Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

European Armenian Federation welcomes ECHR judgment in Perincek v. Switzerland case

October 15, 2015 By administrator

Europian-Armenian-ECHR

Bedo Demirdjian, who is in charge of Communications & PR at the European Armenian

The European Armenian Federation welcomes the judgment delivered today by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of Perincek v. Switzerland (no. 27510/08)), in which Armenia was also involved as a third party.

Bedo Demirdjian, who is in charge of Communications & PR at the European Armenian Federation, told the correspondent of Panorama.am that especially commendable is the point, under which the upper chamber changes the lower chamber’s decision that the Armenian Genocide is not a subject for discussion there.

“It is especially important that the European Court itself has stated that we the Armenians have the right to protection of dignity and respect. Yes, we are satisfied with the judgment delivered by Europe’s highest court today,” Bedo Demirdjian said.

Source: Panorama.am

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: ECHR, Judgment, Perincek, Switzerland

Armenian justice official hails ECHR judgment in Perincek case

October 15, 2015 By administrator

f561fa8461b606_561fa8461b640.thumbA deputy prosecutor general of Armenia praises the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling in the case Perincek vs Switzerland, considering the outcome positive for the Armenian side.
“This ruling is a very good result for Armenia and the Armenians,” Emil Babayan told Tert.am, commenting on the Grand Chamber’s judgment delivered earlier today.
He particularly hailed the statement saying that the ECHR has no authority to make a legally binding pronouncement on a point falling within the logic of criminal law.
“First, it neutralizes the comments of those lower chamber judges who were not inclined to think that the 1915 killings of the Armenians could have amounted to a crime of genocide. The Court ruled that they do not have any authority to issue any conclusion on that point – that the lower chamber’s decision was wrong and could not have any weight or influence,” Babayan noted.
The next important point, he said, was the Chamber’s statement saying that the Armenians have a right to respect the dignity of the ancestors who suffered the Genocide. “That’s a decision of a great importance. It means that the states in Europe can punish the denial of the Armenian Genocide, if [such an act] is calculated to incite violence or disharmony. The idea behind suing Switzerland for the Perincek case was to state that he is just a stool pigeon whose words wouldn’t be taken for granted or inflict damage on anyone. [That’s why the Court ruled] that it was not necessary, in a democratic society, to subject Perincek to a criminal penalty,” he added.
Babayan cited the Chamber’s reassertion of the right to freedom of speech as the next key point in the judgment. “That means that the laws ‘insulting Turkishnes’ [Article 301 of Turkey’s Criminal Code] cannot be applied here as was the case with Hrant Dink and other Turkish and Armenian citizens who are conducting research to study Turkey’s complicity in the Genocide. So Turkey must now stop the violations against freedom of speech,” he added.

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: Armenian, ECHR, Genocide, Judgment, Perincek

Armenia official: That was what we wanted from ECHR in Perincek case

October 15, 2015 By administrator

FRANCE SWITZERLAND ECHR PERINCEK

FRANCE SWITZERLAND ECHR PERINCEK

Even though the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Grand Chamber rejected Switzerland’s petition in the case of Perincek v Switzerland, the judgment can be considered a triumph of the Armenian party in the sense that the lower chamber ruling’s unacceptable evaluations, which questioned the fact of the Armenian Genocide, are removed from the text of this judgment.

Deputy Minister of Justice of Armenia Arman Tatoyan, who is also the Armenian government’s deputy authorized representative at the ECHR, told the aforesaid to Armenian News-NEWS.am, as he commented on Thursday’s ECHR Grand Chamber judgment.

“The Republic of Armenia, as a third party, sought that the ECHR would not make an assessment on the genocide,” said Tatoyan. “In fact, the ECHR Grand Chamber recorded in its judgment that it has no authority and cannot give an assessment on what occurred in 1915, which the genocide term can be characterized in any way within the meaning under international law, and cannot make any legally binding pronouncements.”

In his words, Armenia, as a third party, pursued this very objective from the very beginning.

“Turkey needed a clear statement that there was no genocide, [that] there had been some events,” added the Armenian official. “Whereas the European Court not only noted that it will not give a response to such a matter, but it has no authority and it is not the court to respond to this matter. That was exactly what Armenia claimed.”

The ECHR Grand Chamber judgment also specifically states: “As regards the scope of the case, the Court underlined that it was not required to determine whether the massacres and mass deportations suffered by the Armenian people at the hands of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 onwards could be characterised as genocide within the meaning of that term under international law; unlike the international criminal courts, it had no authority to make legally binding pronouncements on this point.”

In 2008, a Swiss court had convicted Turkish ultranationalist politician Dogu Perincek for denying the Armenian Genocide. In December 2013, the ECHR had ruled in favor of Perincek’s lawsuit that was filed against Switzerland. Subsequently, the Government of Switzerland petitioned that the Dogu Perincek case be referred for a review by the ECHR Grand Chamber.

Separately, Armenia had petitioned to the ECHR, and it now acts as a third party in this case, whose ECHR Grand Chamber hearing was held on January 28. Armenia was represented at this hearing by renowned attorneys Geoffrey Robertson and Amal Clooney.

Dogu Perincek is chairman of the left-wing Patriotic—formerly Workers’—Party of Turkey. In addition, he heads the Turkish ultranationalist Talaat Pasha organization, which actively fights against the Armenian Genocide’s recognition in Europe.

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: Armenian, ECHR, Genocide, Perincek, Turkey

ECHR to deliver judgment in Perincek case on October 15

October 12, 2015 By administrator

ECHR PerincekThe European Court of Human Rights will be delivering its Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Perinçek v. Switzerland on Thursday 15 October 2015.

The case concerns the criminal conviction of a Turkish politician for publicly expressing the view, in Switzerland, that the mass deportations and massacres suffered by the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1915 and the following years had not amounted to genocide.

In 2008, a Swiss court had convicted Dogu Perincek for denying the Armenian Genocide. In December 2013, the ECHR had ruled in favor of Perincek’s lawsuit that was filed against Switzerland. Subsequently, the Government of Switzerland petitioned that the Dogu Perincek case be referred for a review by the ECHR Grand Chamber.

