Gagrule.net

Gagrule.net News, Views, Interviews worldwide

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • GagruleLive
  • Armenia profile

‘Syrian National Coalition lives luxurious lifestyle’

November 15, 2013 By administrator

Press TV talks with Webster Griffin Tarpley, an author and historian in Washington, regarding the millions of dollars Riyadh has reportedly allocated to set up a so-called transitional government for Syria.

Syrian Coalition– How do you see this Saudi move? Certainly, it seems to be supporting this SNC with a lot of money behind it.

– We are seeing a very distinct pattern that is now developing and it is the idea that we have the former imperialist powers like the Suez powers of 1956, the British and the French, the Sykes-Picot powers of World War I, these two left imperialisms.

The British and the French [are] joining together with Saudi Arabia and the United States instead is gravitating, believe it or not, towards Russia at least on some items. This idea of having a Syrian provisional government was something that the United States did not want.

Kerry, if we can believe the news account, Secretary Kerry tried repeatedly to stop this from happening, saying that this was a way for these rebels of Syria to try to block the convening of the Geneva conference but they have now gone on and have done it.

[Laurent] Fabius of France thinks that this is a wonderful thing and also the spokesman for the British foreign office thinks that they are wonderful things. Now of course that sets up this conflict.

As for the Syrian National Coalition themselves, we can see 50 million dollars a month that buys a lot of champagne, caviar and God knows what. These are people who live in hotels; they live a luxurious lifestyle; I guess we can call them lounge lizards, parasites, adventurers and they are going to oppose now as long as and until the money runs out, as the government of Syria. But simply this has no credibility.

I also wonder how happy Turkey is to have this gang on their soil because wherever these people go, crime seems to show up, right? Sarin gas, arms and other problems seem to multiply around them. So I do not think this is an experiment likely to be very successful.

– So then going forward, what do you think will happen with this experiment, as you call it?

– That depends on the battlefield and right now the battlefield could hardly look worse for the rebels. The news reports today are that the liberation of Aleppo may now be, if not in hand, at least in sight.

We have got the Syrian army with its supporters from Hezbollah and perhaps from Iraq and elsewhere have now essentially cleared the highway that leads into Aleppo from the south, taking the strategic villages.

There might be one village where the rebels are able to hold on and at the same time, the Syrian army is making big progress in 4 or 5 suburbs of Damascus and the rebels are, in the north especially, so frightened that they are putting on hysterical calls that everybody has now got to unite, of course what they have never been able to do.

Everybody should unite, they say, to try to prevent the fall of Aleppo. If you get the fall of Aleppo and the loosening of this ring of terrorists around Damascus, I think what you will essentially see then is the beginning of the end of the military rebellion in Syria and getting into a phase of mop-up where the position of the rebels would become critical, desperate.

Source: Panorama.am

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: ‘Syrian National Coalition lives luxurious lifestyle’

Bluesman Toronzo Cannon writes song about Armenia

November 8, 2013 By administrator

Toronzo-1

 

Toronzo-2a

 

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: Bluesman Toronzo Cannon writes song about Armenia

Washington seeks to punish Baghdad

November 7, 2013 By administrator

Iranian Diplomacy’s interview with Alireza Ayati, a senior expert on Middle Eastern affairs

Maliky and Obama– It is said that Maleki’s visit to the US was made to gain this country’s support for his third term as prime minister. This is while Obama had said in a press conference that the US reiterates the on-time holding of elections in Iraq. Some Iraqis accuse Maleki of attempting to postpone the elections for two years. How successful will, in your opinion, Maleki be in this regard?

– Since the 2005 parliamentary elections in Iraq and then the 2010 parliamentary elections, Maleki has been the prime minister of this country and right now acts as a bold and capable administrator who has been able to run the country with its complicated and fragile political and security conditions. He has especially been able to safeguard his country against the storm of insecurities and has directed the Kurdish and Sunni parties towards dialogue and negotiation. There is no doubt that he is one of the significant options for the prime ministerial role in the Spring 2014 election. There is also no legal prohibition for him either. Of course, there are criticisms against him by different parties and even some Iraqi religious leaders and there were attempts in the parliament by some factions to adopt a law to forbid the heads of the three bodies to remain in their position three times, but the constitutional court rejected this bill.

