Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

Armenian opposition member refuses to take up parliament seat

By

Lawyer Robert Hayrapetyan, a member of the opposition Resurgent Armenia party, has refused to take up a vacant parliament seat.

“The current situation is incompatible with my ideas of possible parliamentary activity and responsibility towards the actions stemming from the primary mandate,” he wrote on Facebook on Tuesday.

“I will stay true to my principles in my further public activities and regardless of my status, I will continue my opposition activities, fighting against the incompetent authorities,” Hayrapetyan said.

A number of parliament seats remained vacant after the Resurgent Armenia party, which was part of the largest opposition Hayastan faction in the Armenian National Assembly, announced its decision to quit the parliament last week.

Armenia Should Bring Back Skulls of Five Genocide Victims from Museum in France

By

By Harut Sassounian

The New York Times published on November 28, 2022, a shocking article by reporter Constant Méheut, titled: “A Paris Museum Has 18,000 Skulls. It’s Reluctant to Say Whose.”

The article reveals that the Musée de l’Homme (Museum of Mankind) in Paris, France, holds a “vast collection of human remains.” Stored in the basement of that museum are “18,000 skulls that include the remains of African tribal chiefs, Cambodian rebels and Indigenous people from Oceania. Many were gathered in France’s former colonies, and the collection also includes the skulls of more than 200 Native Americans, including from the Sioux and Navajo tribes. The remains, kept in cardboard boxes stored in metal racks, form one of the world’s largest human skull collections, spanning centuries and covering every corner of the earth.” Five of the skulls belong to Armenian Genocide victims. The museum has not made public the information about the identities of the 18,000 skulls, fearing restitution lawsuits.

I read the December 15, 2021 report of a French Senate Committee on its discussion of a proposed law about the fate of the remains at the museum. During that meeting, Sen. Catherine Morin-Desailly, co-author of the proposed law, stated: “amazingly, we find in our collections skulls dating from the Armenian Genocide.” Sen. Pierre Ouzoulias, another co-author of the proposed law, added: “I was overwhelmed learning that five Armenian skulls of victims of the Armenian Genocide, which were recovered in Deir-ez Zor [Syria], are still in the collections of the Museum of Mankind.”

Since New York Times reporter Méheut mentioned in his article that he had obtained confidential documents about the human remains in the museum, I wrote to him asking if these documents contained any details about the skulls of the five Armenian Genocide victims. He informed me that they were female skulls which were collected by Emmanuel Passemard, a French prehistory specialist, during his explorations in Syria in 1925-1926. The Bulletin of the French Prehistoric Society reported that Passemard gave a lecture at the Sorbonne University in Paris on February 16, 1927, during which he described his trip to the banks of the Euphrates River in Syria.

Méheut wrote in his article that “while France has led the way in Europe in investigating and returning colonial-era collections of artifacts — cultural objects, made by human hands — it has lagged behind its neighbors when it comes to remains.” The claimant of the remains has to prove an ancestral connection. However, “French legislation has made any return a cumbersome and time-consuming process.”

Méheut added: “As with other 19th-century museums, the Museum of Mankind was initially a repository for items gathered from around the world. The skulls were collected during archaeological digs and colonial campaigns, sometimes by soldiers who beheaded resistance fighters. Prized by researchers working in the now-debunked field of race science, the remains then fell into relative oblivion. In 1989, Philippe Mennecier, the curator [of the museum], put together the first electronic database of the collection. It enabled him to identify hundreds of what he called ‘potentially litigious’ skulls — remains of anticolonial fighters and Indigenous people, collected as war trophies or plundered by explorers — that could be claimed by people wishing to honor their ancestors.”

Christine Lefèvre, a top official at the Museum of Natural History, which oversees the Museum of Mankind, and Martin Friess, who is responsible for the museum’s modern anthropology collections, told Méheut the information was withheld because of privacy concerns, fear of controversy and because of uncertainties around some remains’ identities. “But several scholars and lawmakers said the museum’s stance stemmed from a greater concern: that transparency could open the floodgates for restitution claims,” Méheut wrote. “Over the past two decades, France has returned only about 50 sets of remains, including to South Africa, New Zealand and Algeria.”

Méheut explained that “to make matters more complicated, objects in public museum collections are the property of the French state and cannot change ownership unless the return is voted into law — a cumbersome process that has sometimes led France to lend remains instead of ceding possession. A representative for France’s culture ministry said officials were working on a sweeping law to regulate future returns of human remains.” The French government has yet to accept “a bill passed by the Senate in January that would remove the need for Parliament to approve every restitution.”

