By BEN NORTON

Scripps College students & faculty want the ex-secretary of state & “genocide enabler” disinvited from commencement,

Students and faculty alike have joined in protests at California’s Scripps College, where former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was booked to headline the graduation commencement ceremony.

Critics have blasted the ex-Clinton official as a “war criminal” and “repeated genocide enabler,” and have pledged to boycott commencement if she is not disinivited.

The protests have reinvigorated the debate around Albright and her legacy.

Scripps is a prestigious all-women college in Claremont, California. It is relatively small, with just around 1,000 students.

Class President Jennie Xu booked Albright, the first woman to serve as U.S. secretary of state, in early 2015. “She was our top choice,” Xu told the Los Angeles Times. “I was really, really ecstatic.”

Students and faculty did not share the enthusiasm.

Nearly 30 Scripps staff members published an open letter in the student newspaper in April expressing “outrage” at the selection and declaring that they will not participate in the May 14 graduation ceremony in protest.

As former secretary of state and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Albright “supported several policies that led to the deaths of millions of people,” the faculty wrote.

They cited numerous examples of extreme crimes of which Albright has been accused, in Iraq, Rwanda, Yugoslavia and Colombia.

In the 1990s, the Clinton administration pressured the U.N. Security Council to impose one of the most brutal sanctions regimes in history on Iraq, ostensibly in order to punish dictator Saddam Hussein — whom the U.S. had backed throughout the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s — for his 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

A U.N. report found that, from 1991 to late 1995, as many as 576,000 Iraqi children died because of the harsh economic sanctions, of which Albright was a staunch supporter.

The Clinton administration responded not by lifting the sanctions, but rather by helping to create the U.N.’s Oil-for-Food Program, a corruption-plagued agreement in which Iraq gave away its oil in return for basic necessities like food and medicine, which the sanctions restricted.

In an Emmy Award-winning 1996 interview on CBS program “60 Minutes,” the Clinton-era secretary of state was asked whether the deaths of half a million Iraqi children was worth it. “The price is worth it,” Albright bluntly replied.

After working for 34 years at the U.N., Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq Denis Halliday resigned in 1998 in protest of the sanctions, saying they amounted to “genocide” in Iraq.

“We are now in there responsible for killing people, destroying their families, their children, allowing their older parents to die for lack of basic medicines,” Halliday said. Other longtime U.N. officials joined Halliday in resigning in protest.

Albright later apologized for seemingly justifying the genocide of Iraqi children, and claimed she was asked a loaded question.

This is perhaps Albright’s most infamous moment, but the Scripps faculty cited other crimes of which she has been accused.

The U.S., with Albright’s and Bill Clinton’s leadership, pressured the U.N. to withdraw peacekeeping forces from Rwanda during the first two weeks of the 1994 genocide that left hundreds of thousands of people dead.

The National Security Archive at George Washington University obtained Clinton White House emails and handwritten notes from Susan Rice — then a member of the National Security Council staff and now a national security advisor and former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. — that show the U.S.’s role in removing the peacekeepers.

A report commissioned by the Organization of African Unity cited by the Scripps scholars reveals that the Clinton administration knew that a genocide was taking place, and yet the “Americans, led by U.S. Ambassador Madeleine Albright, played the key role in blocking more expeditious action by the U.N.”

Albright’s role in the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia has also again come under intense scrutiny. While the U.S. stymied U.N. action against the genocide in Rwanda, it claimed that genocide could possibly take place in Yugoslavia if NATO did not intervene (as it would again do in 2011 in order to justify war in Libya).

Former Secretary of State Albright was a staunch supporter of the NATO bombing. The Scripps scholars, however, noted that “the bombing was linked to U.S. efforts to thwart Russia in Europe, and Yugoslavia was given a choice between accepting a peace treaty that allowed a NATO occupation of the country or U.S. bombing.”

Source: salon.com