The fact that the officials of Saudi Arabia and the Arab states and even the Zionist regime are concerned about the developments in Iraq is due to the policies pursued by Maleki himself and his braveries with regard to the issue of Syria. He took independent and important positions regarding Syria and in the end everybody agreed with him that if the terrorists are strengthened in Iraq, Iraq will be the first country which would be damaged.

Maleki trusts his popular base and has, several times, stated that in the future a government of majority must be established in Iraq so that no party would be able to shut down the cabinet. This shows that Maleki is certain that his party will gain significant votes in the election. Of course, with this volume of forces and advisors in Iraq, the US embassy will certainly exert pressure on different rival parties to choose a western option (like Alawi) for the post of prime minister because Maleki dealt a blow to the Saudi-US-Zionist plan in the developments of Syria and the western countries are looking to punish him.

– The Maleki government insists on receiving modern arms from the US so that it could fight against al-Qaeda and even claims that one of the reasons that it has not been able to defend its borders with Syria is a lack of armaments and apparently the US is not ready to deliver them to the Iraqi government. What are the US’ reasons for this decision onsidering the security agreement reached between the two countries?

– The Americans entered Iraq to dominate the resources and regional weight of Iraq. Saddam was supposed to be overthrown and then they intended to deal with Tehran and Damascus. Now the US sees that Saddam is gone and Iran and Iraq have taken Syria out of the hands of the Saudi-US-Zionist plan. The US is not happy about this. They said that they would leave Iraq but would sign a security agreement to maintain their dominance. Maleki and the Iraqi parliament stood against it and did not allow such an agreement to be signed.

The US-Iraq security agreement was not aimed at fighting terrorism. The US has no problem with al-Qaeda killing the Shiites and the Sunnis and the Kurds. The US’ objective behind signing this agreement was to later use it against Bashar Assad in the borders and overthrow him. It wanted this agreement to exert pressure on Iran by sending anti-revolutionary forces to the neighboring provinces with Iraq. It wanted this agreement to exert pressure on Turkey any time it wished. But Maleki and the parliament did not allow this to happen. Therefore, the US wants al-Qaeda and the Baathists to weaken the government and the parliament and damage Iraq’s security.

Al-Qaeda’s conflict with Iran, Maleki and Syria will be to the benefit of the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia because otherwise they themselves would be involved in these types of conflicts. That is why the young al-Qaeda commander is easily targeted in Pakistan but nothing happens in Iraq and Syria.

– The government of Maleki claims that it mediates between Iran and the US. To what extent has Maleki been able to play such a role?

– Any country which can transform relations between other countries into friendly and good relations should do so. Mediation is a valuable action in international relations, particularly if it prevents a war and seeks the promotion of the interests of both parties. There is no problem if a powerful and effective Shiite government like Iraq mediates between Iran and the US. Nuclear negotiations were held in the capitals of different countries like Baghdad and Istanbul. We welcome any country which could promote the interests of the people of Iran. The Iraqis have good relations with the US and transfer our messages and analyses and even their own points of view. The Iraqis, whether in the parliament or the government, are Iran’s friends and they are trusted. Talebani or Ibrahim Jafari and Maleki and others are all concerned about Iran’s interests and if they have transferred a message or an analysis it has certainly been in the interest of relations between Iran and Iraq, just as Iran participated in the Iran-US-Iraq negotiations to promote the security of Iraq and the interests of the people of this country and it was a positive and constructive mediator.

– The US is unhappy with Iraq because it has allowed Iran to use its territory to send arms to Syria and, in general, Iraq is on Syria’s front. Has Maleki been able to convince the US that he is not on Syria’s front? What are the US’ expectations from Iraq?

– The US claims that Iran sends arms to Syria. This is while the Iraqis landed Iranian planes in Baghdad airport for inspection and later announced that the cargo was medicine or food and not arms. The Iraqis have officially stated to the US that Iran does not send arms to Syria.

The Congress, which of course is motivated by the Zionists and the Israeli lobby, exerts the most pressure on Maleki in this regard. They have even exerted pressure on the White House to stop giving arms to Maleki until the issue of sending arms from Iraqi space to Syria by Iran is clear. It seems that this is more a psychological war which is created against the axis of resistance by the Israelis. The West knows well that Bashar Assad’s remaining in power has nothing to do with the arms but the strong position of 70% of the people who have stood by Assad.

