One year after a snow storm that destroyed a large number of fruit crops, Armenia will face a bumper crop of apricots, and thus be able to export in large quantity allowed in Russia this summer, said Friday Agriculture Minister Sergo Karapetian.
Karapetyan met with the leaders of export and food processing to the trade to discuss bulk purchases resulting tens of thousands of farmers (…)
Turkologist: While Armenians were being massacred, the West was holding seminars (video)
The 89th Rose Roth seminar underway in Yerevan has brought together a number of NATO representatives, politicians and political scientists. The three-day event, entitled “Security and Stability in the South Caucasus: Fostering Enduring Regional Peace,” focuses on current and future challenges and cooperation issue.
Can the discussions and speeches guarantee lasting peace in the region?
Similar seminars and meetings remind Turkologist Ruben Melkonyan of the 1915 events.
“All this reminds me of the 1915 Armenian Genocide when the West was holding seminars and discussions amid the massacres of Armenian people by Ottoman Turks,” he said.
NATO has never supported a military solution to the conflict, says Vice-President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Paolo Alli.
In the meantime, experts in Armenia say NATO has never worked effectively.
Details are available in the video.
Wikimedia Armenia good model for counterpart offices worldwide
Wikimedia Armenia will from now on carry on its scientific-educational and awareness raising activity in a well-arranged and technically equipped office whose opening was made possible thanks to the foundation Intellectual Renaissance.
Speaking to reporters at ceremony marking the new headquaters’ opening, the foundation’s director, Hakob Hakobyan, said that apart from the re-equipment and repairs, they also implemented different other projects aimed at encouraging the Armenian Wikipedia’s enrichment.
“The project ‘One Armenian, One Article’ was a great success in not only Armenia but also [other countries] worldwide, and was in the headlines of different international media outlets. But it’s not all about material investments, which were admittedly essential. We saw also intellectual cooperation. And thousands of articles were posted on Armenian Wikipedia, improving our standing,” he noted.
As for the items’ quantity, Hakobyan said he knows that it now crosses the boundary of 170,000.
Speaking further, Chairman of Wikimedia Foundation Jan-Bart de Vreede described Armenia as a very active zone in terms of educating the youth on the right use of Wiki resources. He particularly hailed office’s initiative to organize Wiki camps and Wiki clubs, which he said could be a good lesson for users in other countries as well.
Director of Wikimedia Armenia Susanna Mkrtchyan said that the free online encyclopedia’s Armenian language page currently has 40,000 registered editors, of whom 600 are active users.
“Absolutely anyone can edit Wikipedia, but [reference to] sources is mandatory. Any incorrect information posted will be edited by another [user]. Any subscriber can exercise control but only administrators are allowed to block an article,” she said, calling also for journalists’ active participation in Wiki projects.
Armenian authorities tying to remove obstacles hobbling SMEs’ activities
“Our goal is to remove all the obstacles existing in SMEs’ activities and to give them room for strengthening their businesses as well as to take steps for developing the economy,” he is quoted in the government’s press release. “We should unite and move the country forward.”
The council discussed ways to provide family business preferences to the entrepreneurs doing hotel business and also the application of differentiated approach in setting local duties.
The participants of the session exchanged their opinions and presented their ideas and remarks.
Summarizing the results of the discussion, Abrahamyan instructed the concerned agencies to work out and submit appropriate legislative packages to the government.
Some 70,000 small and medium enterprises operate in Armenia now. Of them, 58,000 are micro and small companies and 10,000 are mid-scale businesses.
The SMEs’ share in Armenia’s GDP is 43%, but the sector ensures only 5-6 percent of the country’s tax revenue – See more at: http://arka.am/en/news/business/armenian_authorities_tying_to_remove_obstacles_hobbling_smes_activities/#sthash.5qerR9Tx.dpuf
Armenia “offshore scandal” first court session date is known
YEREVAN. – The first day of the court hearing on Armenia’s “offshore scandal” case is known.
Armenian News-NEWS.am has learned from the judicial information system that the first hearing is scheduled for June 24.
