Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Russia: Excluding Syrian army from fighting ISIS is absurd – Lavrov

September 13, 2015 By administrator

55f558cac461880b658b45f9The Syrian army could be a crucial force in fight against Islamic State, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, reiterating that Russia will support the Syrian government in the fight against the extremist group.

READ MORE: Russia backs Syria’s fight against ISIS, not Assad’s regime – Lavrov

“To exclude Syrian army from fighting Islamic State [formerly ISIS/ISIL] is absurd… Syrian armed forces will be the most effective military force on the ground,” Lavrov said in an interview to Russia’s Channel One TV.

Lavrov added that when there was a question of destroying chemical weapons a year ago, Assad was considered a “legitimate” president of Syria and his actions were welcomed in UN Security Council resolutions.

“A year passed and he [Assad] stopped being legitimate, because the threat is now not chemical weapons or substance but a terror menace,” Lavrov said, describing that as an “ideologized” approach.

“All our western partners, without any exceptions, tell us that they clearly understand what is the main threat in the Middle East and North Africa. And this [threat] is not Assad’s regime, but Islamic State,” he said.

READ MORE: US backs those who want to use terrorists against Assad – Lavrov

Sometimes the US would not authorize an airstrike on a confirmed Islamic State position, sources in the US-led coalition tell Moscow. That raises questions, Lavrov says.

“I hope that I won’t fail anyone, saying that some of our colleagues from the coalition states say that they receive information where exactly, on which positions the Islamic State troops are located, but the commander of the coalition [of course, from the US] doesn’t approve the strike.”

“I could suspect that apart from the claimed purpose – fighting Islamic State – there is something else [as the aim] of the coalition, ” he added.

Lavrov said that Russia will assist Syrian government in the way it assists the governments of all countries, including the Iraqis, which face the threat of terrorism. Such help includes weapons deliveries as well as assistance of Russian specialists who help to set equipment and teach Syrian troops how to handle such equipment.

Troops loyal to the Assad government are fighting a number of enemies, the most powerful of which are Islamic State and the Al Nusra Front. Only two countries, Russia and Iran, internationally support the Syrian authorities, while all of the Arab world and particularly the Persian Gulf monarchies are backing what they call “moderate” Syrian rebel forces.

About 220,000 people have being killed during the ongoing conflict in the war-torn country which started in 2011.

Source: rt.com

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: ISIS, Lavrov, Russia, Syria

Two Russia aid planes land in Syria

September 12, 2015 By administrator

Bassel al-Assad International Airport in Latakia, western Syria.

Bassel al-Assad International Airport in Latakia, western Syria.

Two Russian airplanes carrying humanitarian aid have landed in Syria’s port city of Latakia.

The aircraft landed at Bassel al-Assad International Airport on Saturday. The planes carry 10 tonnes of humanitarian aid provided by Russia, according to Syrian media.

On Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated Moscow’s support for the government in Damascus in its fight against the Takfiri Daesh terrorists, urging other countries to help Syria in the battle.

“It is necessary, of course, to interact with the ground forces and the most efficient and powerful ground force fighting the Islamic State (Daesh) is the Syrian army. But coordination is needed to prevent various incidents as well,” the Russian foreign minister said.

Lavrov emphasized the need to provide weapons and military equipment to Syria, saying Moscow would continue to train the Syrian forces.

“I can say yet again that our military personnel is there to service Russian equipment, to help the Syrian army use this equipment,” Lavrov said, adding, “And we will continue to deliver this equipment to the Syrian government to ensure it has the needed defense capabilities to confront the terrorist threat.”

Lavrov’s call for aid to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad comes as the United States and its western and regional allies have repeatedly pointed to the Syrian president as being the root cause of the conflict in Syria, which has convulsed the country since March 2011.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: landed, plane, Russia, Syria

Russia views Azerbaijan as enemy – Vagharshak Harutyunyan

September 8, 2015 By administrator

f55eee32151a75_55eee32151ab0.thumbViolating the ceasefire is not in the Armenian side’s interests, Armenia’s former minister of defense Vagharshak Harutyunyan told Tert.am.

Mr Harutyunyan, what is the reason for resumed border tensions?

It is Azerbaijan’s strategy. Azerbaijan is well aware of its inability to settle the conflict by means of full-scale war. On the other hand, they do not want a negotiated settlement. The result is a frozen process.