The US let al-Qaeda enter Syria to overthrow Bashar Assad and then planned to kill them, but as in Afghanistan, they will not be able to do this and will be forced to respect a political solution to the Syrian crisis.

Source: Panorama.am

Filed Under: Interviews Tagged With: Washington seeks to punish Baghdad

Saudi Arabia key obstacle to Syria’s peace: Edward Spannaus

November 6, 2013 By administrator

PressTV: has conducted an interview with Edward Spannaus, legal affairs editor of the Executive Intelligence Review, about the dire humanitarian situation in Syria.

Edward Spannaus– Now looking at the numbers, the situation does sound extremely dire for the civilians inside Syria. What do you make of it?

– Well it is a very dire situation and it has been so for many, many months and the reason for that is that the Western countries particularly the United States and Britain will not put any pressure on the Saudis who are the primary sponsors of the so-called opposition forces for actually by and large al-Qaeda.

Syria has become the largest center for al-Qaeda now than anywhere in the world. And until the United States agrees to crackdown on Saudi Arabia with the primary backers arming and financing opposition, this chaos will continue.

– Well all eyes were on the Geneva II peace conference to figure out a solution to what is taking place in Syria but now we are seeing the so-called Syrian National Coalition placing pre-conditions as to the formation of this conference. Does that goes to show in particular how bleak are the prospects of peaceful solution to this as long as pre-conditions are being set by the opposition?

– Right. Well there should be no pre-condition. The Assad government has given their consent to these negotiations as the UN has suggested Iran should participate in these. All the neighbors, the relevant neighbors should participate and they should go ahead. There is no reason for these not to.

And as I said the key obstacle on this right now are the Saudis, is Saudi Arabia and the failure of the Obama government in United States and Cameron in Britain to crackdown on the Saudis. That is the problem.

– And we have also seen a lot of aid organizations appealing to the international community for funds which are not coming through. It is quite interesting to know that there are more than enough funds to go around to help support these Takfiri insurgents fighting the Syrian government but not to help the civilians?

– Yes that is absolutely correct. The [Persian] Gulf states, mean particularly again the Saudi Arabia is pouring all kinds of money and arms into there to increase the chaos and humanitarian situation gets worse.

So it is a danger inside Syria and there is an international danger because of the war danger, if this continues, any time you have a danger of drawing the United States, Russia into a confrontation.

So this Geneva process should go ahead. The Saudis should be reined in and the situation could be cleaned up.

– It seems when you look at John Kerry’s recent visit to Saudi Arabia that the US is doing anything but that? 

– Yes absolutely. I mean if Kerry were honest and Obama, they would demand Saudi Arabia come clean on the 9/11 attacks in the US.

So as long as that the Saudi role in 9/11 is not exposed and is not brought out, none of the rest of these will work and Kerry’s visit to Saudi Arabia is a bad joke.

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: Saudi Arabia key obstacle to Syria’s peace: Edward Spannaus

MI6 seeks drug money in Afghanistan: Gordon Duff (one hundred billion dollar a year drug industry)

October 23, 2013 By administrator

Press TV has conducted an interview with Gordon Duff, senior editor with Veterans Today, about Britain’s intelligence agency MI6 demanding more spies to be sent to MI6Afghanistan amid concerns that the war-torn country could become an “intelligence vacuum” after British troops’ withdrawal.

– We are hearing the MI6 saying there is going to be a security vacuum in Afghanistan. What do you think that precisely means and what do you think these intelligence agencies are going to be up to in Afghanistan?

– I think they are going to Afghanistan to help manage the one hundred billion dollar a year drug industry, moving heroin through Afghanistan, managing the banking for the heroin industry through London banks. I can’t think of anything else they would do there.

There is no history of terrorism involving Afghanistan and Britain or Afghanistan and the United States. That was long disproven, this debunked over a decade ago.

There is no reason for the US or Britain who have been in Afghanistan other than the fact that they do not seem to have the common sense to leave.

– So you are saying that up until now there have been spies from the US, from Britain in Afghanistan involved in the drug trade?

– Yes, the CIA, MI6 and other intelligence agencies have been running drug trafficking in the world. Certainly since Vietnam, the British intelligence services were running world drug trafficking in the 1840’s at the time of the Opium Wars.

They have always managed the world’s opium and heroin trafficking. It is something the British empire is known for. The British began heroin certainly opium production in Afghanistan. It is their industry. They have been doing it for well over a hundred years and it is extremely profitable. It funds all of their other activities and there is no reason for them to want to leave it.

