Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Germany: Bavaria’s controversial cross rule goes into effect

May 31, 2018 By administrator

State Premier Markus Söder says the cross honors Bavarian culture

State Premier Markus Söder says the cross honors Bavarian culture

The southern German state of Bavaria’s decree about hanging crosses in public buildings has gone into effect. The rule, as well as the motives behind it, has left Bavarians and local authorities scratching their heads.

Starting on Friday, nearly all state authorities in Bavaria are required to have a cross hanging in their foyers — meaning that anyone turning in their taxes, reporting something to a police station, or entering an administrative court will be greeted by a cross in the southern German state.

“From then on, the obligation goes into effect — and we mean it absolutely seriously,” Martin Scholtysik, a spokesman for the Bavarian state interior ministry told DW.

The spokesman did not elaborate on whether or not there would be penalties for authorities that refuse to hang up the crosses, but he did note that the ministry is expecting some pushback.

Required: ‘clearly visible cross’

The newly amended requirements for state buildings now reads: “A clearly visible cross must be placed in the entrance area of every service building to serve as a reminder of the historical and cultural influence of Bavaria.”

Bavarian state premier Markus Söder unveiled the new regulation at the end of April — adding a dramatic touch to his announcement by hanging a cross in Bavaria’s state chancellery, surrounded by the photographers’ flashing lights.

The announcement sparked a heated debate in Germany and drew criticism from students as well from the heads of the Protestant church as well as the Catholic German Bishop’s Conference, who warned the state government about misappropriating the cross.

Söder — one of Bavaria’s few Protestant state premiers — won’t be around to see the new cross rule go into effect. He’ll be spending the day in Rome meeting with Pope Francis.

Confusion and criticism

After starting with a bang, it appears that many of Bavaria’s local authorities are hoping to let June 1 come and go as quietly as possible.

Some of the muted reaction likely stems from the lingering confusion around the new rule. The state Interior Ministry spokesman defended the lack of concrete instructions about cross size and placement for authorities, saying each local office should be free to decide for themselves.

This also technically means the crosses could be very small — as long as they’re in the foyer and are visible.

The term “service building,” or “Dienstgebäude” in German, has also been problematic. It’s a broad term that basically covers all buildings that house authorities and administrative offices that are under the control of the Bavarian state government.

Besides police stations and local tax offices, this also technically includes certain museums, theaters, schools and universities as well.

Art museums and other cultural institutions that fall under this category in Bavaria have been particularly resistant to hanging crosses in their entrance halls, saying it violates the mission of their work.

Backlash

Following confusion about exactly which public buildings were required to adhere to the new rule, the Bavarian state government scaled back the requirements.

Eva Krauss, the director of the Neue Museum for contemporary art in Nuremberg, was one of the first to say she would not be hanging a cross in her museum in comments reported by German newspaper, the Süddeutsche Zeitung.

A spokeswoman with the Neue Museum told DW that just a few days after Krauss’ comments were made public, they indirectly found out that the rule may not apply to them.

Indeed, a spokeswoman with Bavaria’s Science and Art Ministry confirmed to the Süddeutsche Zeitung on Wednesday that the new rule is now only “a suggestion,” not a requirement, for museums, theaters, universities and other institutes of higher education.

Whether this has been directly communicated to the affected museums, schools and theaters remains unclear.

Campaign strategy or honoring culture?

Some have questioned the constitutionality of the new cross requirement, since it could violate constitutional rules about religious neutrality and the separation of church and state.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Bavaria's, Controversial, cross, Germany

U.S. Republicans Release Controversial Memo On FBI With Trump’s OK

February 2, 2018 By administrator

U.S. President Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump

Republicans on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee released a controversial memorandum that accuses the FBI and the Justice Department of being biased against President Donald Trump just moments after he declassified it.

The four-page memorandum released on February 2 alleges that the FBI and the Justice Department inappropriately applied for permission to conduct surveillance of a Trump campaign aide, Carter Page, who had extensive Russian contacts. .

The document says its findings “raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality” of the actions of the FBI and Justice Department (DOJ) and “represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes.”

The White House released a statement saying the memo “raises serious concerns about the integrity of decisions made at the highest levels of the Department of Justice and the FBI.”

Shortly after the release of the memo, top Democrats in Congress warned that Trump could trigger a “constitutional crisis” if he uses the contents of the memo as a pretext to fire Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating the alleged meddling of Moscow in the 2016 presidential campaign and alleged collusion between associates of Trump and Russia.

The Democrats also said they would release their own memo next week.

The White House statement said the administration was ready to assist Congress in further releases by facilitating “oversight requests consistent with applicable standards, including the need to protect intelligence sources and methods.”

“What’s happening in our country is a disgrace,” Trump said on February 2, announcing that he had declassified the memo.

“A lot of people should be ashamed,” Trump added, in an apparent attack on senior FBI and DOJ officials.

After the memo’s release, Trump’s attorney general, Jeff Sessions, said he has “great confidence in the men and women” of the Justice Department.

White House sources said that, despite a warning from Trump-appointed FBI Director Christopher Wray, whose future is now uncertain, Trump authorized the memo’s release “in full” with no redactions.

The memorandum was written by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, led by Representative Devin Nunes, a close ally of Trump who has become a critic of the FBI and Justice Department as they have been investigating alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The memo alleges that the FBI relied on a dossier paid for by Trump’s political rivals — the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign — in applying for permission to monitor Page.

It also states that the author of the dossier, former British Intelligence agent Christopher Steele, told a Justice Department official that he was “desperate” to prevent Trump’s election.

The document also claims FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who recently resigned, told the committee that the FBI would not have sought authorization to monitor Page without information from the dossier.

‘Material Omissions’

The FBI on January 31 took the unusual step of publicly opposing the release of the memo, saying it demonstrated “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

Democrats say the memo is a selectively edited set of Republican talking points aimed at distracting attention from the committee’s own investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Shortly after the release of the memo, the Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee said in a statement that they hope to release their own memo on February 5.

“This is designed to impugn the credibility of the FBI, to undermine the investigation, to give the president additional fodder to attack the investigation. And it’s a tremendous disservice to the American people,” Representative Adam Schiff, the senior Democrat on the Committee, said on February 2.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi, and eight other key Democrats also issued a statement addressed to Trump after the release of the memo.

“We write to inform you that we would consider such an unwarranted action as an attempt to obstruct justice in the Russia investigation.

“Firing [Deputy Attorney General] Rod Rosenstein, DOJ Leadership, or [special counsel] Bob Mueller could result in a constitutional crisis of the kind not seen since the Saturday Night Massacre,” they said, referring to President Richard Nixon’s orders to fire justice officials during the Watergate scandal in the early 1970s.

Democratic Senator Mark Warner, the ranking minority member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said releasing the memo was “dangerous to our national security,” while the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s top Democrat, Senator Ben Cardin, issued a statement saying that “the president, once again, chose politics over national security.”

Earlier the same day, Trump posted on Twitter: “The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans – something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people!”

But a senior Republican lawmaker, Senator John McCain, also admonished Republicans for attacking the FBI and the Department of Justice amid the Russia probe, saying such attacks only help strengthen Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Our nation’s elected officials, including the president, must stop looking at this investigation through the warped lens of politics and manufacturing partisan sideshows. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him,” McCain said in a statement.

With reporting by AP, The Hill, and Reuters

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Controversial, Memo On FBI

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in