An Armenian foundation plans to demolish and rebuild Kamp Armen, an Armenian orphanage in the Tuzla district of Istanbul, after a controversial demolition plan was shelved, as the land owner said he would donate it to the Armenian community.
Pastor Krikor Ağabaloğlu of the Gedikpaşa Armenian Protestant Church said they plan to rebuild the buildings as soon as they receive the license, according to Hurriyet Daily News.
“The orphanage cannot be used now. But we plan to demolish it and rebuilt it the same. This time, it will not host only Armenian children but its doors will be open to children from all nations,” Ağabaloğlu told daily Hürriyet on May 27.
Fatih Ulusoy, the camp’s land owner, reportedly said on May 24 that he would donate Kamp Armen, where slain journalist Hrant Dink and thousands of Armenian orphans had grown up, to the Gedikpasha Armenian Protestant Church and School.
“The lawyers are in contact. I hope we will take the orphanage in a short time,” he had said, adding that many people had voiced their support against the demolition of Kamp Armen.
“We want to rebuild it for the peace, love and those people who supported it and we want to host both Armenian children as well as children from all nations here,” said Agabaloglu.
Efforts to demolish Kamp Armen began May 6 and received widespread attention once the news broke out on social media. Later in the day, the demolition was stopped when many people, including activists and leading figures from the Armenian community, rushed to the area to protest the demolition work.
The protesters, who had held vigil for 19 days, said on May 27 that they will resume camping in the area until the day the license for the buildings is given to the foundation.
The Turkish state expropriated the camp in 1987, following the 1980 military coup, based on a 1936 bill preventing minority foundations from acquiring property.
Although the Turkish government signed a historic decree in 2011 to return property taken away from minority foundations, the camp was left out, alongside hundreds of other properties.
Armenian Church Sues Turkey for Return of Seized Monastery
May 27, 2015 2:41 PM
This is widely seen as a groundbreaking legal case for the prospect of reclaiming the Catholicosate of Cilicia, which dates back to 1293, was taken over a century ago by Turkish authorities, during the mass killings of Armenians. Ankara has strongly denied the killings by Ottoman Turks was genocide.
Church spokesperson Teni Pirri-Simonian said the timing of the suit is deliberate.
“We are doing this 100 years after the genocide, for the youth. It is the center of our faith, it is the center of our identity. Therefore the church, by having its headquarters, is also giving life to all these symbols,” said Pirri-Simonian. “Now if it would have its ripple effect, of course it will have it. The church left more than 1,000 churches in different parishes, in different towns that our people were living in before the genocide.”
Pressuring Ankara
The case is not expected to be the last faced by Turkish authorities. Analysts say Yerevan and the wider Armenian Diaspora see the opening of the case as a means of adding pressure on Ankara to recognize the genocide claims.
Political scientist Cengiz Aktar of Istanbul’s Suleyman Sah University said the Armenian Diaspora and its supporters are investing heavily in the project.
“There is now a worldwide effort to develop more and more claims at all levels. There are two big groups, and one is based in the United States and the other in France, who come with extensive records of properties confiscated or taken by force, illegal action,” said Aktar.
Estimates of the value of the properties being sought could run into tens of billions of dollars. The Armenian Church in Istanbul, however, has remained silent about the case.
Journalist Fatih Gokhan Diler of Agos, Turkey’s bilingual Turkish Armenian newspaper, said the silence likely is a combination of rivalry and fear.
“There is [a] certain rivalry between the Church in Armenia and the Church in Istanbul. So they [are] not always on the same side on these kind of cases,” said Diler. “And they do not want to speak much about Armenian genocide, confiscated Armenian properties and all hard issue. They cannot say openly their views, because they might be some problems coming from the government.”
Turkey’s Constitutional Court
The ruling AK Party, which is in the midst of a general election, has not commented on the case. It did introduce a limited program of returning some confiscated properties taken from Turkey’s Christian minorities, but that program has ended.
Turkey’s Constitutional Court has not yet decided whether to accept this latest case filed by the Armenian Church.
