25 after 5 years from the date of the hearing begins after causing outrage in the community resulted in a decision Dink murder trial evaluated the trial court …
1 HEARING: July 2, 2007
Istanbul 14 Heavy Penal Court No. 12 detainees accused in the case in the first hearing of the four were released. Yasin Hayal “did not control us from the police,” he wrote letters entered into the case file. General Directorate of Security, the letter sent to the court, the case gave the first example of the attitude shown throughout. Police sent the article to the court, the defendant not to look at the organization of “a group based on friendship,” it was said that the moves. Police this “conviction”, five years after the court’s verdict would create.
2 HEARING: October 1, 2007
Court, the defendant Erhan Tuncel phone calls about emerging police Muhittin Zenit, “the criminal complaint that there is a need to have decided”. However, the journalist who wrote about the content of the conversation is under investigation. In 2006 the Trabzon police at the request of listening received and prosecutor Hikmet Usta then “Ergenekon’s Trabzon structuring will prove most important evidence described as” the accused Mustafa Öztürk’s phone records TİB’den requested was decided. These demands are not met by TIB. Police Intelligence about the defendant Erhan Tuncel, a writing sent to the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor, upon the request of Police, was destroyed by the prosecution. Document ‘state secrets’ are counted, the court again this summer decided to ask for it.
3 HEARING: February 11, 2008
The court in Trabzon of public officials involved in the murder trial of the case, rejected a request by merging with the main case. This decision of the components of the murder will not be evaluated as a whole showed no time.
4 HEARING: February 25, 2008
The Court of Yasin Hayal’s lawyer Fuat Turgut against Armenians “God you’re all Hrant, bring them!”, “Rabies Armenians!” He was not a criminal complaint. Muamam Governor Guler, the governor’s office in 2004, Hrant Dink, the identity of the MIT officials threatening “security reasons” would be unable to explain.
5 HEARING: March 28, 2008
The court and first-degree relatives in the records of the bank account and credit card statements, requesting that the desired lawyers “that numerous banks, but which can not be understood that the banks are not investigated the issue” was rejected on the grounds.
6 HEARING: July 7, 2008
Istanbul Security Directorate, in the days before the murder of Hrant Dink received threats, which has been threatened many times has threatened to respond to an article on the issue. Court officials to provide information on the process, rather than demand has decided to repeat.
7 HEARING: 13 September 2008
Judged to be heard as witnesses in the trial Muhittin Zenit and Text Gündoğdu’nun’s statements, taken without notice to the lawyers appeared. Intelligence Department Ramazan Akyurek from the 90th sent under the signature of the document “confidential” and “state secret” on the grounds that covered only the regent was allowed to review by a judge. Dink family lawyers requested to send the information to a criminal complaint regarding the TIB request was denied.
8 HEARING: January 26, 2009
Dink family lawyer Fuat Turgut, walked out on the offensive, while the court was still speechless. Camera records the crime scene, appearing diagnosis of hidden observers note, HTS ‘reports that are determined to be in Istanbul Osman Hayal’s arrest request was denied. One of the defendants Abidin Yavuz, Tuncay Uzundal, Mustafa Öztürk was evacuated.
9 HEARING: March 20, 2009
Murder is processed knowledge which already has and take the necessary measures Colonel Ali Oz, Trabzon Police Intelligence Chief Resat Altay, Trabzon Police Chief Ramazan Akyurek, Istanbul, the former Police Intelligence Director Ahmet Ilhan Guler and Istanbul Police Chief Celalettin Surgeons as witnesses demand “file innovation will bring “were rejected.
10 HEARING: July 6, 2009
JİTEM personnel Veysel Sahin, received as part of the Ergenekon case, Yasin Hayal in the expression of the familiar from Trabzon gendarmerie. Eve of eyewitness Mesa, next to Samast time of the murder, saying that two more people, one of them is like Yasin Hayal said. Samast for Dink family “Five years later” the threat of court was silent again.
11 HEARING: October 12, 2009
Lawyers, meeting the demands related to the criminal complaint tib’l request was rejected once again. Erhan Tuncel’s Zaman, Hurriyet, Milliyet article published about him in newspapers such as the request is related to a criminal complaint made was accepted.
