was Armenouhi and she was the daughter of my uncle – my father’s older brother Missak – and Missak’s first wife.”

In 1917, Soghomon Tehrlirian met a 15-year old Armenian girl called Anahit. “She was the great love of his life,” his son says today. 

“After his trial in Berlin, my father went to Cleveland in the US but Anahit, who would become my mother, was inside what was now the Soviet Union and she couldn’t get out. She went to the local passport office in Tbilisi and said she wanted to go to America to marry my father, but they said ‘no’.  Then she and her older sister met a businessman in Tbilisi in 1923, who listened to her story and then gave her his business card and told the two girls to show it to the Soviet passport office.

“The moment they did so, they gave Anahit an exit visa and her sister a full Soviet passport. They never knew who the businessman was. Anahit’s mother – my grandmother – told her she was too young to go on her own and that her sister, who would be my aunt, must travel with her.” 

The two girls left for Marseilles – but the US refused Anahit’s sister an entry visa because she was a citizen of the new Soviet Union. She had to return.

“My father gave up his business in Cleveland and travelled to Marseilles,” his son says. Soghomon Tehlirian married Anahit and decided to go to Yugoslavia because he had family and friends there.  But the politics of revolution followed him like an albatross.

In Yugoslavia, he opened a successful coffee business and his business card, according to his son, announced that he was ‘official coffee grinder to the Royal Court’ of King Alexander. He had a monopoly on coffee in Yugoslavia “and drove around in a Ford station wagon, delivering coffee to the King’s palace”.

But after the Second World War and Tito’s accession to power, Soghomon Tehlirian befriended a street urchin and asked him to work in his coffee emporium. “He became a Communist,” Tehlirian’s son says, “and one day he walked into the store and told my father:  ‘Now, you get out of here – this belongs to the people.’ My father came home in tears. They just kicked him out.”

Soghomon Tehlirian spent the rest of his life in the US before dying of a brain tumour in 1960. His wife Anahit died in 1979.

“In his last years, the Armenians showed my father off in cities around America – in Boston, Cleveland, New York,” his son says today. “He would give patriotic speeches but he really never liked to talk of what happened.” His grave can be found in the Ararat cemetery in Fresno, California, topped by a gold-plated Armenian eagle holding in its claw a serpent representing Tehlirian’s celebrated victim, Talaat Pasha.

Talaat’s own ashes lie today within a much visited mausoleum in central Istanbul. They were returned to the Turks in 1943 in a train decorated with the Nazi swastika, and on the orders of Adolf Hitler – who hoped this would persuade neutral Turkey to join the Axis powers. In vain.

Source:independent

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: assassinated, Mehmet Talaat Pasha, robert fisk, Soghomon Tehlirian

Video: Journalist Robert Fisk, Expos Turkish Crime against Humanity #Armeniangenocide Episode 15

March 19, 2015 By administrator

Armenian-skeleton

Armenian skeleton of Deir el-Zour

By Wally SArkeesian

The Armenian skeleton of Deir el-Zour
Robert Fisk, Deir el-Zour, which is dedicated to the one and a half million Armenians slaughtered by the Turks during the 1915 genocide. All of the church archives, dating back to 1841 and containing thousands of documents on the Armenian Holocaust,

 

Enter your email address Subrcribe Free, and Get up-to-date news views Videos,:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: Armenian, deir el-zour, robert fisk, skeleton

The Independent: Gallipoli centenary shameful attempt to hide Genocide

January 20, 2015 By administrator

1930500_23842708663_5678_nWhen world leaders, including Prince Charles and the Australian and New Zealand prime ministers, gather at Gallipoli to commemorate the First World War battle at the invitation of the Turkish government in April, the ghosts of one and half million slaughtered Christian Armenians will march with them, The Independent’s award-winning Middle East correspondent Robert Frisk said in an article published at the news website.