During the French Senate committee hearing, referring to the skulls of victims of the Armenian Genocide, Sen. Ouzoulias told his colleagues: “This is intolerable. We risk a major diplomatic conflict with certain countries when they become aware of the content of our collections. It is time to stop this. We can no longer live with corpses in our closets.”

Now that Armenians have learned about the storage of the skulls of five Armenian Genocide victims in a French museum, I suggest that the Armenian government, through its embassy in Paris, make an immediate request for the return of these skulls to Armenia to be buried near the Armenian Genocide Memorial complex in Yerevan. These victims deserve a respectful burial after being stored in a box in the basement of a French museum for a century.

Why UNESCO Needs New Leadership

By

By Michael Rubin,

UNESCO laundered Azerbaijan’s reputation right around the time when Azerbaijani forces destroyed the Julfa Cemetery, the world’s largest collection of intricately carved, centuries-old khachkars.

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the United Nations established the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO. Its goal was to foster world peace through education and through cultural and scientific cooperation. Today, UNESCO is best known for putting its stamp on world heritage sites such as the Great Wall of China, the Acropolis in Athens, and India’s Taj Mahal.

Unfortunately, like so much at the United Nations, corruption and national interests have made a mockery of UNESCO’s mission. The organization today is used more as a tool to sow division than to advance peace. 

In 2016, for example, UNESCO deliberately removed any acknowledgment of Jewish ties to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount in a resolution affirming only the Islamic heritage of the shared holy site. To twist history in support of a polemic may win plaudits from rejectionist and anti-Semitic states, but it does nothing to advance peace, education, or cultural cooperation. Such corruption led the United States and Israel to withdraw from UNESCO on Jan. 1, 2019, although U.S. President Joe Biden appears ready to rejoin the organization.

Undermining a Crucial Mission

Another stain on UNESCO’s mission is the way it distributes goodwill ambassadorships to unsuitable figures with clear conflicts of interest. Such was the case with Mehriban Aliyeva, first lady of Azerbaijan, whose only qualification appears to be her marriage to Azerbaijan’s dictator. In effect, UNESCO laundered Azerbaijan’s reputation right around the time when Azerbaijani forces destroyed the Julfa Cemetery, the world’s largest collection of intricately carved, centuries-old khachkars. The cultural destruction wrought against Armenian churches and property following the Azerbaijani assault on Nagorno-Karabakh was too much even for UNESCO. As Azerbaijan sandblasted or removed ancient Armenian inscriptions in churches and monasteries in order to promote the fictionthat Armenia had no ties to the territory, Aliyeva quietly resigned. At no point did she speak up for the protection of cultural heritage that was not her own. While Aliyeva is gone – UNESCO does not even list her name among former goodwill ambassadors – UNESCO continues to abet division and cultural corruption.

For example, UNESCO maintains a list of intangible cultural heritage. Think baguette bread in France, khanjar daggers in Oman, falconry in many European and Gulf Arab countries, and Mongolia’s Nadaam festival. In its latest round of additions, however, UNESCO has made tea (çay) cultureexclusively Azerbaijani and Turkish. That would be news to Iraqis, Iranians, Kurds, Syrians, and many others across the region. This is not just an innocent mistake. It plays into Turkey’s efforts to diminish and delegitimize Kurdish culture, and Azerbaijan’s efforts to do likewise with Armenia. It is akin to weighing in on the hummus or falafel wars by arguing that such foods are intrinsically Lebanese or Palestinian and that Israel’s embrace is nothing more than colonial appropriation. (The reality is that the food is just as much part of Mizrahi Jewish heritage as it was their non-Jewish neighbors in Arab lands.) 

The world needs to preserve its heritage. UNESCO’s politicization and its willingness to allow dictators and cultural abusers to use its good name to justify cultural erasure and division, however, suggests that the organization might have outlived its worth. It needs new leadership. 