The Armenian Church has said if it fails, it will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights; but in January, the Strasbourg court ruled in Turkey’s favor in the case of a local Armenian foundation seeking the return of a building in Istanbul.
Former European Court judge Riza Turmen warned it is far from certain the Armenian Church will be successful.
“These [are] very difficult cases because of the past history. When [going] to court, because of the time that has elapsed, there are many legal obstacles for these cases to become successful,” said Turmen.
With potentially hundreds of cases by individual members of the Armenians Diaspora, as well the Armenian Church, observers warn that Ankara could be facing a wave of litigation, both nationally and internationally.
The VVA (Vietnam Veterans of America) Magazine “Commemorating the Armenian Genocide”
The Rhode Island State Council and its three chapters—James Michael Ray Memorial Chapter 818, Washington County Chapter 325, and Providence Chapter 273—joined hundreds of others from Rhode Island traveling to New York City to commemorate the Armenian Genocide.
Rabbi Shmuley and Centennial Committee depict Obama as ‘liar’ in NY Times ad
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
TheCaliforiaCourier.com
The Centennial commemorations of the Armenian Genocide were marked with unprecedented, and sometimes, unexpected developments.
One such occasion was the full page ad placed in the New York Times on April 18 by well-known and controversial Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (Founder, The World Values Network) and the Armenian Genocide Centennial Committee, Eastern U.S. (AGCC), harshly criticizing Pres. Obama for not keeping his campaign promise on the Armenian Genocide.
A knowledgeable source told The California Courier that the ad had upset some White House officials. The placing of the ad coincided with the efforts of the U.S. National Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide Centennial to convince reluctant administration officials to participate in the commemorative events in Washington, D.C., May 7-9.
Nonetheless, Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power attended the Ecumenical Prayer Service at the National Cathedral on May 7, in Washington, but neither delivered remarks nor was their presence acknowledged. Surprisingly, both officials wore the “forget me not” pin, the official logo of the Armenian Genocide Centennial. Also in attendance were Pres. Serzh Sargsyan, Catholicos Karekin II, and Catholicos Aram I.
The paid ad featured a young boy holding a placard stating, “Pres. Obama why did you lie to us?” This was followed by the title of the ad in large bold letters: “1.5 million Armenian victims cry out from their grave: How long will you deny our genocide just to appease the Turkish tyrant?”
The paid announcement strongly criticized both Pres. Obama, for not keeping his campaign promises, and Ambassador Power, for remaining silent after condemning U.S. indifference to Genocide in a book she wrote before assuming her government post (“A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide”). The ad also targeted Turkish President Erdogan, calling him a “bully” and “quasi-dictator who has dismantled Turkish democracy.”
Furthermore, the ad quoted from a news report by CNN’s Chief Washington Correspondent Jake Tapper: “For the sixth year in a row President Barack Obama has broken his promise to the Armenian community, made when seeking their votes as a senator and a presidential candidate, to use the word ‘genocide’ to describe the massacre of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of the Ottoman Empire a century ago. He did this in deference to the government of Turkey.”
The ad reminded readers that Tapper was referring to Sen. Obama’s 2008 statement: “The Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence. The facts are undeniable. …As President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
The authors of the ad went on to state: “Seldom has an American President misrepresented himself so brazenly on an issue of such profound moral importance. Pres. Obama’s willful moral blindness stands in stark contrast to the courageous statement by Pope Francis last week calling for the world’s recognition of ‘the first genocide of the twentieth century.’”
In the ad, the Rabbi and AGCC posed this question to Ambassador Power: “As a leading voice against genocide, will you stand by your principles or will you become yet another who, after entering office, silences her voice and becomes part of the ‘problem from hell?’”
A second newspaper announcement reminding Pres. Obama of his promise on the Armenian Genocide appeared in the Los Angeles Times on April 24. The three-quarter page ad, placed by Ed Muradliyan, a California businessman from Orange County, asserted: “It’s time for you to be the leader you promised to be. On this 100 year anniversary Mr. President, it’s time to fulfill the promise you made.” Muradliyan’s ad featured a picture of Pres. Obama, copy of Amb. Morgenthau’s cable to the State Dept., dated July 16, 1915, and the headline of a news report from The New York Times, dated December 15, 1915. The announcement ended with: “It’s Time to Recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
If one or both of these ads caused some discomfort to White House officials, it was well worth the money!