“For in an unprecedented act of diplomatic folly, Turkey is planning to use the 100th anniversary of the Allied attempt to invade Turkey in 1915 to smother memory of its own mass killing of the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire, the 20th century’s first semi-industrial holocaust. The Turks have already sent invitations to 102 nations to attend the Gallipoli anniversary on 24th April — on the very day when Armenia always honours its own genocide victims at the hands of Ottoman Turkey.

In an initiative which he must have known would be rejected, Turkish President Recep Erdogan even invited the Armenian President, Serzh Sargsyan, to attend the Gallipoli anniversary after himself receiving an earlier request from President Sargsyan to attend ceremonies marking the Armenian Genocide on the same day.

This is not just diplomatic mischief. The Turks are well aware that the Allied landings at Gallipoli began on 25th April – the day after Armenians mark the start of their genocide, which was ordered by the Turkish government of the time – and that Australia and New Zealand mark Anzac Day on the 25th. Only two years ago, then-president Abdullah Gul of Turkey marked the 98th anniversary of the Great War battle on 18th March 2013 — the day on which the British naval bombardment of the Dardanelles Peninsular began on the instructions of British First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill. At the time, no-one in Turkey suggested that Gallipoli – Canakkale in Turkish — should be remembered on 24th April.

The Turks, of course, are fearful that 1915 should be remembered as the anniversary of their country’s frightful crimes against humanity committed during the Armenian extermination, in which tens of thousands of men were executed with guns and knives, their womenfolk raped and then starved with their children on death marches into what was then Mesopotamia. The irony of history has now bequeathed these very same killing fields to the victorious forces of the ‘genocidal’ Islamist ISIS army, which has even destroyed the Armenian church commemorating the genocide in the Syrian city of Deir ez-Zour. Armenians chose 24th April to remember their genocide victims because this was the day on which Turkish police rounded up the first Armenian academics, lawyers, doctors, teachers and journalists in Constantinople.

Like Germany’s right wing and revisionist historians who deny the Jewish Holocaust, Turkey has always refused to accept the Ottoman Turkish Empire’s responsibility for the greatest crime against humanity of the 1914-18 war, a bloodletting which at the time upset even Turkey’s German allies. Armenia’s own 1915 Holocaust – which lasted into 1917 — has been acknowledged by hundreds of international scholars, including many Jewish and Israeli historians, and has since been recognized by many European states. Only Tony Blair’s government tried to diminish the suffering of the Armenians when it refused to regard the outrages as an act of genocide and tried to exclude survivors from commemorating their dead during Holocaust ceremonies in London. Turkey’s claim – that the Armenians were unfortunate victims of the social upheavals of the war – has long been discredited.

Several brave Turkish scholars – denounced for their honesty by their fellow countrymen – have researched Ottoman documents and proved that instructions were sent out from Constantinople (now Istanbul) to regional officials to destroy their Armenian communities. Professor Ayhan Aktar of Istanbul Bilgi University, for example, has written extensively about the courage of Armenians who themselves fought in uniform for Turkey at Gallipoli, and has publicised the life of Captain Sarkis Torossian, an Armenian officer who was decorated by the Ottoman state for his bravery but whose parents and sister were done to death in the genocide. Professor Aktar was condemned by Turkish army officers and some academics who claimed that Armenians did not even fight on the Turkish side. Turkish generals officially denied – against every proof to the contrary, including Torossian’s photograph in Ottoman uniform — that the Armenian soldier existed.

Now Turkey has changed its story. Turkish foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu recently acknowledged that other ethnic groups – including many Arabs as well as Armenians – also fought at Gallipoli. “We [Turks and Armenians] fought together at Gallipoli,” he said. “That’s why we have extended the invitation to President Sarkissian as well.” The Armenian president’s reply to Erdogan’s invitation even mentioned Captain Torossian – although he sadly claimed that the soldier was also killed in the genocide when he in fact died in New York in 1954 after writing his memoirs – and reminded the Turkish president that “peace and friendship must first be hinged on the courage to confront one’s own past, historical justice and universal memory… Each of us has a duty to transmit the real story to future generations and prevent the repetition of crimes… and prepare the ground for rapprochement and future cooperation between peoples, especially neighbouring peoples.”