Separately, Armenia had petitioned to the ECHR, and it now acts as a third party in this case, whose European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber hearing was held on January 28.

Armenia was represented by famous lawyers Geoffrey Robertson, Amal Clooney.

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: ECHR, Judgment, Perincek

Akçam: Perinçek, “1915 soykırım değildir”i nefret suçu yaymak amacıyla söylediği için ceza aldı

February 17, 2015 By administrator

Haber Merkezi

Taner Akçam

Taner Akçam

Taner Akçam: Türkiye’de davaya ilişkin son derece yanlış bir algı yaratılmıştır. Bu algıya göre, İsviçre’de “soykırımı inkâr etmek” suçtur. Ve bir kişi, “ben şu veya bu olayın soykırım olduğuna inanmıyorum”, derse ceza alır.

Taner Akçam, Taraf gazetesinde yer alan köşesinde, Doğu Perinçek’in Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nde görülmekte olan davası ve Türkiye’deki algısını yazdı. 

Akçam’ın köşe yazısı şöyle; Report Agos

Perinçek ve Türk Hükümeti’nin AİHM’deki Perinçek davasını Türkiye’de pazarlayış tarzları ile mahkemede izledikleri savunma stratejisi arasında büyük bir uçurum var. Bu uçurumdan hareketle, AİHM davasını bir komedi olarak yazmıştım. Oysa aynı dava, benim gibi Hrant’ın öldürülmesiyle sarsılmış insanlar için bir trajedi olarak yazılmalıdır. Perinçek, Ermenilere yönelik ırkçı kin ve nefret yaymak amacıyla kurulan ve bu doğrultuda faaliyetlerde bulunan Talat Paşa Komitesi’nin kurucusudur. Komite, Veli Küçük ve Kemal Kerinçsiz’lerle beraber, sadece ırkçı ve nefret söylemini yaymakla kalmadı, Hrant Dink cinayetine yol açan siyasi faaliyetler yürüttü. Başta Boğazlayan Kaymakamı Kemal olmak üzere, Ermeni soykırımının katillerine sahip çıktı. Bu komitenin üyelerinin büyük kısmı Ergenekon davasından yargılandı ve ceza aldı. Davada, Talat Paşa Komitesi’nin, insanlar arasında kin ve nefret yaymakta olduğu kayda geçti ve bu faaliyetler ile Hrant Dink cinayeti arasındaki bağa dikkat çekildi. Perinçek’in, AİHM önünde yargılanma nedeni, Talat Paşa Komitesi’nin, Ermenilere karşı kin ve nefreti örgütleyen faaliyetlerini Türkiye ile sınırlı tutmakla yetinmeyip, Avrupa’ya taşımış olmasıdır. Bir trajedi olarak Perinçek davası 2005’te Perinçek ile birlikte isviçre’ye gidenlerin çoğu, Talat Paşa Komitesi üyeleridir Ergenekon davasından ceza almışlardır. “Savunma mevzilerini Avrupa başkentlerinde kurduk”; Batı’nın “saldırılarını, Batı başkentlerinden taarruzla karşılama planını uygulamaya başladık. Avrupa’daki beş milyon yurttaşımızı seferber etmek için harekete geçtik. İlk taarruzumuz, çok başarılı oldu” ifadeleri Doğu Perinçek’e aittir. “Bu daha başlangıç yeni zaferler yolda” diyen de Perinçek. Ortada Ermeni düşmanlığını körükleyen, kin ve nefret saçan bir kampanya ve eylemler dizisi var. Söz konusu olan, Türkiye’de başlamış bir kampanyanın Avrupa’ya taşınmasıdır. Şimdi kalkıp AİHM önünde, sanki Zürih’te konferans veren bir profesör edasıyla, “1915’te cinayetler işlendi ama ben buna hukuken soykırım demiyorum”, diye savunma yapmak ikiyüzlülüktür. Yargılamanın, 1915’i soykırım olarak adlandırıp adlandırmamakla ilgili olduğunu ileri sürmek, insanları kandırmaya yönelik kötü bir demagojidir. AİHM’de görülmekte olan davada sözkonusu olan: A)        1915 soykırım mıdır, değil midir, tartışması değildir ve zaten Perinçek isviçre’de “1915 soykırım değildir”, dediği için ceza almamıştır;  B)AİHM, “1915 soykırım değildir”, diye bir karar da almış değildir. AİHM gerekçeli kararında, davanın 1915’in nasıl adlandırılacağı ile alakalı olmadığını (bakınız gerekçeli karar 111. paragraf) ve bu konuda karar vermenin kendi işi olmadığını özel olarak belirtmiştir. Zaten başta Perinçek’in avukatı olmak üzere davaya taraf olan tüm kesimler, Mahkeme’den 1915 hakkında bir karar almasını beklemediklerini, bunun Mahkeme’ye bir saygısızlık olacağını belirtmişlerdir. Peki, “1915 soykırım mı değil mi” tartışması mahkemenin konusu değilse, ve Perinçek de bundan dolayı ceza almamışsa, AİHM’de görülen Perinçek davasının konusu nedir?