According to the indictment, entrepreneur Ashot Sukiasyan fraudulently obtained rights over someone else’s property, legalized illicit proceeds, and evaded paying large amounts of taxes, fees, and other mandatory payments.
The aforesaid “offshore scandal” broke out in Armenia after an Armenian media outlet wrote that Armenia’s then-PM Tigran Sargsyan—who is currently Armenia’s Ambassador to the United States—, Archbishop Navasard Kjoyan—Vicar General of the Araratian Patriarchal Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church—, and “jeweler” Ashot Sukiasyan are shareholders in an offshore company called Wlispera Holdings Limited, which is registered in Cyprus. Sargsyan and Kjoyan, however, denied their involvement in such a company.
The Armenian General Investigation Department had laid charges on Sukiasyan, and on the grounds of committing fraud, causing property damage, and legalizing criminally-earned income.
The Armenian Redwood Project: Improving the lives and well-being of Syrian-Armenians impacted by the war in Syria
Interview with Armenian Redwood Project founder Raffy Ardhaljian
By Vahram Emmiyan
1- What can you tell us about Armenian Redwood project? Report Horizonweekly
The ARP is a project and not another organization. It’s an organizing platform that aims at (1) showcasing to the Armenian Diaspora that while Armenians are a footnote in the larger Syrian war context, we today have an undeniable refugee problem and (2) to develop actionable steps towards alleviating the overwhelming effects on our community in Syria and the ones internally/externally displaced by the war.
I have often commented on the difference between having “organizations” (we have lots of those) and Institutions. Institutions are necessary for nation building and we have very few effective ones. In this case, neither the GoA nor various Diasporan organizations have stepped up to what the situation is actually calling for. On this centennial year, when the Near East Relief’s work has been praised across the globe, it is incomprehensible to me the collective intervention of our trans-Nation. We clearly do not seem as organized to deal with current burning issues as with historic commemorations.
The ARP, as I said is a nothing but a catalyzing organizing platform that conducts research, frames & structures projects, and then engages the larger public once a scalable model has been found. In our case, after months of research we focused on a “rent subsidy” model in Armenia for Syrian refugees as a first step. We realize that the problem is bigger than just “short rents” and we’ll attempt to intervene in other fields as financial capabilities become available. This is a humanitarian crisis that will not just go away. Additionally, doing nothing (or the minimum) and adopting a “to each his own” approach is also not acceptable to us. On the Centennial, if we are truly ONE NATION, then our actions need to reflect that. I respect all the effort that went into supporting our community in Syria in the last 4 years. But given the scope of the damage, we need to collectively engage in 100x more. And soon.
2- What are the main problems facing the Syrian-Armenian refugees in Armenia?
That’s an overwhelming question and it depends which segment of the refugees you are talking about. There are widows with kids, elderly, unemployed with skills that are not transferable into Armenia’s economy, young families with kids, youth needing university education, traumatized refugees needing mental health, families that have been split, etc. There are also families that have personally requested that we help move them out of Aleppo because of financial and psychological distress.
So, I do not want to overwhelm your audience with this question. In our analysis, we view affordable housing as a big problem in Armenia in general, and to the Syrian urban refugees in particular. We think we can make a focused impact through various phased interventions over a period of time. Our first phase involved “rent subsidies” to allow the arriving families, or the vulnerable ones to adjust. You know Yerevan has basically become a “City State” where everything is concentrated. The real estate speculation of the last few years has also raised prices and makes it unaffordable to many to live in the capital city. And yet, the capital seems to be the main destination for many Syrians for now. I’m not sure how many will remain in Armenia and make it their home in the long run. But for now, we view assisting Syrian refugees in Armenia a win/win situation; the Syrian refugees can find safe refuge in Armenia and at the same time they bring invaluable human/social capital with them that can benefit the country. Solving the affordable housing problem requires a serious Armenian institution. The alternative solutions I’ve seen so far, have either been badly planned “concept projects” that got nowhere besides press releases, or individual opportunistic construction efforts fueled mostly by Turkish construction materials which result in unaffordable prices to refugees. Syrians who can afford market prices have already bought apartments. But most cannot. What we have seen is that when a family’s savings goes below a certain level, then migration becomes an serious consideration. In this context, we believe that if we find ways to solve the affordable housing problem for Syrian refugees, we can potentially provide solutions to a bigger problem for Armenia.
