Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

Fear, Silence Weigh on Turkey’s Armenians after Failed Coup

February 15, 2018 By administrator

Cathedral of the Holy Cross is a Medieval Armenian Apostolic church on Lake Van's Akdamar Island in eastern Turkey. (Photo by Bruno Vanbesien/CC BY-NC 2.0)

Cathedral of the Holy Cross is a Medieval Armenian Apostolic church on Lake Van’s Akdamar Island in eastern Turkey. (Photo by Bruno Vanbesien/CC BY-NC 2.0)

Eurasianet.org has unveiled an article by freelance journalist Ayla Jean Yackley about the situation of Armenians following a failed coup in Turkey.

Aruş Taş, a silversmith in Istanbul’s historic Grand Bazaar, has witnessed decades of economic and social upheaval. But the crackdown wrought by a failed military coup in 2016 has been among the most wrenching, he says. Friends and family are leaving Istanbul, trade has nearly ground to a halt, and his faith that he and his fellow Armenians have a future in Turkey has dwindled.

“This time it is worse, because I have lost hope,” Taş says. “Now I fear for the country.”

In the wake of the coup, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has jailed more than 50,000 people, and the authorities have banned hundreds of news outlets and civil society groups. The country’s lurch toward Islamist-tinged nationalism under Erdoğan has left religious minorities feeling vulnerable. Recent attacks on minorities, although apparently isolated and spontaneous, have heightened those suspicions.

Turkey’s largest group of non-Muslims, Armenians have seen restored churches wrecked in military operations and the government block their efforts to elect a new spiritual leader. At stake is a tentative opening over the last decade that had eroded long-standing taboos, especially about the World War I-era Genocide when as many at 1.5 million Armenians perished as the Ottoman Empire collapsed.

Armenians “remember their past, what happened to their grandparents in this kind of atmosphere [which encourages] crimes. They know there is a big risk,” says Garo Paylan, an ethnic Armenian lawmaker from the opposition Peoples’ Democratic Party.

Paylan does not believe Erdoğan’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) deliberately targets these groups, but worries rival political forces can “play the card any time, knowing there is bias against the Armenian identity, and organize provocations against minorities. Armenians know that, and that is why they are silent again.” In this environment, many are reminded of the fate of Hrant Dink, Paylan says. Dink was the outspoken editor of the Armenian community newspaper Agos and an advocate for reconciling with the genocide, and was gunned down by Turkish nationalists outside of his office in central Istanbul in 2007. A trial of state officials accused of complicity in the murder drags on in an Istanbul court.

Paylan himself faced censure for discussing the genocide in parliament last year. A few months later, parliament passed a new set of rules, dubbed the “Garo Paylan clause,” fining lawmakers who are reprimanded or ejected from the assembly. Paylan sees the rules as an attempt to stifle critical debate.

The Turkish government has also thwarted attempts to elect a new patriarch at Istanbul’s Armenian Apostolic Church See. Church leader Mesrob II Mutafyan has been incapacitated, reportedly with dementia, since 2008. A lack of legal clarity over succession and the patriarchate’s status has allowed Turkish authorities to reject the community’s choice last year of Karekin Bekjian, an archbishop in Germany.

The Turkish Interior Ministry informed the patriarchate in early February that it does not recognize Bekjian’s position and that the Church had not established the appropriate conditions for a patriarchal election.

For many in Turkey, the climate has become so restrictive that abandoning it has become the only choice.

Official figures for the number of Turkish citizens who have moved overseas are not available, but the opposition Republican People’s Party reports that tens of thousands of affluent Turks have left since the coup attempt. Paylan, the MP, estimates that hundreds of Armenians are part of that exodus and that hundreds more plan to go.

In recent years, Erdoğan has threatened to “deport” the estimated 30,000 migrants from Armenia in Turkey without papers. The choice of words was painful: Most Ottoman Armenians died during their deportation to the Syrian desert a century ago.

The departure of Armenians and other non-Muslims is felt more acutely in communities already struggling to maintain their numbers, says Yetvart Danzikyan, Dink’s successor at Agos. “There is a historic responsibility in deciding to stay, but I cannot blame anyone who leaves. If only the government had not transformed Turkey into a place that people want to leave.”