The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs are not making any proposals because Azerbaijan has rejected all the proposals.

Azerbaijan has no alternative and is well aware all the ways are closed. So they are trying to influence Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh by escalating tension and an atmosphere of fear, thereby forcing emigration and forcing the Armenian side into concession at the negotiations, blackmailing the co-chairs and the oil-exporting states, which are interested in regional stability. The steps are aimed at information war to force the Armenian side into concessions.

The border tensions followed Russian FM Sergey Lavrov’s visit to Baku. Could Lavrov have given any promises to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev for Russia to retain influence over Azerbaijan?

Lavrov’s visit was preceded by the ones of Russia President Vladimir Putin and other presidents. Border tensions have continued for 21 years, and it is absurd to link them with the visits. It is signed documents that show the level of interstate relations. If we compare Armenian-Russian relations with Armenian-Azerbaijani relations, we can see we have the deepest ties with Russia – in the military, economic and security fields. On the other hand, Azerbaijan has only economic ties involving the Caspian. Azerbaijani-Russian relations are nothing but partnership. We should not forget that Russia and Armenia signed a protocol in 2010, which envisages Russia’s interference in case Azerbaijan attacks Armenia. It means Russia views Azerbaijan as an enemy.

Mr Harutyunyan, does the use of new quality of weapons by Azerbaijan signal a threat of renewed war?

The fact that Azerbaijan uses high-caliber weapons is really a reason for concern, but that does not imply an increasing likelihood of war. The likelihood will increase in a political-military situation in which Azerbaijan will be sure of success. But we do not have that situation now.

What about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict? Is its settlement no longer in a deadlock?

The situation we are facing today signals no solution to the conflict. If we consider the problem in global terms, we will see that no territorial dispute or conflict has ever been settled at once. Israel hasn’t been able to settle the problem for about 60 years and it’s almost 80 years Greece hasn’t done so. So, problems of the kind are not easy to solve.

But the OSCE Minsk Group repeatedly urges the partoes to restrain the tension and avoid violating the ceasefire. And no specifically addressed statements are ever made.

It’s not in the interests of the Armenian side to violate the ceasefire regime. We do not have such purposes, either political or military. We do not seek to move ahead to seize Baku, whereas Azerbaijan has set such a task and announced officially that it is going to seize Karabakh.So from the political-military point of view, Armenia and the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic are not interested in violating the ceasefire?

Then why does the OSCE Minsk Group fail to make its calls specific?

These should be treated as diplomatic statements. Personally I consider them wrong, because if the objective is to avert border tension, the appeals and calls have to be specific and addressed to the side which is really to blame. But the co-chairs simply put an equal sign as a diplomatic gesture.

Is there any need for Armenia to apply to the CSTO (Collective Security Treaty Organization) or the UN Security Council?

The organizations which are concerned with this are the United Nations and its Security Council, the OSCE, its Minsk Group and personal representative, the Commonwealth of Independent States and NATO, the PACE and the EU Eastern Partnership countries. There are also other interested states and institutions. So the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh have to let those institutions know of border transgressions whenever they happen and call for active mechanisms towards resolving and preventing such violations.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Azerbaijan, enemy, Russia

Armenian, Russian Presidents discuss bilateral ties in Moscow

September 8, 2015 By administrator

197025President Serzh Sargsyan met Monday, September 7, with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

According to the website of the Armenian President, the two leaders discussed a broad range of issues concerning bilateral cooperation between Armenia and Russia, particularly focusing on political, economic and humanitarian cooperation, as well as Armenia’s membership in the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU).

Presidents Sargsyan and Putin also exchanged views on current international and regional problems and challenges, including the Nagorno Karabakh peace process.

As Sargsyan further told Putin, “Our regular meetings enable us to summarize previous agreements and discuss newly-emerged issues. I would like to thank you for transferring Permyakov’s criminal case to the Armenian jurisdiction. Besides, we signed an agreement with the Ministry of Energy to reduce the gas price by $25. A $200-million preferential loan agreement has also been singed, enabling Armenia to upgrade the arsenal of its armed forces.”