The ads should have included Pres. Obama’s own words from his book, “The Audacity of Hope”: “Say one thing during the campaign and do another thing once in office, and you’re a typical, two-faced politician.”
Although the commemorative events in Washington were organized with utmost professionalism, there was one major shortfall. When special honors were being awarded at the May 9 Centennial Banquet to prominent individuals, organizations and representatives of countries that had recognized the Armenian Genocide, it would have been only fitting to pay tribute to John Evans, the U.S. Ambassador to Armenia (2004-2006), whose diplomatic career came to an abrupt end when the Bush Administration recalled him for publicly acknowledging the Armenian Genocide. The organizers of the Banquet assured The California Courier that “no slight was intended,” and that it was simply “an oversight.”
Fortunately, this gross error was somewhat mitigated when the “oversight” was brought to the attention of the master of ceremonies, attorney Mark Geragos, who acknowledged from the podium the presence of Amb. Evans. The 2,000 guests at the Centennial Banquet gave the righteous Ambassador an enthusiastic standing ovation and thunderous applause! Needless to say, Amb. Evans deserves far more than mere applause for having sacrificed his career in defense of the Armenian Cause!
Armenia and Canada parliamentary friendship groups adopt joint declaration
Within the framework of Armenian National Assembly (NA) President’s official visit to Canada, NA MP and head of the Armenia-Canada Parliamentary Friendship Group, Hovhannes Sahakyan, and head of the Canada-Armenia Friendship Group, Canadian MP Harold Albrecht, signed Tuesday, at the Parliament of Canada in the capital city of Ottawa, a joint declaration of the two friendship groups.
The document is aimed at strengthening relations between the Armenian NA and the Canadian parliament, and expanding their discourse and mutual assistance within international platforms.
How Greeks’ attempt to send Cilician Armenians weapons failed in 1913
An interesting episode in the history of Armenian-Greek friendship and military cooperation turned to be fatal on the threshold of the Armenian Genocide.
During that period in 1910-1915 prominent political figure Eleftherios Venizelos (1864 – 1936) was the Greek Prime Minister, who, being one of the best friends of the Armenian people, attached great importance to supporting and cooperating with them against the Turkish rule, armeniangenocide100.org reports.
According to Mshak newspaper, a Greek steamship, loaded with weapons and ammunition (some sources say 7000 rifles) departed for Cilicia in November 1913, to give them to Armenians. Learning about this, the commander of the German naval forces in the Mediterranean Sea left for Cilician coast to prevent the unloading. On the threshold of the World War I, Germany, the ally of the Ottoman Empire, could not allow armament of the Armenians.
But things did not lead to German intervention. According to Mshak, Armenians, “obeying their religious authorities’ warnings and not thinking about rebellion in general,” did not go to accept the weapons. Thus, the steamship approached the shores near Mersin and left as no one came to meet.
Before that, however, the local Turks had already learnt about the steamship’s arrival and its purpose and started to threaten Armenians: the latter were afraid that the 1909 Adana massacres could repeat. Although the German admiral could not stop the Greek steamer, he heard of Turks’ anti-Armenian activities, visited the governor of Adana and reportedly threatened to bombard the province in case Armenians were slaughtered and said “Germany will stop supporting Turkey against Russia.” It is unknown how the German command would really act in case Armenians were slaughtered then. However, in the period when the reforms in the Armenian provinces in Turkey were in the center of diplomatic dispute in European superpowers, Germany, previously passive and mainly supportingTurkey, came to support reforms. It aimed to bereave Russia, Great Britain and France to rule the reform process on the one hand, and to divert the Western Armenians’ sympathy to its side on the other. (The German-Armenian society was established in 1914 in Germany, presided over by prominent social activist and humanist Johannes Lepsius).