Other problems also are no different than the ones Armenia’s population faces: lack of well-paying jobs, etc.
On the positive side, we’ve been seeing a nice integration happening. Armenia’s population and government have welcomed Syria’s refugees and made them feel “at home”. The government provides invaluable social, health and educational services to refugees. Syrians – who are hard workers- are seen everywhere in the service economy. And that’s a good thing.
3- In light of those problems, can you tell us also about the 3 party Memorandum of Understanding recently signed between Oxfam in Armenia, ARP and UNHCR?
The MOU is a framework of cooperation. Like I said, the Diaspora did not have appropriate institutions with “boots on the ground” and capabilities to aid with such a large inflow of refugees. We were very impressed with UNHCR’s representative, Mr. Christoph Bierwirth initiatives to aid Syrian refugees in Armenia. We wanted to further “augment” Mr. Bierwirth’s effort and show that the Diaspora wanted to “partner” with the UN. We also found a genuine partner in Oxfam Armenia that has a long history of assisting refugees and with the Syrian Armenia Relief Fund based in Los Angeles. The 3 party MOU, brought together the Armenian Diaspora, along with two international humanitarian organizations to make sure that we cooperate around specific initiatives and also coordinate our efforts. This is what I mean by “Institutional” involvement. And I want to mention here that both the UNHCR and Oxfam appreciate it when the Armenian Diaspora cooperates under one umbrella. Its effective and frankly it works !
4 – What are the benefits of such a collaboration compared to the alternative of working separately?
The benefits again are mostly in institutional effectiveness. We served as a conduit to channel funds and key policies on this issue. UNHCR and Oxfam interface regularly with the Ministry of the Diaspora where key policies are coordinated. We also believe that once such a partnership is built, other possibilities could be structured in other jurisdictions. My personal working relationship with the UN in Armenia as a cooperating partner, goes back over 18 years. The other alternative is augmenting the effect of successful interventions. The rent subsidy project is a model that works, and was introduced in Armenia by UNHCR. This model is very different than what some other local NGOs did in Armenia with refugees by keeping them in “shelters”. The rent subsidy model allows refugees to integrate where they find adequate opportunities, and does not create potential “migrant ghettos” amongst its other benefits. Needless to say we are very grateful to our international partners Oxfam and UNHCR for the valuable humanitarian work they are doing in Armenia. In addition, we also applaud SARF’s (SARF is comprised of over 12 Diasporan organizations) initiative to join these existing efforts with proven partners. In a world constrained with resources, we view this partnering model as a superior alternative to “working separately”.
5-This agreement extends only on a 12 month period. Why? And is it renewable?
International organizations have planning horizons and budgets and thus think in 12 months increments. Additionally, the situation in Syria is dynamic and always changing, and requires flexibility. We knew that Aleppo could face challenges in 2015, and wanted to be ready to absorb refuges that wanted to find refuge after Lebanon closed its borders to Syrian refugees. Actively engaging in augmenting the rent subsidy capability for 2015 was a top priority. For me, I’d much rather work on a capability that collectively provides housing to 800+ household this year than give interviews about future housing complexes that might (or not) be ready in 5 years.
We have agreed with our partners to organize a workshop this fall to discuss sustainable solutions going forward.
That said, this problem requires a Pan Armenian coordinated effort and institutional capability. This cannot be handled with a community picnic fundraiser. I want to stress that it requires coordinated pan-Armenian efforts, and not fragmented efforts by individual organizations. We have advocated this approach consistently in the Diaspora and are hoping that there will soon be such an initiative to collectively raise funds for Syria’s affected Armenian community (including the displaced) and build a platform from which to work from. Once that happens, then we’ll have answers to what happens after 12 months on this specific project. As a nation, and on the eve of the centennial of the Genocide, we cannot adopt a “to each his own” approach to this problem. Almost 100 years ago, there were 1000 US citizens that participated in the Near East Relief efforts, besides the millions that were raised to save the survivors of the Genocide through citizen philanthropy. Our recent blog posting reflected on this. 100 years later it, we are hoping that the Diaspora’s nationalism can partly be channeled into conscious civic responsibility. Unlike back then, folks don’t need to travel to the Syrian desserts to deliver help. A collective platform to act on our values will do.
