December 4, 2013 – 19:32 AMT
Director of the Caucasus Strategic Studies Center slammed Azeri government for abusing Turkey’s attitude and preventing Ankara-Yerevan rapprochement, Haqqin.az reported.
As Dr. Hasan Oktay stated at an Istanbul-hosted symposium, Azeri government’s policy line stands in the way of the peace process in the Caucasus. The analyst further criticized Baku for turning Turkey into its diplomatic hostage where the Nagorno Karabakh issue is concerned.
“Recently, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s visit to Yerevan was sabotaged over an unverified media report, suggesting Armenia was offered to cede two Karabakh-adjacent regions in exchange for normalization of ties with Ankara. It’s quite probable the report was fed to Turkish media by Baku,” he said, characterizing the move as disastrous to Turkey’s Caucasus-related policy.
The analyst characterized the Karabakh issue as the only stumbling block in Ankara-Yerevan relations, with another Turkish analyst Nesrin Sarıahmetoğlu agreeing.
The Turkish analysts’ stance caused an “emotional outburst” and “extreme discontent” among Azerbaijani delegation members, Haqqin.az said.
Will Erdogan visit genocide memorial in 2015?
By: Orhan Kemal Cengiz
“It is very likely for the prime minister to go to Armenia, lay a wreath at the so-called Armenian genocide memorial and apologize to Armenians.” This earth-shattering prediction is not based on information or reports. It’s the accusation of a Turkish nationalist against Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Erdogan has done so many things to upset us, this nationalist is saying, don’t be surprised if he apologizes to the Armenians.
True. Erdogan’s trip to Diyarbakir, his use of the word “Kurdistan” and admitting openly that his government is negotiating with Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) leader Abdullah Ocalan, are all breaking important taboos for Turkey. Can Erdogan break a similar taboo on the issue of the Armenian genocide?
What the non-Muslims have suffered in Turkey has rarely been on the prime minister’s agenda. He hasn’t repeated his 2009 remarks that surprised everyone: “Those with different ethnic identities were expelled from our country. This, in fact, was the consequence of a fascist approach.” No doubt that remark was alluding to the 1915 tragedy and other unfortunate events in Turkey’s history.
Erdogan now frequently describes Turkey as a mosaic made up of diverse ethnic identities. We often hear him mention Arabs, Kurds, Turks, Circassians and the Laz, but when describing this mosaic Erdogan never mentions Turkey’s long-standing non-Muslims such as Armenians, Greeks, Jews and Syriacs.
In my various articles for Al-Monitor, I have written that the Armenian genocide is no longer a taboo subject in Turkey, that new books on the subject are coming out daily and that there is a free, tolerant media environment for the subject. Civil society now remembers the victims of the Armenian genocide in observances on April 24. As the 100-year anniversary of the genocide approaches, civil society is debating what to do in 2015 and is preparing action plans to explain the genocide.
All these observances and publications indicate that the approach of the Turkish government to the issue has somewhat changed. Otherwise, the police would not have protected activists on April 24 from protesting extremist, nationalist groups.
But the freedom the government allows to civil society and intellectuals to debate and observe the genocide doesn’t mean a change to Turkey’s official position on 1915. Reports leaked to the media about the preparations for 2015 by the government indicate that former official policies are going to prevail.
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, in a visit to Switzerland at the end of October, conveyed to Swiss authorities Turkey’s sensitivity about a statue Armenians want to erect in Geneva. From these “sensitivities,” we can conclude that there hasn’t been an iota of change in Turkey’s official position.
From the leaked reports, we also understand that Davutoglu asked Switzerland to mediate between Turkey and Armenia. According to Foreign Ministry sources, if Armenia promises to withdraw from five of seven Azeri plots it is holding in the Karabakh region, Turkey would be ready to open the Armenian border.
The recent dialogue between the foreign minister and members of the parliamentary foreign affairs committee suggests that there are actually preparations to open the border. When a member of parliament from Igdir at the Armenian border said he was aware of some work at the closed border crossing, Davutoglu said, “We have such work going on. If we can persuade Azerbaijan, we can make a surprise. We are working on the border crossing.”