Michael Rubin

Now a 1945 Contributing Editor, Dr. Michael Rubin is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Dr. Rubin is the author, coauthor, and coeditor of several books exploring diplomacy, Iranian history, Arab culture, Kurdish studies, and Shi’ite politics, including “Seven Pillars: What Really Causes Instability in the Middle East?” (AEI Press, 2019); “Kurdistan Rising” (AEI Press, 2016); “Dancing with the Devil: The Perils of Engaging Rogue Regimes” (Encounter Books, 2014); 

Azerbaijan: Papal PR Pays Off

By

Elizabeth Owen,

At first glance, Azerbaijan, a predominantly Shia Muslim state, seems an unlikely destination for the leader of the Roman Catholic Church. But Pope Francis’ 10-hour visit to Baku on October 2 was not so much about religion as it was about PR payback.
 
Since 2012, the Heydar Aliyev Foundation, run by Azerbaijan’s first lady, Mehriban Aliyeva, has donated undisclosed sums to finance restoration work at the Vatican, including repairs to the Sistine Chapel.
 
The Foundation, named in honor of President Ilham Aliyev’s father and predecessor, the late Heydar Aliyev, also has provided funds for other projects, including the restoration of two Vatican catacombs and the preservation and digitization of ancient manuscripts in the Apostolic Library.
 
In 2012, the Vatican termed the catacombs donation the first of its kind by a predominantly Muslim country, although Azerbaijan’s government is secular in nature. Vatican officials did not respond to a question about whether other predominantly Muslim states have supported similar projects.
 
The Foundation’s official interest in preserving European cultural heritage has extended beyond the Vatican.
 
Seven years ago, the foundation provided 40,000 euros (at the time, about $57,253) to finance repairs to two stained-glass windows in France’s Cathédrale de Notre Dame de Strasbourg, and later contributed to the restorations of two medieval Norman churches.
 
“There’s no other such example of a Muslim country restoring Christian churches and museums throughout all of Europe,” said Elkhan Şahinoğlu, head of the non-governmental Atlas research center. Funds also have gone to the Louvre, Versailles, Germany’s Berlin City Palace and Italy’s Capitoline Museum. “Baku and the Heydar Aliyev Foundation are propagandizing the idea of [the] Azerbaijani people’s tolerance toward all other peoples and religions.”
 
Foundation representatives did not respond to questions about its relationship with the Vatican. It does not appear to have a similar relationship with Azerbaijan’s Catholic community of several hundred – reportedly, mostly foreign – believers.
 
The Aliyev foundation is widely perceived in Baku as a quasi-governmental agency, and its involvement in Vatican restoration project is seen by some local experts as an extension of the government’s foreign policy.
 
“There is more than a bit of realpolitik,” said Şahinoğlu. “The tiny country of the Vatican has enormous influence in the Christian world. And by helping the Vatican with restoration, the leadership of Muslim Azerbaijan hopes for support … from the pope’s side.”
 
If that is the foundation’s aim, it appears to be working – at least in terms of helping to promote Azerbaijan as a country that values multiculturalism.
 
In October 2 comments to a Baku audience, Pope Francis hailed what he described as “good relations” between Azerbaijan’s Muslim, Catholic, Orthodox Christian and Jewish citizens, saying that they “assume great significance for peaceful coexistence and for peace in the world.”
 
In that spirit, he urged Azerbaijanis to “grasp every opportunity to reach a satisfactory solution” to its decades-long conflict with Armenia over the separatist, ethnic-Armenian-controlled Nagorno-Karabakh region, so that the Caucasus can become “a gateway open to peace.”
 
President Ilham Aliyev, who has declared 2016 a “year of multiculturalism,” provided the refrain: “This visit is very important for all of humanity,” he stated, local news agencies reported. “Because this visit again shows that dialogue between civilizations is alive [and] continues.”
 
The trip to Baku followed a September 30-October 1 papal mission to neighboring Georgiaand an earlier trip to Armenia.
 
Public opinion appears to be mixed about the connection to the Catholic Church. While many believe that the donations to the Vatican illustrate their country’s generosity and tolerance, others, noted Şahinoğlu, wonder why the funds are not being spent on domestic needs, given that Azerbaijan’s economy has been hit hard by the drop in energy prices. Energy exports are the primary source of revenue for the government.
 
“Why restore museums throughout Europe, if the economic and social situation in Azerbaijan is worse than in European countries?” Azerbaijanis ask, according to Şahinoğlu.
 
The Vatican, which is now trying to make its finances more transparent, did not explain how the Foundation was chosen as a donor, and what mechanisms, if any, were used to check the donated funds’ origins. The source of the Foundation’s financing has never been made public.