Dava iki merkezî soru etrafındadır:  A) Perinçek, isviçre konuşmasında Ermenilere yönelik kin ve nefret suçu işlemiş midir?  B) Perinçek’in söyledikleri kin ve nefret suçu kapsamında telakki edilse bile, İsviçre’de Perinçek gibi birisine ceza vermeyi gerektirecek zorlayıcı sosyal neden var mıdır? Türkiye’de davaya ilişkin son derece yanlış bir algı yaratılmıştır. Bu algıya göre, İsviçre’de “soykırımı inkâr etmek” suçtur. Ve bir kişi, “ben şu veya bu olayın soykırım olduğuna inanmıyorum”, derse ceza alır. Bu nedenle Perinçek’i sevmeyenler bile, onun “1915 soykırım değildir” dediği için cezalandırıldığını zannediyorlar ve fikir özgürlüğüne inandıkları için Perinçek’in böyle bir söz sarf etme hakkı olduğunu savunuyorlar. Bu yanlış algının iki temel nedeni var; birincisi Avrupa’daki ilgili yasaların bilinmiyor olması; ikincisi Perinçek ve Türk Hükümeti’nin, mesele buymuş gibi propaganda yapmalarıdır. Dava doğrudan Avrupa’daki Irkçılık ve Nefret suçları yasaları ile ilgilidir. Perinçek, “1915 soykırım değildir”, dediği için değil, bunu ırkçı ve nefret suçu yaymak amacıyla söylediği için ceza aldı. Bu yasalara yakından bakmakta fayda var.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Akçam, armenian genocide, Perincek, Turkey

STRAZBURG DAVASI SOYKIRIMA UĞRAYAN 1,5 MİLYON İNSANIN DAVASIDIR/

January 30, 2015 By administrator

STRASBOURG CASE OF GENOCIDE CASES SUFFERED 1.5 MİLLİON PEOPLE ARE

ZEYNEP-TOZDUMANBy Zeynep Tozduman, expose Doğu Perinçek,    “see english version at the end”

AHİM davası için Strazburg’a giden kutsal ittifakın “1915 soykırımını unutturma ’’ politikaları yeni değildir. Yüzyıldır varlığını, başka halkların imhası üzerine inşa edenler, bu gün AHİM’de imha ve inkâr endüstrisi olarak yine iş başındaydı.  Soykırım bitmedi, sürüyor.

Doğu Perinçek, Yargıtay Başsavcı Yardımcılığı görevinde bulunan ve dört dönem Adalet Partisi’nden Erzincan milletvekili seçilen, Erzincan Kemaliyeli Sadık Perinçek ve Malatya Darendeli Lebibe Perinçek’in oğludur. Babası yedeksubaylık görevini yaptığı sırada Gaziantep’te doğmuştur. Perinçek’de babası gibi hukukçudur. Bu bilgileri şu yüzden veriyorum. Anne, baba ve oğul Perinçek’in doğum yerleri bir zamanlar Ermenilerin yaşadığı topraklardı.

Perinçek, 1915 mirasıyla büyüyen o günün soykırımcıların torunlarından sadece biridir. Perinçek, Ergenekon örgütü soruşturması kapsamında 21 Mart 2008’de gözaltına alınarak tutuklandı. 06. Mart 2014 tarihinde Özel Yetkili Mahkemelerin TBMM kararı ile kaldırılmasının ardından 10 Mart 2014 akşamında tahliye edilmiştir. Ergenekon davasından, Soykırımı inkâr etmek için serbest bırakıldığı anlaşılan Perinçek ilk iş olarak  ‘soykırım iddialarına devlet destekli karşı tezlerle/dokümanterlerle bu davayı iyice ezber yapıp hazırlanması ise kutsal ittifakın ( CHP- Ergenekon- İP- AKP-Talat paşa Komitesi) bir sonucudur.

dogu perincekPerinçek ile ilgili bu kısa bilgiden sonra gelelim Strazburg’daki AHİM davasına. 28 Ocak 2015’de Strazburg’da Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) Büyük Daire’de görülen”Perinçek- İsviçre Davası”nda İşçi Partisi Genel Başkanı Doğu Perinçek, İsviçre, Türkiye ve Ermenistan tarafları müdahil olarak hazır bulundular. Strazburg’daki davaya Türkiye’den ittihat -Terakki’nin( İTC) bu günkü temsilci olan Kemalistler; ”Talat paşa komitesi ”, CHP eski genel Başkanı Baykal, İşçi Partisi Genel Başkanı Doğu Perinçek ve AKP hükümetini temsilen Egemen Bağış( kutsal ittifak) soykırımı inkâr etmek için mahkemede hazır ve de nazırdılar.

Bu davanın nedenine gelince;  

”2005 yılında Doğu Perinçek’in Ermeni Soykırımı’nı tanımış ve “soykırımın inkârını suç sayan” yasayı kabul etmiş bir ülke olan İsviçre’ye giderek, Bern ve Lozan’da Ermeni “soykırımının bir yalan olduğuna dair” açıklama yapması sonucu 2007 yılında Lozan mahkemesinin “Perinçek’i ülke yasalarını bilerek ihlal etmekten suçlu bulmuş” ve mahkûm edilmesi için dava açılmıştır. Perinçek’in itirazı üzerine Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi, 2008 yılında Perinçek lehine karar vermiş, Lozan Mahkemesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinin düşünce özgürlüğünü düzenleyen 10. maddesini ihlal ettiğine hükmetmiştir”.

AHİM’de, İsviçre hükümeti adına söz alan Frank Schürmann, AİHM 2. Dairenin Doğu Perinçek lehine verdiği kararın ikna edici olmadığını “İsviçre, ceza kanununu BM ırkçılıkla mücadele konvansiyonuna uygun şekilde belirledi ve yerel mahkemenin Perinçek kararı yerinde” söylemiştir. Nefret söylemi ve düşmanlık yaratan ırkçı söylemin en çok insanlığa karşı suçlar üzerinden üretildiğini belirten Schürmann, “Ermeni Soykırımıyla ilgili mahkeme kararı

Olmaması bu açıdan önemli değil. 1915’i soykırım olarak tanıyan pek çok ülke de var” ifadelerini kullanmıştır.

Bence bu dava iki açıdan çok önemli bir davadır. Birincisi, Nefret söylemleri ve ırkçılığın AHİM kararına göre yeniden masaya yatırılması, ikincisi; İnsanlığa karşı işlenen suçların (Soykırım ) cezai müeyyidesi olup- olmaması açısından çok önemlidir.