Other aspects of Turkey’s preparations for 2015 can be detected from remarks by government spokesman Bulent Arinc: “2015 is the 100th year of both the Dardanelles and the claims of the Armenian genocide. We are working seriously. There is work on symposiums, conferences, panels, publications and documentaries. But we are also engaged in very special public diplomacy activities that could affect the entire world.”
We also know that leading members of the government and opposition have met in the parliament to discuss Turkey’s 2015 strategy. Sadly, all these strategies don’t appear to be anything else but mere repetition of Turkey’s routine approaches.
The Turkish Historical Society is also preparing for 2015. Mehmet Metin Hulagu, president of the society, said it is working on a complete works of Turkey-Armenian relations in preparation for 2015.
When we put all these preparations and views of government officials together, we can predict that Turkey’s defensive attitude based on denials is not going to change in 2015. Though the Foreign Ministry is striving to improve Turkey’s image related to the Armenian issue with gestures such as opening the border, it also seems determined to combat the Armenians’ campaign for 2015.
In short, if Erdogan doesn’t turn the world upside down with a last-minute surprise, we are likely to see in 2015 a more refined and sophisticated version of Turkey’s denial policy of the past century.
Orhan Kemal Cengiz is a human rights lawyer, columnist and former president of the Human Rights Agenda Association, a Turkish NGO that works on human rights issues ranging from the prevention of torture to the rights of the mentally disabled. Since 2002, Cengiz has been the lawyer for the Alliance of Turkish Protestant Churches.
Van PEOPLE STILL COLD AND MONASTERY Varagavank
BY: ZEYNEP TOZDUMAN (Translated from Turkish and is not perfect)
Journalist: I’ll return to Turkey when it recognizes Genocide
An Armenian-born Turkish journalist slammed Ankara’s Genocide denial policy and lack of media freedom, Bianet reported.
“The country that hasn’t punished Hrant Dink’s murderer, one that forbids visiting singer Aram Dikran’s tomb, one that refuses to recognize the Armenian Genocide is not fit to be lived in,” Cevat Sinet, who currently resides in Belgium, said.
He further criticized Turkey for stifling freedom of expression, with journalists getting arrested over failing to adhere to government-dictated information. According to Bianet, 66 journalists and 27 editors were imprisoned in Turkey in 2013, with the majority of them of Kurdish origin.
Sinet, who lived in Adana and wrote about the country’s national minorities since 1993, was forced to leave Turkey after releasing an article on the murder of Armenian-born soldier Sevag Balıkçı.
“While living in Turkey, I could never openly announce my nationality or faith. I could no longer live in a country devoid of justice,” the descendant of Genocide survivors said.
Source: http://bianet.org
Sourp Kevork church reconstruction to launch in Turkey’s Sivas
Turkish Minister of Defense Ismet Yilmaz instructed to launch reconstruction of the Sivas-located Sourp Kevork (St. George) Armenian church.
According to Agos Armenian-Turkish daily, the official issued an assistance request to the city administration.
Trough the efforts of Sourp Kevork Armenian charity union and Defense Minister’s assistance, the currently dilapidated church was transferred from the territory of a military base. The reconstruction is due to start next spring.
Source: http://agos.com.tr
Searching for the ‘Armenia’ in Historic Armenia, and Finding A Small Bit of It
he exterior of the Armenian Church of the Savior at Ani is covered with scaffolding in September, 2013. Photo © 2013 Matthew Karanian, Reprinted with Permission.
PHOTOS AND STORY
BY MATTHEW KARANIAN
Travelers who are looking for anything Armenian in ancient Armenia have long become accustomed to finding plenty of disappointment, as well.
But when I traveled throughout Historic Armenia last month, I also found a bit of cause for cautious optimism—and bewilderment.
I was in Historic Armenia—a vast geographic area that includes both Western Armenia and also the lost Eastern Armenian lands of Ani and Kars—while doing research and photography for a future book.
I had good reason to expect that the remaining Armenian sites would be in worse shape than I remembered them. Why? Because we’ve already seen this tragedy recur countless times: an Armenian church that has stood for centuries inexplicably falls down. Then the church disappears. And finally, the church never existed.