The Armenian leader also thanked Putin for Russia’s and his personal efforts in finding new ways for the resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

The conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan

The conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan broke out as result of the ethnic cleansing launched by the Azeri authorities in the final years of the Soviet Union. The Karabakh War was fought from 1991 (when the Nagorno Karabakh Republic was proclaimed) to 1994 (when a ceasefire was sealed by Armenia, NKR and Azerbaijan). Most of Nagorno Karabakh and a security zone consisting of 7 regions are now under control of NKR defense army. Armenia and Azerbaijan are holding peace talks mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group up till now.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Armenia, bilateral, Russia

Armenian air-defense unit participates in ‘Combat Commonwealth 2015’ drills in Russia

September 8, 2015 By administrator

air-defenceThe opening ceremony of ‘Combat Commonwealth 2015’ joint air-defense exercises of CIS countries took place in the Ashuluk training range in Russia’s Astrakhan region, Armenian Defense ministry said.

Troops from CIS countries are taking part in the military drills – Armenia, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan.
The Russian Defense Ministry’s press service reported yesterday that the drills involve anti-aircraft missile systems ‘S-400 Triumph’ and “S-300 Favorite’ as well as 40 crews of combat aircraft MiG-29, Su-24, Su-24, Su-27, Su-30, Su-25, MiG-31 and Tu-22M3.

Source: Panorama.am

Filed Under: News Tagged With: air-defense, Armenia, cis, Russia

In Major Escalation, Washington Demands Greece Blocks Its Airspace For Russian Flights To Syria

September 7, 2015 By administrator

by Tyler Durden,

Last week, when reporting that at least according to the White House,Russian presence in Syria is no longer disputed, we said that regardless if Russian troops are indeed on the Syrian ground, this admission that the current Syrian state of play “effectively ends the second “foreplay” phase of the Syrian proxy war (the first one took place in the summer of 2013 when in a repeat situation, Russia was supporting Assad only the escalations took place in the naval theater with both Russian and US cruisers within kilometers of each other off the Syrian coast), which means the violent escalation phase is next. It also means that Assad was within days of losing control fighting a multi-front war with enemies supported by the US, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and Putin had no choice but to intervene or else risk losing Gazprom’s influence over Europe to the infamous Qatari gas pipeline which is what this whole 3 years war is all about.”

Moments ago, following ever louder hints – if still unconfirmed by the Kremlin – that Russian forces are either en route to Syria or already there (Russian soldier’s VK post stating troops are in Syria, intercepted communication from a Russian An-124 military cargo plane en route to Latakia, Russian Roll-on/roll-off ship allegedly carrying military equipment to Syria), the US made a dramatic diplomatic escalation ahead of what is now assured to be the second major showdown between the US and Russia in Syria, over a Qatari gas pipeline no less, when according to Reuters, it asked Greece to deny Russia the use of its airspace for supply flights to Syria, a Greek official said on Monday, after Washington told Moscow it was deeply concerned by reports of a Russian military build up in Syria.

Reuters also notes that the Greek foreign ministry said the request was being examined. “Russian newswire RIA Novosti earlier said Greece had refused the U.S. request, quoting a diplomatic source as saying that Russia was seeking permission to run the flights up to Sept. 24.”

We very much doubt Athens will refuse to comply with western (either US or European) demands: now that Greece is officially a European debt colony with permanent capital controls, and deposits whose evaporation is merely a function of Brussels (and Frankfurt’s) good will, what the “democratic powers” demand – if only from Greece – the “democratic powers” get, which is why we are confident that within 48 hours Greece will fully roll over and make it clear to Putin that all Russian military flights will have to be diverted going forward.

We have previously explained the state of play, which Reuters summarizes as follows:
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov on Saturday that if reports of the build-up were accurate, that could further escalate the war and risk confrontation with the U.S.-led alliance that is bombing Islamic State in Syria.

Lavrov told Kerry it was premature to talk about Russia’s participation in military operations in Syria, a Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman told RIA Novosti on Monday.
Lavrov confirmed Russia had always provided supplies of military equipment to Syria, saying Moscow “has never concealed that it delivers military equipment to official Syrian authorities with the aim of combating terrorism”.
Russia has been a vital ally of President Bashar al-Assad throughout the war that has fractured Syria into a patchwork of areas controlled by rival armed groups, including Islamic State, leaving the government in control of much of the west.

Foreign states are already deeply involved in the war that has killed a quarter of a million people. While Russia and Iran have backed Assad, rebel groups seeking to oust him have received support from governments including the United States, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The Syrian army and allied militia have lost significant amounts of territory to insurgents this year. Assad said in July the Syrian army faced a manpower problem.
Still, the simplest confirmation and the proof that the Syrian intervention was never about ISIS (which from day one was a US creation designed to remove Assad from power), is that Russia has been trying to build a wide coalition including Damascus to fight Islamic State.