AHİM ne yönde karar verir bilmiyoruz. Bilinen o ki İnsanlık suçu işleyenlerin kamu vicdanlarında ve hukuksal olarak er ya da geç mutlaka yargılanacak olmasıdır. Bizler yargılamazsak bile tarih yargılayacaktır. Bu dava bir sınavdır. 1915’de soykırıma uğrayanların 2015’de Avrupa’nın gözü önünde yeniden öldürülüp- öldürülmemesiyle ilgili bir insanlık sınavıdır.

AHİM’de Perinçek’in avukatı Mehmet Cengiz’in Perinçek ile ilgili ”Perinçek hayatını ırkçılık karşıtı mücadeleye adamış ve 1915 olaylarının soykırım olduğuna dair mahkeme kararı yok demesi” sözlerine ise kargalar bile güler… Eğer Perinçek Irkçılık karşıtı mücadele veriyorsa, İŞİD’ DE kendini komünizme adamış demek kadar inandırıcıdır bu söylem. Mahkemenin gerekçeli kararı iki-üç ay içinde açıklaması bekleniyor.

Türk ulusu varlığını; Ermenilerin, Süryanilerin, Rumların, Yahudilerin, Ezidilerin yokluğu üzerine inşa etmiştir.

TC. İçin Ermeni soykırımını kabul etmek demek Türk ulus kavramının dumura uğramasıdır.

Soykırımın bir diğer şekli olan koordineli asimilasyon politikaları ile Milli kahramanlar, sermayenin el değiştirmesi ile yeni zenginler, zorla İslamlaştırma(Hristiyan yetim çocukların Türk ve Müslüman olarak yetiştirilmesi, soykırımda sağ kalan genç kızlar ile zoraki evlilikler, Bir ulusun kutsal değerleri olan Kilise, sanat, tarih ve kültürünün harap edilmesi, yıkılması, el konulması), Ana dilde eğitimin yasaklanıp, Türkçe eğitim zorunlulukları v.b. nedenlerden ötürü bu ülkede % 99 Türk- İslam nüfus işte böyle oluşturulmuştur.

Perinçek ifade özgürlüğünde samimi ise Türkiye’de en çok düşünce suçlarından gazeteciler cezaevlerinde olanları niçin savunmuyor? Bu gün cezaevleri özellikle Kürt ve Türk yazar, aydın, gazetecilerle doludur. Pozantı Ceza evindeki Kürt çocuklarına tecavüz etmenin serbest, bu skandalları ortaya çıkaran gazetecilerin haber yapması yasaktır. Hrant’a, Sevag Balık’çıya, Roboski’ye katliam yapmak serbest, katillerin adil yargılanmasının yasak olduğu bir ülkede yaşıyoruz ne yazık ki. 

Perinçek ve beraberindeki kutsal ittifak Faşist sistemin, siyasi tarihi boyunca hep yılmaz savunucusu olmuştur. Ne yaparsa yapsınlar 1,5 milyon ve üzerindeki insanın yok edilmesi gerçeğinin üstünü asla örtemeyeceklerdir. Ne garip bir ülkede yaşıyoruz Ermeniler soykırım yaşadığını, Kürtler var olduklarını, Süryani ve Ezidiler’de 1915’de soykırım yaşadıklarının görünür olması için çırpınıyorlar.

27 Ocak Uluslararası Holokost Kurbanlarını Anma gününden bir gün sonra AHİM’ de görülen bu dava öncesi Alman Hükümeti tıpkı 1915’de ki Almanların rolünü devr alarak yaptığı konuşma ise ”1915 Olayları soykırıma girmez, Kanun geriye dönük işlemez, kararı tarihçiler vermelidir, sorunun muhatapları Türkiye ve Ermenistan. ‘İnkâr yasası’ çıkarsak uygulayamayız ”. Sözleri ise yüreklerimize bomba gibi düşmüştür. 1,5 milyonun üzerinde insanın ölüme yolculuk ettirildiği 1915 soykırımında o dönemde Jön Türklere en büyük desteği veren Almanya, bu günde soykırımın inkârında Türk hükümetine destek vermeye devam ediyor. Yahudi Holocoustu ile yüzleşmiş bir Almanya, her ne hikmetse Türkiye’nin yüzyıllık acısıyla yüzleşmesinden yana değil. Almanya’yı anlamak hiçte güç değil aslında. Yine emperyal çıkarlar ve bu davada kendi suçları da resmen ortaya çıkacağı için Almanya, hükümetten yana dümeni sürmeye devam ediyor.

1940-1945 yılları arasında Almanya’da 1,1 milyon insanın katledildiği ve kurbanların büyük kısmının Yahudi olduğu Auschwitz Toplama Kampı’nın kurtarılmasının 70’inci yıldönümü daha dün tüm dünyada Ermenistan ve İstanbul’da anıldı.

Bizim topraklarımızda ise 100 yıl oldu hala 1915 için bir adım atılmadı. Geçen yıl Başbakan Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’ın 24 Nisan ile ilgili ” Ermeni halkına Taziyede bulunması ” ile olumlu bir hava estirilmesine rağmen bu güne değin henüz bir adım atılmadı. Adımlar atılmadığı gibi AHİM’deki Perinçek şahsındaki davada Hükümet hala inkâra devam ediyor. Irkçılığa, ayrımcılığa, tahammülsüzlüğe ve antisemitizme karşı adım atılması ve gelecekte benzer suçların işlenmesinin önüne geçilmesi için AHİM’in gerekçeli kararı, umarım İsviçre hükümeti ve soykırım yaşayan halklar lehine olur.

AHİM’deki Perinçek davası ile ilgili Zoryan Enstitüsü Danışman ve Yazar Raffi Bedrosyan’nın Taraf gazetesinde ( http://www.taraf.com.tr/her-taraf/hrant-dink-1954-1915/) çıkan makalesinde ”Ümidimiz Türkiye devletinin de bu gerçekler ve adalet arayışı yolculuğunda artık bize karşı engel olmak yerine yanımızda olup bizi desteklemesi” sözleri ise hala bu ülkede umut insanda diyen bir çığlıktır. Raffi Bedrosyan’nın destek arayışında TC. Hükümeti ne der bilemem ama bu yolculukta yalnız olmadığının bilinmemesi insani bir görevdir. Vicdanla donanmış herkes Zoryan Enstitüsü şahsında Kadim Ermeni halkının yanında olacaktır.