6- What’s next for the ARP ?
We are going to launch a small crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo during the week of June 8th and we are hoping that it will be vastly oversubscribed. Its entitled [#RootsForRefugees]. We will then focus most of our attention to a mega fundraising effort in early 2016 and hope to bring most of the Armenian Diaspora under one organized effort. This is the biggest humanitarian issue of our time. Fatigued or not, as a surviving nation, Armenians will need to address their share of the burden, and show support to their brothers and sisters.
I thank the Diaspora for its support and for trusting us. It’s been a true privilege to be part of this effort.
Armenia v Portugal: Ronaldo hat-trick decides Yerevan soccer encounter
Invigorated Armenia suffered a defeat in Saturday’s Euro-2016 qualifier against Portugal, conceding three goals from the visiting team’s megastar Cristiano Ronaldo.
The Havakakan’s naturalized Brazilian Marcos Pizzelli scored for the home team in the 14th minute with a spectacular long-range shot from a set piece, but Ronaldo equalized from the 11-meter spot in the 29th minute after a Henrikh Mkhitaryan foul in the penalty area.
The Real Madrid man twice punished the Armenian defense at the start of the second half before Portugal were reduced to 10 men following a second yellow card picked by Tiago Mendes.
Cheered by nearly 15,000 fans at the Vazgen Sargsyan Republican Stadium, Armenia charged ahead and Hrayr Mkoyan managed to score with a right footed shot from very close range in the 71st minute. But the home team failed to find the equalizer in the remaining time, with the scoreboard showing the final result at 2-3 to the visitors.
Armenia played their first official match under new caretaker coach Sargis Hovsepyan. The 42-year-old specialist – who ended a long and successful career as Armenia defender and captain in 2012, having earned 132 caps for his nation – succeeded Swiss Bernard Challendes who resigned in April following the team’s unsuccessful start in the qualifying campaign.
The latest result leaves Armenia with just one point at the bottom of the five-nation qualifying group that also includes Denmark, Albania and Serbia.
Armenia will next travel to Belgrade for a qualifier against Serbia on September 4.
ARMENIA Members of the Executive Committee of the World Council of Churches visits Tsitsernakaberd
On 10 June, members of the Executive Committee of the World Council of Churches visited the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial to pay tribute to the memory of the martyrs of the Armenian Genocide.
The Executive Committee members have laid flowers at the eternal flame, and a joint ecumenical service was held. The participants prayed for the Armenians killed during the Armenian Genocide, and for all the Greek and Assyrian people who perished in the genocide.
Representatives of the various Christian churches have raised their prayers to God for the immediate cessation of conflicts and consolidation of peace in the Middle East, especially in Syria and Iraq, and for the safety of Christians.
The participants also prayed for the safe return of the Metropolitan Gregorios Ibrahim March (Syrian Orthodox Church) and the Metropolitan Paul Yazigi (Greek Orthodox Church); the two bishops kidnapped in Aleppo in 2013.
Dr. Agnes Abume, president of the WCC Central Committee, read out the declaration adopted by the Executive Committee of the WCC to mark the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, in which it is stated:
“The Executive Committee of the World Council of Churches, the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire, convene its meeting the country from 8 to 13 June, organized by the Saint of Etchmiadizn Headquarters to honor the victims of genocide and survivors. We visit the Armenian Genocide Memorial to remember them and pray in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. And glorify the life of the Armenian people and the testimony of the Armenian Church.
The Executive Committee reminds the protocol adopted at the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide at the 10th WCC Conference in Busan in 2013. This important step implemented by the 10th Conference was followed by numerous other occasions. For years, the WCC has had an important role in raising awareness and recognition of the Armenian genocide. The protocol adopted at the sixth WCC assembly in Vancouver in 1983 recognized that “The silence of the international community and even deliberate attempts to deny the historical events have become a constant source of suffering and increasing desperation for the Armenian nation, the Armenian Church and many others. “ While some continue to make efforts to refuse or reduce these historic events, the Executive Committee was strongly encouraged by His Holiness Pope Francis, the public recognition of the mass murder of 1.5 million Armenians as genocide on April 12, 2015. We emphasize that the international community has a duty to honor the memory of genocide victims, to heal this injury and protect the historical recurrence of such atrocities.