Several years ago, during my first trip to the ancient Armenian church of Holy Cross (Soorp Khatch) on the island of Aghtamar, I observed that the site had suffered significant vandalism. When I returned a few years later, the vandalism was worse.
When I sought out the majestic monastery of Varagavank, located on a hilltop above the town of Van, I was disappointed again.
I struggled to locate the site, even as I walked amid its ruins. I was in the right place, but where was the church?
Hay for livestock, stacked floor to ceiling, had disguised the chapels. Other parts of the monastery were similarly camouflaged. I finally found the ruins of the church. I also found the sadness of knowing that such a mighty site could have been become so diminished.
My travels throughout Historic Armenia a decade ago revealed a persistent erosion of the evidence of our civilization. I was disappointed and saddened to see that everything Armenian was disappearing.
And so I was puzzled last month when I encountered people in Ani who appeared to be repairing Armenian churches, rather than destroying them. I saw workers who were shoring buildings up, rather than pulling them down.
Ani, the ancient Armenian capital, and the fabled city of a thousand churches, had appeared to be on the verge of collapse when I walked the site a decade ago. Now, an effort appears to be underway to save what’s left.
What was going on here?
The remains of Varagavank as it appeared in September, 2013. Photo © 2013 Matthew Karanian, Reprinted with Permission.
A Notorious ‘Restoration’ By Turkey
My travels took me on a swath through Armenian Diyarbakir, Van, Kars, and Ani. I visited as many Armenian sites as I could find. I saw ruins and repairs. I saw clumsy restorations. And I saw one horribly botched renovation at Edremit, just outside Van.
I didn’t see a trend, but amid all the work, I did see some hopeful signs pointing to the preservation, at least for a while, of some of the last surviving Armenian sites.
The reconstruction of Soorp Khatch at Aghtamar is perhaps the most notorious and widely publicized of the church repair projects in Historic Armenia. This tenth-century church was seized by Turkey following the Genocide, then largely ignored for 90 years, before being subjected to a controversial, perhaps unnecessary, restoration and alteration.
Roofs were reconstructed and altered from their original design and flooring was changed. Critics say that some of the materials used in the repair work are inappropriate, as well, having been milled by machine, rather than by hand.
Kurdish children in a village near the shore of Lake Van look at the ancient Armenian inscriptions on a rock near an abandoned, ruined Armenian church. Photo © 2013 Matthew Karanian, Reprinted with Permission.
The Turkish government now considers the church to be a museum, and since 2010 it has allowed the Armenian Church to openly perform the rites of the church—the badarak—once each year. This year, for the first time since 1915, the Church also performed the rite of baptism.
To be sure, there have been furtive church services and prayers at Aghtamar over the years. I was present in 1997 when Archbishop Mesrob Ashjian led us in prayer. And it’s difficult to be overjoyed that a foreign government allows the Armenian Church to use one of its most cherished churches as a church, once each year.
Still, who could have foreseen just a decade ago that the rites of the Church might be openly performed at Aghtamar ever again? Roughly one thousand people attended the badarak this year. I was one of them.
The Armenian Patriarch Gets Involved
Aghtamar’s tentative reemergence as an Armenian Church once each year isn’t the only cause for optimism. The eleventh century monastery of Varagavank has also seen a transformation during the past several years, with the participation of the Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul.
Varagavank is located about seven miles from the town of Van, and is known to local Kurds as Yedi Kilesi, which means Seven Churches.
The remnants of this once-mighty monastery, which a decade ago served as a granary and a stable, have now been returned to use as a church. A Kurdish village grew up around Varagavank during the century following the Genocide, and there are no Armenians living here, so the church doesn’t see much use.
But the existence of this church as a church, instead of as a barn, is reason for optimism about the future of other Armenian sites in this region. If the local population can tolerate Varagavank, perhaps other Kurdish communities can tolerate Armenian sites in their midst, as well.
Funding for the cleanup of the site, and for the salary of a caretaker, is provided by the Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul. There has been no architectural restoration of the site. Indeed, an earthquake just a couple of years ago caused further damage to the structure and destroyed an arched entry.