Biz ezilenler, ötekileştirilenler, İnsan hak savunucuları, barışseverler, emekten ve devrimden yana olanlar, soykırım yaşayan halklarla yüzyıllık utancımızla; sizlere gecikmiş vicdan borcumuzu ödemek için yürüyoruz. Faşizme inat yüreklerimizi bir kez yatırmışız yüreklerinize başka kurtuluş yok ya hep beraber kurtulacağız ya hep birlikte yok olacağız.

25 Ocak’ta Yunanistan’da Radikal Sol SYRİZA’nin seçim zaferi, 26 Ocak’da Irak/ Kobane’de yaşanan devrim rüzgârları mutlaka ülkemizdeki ezilen ve soykırım yaşayan halkları da kucaklayacaktır. İnancım o dur ki bu rüzgâr,

Karanlık ve kirli geçmişimizle ya yüzleşeceğiz ya da yüzsüzleşeceğiz.

1915’i unutursak kalbimiz kurusun.

ZEYNEP TOZDUMAN

STRASBOURG CASE OF GENOCIDE CASES SUFFERED 1.5 MİLLİON PEOPLE ARE

ECHR case holy alliance went to Strasbourg for the “1915 genocide forget the ‘politics is not new. Century is the presence of other people who built on the destruction of these days, destroyed AHİM’e and denial industry as were still at work. I end the genocide in progress.

Perinçek, Assistant Attorney General in the Court of Cassation and Justice Party Erzincan four-term elected member of parliament, and Malatya, Erzincan Kemaliye Loyal Perinchek Darendeli Lebibe is Perinçek son. His father, in which he was born in Gaziantep yedeksubaylık task. Perinçek’ is a lawyer like his father. That’s why I’m giving this information. Mother, father and son’s birth place Perinchek land that was once inhabited by Armenians.

Perinçek, is just one of the descendants of the genocide committers growing that day with the legacy 1915. Perinçek, was arrested and detained on 21 March 2008 within the scope of Ergenekon investigation. 06. March 2014 by the Parliament following the abolition of the date of the decision of the Special Court was released on March 10, 2014 in the evening. The Ergenekon case, apparently released to deny the Holocaust Perinchek first job ‘genocide allegations to state the arguments against assisted / document on with the preparation of whether the case is thoroughly memorized the holy alliance (CHP- Ergenekon- IP AKP-Talat Pasha Committee) is the result.

After this brief information about Perinchek let’s case to the ECHR in Strasbourg. On 28 January 2015, Strasbourg European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Big seen in the apartment “Perinçek- Swiss Case” in the Labor Party Chairman Dogu Perinçek, Switzerland, Turkey and were present as involved Armenia parties. A case in Strasbourg Turkey at the confederation -Terakki (ITC) Kemalists these days that representatives of ‘Talaat pasha committee’ ‘, former CHP Chairman Baykal, Labor Party Chairman Dogu Perinçek and Egemen Bagis, representing the AKP government (holy alliance) to deny the genocide present in court and also ErdUlAr overlooked.

As to the cause of this case;

” In 2005, recognized the Perinçek of the Armenian Genocide and “criminalizing genocide denial” went to Switzerland, a country that has adopted legislation, Bern, Lausanne Armenian “that is a lie of genocide” as a result of making a statement in Lausanne in 2007 court “Perinçek has been found guilty of violating the country’s laws knowingly” and the lawsuit has been filed for the prisoners. European Court of Human Rights on Perinçek’s objection, in 2008, decided in favor of Perincek, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the Lausanne violated Article 10 of the Convention regulating the freedom of thought ‘.

In AHİM’e, the Swiss government on behalf spoke Frank Schürmann, the Court 2 is not convincing the decision of the Department of East Perinçek in favor of the “Switzerland has set the criminal law of the UN anti-racism in accordance with the conventions and local court Perinchek decision over” He said. Hate speech and racist discourse that creates hostility that produced over crimes against humanity most Schürmann, “the court decision regarding the Armenian Genocide

Absence does not matter in this regard. There are also many countries to recognize the genocide of 1915 “has said.

I think this case is a very important case in two ways. First, to be deposited on the table again according to the hate speech and racism of the ECHR decision, the second; Crimes against humanity (genocide) is very important in terms of criminal sanctions there are any.

AHI I do not know what will decide the direction. It is known in the functioning of the public conscience and crimes against humanity is that sooner or later must be prosecuted legally. We do not even judge’s history will judge. This is a test case. Who suffered genocide in 1915 2015 is a re-examination on humanity by not öldürülüp- killed in front of the eyes of Europe.

AHİM’e Perinçek’s lawyer Mehmet Cengiz related Perinchek ‘Perinchek life dedicated to the struggle against racism and no court ruled that the genocide of 1915 in the’ ‘he laughs, even the crows … If fighting against Perinchek racism, Isidor’ DE is committed to communism means convincing as I say this. Reasoned decision of the Court is expected to announce within two-three months.

The existence of the Turkish nation; Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, Jews, has been built in the absence of EZiD.

TC. Turkey recognizes the Armenian genocide is not to say that the concept of atrophy of the nation.

National heroes with coordinated policy of assimilation, which is another form of genocide, the new rich with the changing hands of capital, forced islamization (to be raised as a Christian orphan children of Turkish and Muslim, forced marriage with the surviving girls in genocide, a nation’s sacred values of the church, art, history and the destruction of culture, demolition, seizure), the education in the mother tongue banned, Turkish educational requirements, etc. 99% in this country for reasons such work has been created Turkish-Islamic population.

The freedom of expression is the most sincere Perinchek thought crime of journalists in Turkey prisons do not defend why? These days prisons, particularly Kurdish and Turkish writers, intellectuals, is packed with journalists. Pozantı free raping Kurdish children in prisons is prohibited from issuing news reporters out of this scandal. Hrant, Sevag Balık’çı to, Roboski massacre free to do, we live in a country where it is prohibited to a fair trial of the murderer, unfortunately.