There is no other interest they have. MI6 does not have the capability to impact the intelligence or military situation in Afghanistan in a positive way, whatsoever.

– So how could this be under way Mr. Duff, with the knowledge of the Afghan government?

– With a hundred billion dollars moving around, it is not just the Afghan government. There are key members of the British government who are paid tens of millions of dollars a year.

Over four hundred million dollars of Afghan drug money went into the last American congressional elections. Afghan drug money is the lubrication that runs much of the world’s politics.

 

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: MI6 seeks drug money in Afghanistan: Gordon Duff (one hundred billion dollar a year drug industry)

Opinion: time to rescue Christians from annihilation

October 23, 2013 By administrator

October 23, 2013 – 16:26 AMT

While Europe is struggling for gay rights and America is cultivating Jihad through financing and training terrorists and then fighting them 171669‘heroically’, Christian shrines are being eliminated across the globe, the head of the Ararat Armenians Community of Israel says in a post of his Facebook page.

“Copts are oppressed in Egypt; Aleppo, the pearl of the Christian world in Middle East is ruined and looted; people are being arrested in Libya only because they are carrying Bibles with them… This is a minor part of the violence raging in the territory of Caliphate,” David Galfayan says.

“In response, looters demand asylum and respect of their religion in Christian countries. Why do heads of Christian confessions close their eyes to destruction of sacred places and murders? The situation reminds of 1915 when Europe did not notice the slaughter of 1.5 million of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire,” he says.

“The big and beautiful cathedral, Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, is ‘decorated’ with minarets. Destroying Christian values, Islamists are trying to impose their own rules in European countries, whose officials had better tear themselves away from discussions of gay marriages and think thoroughly about salvation of their nations from assimilation and annihilation. Otherwise, Elena Chudinova’s novel, The Mosque of Notre Dame, will come true. I am not calling for violence. On the contrary, I am calling for protection of our children from forced Islamization before it’s too late,” Galfayan concludes.

Chudinova’s novel imagines Paris in 2048 ruled by Shari’a laws. In the novel, Frenchmen who refuse to convert to Islam are herded into ghettoes. France has been taken over by Wahhabite Islam, and the Vatican no longer exists.

Source: PanARMENIAN.Net

Filed Under: Interviews, News Tagged With: Opinion: time to rescue Christians from annihilation

PKK threatens new fight in Turkey QANDIL – Reuters

October 22, 2013 By administrator

Bayık accused Ankara and influential Turkish preacher Fethullah Gülen of recruiting and training Islamist “bandit groups” to fight Kurds in Syria on their behalf.

QANDIL – Reuters

n_56615_4The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK)  could halt the peace process and re-enter Turkey from northern Iraq, a senior leader of the group said at Qandil Mountains, threatening to “rekindle an insurgency unless Ankara resuscitates the peace process soon,” according to Reuters.

Accusing Turkey of waging a proxy war against Kurds in Syria by backing Islamist rebels fighting them in the north, Cemil Bayık, a founding member of the PKK said they had the right to retaliate threatening to end the ongoing peace process, a round of meetings between the Turkish state and the organization’s jailed leader Abdullah Öcalan.

However, Ankara strongly denies backing any rebel faction against Kurds in Syria and has held regular talks with the head of a Syrian Kurdish group close to the PKK.

“The process has come to an end,” Bayık said in the interview, which took place on Oct. 19. “Either they accept deep and meaningful negotiations with the Kurdish movement, or there will be a civil war in Turkey.”

As prerequisites, Turkey must improve the conditions in which jailed Öcalan is being held and deal with him on equal terms, guarantee amendments to the Constitution and enlist a third party to oversee any further steps in the process, he added.

“Now we are preparing ourselves to send the withdrawn groups back to North Kurdistan if the [Turkish] government does not accept our conditions,” said Bayık. He said the direction of the process would become clear “in the coming days.”

The ongoing peace process was thrown further into doubt earlier this month when Turkish government unveiled a package of reforms Bayık described as “empty.”

“That package has nothing to do with democracy,” Bayık said, accusing Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of giving false hope. “There is no change in the mentality.”