YSU professor ‘boycotts’ Republic Square celebrations

By

Menua Soghomonyan, a political science professor at Yerevan State University (YSU) and a member of the opposition 5165 movement, has announced a boycott of “luxury” celebrations in Yerevan’s Republic Square in the run-up to the Junior Eurovision 2022 and New Year.

The opening ceremony of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest kicks off in Republic Square late on Monday afternoon.

“I am announcing a boycott of celebrations in Republic Square,” Soghomonyan wrote on Facebook.

“I won’t take my kids to Republic Square, explaining to them that these luxury celebrations come at the cost of sleep loss for many children in border villages and show contempt for the yearning of thousands of children who have lost their fathers,” he stated.

The YSU professor claims the festivities are aimed at distracting the people’s attention from urgent issues.

“It’s a feast in the time of plague,” Soghomonyan said.

Syria resisting Russia’s efforts to broker Turkey summit, sources say

By

By Maya Gebeily

BEIRUT/ANKARA, Dec 2 (Reuters) – Syria is resisting Russian efforts to broker a summit with Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan, three sources said on Friday, after more than a decade of bitter enmity since the outbreak of Syria’s civil war.

However two Turkish sources, including a senior official, disputed that Damascus was delaying and said that things were on track for an eventual meeting between the leaders.

Erdogan’s government supports rebel fighters who tried to topple President Bashar al-Assad and has accused the Syrian leader of state terrorism, saying earlier in the conflict that peace efforts could not continue under his rule.

Assad says it is Turkey which has backed terrorism by supporting an array of fighters including Islamist factions and launching repeated military incursions inside northern Syria. Ankara is readying another possible operation, after blaming Syrian Kurdish fighters for a bombing in Istanbul.

Russia helped Assad turn the tide of the war in his favour and says it is seeking a political end to the conflict and wants to bring the two leaders together for talks.

Erdogan has signalled readiness for rapprochement.

Speaking a week after he shook hands with Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi last month, after repeatedly saying he could not meet a leader who came to power in a coup, he said Turkey could “also get things on track with Syria.”

“There can be no resentment in politics,” he said in a televised discussion at the weekend.

However, three sources with knowledge of Syria’s position on possible talks said Assad had rejected a proposal to meet Erdogan with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.

Two of the sources said Damascus believed such a meeting could boost Erdogan ahead of Turkish elections next year, especially if it addressed Ankara’s goal of returning some of the 3.6 million Syrian refugees from Turkey.

“Why hand Erdogan a victory for free? No rapprochement will happen before the elections,” one of the two said, adding that Syria had also turned down the idea of a foreign ministers’ meeting.

The third source, a diplomat with knowledge of the proposal, said Syria “sees such a meeting as useless if it does not come with anything concrete, and what they have asked for so far is the full withdrawal of Turkish troops.”

Turkish officials said this week the army needed just a few days to be ready for a ground incursion into northern Syria, where it has already carried out artillery and air strikes.

But the government has also said it is ready for talks with Damascus if they focus on security at the border, where Ankara wants Syrian Kurdish YPG fighters pushed from the frontier and refugees moved into ‘safe zones’.

An Assad-Erdogan meeting could be possible “in the not too distant future”, the senior Turkish official said.

“Putin is slowly preparing the path for this,” the official said. “It would be the beginning of a major change in Syria and would have very positive effects on Turkey. Russia would benefit too… given it is stretched in many areas.”

Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/syria-resisting-russias-efforts-broker-turkey-summit-sources-say-2022-12-02/

Armenia to me, Artsakh to you. The possible core of the Pashinyan-Kocharian agreement

By

While some MPs of the “Armenia” faction give up their parliamentary mandate without any understandable explanation and announce the decision to stop their political activities as a sign of protest,

while others find some excuses-explanations for keeping their mandate and others, the question is whether, in the end, what happens in that faction remains open. In May, when the opposition initiated the Resistance movement, it simultaneously boycotted the NA sessions and promised to return to the parliament only with its own agenda, presumably to initiate the dismissal of Nikol Pashinyan. Meanwhile, two weeks ago, the opposition returned to the parliament, which was incomprehensible to a significant section of society, and unacceptable to some members of the “Armenia” faction.

The only logical explanation for the return of the Armenia faction to the parliament is the conclusion of some kind of agreement between the government and the opposition, more specifically, Nikol Pashinyan and Robert Kocharyan. And what could be the subject of the agreement and what should have forced the parties to reach such an agreement?
Nikol Pashinyan and his team, who constantly declare that Armenia is a bastion of democracy, faced a situation that disproved that claim every day. The Armenian parliament had turned into a one-party body, where laws are passed just like in North Korea, without any discussion or disagreement. Even in the Russian parliament, which has an authoritarian government system, there is a so-called “systemic opposition” that disagrees with or criticizes the government on some issues, creating an apparent plurality.