12 HEARING: February 8, 2010
The rest of the secret witness is expected to be brought to trial was forgotten. Selim Kutka, Ahmet Ilhan Guler, against whom, Resat Altay, Hussein Sabri Uzun Yavuzdemir and the request was denied in court as witnesses.
13 HEARING: May 10, 2010
Secret witness, is not alone Samast day of the murder, saying it has detected Osman Hayal. But the dream did not arrest warrant. Imagination JITEM JİTEM personnel associated with the expression of a saying that has been read, but has taken a decision to conduct further investigations. The court decided that the end of the point, it was decided that the preparation of the prosecutor.
14 HEARING: July 19, 2010
Police allegedly prepared by the Directorate of Intelligence and submitted to Prime Minister Erdogan also accused with murder diagrams showing the Ergenekon suspects involved in telephone contact between the police appeared to be two names. These cops Trabzon Deputy Police Chief Necati Ekici, also of Dink murder was taking place in the prosecution and investigation team. Suspect in police investigation team is Mahkemeb saw no harm in that.
15 HEARING: 25 October 2010
The court case despite the decision of the ECHR convicted Turkey who were merging. Samast shooter was decided to be held in a juvenile court judge. MIT, no prior relationship that Dink’s murder have claimed that intelligence information.
16 HEARING: February 7, 2011
Court president Rustem Eryilmaz Erkan Canak was brought instead. Finalized the Court’s decision on the lawyers once again join the cases for demanding that the court at this time “file his Safahat and the stage reached, merge files important to bring innovation will and judgment elongation give rise to can” refused on the grounds.
17 HEARING: March 28, 2011
Samast’s father is having an affair with a gendarme commander claimed. The court refused the request of Father Samast was heard as a witness. TUBITAK, the events of the day belongs to the branch of Akbank Pangaltı camera records to the court in relation to the “events of the day there is no record of any record or deleted,” the report was sent. This report can not be understood nor the lawyers protested. Request denied.
18 HEARING: 30 May 2011
Hrant Dink in Istanbul in 2004 governorship threatened by alleged in the court initiated an investigation MIT Istanbul Regional Management Özer Yılmaz and Handan Selçuk file on the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor be sent to the request, “the Attorney General’s authority was” in the grounds was rejected.
19 HEARING: 29 July 2011
TIB records related to the scene ‘of privacy’ has not submitted on the grounds. Dink family lawyers at the hearing by showing some images of that day, the image of whether or not the person identified Osman Hayal from the Trabzon Police Directorate asked for photographs of imagination. Photos sent to court after a very long time.
20.DURUŞ on: 19 September 2011
The case prosecutor Hikmet Usta announced his opinion on the merits. Lawyers, TIB access to court records and proceedings considered coming to the stage was objected to on the grounds that opinion. The Court rejected the objection. Master, in the opinion of the murder was committed by Ergenekon terror organization has emphasized, however, it “failed to substantiate” claims. Because Ergenekon’s Trabzon cell structure for the organization that claims to be the most important evidence had been destroyed by police in 2006. Considered to react to the disclosure of the Dink family had to leave the hearing and did not attend a further hearing.
21 HEARING: 14 November 2011
TIB test for the detection of phone records from the court wanted to make the call. Events of the day and found some of the suspects stated that the re-examination of the camera records the request was denied. Some witnesses again the rest of the court did not accept their demands.
22 HEARING: December 5, 2011
Lawyers, without waiting for new evidence is considered legally wrong administration said, but explained their views on OPINION. Lawyer of the opinion, murder is at the intersection of the two states was the direction of tradition: political killings and Armenian hostility.
23 HEARING: 26 December 2011
The prosecutor TİB’den examine the records and the defendants to the Istanbul Police said there was no contact. Lawyers, they continued to the judicial authorities of the Joint Chiefs of OPINION, the government spokesman for security forces in the murder responsibilities of the various actors of the state until told.
24 HEARING: 10 January 2012
Lawyer Fethiye Çetin, delete the camera records the murder of days before the Police as evidence carat said. Lawyers, TİB’den 5 numbers in the record that the defendants directly attached at various dates and events many times before the day was determined that they did interviews. Prosecutors, Police that they rely on the information given, Hrant Dink was not killed for being Armenian, he said.
25 HEARING: 17 January 2012