The WCC, with its many member churches, has participated in several events of the anniversary of the 100th anniversary, including the official commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide and the canonization of the Holy Martyrs (from April 21 to 25, Yerevan, Armenia ). The WCC and its member churches will continue to participate in events during the commemoration of the centenary this year, organized by the Armenian diaspora, including with the Great House of Cilicia of the Armenian Apostolic Church of the July 18 to 19 in Antelias, Beirut. The Executive Committee expresses its gratitude to member churches worldwide and the ecumenical partners, who observed in their context or observe the 100th anniversary and spoke for the sake of recognition of the Armenian genocide. Through this remembrance ceremonies we recognize that these tragic events have occurred and they should be qualified by their name.
The Armenian Genocide in the same historical and political context was accompanied by genocidal actions towards others: communities Aramaic, Chaldean, Assyrian, Syrian and Greek, and especially against Christians, which has affected the history of the 20th century .
The rejection, forgetfulness and lack of sanctions for such events encourages their recurrence. Those who refuse, or raise their hand on the life and dignity of their sister and brother, corrupt and destroy their human nature. The commemoration of the 100th anniversary must specify the fullness of time, while governments are opposed to characterize as genocide. We urge all governments to refuse this resistance.
In this centenary year, we urge the international community, the WCC member churches and people of good will and faith, commemorate and again to reflect on the prevention of genocide and crimes against humanity. “
In the end, the members of the Executive Committee, accompanied by His Grace Bishop Hovakim Manukyan, Director of Interfaith Relations of the Holy See, visited the Museum-Institute of Armenian Genocide.
Stéphane © armenews.com
Armenia The sale of the Vorotan hydroelectric complex will boost economic relations between Armenia and the US
The Armenian Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan welcomed the agreement for the sale to the Americans in the amount of $ 250 million, the hydroelectric complex on the Vorotan River in the south, he said he would give new impetus to economic relations between the US and Armenia, while the energy company that has acquired the largest Armenian hydro complex finalizing Monday, June 8, the agreement that had been repeatedly postponed.
Based in New York, ContourGlobal Group became the first Western company to take a position in the Armenian energy sector, largely dominated by Russian groups. Under a contract signed in Yerevan by its director general, Joseph Brandt, ContourGlobal will pay the sum of $ 180 million to acquire Vorotan Hydro Cascade, a complex of several hydoélectriques units arranged on the tumultuous river Vorotan, and will invest $ 70 million to modernize infrastructure in the next 5 years. The acquisition, which was welcomed by the US government, was to be finalized in April 2014. Mr. Abrahamian had priority on its agenda shortly after his appointment as head of government, there are more than a year .
But he left dragging the file on the grounds that some of the elements of the procedure were contrary to Armenian legislation and should be renegotiated. This brake application had fueled speculation about possible pressure from Russia, which would have preferred a Russian company to take control of the complex Vorotan, despite repeated denials of the Armenian authorities. The Armenian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Yervand Zakharyan had announced in January that the Armenian government and ContourGlobal were about to seal the renegotiated agreement. Mr. Brandt had proceeded to the signature of this agreement with Mr. Zakharian after meeting M.Abrahamian. In addition to the contract for the sale of the Vorotan complex, the Armenian Prime Minister appointed the signing of the Agreement on Trade and Investment (TIFA), on the occasion of the visit of President Serzh Sargsyan in Washington in May, as another illustration of the strengthening of economic cooperation between Armenia and the United States.
Sarkisian had also announced the imminent finalization of the agreement on the Vorotan complex just hours after the signing ceremony of the agreement on the TIFA in Washington. “This will be the biggest investment ever made by the United States in Armenia”, had then congratulated the Armenian President. The “Vorotan Cascade consists of three hydroelectric power plants built in the Soviet era along Vorotan river that irrigates Siounik province, southeast of the country. The complex has a capacity of 405 megawatts, almost as much as the Medzamor nuclear power plant, whose end is regularly announced and postponed, and represents some 40% of Armenia’s electricity production.