A Kurdish villager opens the door to the what’s left of the ancient Armenian monastery of Varagavank. This villager is the caretaker of the ruined site, which locals refer to as Yedi Kilesi, or Seven Churches. Photo © 2013 Matthew Karanian, Reprinted with Permission.
Discerning from the exterior that this was once a fine monastery, and an architectural gem, is still difficult. There’s no mistaking the identity of this Armenian site on the inside. There’s an altar, an Armenian cross, and a stand for candles. A black and white photograph of the monastery, as it appeared prior to 1915, is prominently displayed on the wall of one of the surviving chapels.
The criticism that attached to the repairs of Aghtamar—that the work was done so that Turkey could trumpet the site as an example of its benevolence—has not been voiced at Varagavank.
Perhaps this is because the Turkish government didn’t pay for the repairs here, and hasn’t claimed that the site is a museum. The absence of Turkish involvment in the restoration of Varagavank allows Turkey to avoid answering questions about the circumstances of the destruction of this monastery by the Turkish Army in 1915, during the seige of Van.
Still, the community’s tolerance of the return of Varagavank as a church suggests there might be a greater tolerance for Armenian sites elsewhere in the region, too, just as there is in Diyarbakir—a large city located west of Lake Van.
Diyarbakir is today a Kurdish stronghold, but until the Genocide it was a multicultural city shared by Kurds and Armenians alike. Today this thriving center of Kurdish population is home to the largest functioning Armenian church in Turkey. This church, Soorp Giragos, was restored in 2007 and is now a model for Armenian-Kurdish reconcilation. The restoration was championed by the local Kurdish government.
Saving Ani
But it was Ani that most dramatically captured my attention as an example of apparent Turkish concern for the preservation of Armenian monuments. The condition of the surviving churches of Ani has become perilous in recent years. The site is directly on the international border between modern Turkey and the Republic of Armenia. Across the border, which is delineated by the Akhurian River, a quarry scars the view from Ani.
Turkish Journalist Nedim Şener, dedicated his Press Freedom Awards to the memory of Hrant Dink,
The Committee to Protect Journalists’ 2013 International Press Freedom Awards were presented to Ecuador’s Janet Hinostroza, Egypt’s Bassem Youssef, Turkey’s Nedim Şener and Vietnam’s Nguyen Van Hai in a ceremony at New York’s Waldorf Astoria hotel on Tuesday evening.
Şener, who is among the four foreign journalists that were honored with Press Freedom Awards for their work in the face of severe reprisals, including physical threats and imprisonment, dedicated his award to the memory of Hrant Dink, a journalist whose killing he blames on the Turkish intelligence service.
“Hrant Dink was threatened by state officials because he had exercised his freedom of expression. He was murdered because state officials turned a blind eye to threats against him and failed to protect his life,” said Şener in the ceremony in New York.
Şener spent a year in jail awaiting trial on terrorism charges following allegations his reporting had contributed to an anti-government plot. He is currently free on conditional release but faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.
“Turkey is a record-breaker. Sixty journalists are jailed there on the accusation of being terrorists — that’s more than anywhere else in the world,” Şener said. “Most recently, several colleagues received life terms after a trial that shocked the Turkish press corps. I feel compelled to speak for them now. Don’t be indifferent to their fate! Demand their release!”
He said there is a disagreement between journalists and politicians over the meaning of democracy as the latter view democray only through the prism of ballot box and elections.
“For politicians,democracy means allowing people to vote every four years. For journalists, democracy is an everyday experience. And the essence of that experience is the people’s right to be informed. It is no coincidence that the first act of an authoritarian government is to silence the press,” Şener said, addressing the increasing government pressure on the press.
He also lamented on wide use of self-censorship by media outlets in the face of government pressure. He said majority of the media outlets remained indifferent to Gezi Park protests in June, exercising self-censorship to avoid a crisis with the government.