Related links:

Eurasianet.org. Fear, Silence Weigh on Turkey’s Armenians after Failed Coup

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: 'Silence', fear, Turkey's Armenians, Weigh

Turkey: Even through all his bluster, Erdogan’s fear is obvious

July 18, 2017 By administrator

A soldier accused of attempting to assassinate Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on the night of the failed coup of July 15, 2016, is carried to the courthouse by gendarmes in Mugla, Turkey, July 14, 2017. (photo by REUTERS/Kenan Gurbuz)

By Pinar Tremblay,

Turkey is commemorating the first anniversary of the July 15 failed coup — the official Martyrs and Democracy Day. The list of state-sponsored celebrations is quite impressive, with nonstop TV shows rewriting that night. A webpage titled “July 15 activities” presents a documentary, songs about the attempt, the names of those killed, and the images of monuments built in Ankara and Istanbul for the victims. It also displays posters designed to capture the key moments of the coup attempt. Since July 11, these images have decorated cities throughout Turkey. Most of them are quite problematic, however.

There is an uproar on social media under the hashtag #IndirinOAfisleri (Take down those posters), which quickly became a trending topic. Social media commentators and columnists were disappointed, furious and perplexed; the most prevalent complaint was the display of Turkish soldiers as traitors and losers positioned against civilians and the Turkish flag. Those who object see the campaign as the government’s psychological attack on the military and believe it benefits the country’s enemies. Many commentators expressed surprise that there was not an image of exiled cleric Fethullah Gulen, who is said to have orchestrated the coup attempt.

Ultranationalist politicians Umit Ozdag and Meral Aksener expressed their disapproval of the posters and asked for them to be corrected promptly.

Within a few hours, it became clear that these images were not only offensive to the Turkish Armed Forces, but they were also plagiarized — in particular, one image caused commotion because it was plagiarized from an award-winning image by American photographer David Turnley taken during the 1991 Gulf War.

In the midst of the public’s anger, several old photos and videos resurfaced online of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other Justice and Development Party (AKP) elites with Gulen. So far, it’s unclear who was responsible for these images. People jokingly debated on social media whether it is Gulen followers or foreign enemies.

The images of defeated and meek soldiers underline two intertwined issues that are becoming increasingly problematic. First, a year after the botched coup, the domestic and international public remains unclear about what really happened. The coup’s political culprits can’t be clarified without the AKP’s cooperation.

Second, why does the government have such an uneasy relationship with the military? The images posted on social media revealed the pent-up frustration the Turkish public has with the AKP government and compelled a public discussion. For example, one Twitter user posted photos of distressed soldiers and wrote, “You cannot pen a grand legacy by getting poor conscripts killed in Syria or through Sadat.” (Sadat is the name of an international defense consultancy company whose owner, Adnan Tanriverdi, is one of Erdogan’s senior advisers.)

Even long before the coup attempt, Ankara bureaucrats would joke, “We have to keep the military busy so it won’t have time to cause trouble.”

AKP elites haven’t hidden their suspicion of the armed forces. They have persistently expressed dislike of national holidays celebrated with military parades, which used to be opportunities for the armed forces to show their strength. Through the years, AKP leaders have found perplexing excuses not to attend national celebrations, and they sometimes ban military parades altogether. Instead, government offices, schools and the public have been encouraged to celebrate newly discovered Islamic holidays and AKP-approved events.

A few recent cases that didn’t escape the press indicate that AKP officials, including Erdogan, may indeed be more worried about the armed forces than ever before. For example, in May, just before Erdogan’s arrival in the city of Tekirdag, a soldier assigned to salute the president was removed from the military guard. He was accused of being a member of the Gulen movement.

In June, images of officers with empty holsters saluting Erdogan appeared in the media. And it’s not just Erdogan who may not like security personnel with guns. On July 11, Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu was photographed saluting special operations police who had blank firing adaptors attached to their automatic rifles. Although unverified, there have long been rumors that Erdogan, AKP bureaucrats, lawmakers and even pro-AKP journalists wear bulletproof vests. So what is the cause of their hyperbolic fear of the military?

A professor of Ottoman history who works at a government university and spoke on condition of anonymity told Al-Monitor, “Trying to revitalize the Ottoman Empire’s glory, Erdogan has definitely woken up the sultan’s nightmare of the Janissaries. For centuries, the sounds of their cauldrons’ banging sent chills down the spines of the palace elite. So the tradition of a military shadow on politics is part of the culture here. Despite multiple coups, armed forces are revered because they are considered just and necessary for modern Turkey.”

However, he said, “in the last decade, starting with the damaging plots, such as the Ergenekon and Balyoz [cases] against high-ranking military officials, the reputation of the army has been tarnished. There are also concerns that Erdogan is raising his own private army [referred to as Sadat in the daily lexicon]. Still, for Erdogan’s and other officials’ security details to collect weapons from honor guards required by protocol is unheard of.”