Armenians hold their commemorations on April 24th – when nothing happened at Gallipoli – because this was the day on which the Armenian intellectuals were rounded up and jailed in the basement of Constantinople’s police headquarters prior to their deportation and — in some cases — execution. These were the first ‘martyrs’ of the Armenian Genocide. By another cruel twist of history, the place of their incarceration is now the Museum of Islamic Arts – a tourist location to which Prince Charles and other dignitaries will presumably not be taken on 24th April. These killings marked the start of the Armenian people’s persecution and exile to the four corners of the earth.

Professor Aktar’s contribution – along with that of historian Taner Akcam in the US — to the truth of Turkish-Armenian history is almost unique. They alone, through their academic research and under enormous political pressure to remain silent, forced thousands of Turks to debate the terrible events of 1915. Many Turks have since discovered Armenian grandmothers who were ‘Islamised’ or seized by Turkish militiamen or soldiers when they were young women. Aktar also points out that other Armenian soldiers – a First Lieutenant Surmenian, whose own memoirs were published in Beirut 13 years after Torossian’s death – fought in the Turkish army.

“He has little time, however, for either the Turkish government or Armenian president Sargsyan. “If you want to honour the Armenian officers and soldiers who… died for the fatherland (Turkey) in 1915, then you should invite the Armenian patriarch of Istanbul,” Aktar told me,” the author said. “Why do (they) invite President Sarkissian? His ancestors were probably fighting in the Russian Imperial Army in 1915. He is from Karabakh as far as I know! This is a show of an ‘indecent proposal’ towards President Sargsyan… it is rather insulting!”

Many Armenians might share the same view. For several months, Sargsyan was prepared to sign a treaty with Turkey to open the Armenian-Turkish frontier in return for a mere formal investigation by scholars of the Genocide. Then-US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton supported him, along with sundry politicians and some Western journalists based in Turkey. But the Armenian diaspora responded in fury, asking how Jews would feel if friendship with Germany was contingent upon an enquiry to discover if the Jewish Holocaust had ever occurred. In the First World War, American and European newspapers gave massive publicity to the savagery visited upon the Armenians, and the British Foreign Office published a ‘black book’ on the crimes against Armenians of the Turkish army. The very word ‘genocide’ was coined about the Armenian holocaust by Raphael Lemkin, an American lawyer of Polish-Jewish descent. Israelis use the word ‘Shoah’ – ‘Holocaust’ — when they refer to the suffering of the Armenians.

The Turkish hero of Gallipoli, of course, was Lieutenant Colonel Mustapha Kemal – later Ataturk, founder of the modern Turkish state – and his own 19th Division at Gallipoli was known as the ‘Aleppo Division’ because of the number of Arabs serving in it. Ataturk did not participate in the mass killings of Armenians in 1915, but some of his associates were implicated – which still casts a shadow over the history of the Turkish state. The bloody Allied defeat at Gallipoli was to cast a shadow over the rest of Winston Churchill’s career, a fact well known to the tens of thousands of Australians and New Zealanders who plan to come to the old battlefield this April. How much they will know about an even more horrific anniversary on April 24th is another matter,” the article concludes.

Related links:

The Independent. The Gallipoli centenary is a shameful attempt to hide the Armenian Holocaust
The Armenian Genocide

The Armenian Genocide (1915-23) was the deliberate and systematic destruction of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire during and just after World War I. It was characterized by massacres, and deportations involving forced marches under conditions designed to lead to the death of the deportees, with the total number of deaths reaching 1.5 million.

The majority of Armenian Diaspora communities were formed by the Genocide survivors.

Present-day Turkey denies the fact of the Armenian Genocide, justifying the atrocities as “deportation to secure Armenians”. Only a few Turkish intellectuals, including Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk and scholar Taner Akcam, speak openly about the necessity to recognize this crime against humanity.