Already in 1915, Germany pursued a policy of indifference and permissiveness towards its military ally in the issue concerning the massacres and forced deportation of Armenians.
As Mshak reported, citing Greek sources, the ship conveying the weapons belonged to a private person and no political meaning was attached to it appearing on Mersin shores.
Although the fact of declining the Greek military support refutes one of the widely spread theses of Turkish denialism, i.e. the Armenians’ rebellion, it should be noted that the Armenians had the full moral and legal right to take up arms and fight against the Turkish dictatorship and the policy of extermination after the state anti-Armenian genocidal policy was implemented in the era of Abdul Hamid.
Events, however, took a different course and due to certain reasons the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, including those in Cilicia chose to rely on authorities on the eve of the WWI in order not anger them and solve the Armenian Question through the implementation of reforms. And the incident in Cilicia only proves, unfortunately, that Armenians were not ready to protect themselves against physical extermination and deportations ahead of the impending Genocide.
Turkey: Churches in Karaman aired
Değle ongoing excavations at the site in Karaman was removed from the church in the face three days. In the region, it is expected to open by the end of November, three more visits to the church. Report AGOS
According to the Anatolia news agency reported, 4th and 9th century in the diocese center 45 kilometers from the center of Karaman in Montenegro, has nearly 30 churches in Değle.
Karaman Museum Director Abdulbari Stars, excavations with his statement to relevant journalists, emphasized the metropolitan of its kind in the region, “Our total close to 30 churches, two episcopal our palace, there are ancient cemeteries. We have the interests of the episcopal palace with three churches under study attachments section face the day . We started excavation work in 2015. We will continue to work until 30 November. 3 churches with this study, the mausoleum, we will remove ancient period cemetery of the face the day. in the year 2016 will continue the excavations. Regional religious tourism will be brought to the Karaman tourism in terms of ” he said.
The Armenian Church mcho Arakelots the Mush region (Turkey) Turkish victim treasure hunters …
The Armenian Church of Arakelots monastery (Holy Apostles) of Mush (Western Armenia, now Turkey) continues to deteriorate, victim Turks treasure hunters. According to the Turkish newspaper Milliyet, the last monastery church mcho Arakelots located near the town of Arak in the province of Mush is half destroyed, with box gold diggers or “treasure of the Armenians” who dug in the church basement and the walls threaten to collapse. They also dug under Armenian graves.
Arakelots had significant meaning for Armenians. He said that 23 graves were desecrated and that, even inside the church a large hole had been dug. He also filed a complaint against theft of materials of the Armenian Church, including outdoor ornamental stones.
Krikor Amirzayan
Spain’s Santa Margarida recognizes Armenian Genocide
Santa Margarida, municipality in Spain, has joined the Spanish cities that have officially recognized the Armenian Genocide.
The municipality decided to support recognition of the Armenian Genocide as well as restitution demands. The municipality demands recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Spain, taking into account the resolution adopted by the European Parliament.
Book Review: ‘Operation Nemesis: The Assassination Plot That Avenged the Armenian Genocide’
By
By Eric Bogosian
Little, Brown and Company, New York (April 21, 2015), 384 pages
ISBN 978-0316292085; Hardcover, $28.00
Special for the Armenian Weekly
Over the years, the story of Operation Nemesis, the clandestine plot to assassinate the chief architects of the Armenian Genocide, had been told with a certain cloud of mystery and ambiguity hanging over it. While the topic had been discussed and written about in parts, authors were generally hesitant to present an all-encompassing understanding of the often-ignored, true story of Nemesis. Moreover, nearly a century after the project was carried out, the topic continues to remain somewhat taboo in the Armenian community.
Fast forward to 2015, the Centennial of the Armenian Genocide, which has already seen the publication of several books and volumes that deal with various aspects of the operation. From Marian Mesrobian MacCurdy’s Sacred Justice: The Voices and Legacy of the Armenian Operation Nemesis, which includes narratives, selections from memoirs, and previously unpublished letters, to the graphic novel Operation Nemesis: A Story of Genocide & Revenge by Josh Blaylock (author), Mark Powers (editor), and Hoyt Silva (illustrator), the 100th anniversary of the genocide seems to have provided the perfect opportunity for authors to shed light on the sometimes-murky details of this historical quest for justice.