Gari © armenews.com
Armenian Officials Face No Investigations over ‘Donations’
YEREVAN (RFE/RL)—Senior Armenian state officials tasked with combating corruption have faced no investigations into millions of dollars in financial aid which they and their wives claim to have received from undisclosed sources in recent years.
The officials running the “oversight services” of President Serzh Sarkisian, Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamian and the Armenian parliament have reported such lavish financial contributions in their annual asset declarations filed with the state Commission on the Ethics of High-Ranking Officials.
So far none of them has been accused by the commission of using their position to enrich themselves and their relatives. Nor are law-enforcement authorities known to have investigated the origin of the “donations” which Armenia’s leading anti-graft watchdog believes carry serious “corruption risks.”
Hovannes Hovsepian, the wealthy head of the presidential Oversight Service, claims to have especially generous benefactors. Hovsepian’s income declarations say that from 2011 through 2014 he received a total of $2.75 million in dollar donations from individuals or legal entities not identified by him. According to the document, the minimum amount of a single donation to Hovsepian was $100,000, while the largest one stood at as much as $1.6 million.
The presidential service headed by him is supposed to monitor use of public funds by various government agencies and detect possible instances of their embezzlement.
Sargis Grigorian manages a similar oversight division in the prime minister’s office. He has reported no lavish donations and claims to live off his monthly salary of 314,000 drams ($660). His wife, Armine Kocharian, is apparently unemployed, having reported no financial incomes to the anti-graft commission.
However, Kocharian somehow managed to receive $530,000 in loans from Armenian banks from 2012-2014. She also admitted paying around $120,000 to buy several paintings last year.
Just how Grigorian’s wife secured the sizable loans is not clear. Armenian banks are extremely unlikely to lend so much money to a regular client who has no well-paid job.
The wife of Gagik Mkrtumian, a senior official at the parliamentary Audit Chamber, claimed to have received last year $100,000 in “donations” in addition to earning 180,000 drams ($380) per month. Karine Mazmanian too did not disclose the source of the cash.
The wife of Ishkhan Zakarian, the controversial Audit Chamber chief, reported a single and far more modest donation: $15,000. Zakarian’s asset declaration says that Gayane Soghomonian received the money in 2011.
The sum pales in comparison with the conspicuous wealth of Zakarian. Two years ago he was forced by opposition lawmakers to comment on sources of funding for his newly built villa in Yerevan reportedly worth millions of dollars. Zakarian said that the mansion’s construction was mainly financed by Albert Boyajian, an Armenian-American businessman described by him as his “friend.”
For the Anti-Corruption Center (ACC), the Armenian branch of the Berlin-based group Transparency International, these financial statements are a cause for serious concern.
“Such donations can be considered to be transactions fraught with high risks of corruption,” Artak Manukian, an ACC expert, told RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am) on Friday. Manukian said that they would at least be investigated in many countries that are “really fighting against corruption.”
Siranush Sahakian, the chairwoman of the Commission on the Ethics of High-Ranking Officials, last month could not name a single state official who the anti-graft body believes has enriched themselves through abuse of power. The remarks suggest that the commission has never scrutinized the “donations.”
No such investigations have been reported by Armenian law-enforcement bodies either. They declined on Friday to respond to RFE/RL inquiries on the subject.
This stance will only fuel more skepticism about the Armenian government’s stated efforts to tackle widespread bribery, nepotism and other corrupt practices.
The government pledged to reinvigorate those efforts in February when it announced plans to set up a new Anti-Corruption Council that will be headed by Prime Minister Abrahamian and comprise several ministers and other top state officials. It also urged the political parties represented in the Armenian parliament and civic groups to nominate their representatives to the council. None of those groups expressed readiness to join the body.
Armenia ranked, along with four African states, 94th of 174 countries and territories evaluated in the Transparency International’s most recent Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) released last December. It occupied the same position in the 2013 CPI which covered 177 nations.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- …
- 137
- Next Page »