Perincek and his Fascist holy alliance system, has always been an outspoken defender during political history. What should they do if the 1.5 million people and the destruction on top of never not be able to cover the truth. What we are living in a strange country Armenian genocide have experienced, they are Kurds, Assyrians and their experiences are scrambling to be visible in the 1915 genocide Ezidiler.

A day after the January 27 International Holocaust Victims Remembrance day ECHR, as is shown in this case before the German government like in 1915 the Germans of the role of the speech made by giant ‘1915 Incidents do not enter the genocide, the law does not operate retrospectively, should decide to historians, addressed the issue of Turkey and Armenia. ‘Denial law’ can not apply if we go ‘. The words fell like a bomb in our hearts. Which brought death journey of over 1.5 million people in the 1915 genocide in that period that the greatest support for the Young Turks in Germany, the denial of the genocide continues to this day to support the Turkish government. Jews had to confront an Holocous Germany, although not in favor of Turkey’s century of bitter confrontation with wisdom. Germany is actually not difficult at all to understand. Yet imperial interests, and in this case Germany for their crimes will occur formally, since the government continues to take the helm.

Between the years 1940-1945 which killed 1.1 million people in Germany and the 70th of the liberation of Auschwitz Concentration Camp, where most of the victims were Jews all over the world yesterday anniversary was commemorated in Armenia and Istanbul.

If our land was still taken a step 100 years to 1915. Last year, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan about April 24, “Armenian people present in Sympathy ‘Although air blown by the positive action has been taken yet another step until this day. Steps to be taken in the case, as the person in AHİM’e Perinchek government denial persists. Racism, discrimination, intolerance and anti-Semitism against stepping and AHİM’e reasoned decision in order to prevent the processing of similar crimes in the future, I hope that the Swiss government would be in favor of the people who live and genocide.

The Zoryan Institute in cases related Perinchek AHİM’e Consultant and Author of Raffi Bedrosyan’n Party newspaper (http://www.taraf.com.tr/her-taraf/hrant-dink-1954-1915/) in the article ” We hope Turkey in this state the facts and justice-seeking journey is no longer with us, instead of us support to prevent against us, ” the words of a screaming man hope he is still in this country. Raffi Bedrosyan’n seeking the support of TC. I do not know what to say but to know that the government is not alone in this journey humanitarian mission. Conscience equipped everyone will be next to the Zoryan Institute in the person of ancient Armenian people.

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: armenian genocide, Perincek

#armenian-genocide Review of the denial Perinçek by the Grand Chamber (updated 2:20 p.m.)

January 28, 2015 By administrator

tarihi-durusma-perincek-aihm-de-5242039At the request of Switzerland, Strasbourg judges are reviewing the case between Bern Dogu Perinçek. The Turkish nationalist had called the Armenian Genocide “international lie”.

It was in Strasbourg that the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) must reconsider Wednesday at the request of the case between Bern Switzerland Dogu Perinçek.

Chairman of the extreme Left Party, he denied the existence of the Armenian genocide at conferences in Switzerland in 2005.

The decision of the Court ultimately fall to an unspecified date.

Amal Clooney and George Robertson

Judged by the Vaud justice in 2007 for racial discrimination after describing the Armenian Genocide “international lie”, he was sentenced for violating the anti-racism norm.

In 2013, the ECHR considered that Switzerland had violated the freedom of expression, arguing that a democratic society should be able to discuss sensitive issues, even if it displeases.

9H – Mehmet Cengiz, Turkish, speaking, representing Perincek. #DenialvsJustice

“Perincek did not deny the tragic events of 1915. He said they are not a #Genocide”

203393Dr. Perincek is not racist. He spent years in prison for his ideas, his speeches for peace “!!!

Mehmet Cengiz “Perincek is against racism, xenophobia and intolerance! It can not be accused of racism “…

“Mr Perinçek made the same speech [denying the Armenian Genocide] in France and Germany and was not prosecuted,” said his lawyer

“You will not find a racist motive in Mr Perinçek. It is a scientific socialist (sic.), Who fought against racism tjrs.

#Perincek: Welcomes the decision. He is here to defend European values, freedom!

Perinçek “Scientifiquemt the events of 1915 were not genocide. We brought 90 kg of documents to the Swiss courts. “

#Perincek #DenialvsJustice ‘It was a mutual killing; I sympathize with the Armenians, Armenians and I recognize their contribution to culture “

Turks and Muslims in Europe are oppressed. Armenians are oppressed, as well!

“The events of 1915 are used to despise the Turks,” said the Turkish politician Dogu Perinçek

the Turkish side

Prof. Christian Laurent Pech, spoke to #Perincek. The Court is not here to qualify #Genocide events.

PECH: “Our client (#Perincek) has never denied the murders and massacres”

“Never denied the events of 1915” #DenialvsJustice

CHEP “states can punish countries for their past”

“Community law does not have to suppress freedom of expression” Perincek made a historic speech “

“The speech (on the Armenian genocide of Perinçek) was historical, legal and political” and not hate speech

“The search for truth integral to freedom of expression,” said Perinçek lawyer. This is a major issue in the case

Mr. Frank Schürmann for the Swiss government.

“Crimes against humanity are the most vicious form of racial annihilation”

“International lie” can not be restricted in legal terms only. #DenialvsJustice

“This law fights crimes against humanity and genocide”

“The #Perincek applicant has not provided any scientific or legal contribution. He mentioned that he will never change his mind “#DenialvsJustice

Frank Schurmann: #Perincek accused the Armenians of falsification of history, the Armenians killed the Turks “#DenialvsJustice

“International lie” is a group in Turkey, rather than scientifically “#Perincek #DenialvsJustice

Schurman reveals the intervention of Turkish groups of human rights before the Court. #Perincek Is associated with Talaat Pasha Committee.

