Ermenihaber.am news website published an interview of architect, Istanbul-based Agos daily’s correspondent Zakaria Mildanoglu with “It’s your word” TV program, in which he told about the misfortunes that fell upon his family in 1915 as well as about the reasons why he moved to Istanbul.

Mildanoglu also told about the fate of Armenian churches in Turkey.

“Cultural massacre was being perpetrated after the 1950s – Armenian churches and schools were being destroyed. There is factual proof of it. Turkey is carrying a heavy burden. At the same time, restoration works are currently being carried out. But I would like to mention one thing: once Turks were turning Armenian churches into cinemas where they were mainly screening porn films. There is also factual evidence of that,” Mildanoglu said.

The Agos daily’s correspondent told two real stories about the fate of Armenian churches in Turkey.

“Treasure seekers are still making searches on the cemetery of our village. A horrifying cultural destruction was carried out there. The village church no longer exists. My mother remembers how it was destroyed. Kazim Karabekir, marching to the East, gave an order. He said, “I must not see this church when I am back.” And the church was pulled down.”

The Surb Khach (Holy Cross) Church on Aghtamar Island was saved from destruction thanks to the efforts of Yasar Kemal, a reporter for Cumhuriyet newspaper. “If Yasar Kemal had not gone there, that church would not exist today,” the architect concluded.

STEPANAKERT—“We must recognize Nagorno-Karabakh, Karabakh in order to demonstrate to the world Karabakh’s democracy and to let the people of the world know that the people of Karabakh want to live free and independent,” said French member of Parliament Valery Boyer on Friday during her second visit to the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, reported RFE/RL.

Boyer, who is the author of the French bill criminalizing the denial of the Armenian Genocide, is also a founding member of the France-Karabakh Friendship Group, which was inaugurated last month.
“By creating the France-Karabakh Friendship Group, we have set our goal to recognize Karabakh and to secure conditions for the people of that country to live freely,” added Boyer.

Boyer is part of delegation of European legislators who are on a fact-finding mission to Karabakh and upon arrival in Stepanakert began visiting the sites and engaged in meetings with Karabakh officials.

“We continue to be your humble servants, and are awaiting your direction,” said European Parliament member from Greece Eleni Teokharus, who is also part of the delegation.

Teokharus first visited Karabakh 25 years ago as a volunteer surgeon. Visiting Karabakh today, she said that Artsakh is her second home.

“But for me Artsakh is neither a motherland nor a fatherland. It is like a new-born child, whom I cuddle and care for as a mother, because from its birth it has had difficulties. Despite this, it is now a struggling Democracy,” said Teokharus.

“Today we are here to defend the people of Nagorno-Karabakh’s right to self-determination. Regardless of which principle supersedes the other in the eyes of international law, but the day will come when we, in Europe, and the rest of the world will comprehend that people’s right to self-determination is of utmost importance,” added the Greek legislator.

The European delegation was greeted by Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Parliament Speaker Ashot Ghulian who expressed the gratitude of the people of Artsakh for the cooperation and the belief in Karabakh’s democracy by his European colleagues, reported the Aparaj newspaper, which is the official organ of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Central Committee of Artsakh.

The discussions centered on strengthening of legislative diplomatic ties. The importance of creating parliamentary friendship groups and mutual visits was highlighted.

Leaders of Karabakh parliamentary blocs Gagik Petrosian, Janna Galstian and Armen Sargsyan also took part in the meetings. The chairman of the Armenia’s Parliamentary Committee of Foreign Relations, Artak Zakaryan and parliament member Tevan Poghosyan accompanied the delegation to Artsakh.

 

ANKARA,— Turkish police used tear gas and water cannon to break up clashes between Kurdish and nationalist students at an Ankara university campus that left 15 people injured late on Wednesday, Turkish media have reported.

The hours-long scuffles, which saw both sides take up sticks and stones, reportedly erupted when students sympathising with Turkey’s Kurdish insurgents confronted those from a nationalist group at Ankara’s prestigious Middle East Technical University (ODTU).

Police were called in to put an end to the violence that also wrecked several vehicles and damaged school property.

The incident comes as Ankara and the rebel leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) are negotiating steps to a permanent peace that would end the outlawed PKK’s insurgency.

Last week, Turkish Interior Minister Muammer Guler announced an increase in student unrest across Turkey in 2013, which he said was likely to be related to the tension linked to the fragile peace process.

Earlier in April, four students were hurt in clashes between Kurdish and Islamist groups at a university campus in the southeastern city of Diyarbakir.

Turkish universities are frequently hotbeds for conflict between student groups affiliated to different political camps.

Turkey’s Kurdish-majority southeast (Northern Kurdistan) was particularly prone to fatal scuffles and protests in the 1980s. Student clashes there have noticeably subsided in recent years,www.ekurd.net in part because of sterner police action.