The reform package revealed by Erdoğan on Sept. 30 stopped short of constitutional guarantees for Kurdish identity and culture, greater autonomy and native-language education, and did not touch anti-terror laws that have put thousands of political prisoners behind bars, Bayık claimed.
“We silenced our weapons so that politics could speak, but now we see that politics is in prison.”

Bayık claimed whilst the PKK had abided by the cease-fire, “Turkey had moved the frontline in its fight against the Kurds to Syria,” where civil war has raged for more than two years.

Bayık also accused Ankara and influential Turkish preacher Fethullah Gülen of recruiting and training Islamist “bandit groups” to fight Kurds in Syria on their behalf.

“At a time when the Turkish government is helping the bandit groups and is waging a war on the people of West Kurdistan… it is the right of the Kurdish people to bring the fight to Turkey,” Bayık said, referring to the northeastern corner of Syria, where a Kurdish group aligned with the PKK is in control.

Ankara denies arming the rebels or facilitating the passage of foreign fighters who have gone to join al-Qaeda-affiliated factions in Syria, including the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and the al-Nusra front.

Asked whether the PKK had sent militants to reinforce the ranks of fellow Kurds in Syria, or would consider doing so in future, Bayık said they did not need help.

“We don’t want to send them to West Kurdistan,” he said. “If the Turkish government wants to insist on fighting, North Kurdistan is the field of war.”

However he admitted some Kurds from Syria who had previously member of the PKK in Turkey had returned home of their own volition, and that they increasingly felt compelled to go to Syria and fight there. Bayık said in principle the PKK had nothing against Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) developing good relations with Ankara, as long as they were based on “equality, freedom and democracy.”

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: PKK threatens new fight in Turkey QANDIL - Reuters

Politicking with Jesse Ventura: Ex-governor and former wrestler (VIDEO)

October 18, 2013 By administrator

Jesse VenturaEx-governor and former wrestler Jesse Ventura joins Larry King in a no holds barred talk on Obama, the Gov’t shutdown, American hypocrisy, and what he’d do with Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning. Plus, why he thinks Americans are still being lied to about JFK’s death, and who’s to blame — including another former president.

Source: RT America

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews, Videos Tagged With: Politicking with Jesse Ventura: Ex-governor and former wrestler Jesse (VIDEO)

Another U.S. Whistleblower Behind Bars? Investor Jailed After Exposing Corrupt Azerbaijani Oil Deal

October 16, 2013 By administrator

By AMY GOODMAN & JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Democracy Now

In a Democracy Now! exclusive, we look at the case of multimillionaire American businessman and philanthropist Rick Bourke, who blew the whistle on a fraudulent Exposing corrupt Azerbaijani oil dealscheme by international criminals to gain control of the oil riches of the former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan — only to end up as the only person sent to jail by federal prosecutors in the massive conspiracy. Since May, Bourke has been held in a federal prison, serving a term of one year and one day for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for alleged knowledge of the bribery that allegedly took place in 1998. Other investors in the Azerbaijan scheme included former Democratic Senate Majority leader George Mitchell and major institutions including Columbia University and AIG, but no one else was jailed in the United States.

http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/15/another_us_whistleblower_behind_bars_investor

High-ranking former U.S. and British officials from the CIA and MI6 have raised serious concerns about the conviction of Bourke in part because the key witnesses during his trial were allegedly intelligence assets working for the U.S. government. They are not the only ones who question Bourke’s guilt. Even the judge in his case has admitted having doubts. At the time of Bourke’s sentencing, Shira Scheindlin of the Federal District Court said, “After 10 years of supervising this case, it is still not entirely clear to me whether Mr. Bourke was a victim, or a crook, or a little bit of both.

 

” We speak to Bourke’s lawyer, the law professor and renowned attorney Michael Tigar, as well as former Washington Post reporter Scott Armstrong. “Why is it that they would go after the guy that blew the whistle on the thievery and bribery, Rick Bourke?” Tigar asks. “Why is it that the Czech citizen and the guy, the ex-patriot, and the German-Swiss lawyer all are walking free; the American citizen, philanthropist, and so on, is sitting in a minimum security jail? Well, investment in the Azerbaijan hydrocarbon industry is now safely in the hands of major petroleum companies. Is that a reason?”