#Perincek Applicant’s motives are racist and nationalist 

Faced with Perinçek Switzerland explains that condemn the denial of the Armenian genocide is in the fight against hate speech.

Perinçek “jms repeated that he would change his mind [Armenian Genocide] although independent commission established by” recalls Switzerland

Professor Daniel Thürer for Switzerland speaks.

Turkish politicians, former ministers Egemen Bagis, Deniz Baykal, in the courtroom.

Prof. Stefan Talmon representing Turkey, speaks

Talmon: not to interfere and limit freedom of expression

Talmon “#Perincek did not deny the Armenian massacres. He challenged Swiss law

Perinçek “does not question the existence of massacres and déportat ° s Armenian Genocide in 1915 but their qualification”

#Perincek Made no racist discrimination against Armenians.

Talmon: #Perincek loves and recognizes the Armenians! #DenialvsJustice

Talmon: what #Perincek done with Talaat Pasha is irrelevant in this Court!

Talmon: Nier #ArmenianGenocide is different from denying #Holocaust

he Prosecutor General of the Republic of Armenia Gevorg Kostanyan takes #DenialvsJustice word

“How can a Human Rights Court can consider massacres and death marches as” not controversial definition “?”

“The Armenian nation has ever asked the #CEDH to judge his suffering but condemn those who deny”

Geoffrey Robertson speaks for Armenia

Robertson JA: We must live freely without discrimination and hatred.

Robertson: Talaat Pasha, the Turkish Hitler

Perincek is a professional denial

Perinçek “went to Switzerland only to be condemned. This is the holocaust denial tourism “

#Perincek Is not a politician

Only Turkey has decided that the # ArmenianGenocide is not genocide

11h: End of interventions.

Amal Alamuddin Clooney calls for Armenia

Armenia does not claim to be against freedom of expression, nor Turkey is fighting for freedom of expression

Clooney: Turkey violates freedom of expression, human rights are dismal!

Amal Clooney recalls that Turkey condemned 224 times by the ECHR for violations of freedom of expression. End of argument.

The Amal Clooney argument centered on “the evidence of the Armenian Genocide,” evokes images of beheadings.

End of interventions. Judges are their questions to countries Armenia, Switzerland and Turkey.

Amal Clooney says the Turkish mentality about the murder of Hrant Dink.

Perinçek defended Talaat Pasha, but do not deny the massacre of the Armenians, but this is not genocide .. He repeated that genocide is “an international lie.”

Perinçek to ECHR: “Talaat Pasha is a hero of freedom”.

The President of the Court interrupted twice Perinçek.

Hearing closed at 11:50. The verdict will be announced at a later date, between 6 and 8 months.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015,
Jean Eckian © armenews.com

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: #armenianGenocide, Perincek, Switzerland, Turkey

The Turkish Association of Human Rights seeking admission at trial Perinçek

January 26, 2015 By administrator

turkish-human-rightASSOCIATION (Turkish) OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE TRUTH AND JUSTICE CENTER MEMORY CALL ADMISSION AS INTERVENER IN THE TRIAL Perincek

January 28, 2015, will start the review of Perincek v / Switzerland by the Grand Chamber, whose powers the European Court of Human Rights are those of a Court of Appeal.

It is well known now that in 2005, Dogu Perinçek had traveled to Switzerland, a country that has officially recognized the Armenian Genocide and passed a law criminalizing the denial, and made in Bern and Lausanne statements denying Genocide Armenian, manufacturing according to him. In 2007, Perinçek had been found guilty of deliberately violating national law and was sentenced by the court in Lausanne. His appeal to the Federal Court was dismissed, he brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights, which ruled in his favor in 2008 [2013] and decided that the court in Lausanne had violated the right to expression, a right guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights in Article 10.

The Association of Human Rights sent a letter to the Swiss Federal Office of Justice in 2014, explaining that the denial of the Armenian Genocide incites hostility towards Armenians and asking her to do call Switzerland the decision of the ECHR. Subsequently, the appeal of Switzerland and its request was accepted in June 2014.

The first hearing of that review will take place on 28 January 2015.

The Turkish Association of Human Rights joined the Truth Justice Memory Center and the International Institute for the Study of Genocide and The Toronto Human Rights to appeal to the ECHR in July and Party present a Notice of Joint Kit, that is to say, to be admitted as an intervener. The ECHR has given the request of the three human rights organizations favorably.

We explained this issue in Turkey, the denial of the Armenian Genocide incites racial hatred and encourages anti-Armenian groups. Neither the decision of the ECHR nor the case we presented under joint part relate the historical reality of the massacres of 1915-1917 or precise definition. The bottom of the approach is the fact that the statements are Perinçek footprints racism and discrimination. In this sense, the review by the Grand Chamber is of particular importance as a precedent addressing the denial, minimization and justification in a separate context of the Holocaust.

The decision of the ECHR is held to the effects of denial and discrimination solely on the Swiss Armenians and overlooked the fact that Perincek’s leader Talat Pasha Committee and that the denial of genocide as an international lie, even proclaimed in Lausanne, is a direct charge against the Armenians of Turkeys. We have therefore supported in our file the statements of Perincek do not end in a qualifying event, they constitute the crime of discrimination, and have said that the decision should take into account the position of Perincek political player leading in Turkey, head of the Workers’ Party and leader of Talat Pasha Committee – and the goals and actions of the Committee.

That’s right, the act was considered criminal under Swiss law was committed on Swiss soil, but the Talat Pasha Committee and its leaders, which include Perincek, are in Turkey the authors of acts aimed at the Turkish society. The recipients of their message – those who listen to the Armenians should expect to requests for clarification and trouble, even if they are on the other side of the earth – it was the Turkish society. The hostility against Armenians and in respect of other non-Muslim peoples was fueled in this Turkish company which is intended this message for generations. Reflections and anti-Armenian sentiments were exacerbated throughout the history of the republic, the Permanent dogma, dissemination in the mass media and indoctrination in education, the notion that the eradication of population and the empire’s Armenian civilization is a lie.