Given Erdogan’s show of strength July 15, and given that the military’s reputation and power are at their lowest point in the last decade, why are government elites still scared of their own soldiers?

Limited data on the past 15 years of the armed forces show a dismal picture. For example, between 2005 and 2015, more soldiers committed suicide than died in combat. That said, the number of security personnel lost in combat or terror attacks has also risen significantly since 2015. Government purges have hit the security forces the hardest, and the latest recruits haven’t been trained properly, leading to undeniable incompetence in their service at all levels. To top this off, thousands of conscripts suffered from food poisoning in May and June, and it is doubtful that the allegations of corruption involving the Defense Ministry and catering firms will ever be investigated diligently.

A colonel who spoke on condition of anonymity told Al-Monitor, “Erdogan will go down in Turkish political history as a politician with the least tolerance toward criticism and satire. We knew he had a fragile ego. We now see the fear of death is quite potent for him, and it is contagious. For now, fear compels obedience. Once the threshold for fear is surpassed, the result is disobedience. Once you have overt disobedience, further domestic pressure becomes inevitable and the cycle for disaster starts. What if people no longer fear the system?”

Pinar Tremblay is a columnist for Al-Monitor’s Turkey Pulse and a visiting scholar of political science at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. She is a columnist for Turkish news outlet T24. Her articles have appeared in Time, New

 

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Erdogan, fear, obvious

Turkey’s Main opposition head says Erdoğan is insisting on system change ‘out of fear of prosecution’

February 2, 2017 By administrator

DHA photo

The reason why President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is so insistent on shifting Turkey to a presidential system of governance is because he is afraid of being prosecuted and therefore wants to “secure his own future,” main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) head Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu has said.

“He is afraid of being tried. He knows that if he and his family are prosecuted, he will be convicted. Everybody knows this. Even his closest circle knows this. So he wants to secure his own future. He cares about his own future more than the people’s future,” said Kılıçdaroğlu in a Feb. 1 interview with German broadcaster Deutsche Welle’s Turkish service.

“The most successful leader is the one who makes others feel the need for him the least,” the CHP head said, adding that competent institutions should carry out the state’s duties rather than individuals.

“If you take all the power, this means you break down this structure. You only create an environment of chaos. No sensible person would want so much responsibility. All Erdoğan cares about is the thought: ‘What if I get prosecuted one day?’ His whole strategy is founded on this,” said Kılıçdaroğlu, referring to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

He described the constitutional amendments set to be taken to the people in a referendum in April as a “regime change,” arguing that if such excessive responsibilities are handed over to the president a “totalitarian presidential system” will emerge.

“This is called a regime change,” said Kılıçdaroğlu.

Meanwhile, the CHP has decided to accelerate its preparations for the “no” campaign in the upcoming referendum. With four party deputies in particular – Deniz Baykal, Haluk Koç, Gürsel Tekin and Muharrem İnce – set to join campaigns throughout the country to promote a “no” vote for the charter amendments.

The party has also stated its intention to employ a “supra-party rhetoric” in its referendum campaign.

February/02/2017

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Erdogan, fear, prosecution

Azerbaijan ‘revolution’ fear

December 29, 2014 By administrator

azadliqOpposition radio station in Azerbaijan ‘Azadliq Following the sealing of the office in Baku 12 radio employees were detained. Aliyev supporters of increased pressure on the media in the country, activists and civil society organizations ‘revolution’ is spreading news that it is in preparation.

Financially supported by the US Radio Free Europe “Radio Azadliq known as’ the raid on the offices of Azerbaijan takes repercussions. sealed radio last Friday’s 12 employees were detained and interrogated for 12 hours. The host of the daily radio broadcast program Kamran Mahmudov reportedly detained at his home.

All radio workers detained were released, but it is estimated that in the coming days the statement called for questioning more employees.

A long time that the Government’s target Radio Azadliq terrestrial broadcast was halted in 2009. Radio has been broadcasting on the internet since then.

Out by the David Herszenhorn signature in the New York Times in an article is by Aliyev fans overseas in countries supported NGOs ‘Arab Spring in or may be revolutionary preparations in Baku as in Ukraine’ is doing the review.

Aliyev government blames the grounds of their cooperation with Armenia örgtü of civil society.

New Azerbaijan Party deputy Siyavuş Novrusov, in a statement to a newspaper ‘Armenian lobby working for foreign intelligence services and the need to search every place,’ he said.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Azerbaijan, fear, revolution

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in