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Today in a Democracy Now! exclusive, we spend the hour looking at a story of yet another whistleblower imprisoned under the Obama administration, a story that could be straight out of a Hollywood thriller. The saga centers on an American businessman and philanthropist who was caught in an amazing web of international white-collar crime and mysterious suspected double agents of powerful intelligence agencies, a man who, when he blew the whistle, ended up being indicted by federal prosecutors, convicted and sent to prison for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The cast of unlikely characters includes a man nicknamed the Pirate of Prague, a former U.S. senator, an Ivy League university and the presidents of the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan.

AMY GOODMAN: The story centers on a multimillionaire named Frederic Bourke, known as Rick. You might recognize the name. He is best known for co-founding the luxury handbag company Dooney & Bourke. Using profits from the handbag company, he later became a major investor in medical research, including cutting-edge cancer treatments.

 

Filed Under: Interviews, News Tagged With: Another U.S. Whistleblower Behind Bars? Investor Jailed After Exposing Corrupt Azerbaijani Oil Deal

‘US financial crisis deeper than debt ceiling’ Paul Craig Roberts

October 4, 2013 By administrator

Press TV has conducted an interview with Paul Craig Roberts, a former assistant secretary of the US Treasury from Atlanta, to share his opinions on the shutdown of the US government following the worsening economic situation in the country.

US Financial crisis– First of all, tell us what does this government shutdown in essence mean?

Kind of a guide if you can be for us, for non-Americans, as to how many people are affected, what sections of the government, what departments, and if it is a partial shutdown how does that affect the US economy?

– Well, let me say, let me go to the most general level. What this shows is that the superpower, the exceptional country, the indispensable country is not even capable of governing itself and yet it claims to know what is best for Iran, for Iraq, for Afghanistan, for Somalia, for Libya, for Russia, for china, for the whole world and yet it cannot govern itself.

Now this so-called debt ceiling crisis, that is not the real crisis, it would be resolved. In fact, if it is not, Obama under all of the directives that have concentrated power in the executive, doing the war on terror, he can simply declare a national emergency and raise the debt ceiling on his own account.

Congress knows that and they will not want the executive to exercise that type of power, so I do not think that this would be long-lived.

But the real crisis is not the debt ceiling, the real crisis is that for 20 years American jobs have been moved offshore, which in effect means that the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) has moved offshore, tax pays have moved offshore; therefore, the revenue flow is impacted and doing much of the same …, Washington has been at war for 12 years and these wars are extremely expensive and distinguished experts have said that the cost of these wars both out of pocket and already incurred future obligations, are in the nationhood of six trillion dollars.

So, the real crisis is the gap, the wide gap that has appeared between expenditures and revenues and that cannot be closed under present circumstances.

So, all solving the debt ceiling crisis, all that does is let them issue more debt in order to continue to bridge the deficit.

Now…, a part of this is that to bridge that deficit, the Federal Reserve is printing one thousand billion dollars a year…, to purchase bonds to finance its deficit and the printing of these dollars is impacting the world’s confidence in the dollar as the reserve currency.

So, if you were to see a movement away from the dollar, the exchange rate would fall and this would then import very high inflation into the American economy, the Federal Reserve loses control of the interest rates and the whole house of cards would come down.

Now that is the real crisis.

– Paul Craig Roberts, can you explain this a little bit for us? Do you agree with some of the viewpoint there made by our viewers on our Facebook page?

– Well, this is a very popular account in conservative circles. What happened with the Federal Reserve, the reason it was said to be owned by private banks, was that there was a strong opposition to having a national bank. It had been always in the United States; so, they disguised this by saying: Well, it is truly just a big bank owned by the banks and this made it more acceptable to the opponents.

I do not think that these owners, as they are called, actually control the policy and if they did, it would not be permitted, there is no reason at all for the United States government to … a few banks.

So, it is true that the Treasury lost its ability to turn up money directly, control the money supply and just transfer it to the Federal Reserve and so now the treasury prints bonds and then use their bonds to Federal Reserve for money, but the interest on these bonds are returned to the Treasury; they do not go to the private owners and the Federal Reserve pays its own expenses out of the interest income, yet, it gets from its holding of Treasury bonds but it returns the rest to the Treasury.

So, it is not the system that it was made out to be and I think that the reason that it is in this form, to repeat myself, is that was a form they had to put in to get around the opposition to having a national bank.