The Armenian Genocide was recognized by Uruguay, Russia, France, Lithuania, the Italian Chamber of Deputies, majority of U.S. states, parliaments of Greece, Cyprus, Argentina, Belgium and Wales, National Council of Switzerland, Chamber of Commons of Canada, Polish Sejm, Vatican, European Parliament and the World Council of Churches.

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: armenian genocide, gallipoli, robert fisk, shameful, Turkey

Robert Fisk published article on Armenian Holocaust in The 
Independent

December 1, 2014 By administrator

Rober-fisk-articalDo you know the difference between a Holocaust and a holocaust? The Armenians do.

Despite what some sub-editors might think, the genocide of 1.5m Armenian Christians in 1915 was not a holocaust. As reports
“Armenpress”, journalist Robert Fist stated this in his most recent article published in The Independent. As reports “Arrnenpress”, Fisk particularly
stated in his article:

“What‘s in a name? Let’s start with the Persian Gulf. Or the Arabian Gulf. Or just the Arab Gulf. I’m
indebted to reader (and surgeon) Ross Farhadieh for complaining to me last week about my use of “The
Gulf” – bland, dull and historically anaemic – in a column on Iran and its possible return to geopolitical
power in the Middle East. Historically, legally – and in the UN – Ross told me, it should be called the
Persian Gulf. It was Gamal Abdul Nasser‘s nationalism which renamed it the “Arabian Gulf”.

And Ross is right. And I think I know the background to this slippage in nomenclature. When I worked in
the Middle East forThe Times – long before Murdoch emasculated the paper – we found that whenever we
referr~d to the Persian Gulf, Arab states would refuse to let the paper go on sale in Dubai or Cairo. But
whenever we called it the Arabian Gulf, the paper was not allowed into Iran.

Other Great War events remain contentious, not least what I always refer to as the Armenian Holocaust
(with a capital “H”), the genocide of 1.5m Armenian Christians at the hands of the Turkish Ottoman
government in 1915. It was the first industrialised genocide of the last century – the second being the
Jewish Holocaust – and the two mass acts of slaughter had clear historical connections. The Turks
suffocated thousands of Armenians in caves – by blowing smoke from bonfires into the cavities where they
had imprisoned them in the Syrian desert – and thus created the first primitive gas chambers.

Armenian men were sometimes taken to their execution in railway goods wagons. And junior members of
the German Kaiser‘s army who were training the Turkish army at the time witnessed the genocide; more
importantly, some of the names of these Germans turned up less than a quarter of a century later as
members of Hitler’s Wehrmacht in the Ukraine and Belarus, where they were helping to organise the mass
killing of Jews. There’s no doubt where they learned how to do that.

Many years ago, therefore, I used the phrase “Armenian Holocaust” in The Independent. A sub–editor
immediately changed the capital H to a lower-case h. My phone did not stop ringing. Armenians were
outraged. Why did they not deserve a capital H, they demanded to know? Didn’t the Turks murder enough
Armenians to qualify them for a capital H? I wrote a long memorandum to my then editor; Simon Kelner;
explaining that it was racist–to make a distinction between two genocides; we could not base our definition
on the numerical difference between 1,500,000 and 6,000,000. Besides, Israelis (as opposed to the state
of Israel, which doesn‘t even regard the Armenian catastrophe as a genocide) refer to the Armenian
massacres as the Armenian Shoah – using the Hebrew word for Holocaust. Kelner later published my
memo as an article in The Independent – and it won the DC Watt journalism award.

But we newspaper folk have poor institutional memories. Earlier this month, I again referred to the
Armenian Holocaust – and a sub–editor; unfamiliar with the expression, innocently downgraded the poor
old Armenians again. He changed the capital H into h! My phone trilled once more. The same
unanswerable arguments. Didn‘t the Turks kill enough of us, my Armenian callers asked again? So of
course we sheepishly upgraded the Armenians on the website version of my report and returned to them
their capital H … ”

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: Armenian, Holocaust, robert fisk

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in