But the idea has been rejected by enemies including the United States and Saudi Arabia, who see Assad as part of the problem.

But wait a minute, the only reason Assad is on the verge of losing control is because of ISIS which earlier today was reported to have captured a key Syrian oil field near the city of Palmyra. It appears that only when it comes to affairs involving ISIS, the enemy of America’s enemy is double its enemy.

Then again, once one realizes that ISIS was from day one nothing but window dressing for a mythical opponent created in Hollywood, and designed to spook the masses into providing the media cover for what is shaping as an inevitable western intervention in Syria, and that the real enemy was none other than the same Assad who in the summer of 2013 was shown on a fabricated YouTube clip to have gassed his population in another transparent attempt to rally the population around the offensive war flag, then all falls into place.

Meanwhile, what we first reported is quietly but rapidly taking place behind the scenes: Russia is preparing for what appears to be the latest inevitable proxy war: one which will pit Syria (with Russian support, on and off the ground) against ISIS, the “moderate Syrian rebels”, and various Turkish forces (with US support, on and off the ground).

From Reuters:

A senior U.S. official told Reuters on Saturday that U.S. authorities have detected “worrisome preparatory steps,” including transport of prefabricated housing units for hundreds of people to a Syrian airfield, that could signal that Russia is preparing to deploy heavy military assets there.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Moscow’s exact intentions remained unclear but that Kerry called Lavrov to leave no doubt about the U.S. position.

A Syrian military official has said Syrian-Russian military relations have witnessed a “big shift” in recent weeks.
A Lebanese newspaper reported on Monday that Russian military experts who arrived in Syria weeks ago have been inspecting air bases and working to enlarge some runways, particularly in the north, though Moscow had yet to meet a Syrian request for attack helicopters.

As-Safir, citing a Syrian source, said there had been “no fundamental change” in Russian forces on the ground in Syria, saying they were “still operating in the framework of experts, advisers, and trainers”.
Well would you look at that: the US is not the only country that can send military “instructors”, “consultants” and “trainers” to a distant country to prepare the locals for war.

As-Safir said the Russians had “started moving toward a qualitative initiative in the armament relationship for the first time since the start of the war on Syria, with a team of Russian experts beginning to inspect Syrian military airports weeks ago, and they are working to expand some of their runways, particularly in the north of Syria.”

The newspaper, which is well-connected in Damascus, said nothing had been decided about “the nature of the weapons that Damascus might receive, though the Syrians asked to be supplied with more than 20 Russian attack helicopters, of the Mi-28 type”.
Bottom line: the battle lines are now fully drawn and the only question, just like in the case of the Greek near-default, is who gets the blame: if the western full court media press to represent Syria as colluding with Putin – when in reality Assad’s forces were about collapse under relentless US pressure, which with the help of ISIS, meant from day one to remove the Syrian president from power and replace him with a pro-US puppet, one who would allow the passage of the Qatari gas pipeline – succeeds, then the media spin is already prepared. It will mean that the imminent invasion in Syria by US and European powers will be portrayed as another escalation involving Russia, just like in 2013 and 2014.

And yes, we said Europe because as France’s president pivoted earlier today, Europe’s refuge crisis is about to be portrayed as the responsibility of Assad (but apparently not of the Western powers whose intervention in Syria has led to the country being torn by a bloody civil war), and as a result France is now preparing to bomb Syria to retaliate for a tragic refugee crisis, that has been years in the making not without Washington’s, or CIA’s, blessing. In other words, just like the fabricated “chemical attack” youtube clips of 2013 were the media pretext to attack Syria, so Europe’s great refugee crisis of 2015 will be the catalyst for the second attempt to remove Assad from pwoer.

On the other hand, Russia will deny any involvement in Syria, a la Crimea, even as its troops are positioned deep inside Syrian territory in preparation for what will soon be the latest mid-east proxy war.

None of the above, however, should not detract from the seriousness of the situation: suddenly Syria is months if not weeks or even days away from a repeat of the summer of 2013 which some may have forgotten, but on several occasions the US and Russia were this close from launching another world war.

Which is also why while we appreciate the impact of China’s economic hard landing on the price of oil, should the upcoming conflict, which now seems inevitable, spark a metaphorical (or literal) fire in, say, Saudi’s Ghawar oil fields – an outcome Putin would be delighted by – then oil may be poised for substantial upside from here.