No matter how much the countries and institutions promoting the values ​​of Western democracy turn a blind eye to the various manifestations of Pashinyan’s dictatorship, they still demanded that Pashinyan return the opposition to the parliament, especially since the threat of depriving the opposition of its mandates or opening a criminal case against all oppositionists and sending them all to prisons was not international support. gets Pashinyan needed to return the opposition to the parliament and restore the democratic order in the country, and he actually achieved what he wanted. And what did the opposition get?

After the appointment of businessman Ruben Vardanyan as Minister of State of Artsakh, information spread that Vardan Oskanyan, who held the position of Foreign Minister of Armenia during the 10 years of Robert Kocharian’s presidency and is now one of the representatives of Kocharian’s team, may be appointed Artsakh’s Foreign Minister. It is possible that the Pashinyan-Kocharian agreement may refer to Artsakh itself. Kocharyan refuses to actively fight against Pashinyan’s rule in Armenia and returns the “Hayastan” faction to the parliament, instead Pashinyan will not mind if some representatives of Kocharyan’s team get positions in Artsakh. 

Those arrangements can also affect individual deputies of the “Armenia” faction. The authorities have initiated criminal cases against various MPs of the opposition and are threatening them with criminal prosecution. Some of them are threatened with expropriation, declaring their property illegal. It is natural that there will be some mitigations as a result of these agreements. criminal prosecutions will be stopped, illegal property will be legalized.

The Pashinyan-Kocharian agreement has not only internal, but also external beneficiaries, and there may be external mediators and guarantors in the matter of making these agreements. In particular, Moscow and Paris may be interested in making these agreements. The French Senate, with its decision and President Macron’s statements, helped abort the Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations under the auspices of the EU, which Russian President Putin called the “Washington option” on October 27. In fact, now the “Russian version” remains on the agenda, which implies the freezing of the settlement of the Artsakh problem with the preservation of the current status quo. With Ruben Vardanyan becoming the Minister of State and the possible appointment of Vardan Oskanyan as Foreign Minister, the freezing of the Artsakh issue becomes more realistic.

It is natural that there would be MPs within the “Armenia” faction, for whom it is unacceptable to make even situational agreements with Pashinyan’s government, to refuse the public promise to free Armenia from that government at any cost, or even to postpone it temporarily. They are the ones who will announce the decision to give up the mandate. The others will comfort themselves with the formula “politics is the art of the possible” and will continue their activities within the framework of that principle, continuing to criticize the government on various issues and ensuring pluralism in the parliament. 

Meanwhile, the fact that the part of the society with opposition sentiments will no longer have any expectations or expectations from the active opposition is now a reality. Deputies of the “Hayastan” faction also admit that they need their mandate only to protect the interests of Artsakh and prevent the current government from making anti-Armenian decisions regarding Artsakh. A very important and necessary approach.

Avetis Babajanyan

Ամբողջական հոդվածը կարող եք կարդալ այս հասցեով՝ : https://hraparak-am.translate.goog/post/0b8e9aeca85a23967ca4c372d93b8283?_x_tr_sl=hy&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc

© 2008 – 2021 «Հրապարակ օրաթերթ»

The real goal of Azerbaijanis is to close the highway

By

Hayka Aloyan

In the morning, Artsakh’s information headquarters spread a message that a group of Azerbaijanis in civilian clothes blocked the Stepanakert-Goris highway under the pretext of carrying out environmental works at the intersection under Shushi-Kari. In the conversation with “Hraparak”, the deputy of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia Metaxe Hakobyan informed that there were about 40 Azerbaijanis. 
Russian peacekeepers started negotiations with Azerbaijanis, which were led by the commander of Russian peacekeepers in Artsakh, Major General Volkov.

Three hours after the incident, Azerbaijanis opened the road. Azerbaijani Telegram channels write that at the request of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan and the closed joint-stock company “Azergold”, a number of specialists from Azerbaijan appealed to Russian peacekeepers to ensure their visits to the mines to conduct research in order to find out whether the so-called “occupied” territories of Azerbaijan “how much mineral was exploited in the areas, what profit was made, so that they can apply to the court based on these data.