Renowned actor, novelist, and playwright Eric Bogosian first heard about the assassination of Talaat Pasha about two decades ago. According to Bogosian, the story struck him as “wishful thinking,” which was far from the truth—an Armenian urban legend, of sorts. After some research and investigation, though, Bogosian quickly realized that not only had the assassination taken place, but that it was part of a much more complicated history of secrecy.
Bogosian thought Tehlirian’s story would make a good film, so he decided to dedicate a few months to writing the screenplay. The few months would snowball into more than seven years of meticulous research and study. The result: Operation Nemesis: The Assassination Plot That Avenged the Armenian Genocide, a 384-page, in-depth history of the conspiracy.
Published in April by Little, Brown and Company, Bogosian’s book aims to go “beyond simply telling the story of this cadre of Armenian assassins by setting the killings in the context of Ottoman and Armenian history.” And it holds true to this promise.
In part one of the three-part book, Bogosian brilliantly paints a thorough picture of Armenian history, with a particular focus on the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire before and during the Armenian Genocide. By drawing on a number of academic and non-academic sources, including several primary sources, such as newspaper articles, memoirs, and letters from the time, Bogosian provides his reader a concise, yet wide-ranging historical context for the operation.
While some may feel that Bogosian dedicates too much of the book to historical background, it seems to be a wise decision on the part of the author, as most readers do not have a sufficient understanding of Armenian history.
In part two of the book, Bogosian details the origins of Nemesis, the story of the assassination of Talaat Pasha, and gives insight into its immediate aftermath. Bogosian does this fiercely, sparing little detail. By employing Tehlirian as his protagonist, he vividly describes the inner-workings of the covert operation, while giving readers an intimate look into a young survivor’s post-traumatic inner world.
Bogosian’s description of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s (ARF) role as the parent organization of Operation Nemesis is refreshing and crucial, considering it is often ignored or discussed in passing in other English-language works examining the operation. Bogosian openly writes about how the ARF aimed to exploit the assassination strategically to bring international attention to the Armenian Genocide, a reality rarely written about in the past.
Finally, Bogosian brings in a completely ignored facet of the Nemesis story: international intelligence in the context of the plot. Bogosian provides much evidence, for example, that British Intelligence at the time knew exactly where Talaat Pasha was, while in hiding in Berlin.
While part two of the book is captivating to read, it is also straightforward and balanced. Bogosian is careful not to follow the traditional typecast of heroizing Tehlirian (and later, his co-conspirators). Instead, he is able to provide a sober description of the operation in an in-depth and well-explained context.
Many critics, especially those from the Armenian community, will be quick to point to Bogosian’s overuse of the term “assassin” to characterize Tehlirian and his fellow collaborators, and may accuse him of trying to downplay their significance in history. However, Bogosian’s choice to characterize them as such can be considered fair, considering the word “assassin” is defined as “a murderer of an important person in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons.” And that’s exactly what Tehlirian and the rest of the gang were.
In his conclusion, Bogosian points out that the members of Operation Nemesis saw themselves as “holy warriors” carrying out more of a spiritual, rather than strictly political, calling to exact “some fraction of justice” for the destruction of a nation.
Bogosian closes off his masterpiece with the hopes that more serious scholarship examines the “memories we are losing” and the “history we’ve lost,” including the story of Operation Nemesis. What he ignores, however, is the fact that he himself has made a substantial and lasting contribution to the history of Operation Nemesis.
Bogosian’s Operation Nemesis is the result of painstaking and thorough investigation and research. Not only does he offer a comprehensive historical account of the plot, but also successfully changes the traditional narrative on one of the most important and most ignored aspects of post-genocide Armenian history.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 202
- 203
- 204
- 205
- 206
- …
- 371
- Next Page »