– Paul Craig Roberts, I like to expand more with you on what has been called … , many adjectives but “a political bickering” and some of the headlines that have been noted here on some of the publications there in the US, because as an outsider, you know, many people from around the world are really surprised and some shocked at how this could be going on in the United States, but one of the headline that reads “For House Republicans, confrontation is safer that compromise”, another one: “For most Republicans the only greater parallel than shutting down the federal government would have been fighting to keep it open.”

I mean is this how deep is this? And then what about the American people who are suffering because of this?

– Well, the American people are suffering for a lot of reasons, and it is true that the right-wing Republicans are being silly and I think that they will end up discrediting themselves.

I do not think that this shutdown will last long. It certainly will not be permitted to endanger debt repayment.

In fact, the Federal Reserve can always repay bonds simply by printing the money; there is no limit on the ability of the Federal Reserve to print money. You have to keep in mind that during the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve extended over 16 trillion dollars in loans to the US and European banks and they did this on their own authority, so I assume that they can do this as well for the Treasury.

I do not really think that the debt ceiling is important because, as I have already said, Obama has the power to declare a national emergency and raise it by himself and so people do not really understand that and so if this sort of impacts were to last too long and start causing the kinds of problems that people talk about, I think that the executive branch would simply act independently.

So, if they can throw somebody in prison for the rest of their life without due process of law, without evidence, if they can murder American citizens under the authority of the executive branch without due process of law, they can certainly set aside whatever the debt ceiling law is.

So, I am not in any way worried about that and I think that my main point was missed. The main point is that the real crisis is not the fact that the debt ceiling has been delayed from being raised, it is the fact that there is a huge imbalance now between the expenditures and revenues.

When you offshore a good segment of your economy, you have really hurt yourself. You have deprived yourself of revenues in the long run and when you build in the costs of 12 years of war, you have really hurt the expenditure side.

So, the real crisis is that the gap is so wide, there is really nothing they can do …, they would have to be able to bring the jobs home, they would have to be able to get rid of these … costs and there are powerful vested interests defending both things. So, that is the real crisis, it is not the debt ceiling that is the crisis.

– Paul Craig Roberts, in less than 30 seconds give us your reaction to what Sean O’Grady (other guest of the show) was saying there.

– Yes, jobs offshoring has nothing whatsoever to do with trade. It is not trade, it is when the American corporation locates the production for its domestic markets offshore and uses foreign labor to produce the goods it sells in the United States.

So, it is a substitution of foreign labor for US labor; so, it affects the employment, income, tax-based GDP in the United States.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with free trade, it has no relation to trade. Free trade is based on the comparative advantage. Offshoring is based on the pursuit of absolute advantage, which is an antithesis of free trade.

It is amazing that people do not know this. They obviously mouth ‘free trade,’ but they do not know what it is.

Anyhow, to repeat myself, jobs offshoring is not trade, it is the movement of the production for your home market to a foreign country.

Filed Under: Articles, Interviews Tagged With: 'US financial crisis deeper than debt ceiling’ Paul Craig Roberts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • Next Page »

Support Gagrule.net

Subscribe Free News & Update

Search

GagruleLive with Harut Sassounian

Can activist run a Government?

Wally Sarkeesian Interview Onnik Dinkjian and son

https://youtu.be/BiI8_TJzHEM

Khachic Moradian

https://youtu.be/-NkIYpCAIII
https://youtu.be/9_Xi7FA3tGQ
https://youtu.be/Arg8gAhcIb0
https://youtu.be/zzh-WpjGltY





gagrulenet Twitter-Timeline

Tweets by @gagrulenet

Archives

Books

Recent Posts

  • Pashinyan Government Pays U.S. Public Relations Firm To Attack the Armenian Apostolic Church
  • Breaking News: Armenian Former Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan Pashinyan is agent
  • November 9: The Black Day of Armenia — How Artsakh Was Signed Away
  • @MorenoOcampo1, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, issued a Call to Action for Armenians worldwide.
  • Medieval Software. Modern Hardware. Our Politics Is Stuck in the Past.

Recent Comments

  • Baron Kisheranotz on Pashinyan’s Betrayal Dressed as Peace
  • Baron Kisheranotz on Trusting Turks or Azerbaijanis is itself a betrayal of the Armenian nation.
  • Stepan on A Nation in Peril: Anything Armenian pashinyan Dismantling
  • Stepan on Draft Letter to Armenian Legal Scholars / Armenian Bar Association
  • administrator on Turkish Agent Pashinyan will not attend the meeting of the CIS Council of Heads of State

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in