Since it was established in 1984, the PKK has been fighting the Turkish state, which still denies the constitutional existence of Kurds, to establish a Kurdish state in the south east of the country. By 2012, more than 45,000 people have since been killed.

But now its aim is the creation an autonomous region and more cultural rights for ethnic Kurds who constitute the greatest minority in Turkey, its goal to political autonomy. A large Turkey’s Kurdish community, numbering to 22.5 million, openly sympathise with PKK rebels.

The PKK wants constitutional recognition for the Kurds, regional self-governance and Kurdish-language education in schools.

PKK’s demands included releasing PKK detainees, lifting the ban on education in Kurdish, paving the way for an autonomous democrat Kurdish system within Turkey, reducing pressure on the detained PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan, stopping military action against the Kurdish party and recomposing the Turkish constitution.

Turkey refuses to recognize its Kurdish population as a distinct minority. It has allowed some cultural rights such as limited broadcasts in the Kurdish language and private Kurdish language courses with the prodding of the European Union, but Kurdish politicians say the measures fall short of their expectations.

BY Ekurd.net

26.4.2013
By Hiwa Barznjy, Erbil, Kurdistan – Niqash

ERBIL-Hewlêr, Kurdistan region ‘Iraq’,— Elections will held in Iraqi Kurdistan in September. And despite the fact that local laws say he can’t, the current president may run for the job again. Local MPS are hatching several cunning plans to get around the law.

On April 18, the President of Iraqi Kurdistan Massoud Barzani, announced that parliamentary and presidential elections would be held in the semi autonomous region in September this year. And many others said that Barzani would also be running for President again, come September 21.

But there’s a problem there. According to current laws in the semi-autonomous region, the President of the region may only remain in power for two terms. A term is four years. And Barzani will complete his two terms in the middle of this year.

Yet many senior politicians in Iraqi Kurdistan – including the Barzani’s party, the Kurdistan Democratic Party’s spokesperson, Jafar Ibrahim Eminki – have said that they are trying to get around the law in order to allow Barzani to be nominated for a third term as President. Senior politicians from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan have also said that they don’t have anyone to replace Barzani.

Generally power is shared between two major parties in Iraqi Kurdistan – the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) – and in practice the region is basically split into two separate zones of influence, with local administrations in Erbil and Duhok controlled by the KDP and the Sulêmanî (Sulaimaniyah) area mostly administered by the PUK.

There are also opposition parties in the region, including the relatively influential Change Movement, also known as Gorran, which is formed of many dissatisfied with the two major parties.

And opposition parties in Iraqi Kurdistan responded with strong criticism to the idea that Barzani might be nominated for President again. In a joint press conference,www.ekurd.net the Change Movement and the region’s two major Islamic parties, said that trying to change the law to allow Barzani to remain in power was a step toward dictatorship in Iraqi Kurdistan and was a blatant disregard of the law.

“We don’t have any problems with Barzani as a person,” Aram Sheikh Muhammad, director of the elections office for the Change Movement, said. “The problem is that the law doesn’t allow him to run for another term.”

The critics of the plan for Barzani to run again suspect that the KDP and PUK have various ideas to circumvent the current law. One sees legal experts interpreting the law in such a way that Barzani is able to run for election again.

Ali Awni, a senior member of the KDP, gave a clue as to how that plan might work. He told Niqash that in 2005, when Barzani first became President of the region, there were no actual elections held. Barzani was never elected and he was appointed President by the local parliament, via political agreement between the leading political parties in the region.

“The President was elected by the people for the first time in 2009,” Awni said. “So if he runs again it will only be for election for the second time.”
Awni added that as yet, Barzani himself hadn’t suggested that he run for President again. He said it was an issue that the opposition parties were talking about publicly in order to pre-empt any such thing happening. This was a violation of Barzani’s own rights and “it didn’t serve the public interests,” Awni noted.
The second way of allowing Barzani to run again would involve MPS belonging to the KDP and PUK going back to parliament to amend the law – the KDP and PUK have 59 out of 111 seats in the Iraqi Kurdish parliament.

However the latter could run into problems as it appears that not all the members of PUK like the idea of Barzani running again. “If Barzani wants to nominate himself again, then it must be under an amended law,” Arez Abdullah, a leading member of the PUK, said. “But if the law isn’t amended then Barzani cannot be nominated to run. But up until now nobody in the PUK has even discussed this with the KDP. If they approached us on this issue, then we’d make a public announcement of you r position.”

Meanwhile Bakhtyar Saeed, a local lawyer and political observer, says that if Barzani is eventually nominated to run for a third term, the conflicts that already exist between the two ruling parties and the opposition movement in Iraqi Kurdistan will only deepen.

“Barzani has finished two terms and he cannot re-nominate himself,” Saeed confirmed. “But the KDP is not ready to give away this position at any price. They believe that if the opposition succeeds in preventing Barzani’s nomination, then they will lose a lot of power in a very short time. That’s something they will never accept.”