Holocaust denial is not only in statements like “there was no genocide.” Denial requires justification irreversible and unforgivable eradication of a people: the notion that “it is the Armenians who are responsible for the events”, ie the Armenians deserved their eradication, they have “stabbed the Turks in the back, “and collaborated with the enemy, has always been and still is constantly repeated in the classes, lectures at universities in the series and TV shows, and books.

Hostility towards Armenians is not only limited to speech; it takes lives. In such a context of discrimination and ethnic hatred, Armenians were attacked and Hrant Dink, the founder and director of Agos, was the victim of a murder whose perpetrators must always be presented to a court. Armenian military Sevag Sahin Balikci was killed in 2011 by another soldier in Batman, where he was doing his military service, on the day of April 24, World Remembrance Day marks the beginning of the Armenian Genocide. The conditions in which took place the killer trial provoked public skepticism, while the press reported that commanders had put pressure on the military that they may witness the incident was “an accident.” In addition, the “event for Khojaly” of 27 February 2012, which was held in Taksim Square, chaired by the Minister of the Interior, banners that read “You are all Armenians, you are all bastards “were deployed. In the space of two months between 2012 and 2013, in the district of Samatya Istanbul, home to many Armenians, many elderly Armenian women were attaquées- Maritsa Kucuk is one of them, his bones were broken in several places his entire body larded stabbing. And 23 February 2014, banners saying “Long live Ogun Samasts, that Hrant Dink be damned” were brandished, without opposition, in front of Agos newspaper.

In total, the denial of genocide is the essential basis, the most fundamental basis of the threat to the existence of Armenians in Turkey, a threat that the state admits.

As associations of human rights that were direct witnesses and reconciled acts and declarations of incitement to ethnic hatred, we, the Association of Human Rights and the Truth Justice Memory Center, consider it our duty, our purpose and our field of action to present our findings to the European Court of Human Rights in order to contribute to a good and right decision.

Finally, we stress once again: the negation causes hatred and hatred kills. We defend the inalienable right to live in safety, without fear of tomorrow, and hope that the European Court of Human Rights will in the name of fundamental human rights, impede the speech that incites acts contrary to this inalienable right.

January 23, 2015,

INSAN Haklari DERNEGI

Hakikat ADALET Hafıza MERKEZI

Translation for Gilbert Béguian Armenews

Monday, January 26, 2015,
Jean Eckian © armenews.com

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: Human Right, Perincek, Trial, Turkish

Who will go from Armenia to ECHR to attend Perincek vs. Switzerland case?

January 24, 2015 By administrator

ECHR courtYEREVAN. – The delegation from Armenia will leave on January 26 to participate in the hearing of the “Dogu Perincek vs. Switzerland” case, which will be held on January 28 at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Grand Chamber.

The sources of Armenian News-NEWS.am have informed the aforesaid.

From Armenia, Prosecutor General Gevorg Kostanyan, Deputy Prosecutor General Emil Babayan, and Deputy Minister of Justice Arman Tatoyan, will go to the ECHR to attend the hearing.

In addition, internationally renowned attorneys Geoffrey Robertson, Amal Ramzi Clooney—the wife of famous actor George Clooney—, and Toby Collis will defend Armenia’s interest at the European court.

All six attorneys, who will be representing Armenia, are expected to address the ECHR.

In 2008, a Swiss court had convicted Dogu Perincek for denying the Armenian Genocide. In December 2013, the ECHR had ruled in favor of Perincek’s lawsuit that was filed against Switzerland. Subsequently, the Government of Switzerland had decided to petition that the Dogu Perincek case be referred for a review by the ECHR Grand Chamber. Afterward, Armenia had petitioned to the ECHR, and it now acts as a third party in this case.

Dogu Perincek is Chairman of the socialist Workers’ Party of Turkey. In addition, he heads the Talat Pasha organization, which actively fights against the Armenian Genocide’s recognition in Europe.

Filed Under: Genocide, News Tagged With: Armenia, Court, ECHR, Genocide, Perincek, Switzerland, Turkey

The ban was lifted out abroad, Perinchek attending the appeal hearing

January 20, 2015 By administrator

 Dogu-perincekIstanbul Heavy Penal Court No. 4, abroad to the lifting of the ban after Perinçek, the European Court of Human Rights on the 1915 Genocide (ECHR) can be seen to be participating in the appeal hearing of the case on January 28.

Labor Party Chairman Dogu Perinçek be seen in the ECHR Grand Chamber “Perinchek-Swiss Case” appeal hearing will be held on 28 January.

Ergenekon in the prison area, and the Supreme Court’s decision on Perincek who was released after the breach given because of the long detention, judicial control by implementing an exit ban was placed abroad.

To lift the ban on overseas output Perinçek reviewing the applications made by the prompt Istanbul Heavy Penal Court No. 4, lifted the ban.

Thus, the Court may participate in the hearing of the case on appeal on January 28 Perinchek.

ECHR Grand Chamber to be seen “Perinchek-Swiss Case” appeal hearing, the center of Strasbourg, Council of Europe carrying out the work of the Parliamentary Assembly of the ruling and opposition parties members members deputies to the delegation to Turkey, Turkey will follow on behalf of Parliament.

Perinçek, Switzerland 10 years ago removed “which prohibits the denial of the Armenian genocide” after the entry into force of the law had given several conferences going on this country.

Perinçek, speech rejecting the Armenian Genocide was sentenced to prison by the courts because of Switzerland. Thereupon he carries Perinchek subject ECHR.

The Court of December 17, 2013 decision that takes due punishment of Switzerland ruled that Perincek found in human rights violations, Switzerland’s European Court of Human Rights ruled that a violation of Article 10 of the Convention on freedom of expression

Court of appeal made by the Swiss had agreed to be evaluated by the Grand Chamber.

‘Genocide Case’ Perinchek-known Swiss case of the hearing will be held January 28 Armenia and Turkey will also be involved with the government.

Filed Under: Articles, Genocide Tagged With: appeal hearing, armenian genocide, ECHR, İstanbul, Perincek

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in