Speaking about the agenda of peace at any cost, Pashinyan and his political team, with their mega-concession policy and anti-Armenian agenda of abandoning Artsakh, have made us face the fact that the theses that seem like delusions to all of us on TV channels in Turkey and Azerbaijan in recent years may soon become reality. Thanks to the rhetoric and actions of the current Armenian authorities, Azerbaijan has received the green light to apply to the international court and demand from Armenia the money received from the mining industry in Artsakh and a number of areas of Armenia over the course of thirty years. They informed us from Artsakh that it is about the Drombon mine. They are trying to cut off all ways of survival of Artsakh, close all sources of income.

In a conversation with Hraparak, analyst Arman Abovyan, talking about Azerbaijan’s plan to divide Armenia, notes that Azerbaijan is preparing for a new war, and the Armenian authorities are destroying the religious and cultural monuments of the Republic Square with bolts, preparing for the New Year. Returning to the lion cut forty Azerbaijanis who blocked the Stepanakert-Goris highway, thus blocking Artsakh, we should note that the announcements of the Azerbaijani telegram channels about studies on mining are part of far-reaching plans. The closure of the road, according to “Hraparak” information, actually had other goals.

From the beginning, the Azerbaijanis wanted to put a customs post on the alternative road to Berdzor, which was put into operation recently, which means that there will be no more connection between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Artsakh is completely surrounded by Azerbaijan. The Armenian side did not allow to set up a customs post on that road and the Azerbaijanis are trying to achieve the opening of the customs post by exerting pressure. According to our information, the road was opened in exchange for certain agreements, the Armenian side agreed to make certain concessions. We can only guess what concessions these are. Azerbaijani telegram channels inform that after the opening of the road, the Russian peacekeepers escorted the Azerbaijanis to Stepanakert, but the main headquarters of the Russians is located at the Ivanyan airport. The question arises, why do Azerbaijanis go to Stepanakert? According to some reports,

It is a fact that the closure of the Stepanakert-Goris highway by the Azerbaijanis is an additional psychological terror against our compatriots living in Artsakh. It is difficult to say whether Artsakh will be de-Armenized if Azerbaijanis continue to work consistently like this. However, it is impossible not to record the fact that the motherland is being divided piece by piece and “THE FUTURE IS” is no longer visible on the horizon, but the RA authorities are decorating the Square. The rather sober logic, not disconnected from reality, suggests that the presence of terrorists of the enemy state in the territory of the country and the creeping war presuppose, first of all, the rebuilding of the army and the strengthening of the border.
One can envy the precise work of the propaganda and state structures of hostile Azerbaijan. Here they not only spread lies and disinformation, but also carry out anti-Armenian, anti-real propaganda, which prepares the ground for new actions in Artsakh.

Information is actively circulating in the Azerbaijani information field that fourteen Iranian citizens have arrived in Stepanakert from Iran, and they are to conduct courses on the implementation of sabotage and terrorist activities in the territory of Artsakh, teaching the “gangs” of the Artsakh Defense Army. what to do in areas under the control of Russian peacekeepers. According to Azerbaijanis, fourteen Iranian special officers infiltrated Stepanakert from the city of Ize, where there is a secret base of Iranian special services. One thing is clear, with such false information, Azerbaijanis are trying to prepare the ground for new military conflicts.

Let’s not forget, the USA announced that it will help Azerbaijan if any country threatens its territorial integrity. By the way, the Azeri press mentions the names of 14 Iranians and adds that these may not be their real names. They are: Mohammadi Wahab Mehrali, Heydari Abdollah Allah Rahm, Mohammadi Daryush Awaz, Amiritolmarani Elsa Mohammad, Salahshur Duraki Farzad Nader, Mohammadi Aref Hossein, Almasian Nejad Ebrahim Mohammad, Mohammadi Abdallah Mehr Ali, Mohammadi Nasrola Makhtr Ali, Safari Hossein Hatam, Kurziav Ali Hossein, Mohammadi Omid Mehr, Ali Mohammadi Mokhtar Bar Ahmad, Salahshuri Duraki Keramat Nader.

Ամբողջական հոդվածը կարող եք կարդալ այս հասցեով՝ : https://hraparak-am.translate.goog/post/19d378027e0e3d6c430744ba8d86089e?_x_tr_sl=hy&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc

© 2008 – 2021 «Հրապարակ օրաթերթ»