This is what we said last week:

Finally, while we have no way of knowing how the upcoming armed conflict will progress, now may be a safe time to take profits on that oil short we recommended back in October, as the geopolitical chess game just shifted dramatically, and with most hedge funds aggressively short, any realization that the middle east is suddenly a far more violent powderkeg – one which may promptly include the Saudis in any confrontation – could result in an epic short squeeze.
With every day that we get closer to the all-out Syrian war, said squeeze becomes virtually assured.

Source: zerohedge.com

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: airspace, escalation, Greece, Russia, US

Plan B: Russia May Use New Aid Flight Routes to Syria Bypassing Greece

September 7, 2015 By administrator

1013810801Russia may use new flight aid routes to Syria if Greece closes its airspace to Russian aircraft, first deputy head of the international committee of the Russian Federation Council Vladimir Jabbarov said.

Earlier Monday, a source told Sputnik that Greece had received a request from the United States to deny Russian aircraft providing humanitarian aid to Syria use of the country’s airspace.

“This is an absurd move and if it is supported by Greece, it will be an unfriendly move toward Russia,” Jabbarov said.

On Saturday, the US embassy appealed to the Greek government with a request to prohibit the flights of Russian aircraft providing aid to Syria, however, Athens refused to do so, a source told RIA Novosti.

The Russian senator stressed that there Iran, Turkey and Central Asian states may assist Russia with regard to its humanitarian mission in Syria.

Commenting on the US’ request to close Greek airspace to Russian humanitarian flights to Syria, the Russian senator said that Washington “is afraid of any assistance that Russia is providing to the Syrian people.”

Jabbarov commented on Western media reports concerning Russia’s alleged increased weapons supplies to Syria saying that “the purpose of this campaign is to spark anti-Russian hysteria.”

The senator also noted that if the United States had the right to do so, it would have closed all countries’ airspace to Russian aircraft.

However, Russia can create new flight routes under international agreements, he concluded.

Syria has been mired in civil war since 2011 as government forces loyal to President Assad have been fighting several opposition and radical Islamist militant groups, including Nusra Front and Islamic State.

A number of Western countries have long supported what they call “moderate” rebel fighters, while Russia has repeatedly stated that Assad is the legitimate president of Syria, and that the people of Syria must choose their government and leaders without outside intervention.

In August, the Syrian president said that he highly appreciated Russia’s assistance, by which Moscow had proved its firm position in supporting Damascus during the military conflict.

Source: sputniknews.com

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: aid, flight, Greece, Route, Russia, Syria

Russia sends arms to Syria to fight terror: Official

September 7, 2015 By administrator

Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova

Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova

Russia has confirmed its arms deliveries to Syria, noting that the move aims to assist the Arab country in its fight against terrorism.

“The Russian side has never concealed the fact that it is sending military equipment to the Syrian authorities to help them fight terrorism,” AFP quoted Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova as saying.

Zakharova said Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told US Secretary of State John Kerry in a recent phone conversation that it is “premature” to speak about Moscow’s military participation in Syria.

The announcement comes as a Syrian military official has told Reuters that Russia’s military support for Syria, including new weapons and training, has recently seen a “big shift.”

“Our ties are always developing but in these days a qualitative shift has happened. We call it a qualitative shift in Arabic, which means big,” the unnamed Syrian official said.

No change in Russia’s stance

Meanwhile, the Russian Foreign Ministry has rejected as “falsifications and fabrications” media reports it is changing its position on the crisis in Syria or on the future of President Assad.

“We don’t appoint or dismiss foreign presidents, neither on our own or in cahoots with anyone else,” the ministry said in a Monday statement.

The US has expressed concern over reports of Russia’s increased involvement in Syria, with American media saying Russia has sent a military team to Syria.

Moscow and Washington have had major differences over the crisis in Syria. The Kremlin lends support to Damascus in its fight against Takfiri terrorists groups, whereas the White House wants to see President Bashar al-Assad toppled.

The foreign-sponsored conflict in Syria, which flared up in March 2011, has reportedly claimed more than 240,000 lives up until now.

The violence has also forced over four million Syrians to take refuge in neighboring countries, including Jordan and Lebanon. More than 7.2 million others have been displaced within Syria, according to the United Nations.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: arm. terror, Russia, suria

White House: Russian Military Action Against ISIS in Syria Would be ‘Destabilizing’

September 5, 2015 By administrator

Written by daniel mcadams, Published on ronpaulinstitute.org

josh-earnestToday’s lesson in how propaganda works: The rumor mill turns a trickle of a story early this week about “thousands” of Russian soldiers deploying to Syria any day — a wholly unsourced story originating on an Israeli website — into a torrent of hyperventilating about the “Russian invasion” of Syria.

Today neocon convicted felon Eliot Abrams took to the Council on Foreign Relations website to amplify the Israeli article (again with no sources or evidence) to a whole new and more dramatic article ominously titled “Putin in Syria.” Abrams adds “reporting” by Michael Weiss, who has long been on the payroll of viscerally anti-Putin oligarch Michael Khodorkovsky, without revealing the obvious bias in the source. Never mind, all Weiss adds to Abrams’ argument is that the Pentagon is “cagey” about discussing Russian involvement in Syria before again referencing the original (unsourced) Israeli article.

See how this works? Multiple media outlets report based on the same totally unsourced article and suddenly all the world’s writing about the Russian invasion of Syria.

Now the White House has gotten into the game. According to an article by Agence France Press, the White House is “monitoring reports” that the Russians are active in Syria.

What reports? The article does not say nor does the White House. Presumably the White House is referring back to the original (unsourced) Israeli article.

But in the category of never let a good “crisis” go to waste, the White House, which began bombing Syria last August in violation of both international and US law, has declared that any Russian involvement in the Syria crisis would be “destabilizing and counterproductive.”

Apparently a year of US bombs is not “destabilizing.”

This is where the hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a knife. The US is illegally bombing Syria, illegally violating Syrian sovereignty, illegally training and equipping foreign fighters to overthrow the Syrian government, and has backed radical jihadists through covert and overt programs.

ISIS and al-Qaeda in Syria were solely the products of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq under false pretenses — the lies of the neocons — and after a year of US bombing ISIS seems as strong as ever while scores of civilians are killed by US attacks.

All of this is perfectly fine and should never be questioned. But even the hint that the Russians, who have had to contend with their fair share of radical Islam and are much closer to Syria than the US, may have an interest in joining the fight against ISIS is met with hysterical reproaches by a White House that admits it has no evidence.

What is the White House afraid of? While the stated goal of the Obama Administration is to defeat ISIS, the real, long-term goal is to overthrow Assad. The Russians disagree with the US insistence that Assad’s departure must be the starting point of any political settlement of the crisis. The Russians have long ago come to understand that Assad may be key to saving Syria from the kind of jihadist chaos that has engulfed Libya after its “liberation” by the US and its allies.

That is why the US government is flirting with the (unsourced Israeli) rumors of a massive Russian invasion of Syria. Regurgitated cries that the Russians are coming may serve to divert attention from another failed US intervention in the region.

One might think that if the US was serious about defeating ISIS it would welcome involvement from Russia and Iran, both of which would like nothing more than to see the back of the Islamic State. One might think if the US was serious about defeating ISIS it would rethink its “Assad must go” policy and allow the one force that has the most incentive to defeat ISIS — the Syrian Arab Army.

Yet the US will only work with the same states that have trained, funded, and turned a blind eye to the radical Islamic fighters as they have poured into Syria over the past four years — Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, etc.

Conspiracy-minded people must be wondering why the US is so reluctant to accept assistance from forces that so earnestly and with such military capacity seek the end of ISIS while partnering with those forces that have done so much to create ISIS.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Destabilizing, Ron Paul, Russia, Syria, US

Russia: Prosecutors released Domodedovo German Sterligov.

August 31, 2015 By administrator

520x310Talk with law enforcement officers lasted several hours Report rusnovosti.ru

Prosecutors released Domodedovo German Sterligov. The channel LifeNews their work entrepreneur called “correct.”

Sterligov said that he was invited to talk at the passport control, the conversation lasted several hours.

Previously, the lawyer said the businessman RSN that his client was stopped at the airport Domodedovo through interstate investigation.

July 28, 2015 German Sterligov Azerbaijan declared internationally wanted by Interpol for being in Nagorno-Karabakh. August 23, 2015 Arthur Airapetov told RSN that Interpol wanted list stopped German Sterligov.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: German Sterligov, Karabakh, released, Russia

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • …
  • 48
  • Next Page »

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in