“The events of Gezi Park over the summer revealed the scope of the press freedom crisis in my country. Thirty journalists were hurt, many were detained, and dozens were fired from their jobs because of their Gezi coverage. But perhaps the gravest problem was that many media outlets did not cover Gezi. Even though dramatic clashes were taking place right outside their windows, many newsrooms chose to self-censor for fear of official repercussions.”
The Sydney Morning Herald: Visiting professor’s views on Turkey and its historic role anger Australia’s Armenians
Deborah Snow, The Sydney Morning Herald
Visiting US academic Justin McCarthy paints himself as an unassuming historian just doing his job.
But his presence in Australia on a brief speaking tour has enraged the Armenian community and landed him in the middle of a row between the NSW Parliament and leading politicians in Turkey.
He has had the doors of the Art Gallery slammed in his face and the welcome mat pulled from beneath his feet by the University of Melbourne.
He has been compared with holocaust denier David Irving (a charge that he says ”offends and saddens” him) and has been portrayed as a tool of the Turkish government.
The source of this odium is the implosion of the Ottoman Empire a century ago, and whether the deaths and expulsion of more than a million Armenians during that bloody chapter of history amounted to a genocide at the hands of the Turks.
The hugely influential Armenian diaspora (with politicians such as Joe Hockey and Malcolm Turnbull on its side) says yes. The Turks say no.
Professor McCarthy leans towards the Turkish side, arguing events at that time were more akin to a civil war with mass casualties on both sides.
”This was a horribly inhuman time for all groups involved,” the 68-year old said in Sydney on Friday. ”To say that one group was guilty and one was innocent is just to ignore the historical reality, I believe.”
Armenian National Committee of Australia executive director Vache Kahramanian says Professor McCarthy’s ”denialist” views are an ”insult” to Armenians. He also accuses Turkey of using the looming centenary of Gallipoli to ”politically blackmail” Australian politicians.
In May the NSW Parliament endorsed the prevalent view of an Armenian genocide, drawing threats from Turkey’s parliamentary Speaker, Cemil Cikek, to bar NSW MPs from the Gallipoli centenary ceremony.
Professor McCarthy said he ”could not be more against” threats of retaliation. But he also believes his opponents should debate him, not close the discussion down. ”Even Jesus listened to the devil,” he said.
The organiser and funder of the speaking tour, the Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance, booked Professor McCarthy nearly two months ago to speak at the University of Melbourne and at the Art Gallery of NSW but both institutions cancelled at the last minute.
The gallery said on Friday that it had canned the ”private function … in the interest of public and staff safety.” The university said ”the description of the event given at the time of the booking was not consistent with its true nature.”
On Thursday, Professor McCarthy addressed a small gathering in Parliament House in Canberra, organised through the office of federal MP Laurie Ferguson, but only five MPs turned up. He appeared unfazed, saying: ”I just write the history. It should be studied like any other set of events.”
Obama’s Glendale Visit Prompts Calls to Permit Display of Genocide-Era Rug
GLENDALE—As President Obama visits the epicenter of the Armenian community in the United States, religious and community leaders will hold a press conference to call on the President to stop blocking the display of an Armenian Genocide-era rug woven by orphans of that crime against humanity. The rug, which took Armenian orphans 10 months to weave and has 4,404,206 individual knots, was presented to President Calvin Coolidge in 1925.
A community briefing will take place on Tuesday, November 26 at 8:30 a.m. at the Glendale Youth Center. Participating in the event will be Western Prelate Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian; Raffi Haig Hamparian, Armenian National Committee of America, National Board Member; Berdj Karapetian, ANCA–Glendale Chapter, Chairman; Armenian American Leaders
Armenian Americans across the U.S. are calling on President Obama to secure a prominent and permanent public display of a historic rug woven by Armenian Genocide orphans and presented to President Calvin Coolidge in 1925, in appreciation for U.S. humanitarian assistance in the aftermath of Turkey’s murder of over 1.5 million Armenians from 1915-1923.
The ANCA campaign was initiated last month after The Washington Post reported that a planned December 16th Smithsonian Institution exhibit featuring the rug, organized in conjunction with the Armenian Cultural Foundation and the Armenian Rug Society, was abruptly cancelled when the White House, reversing an earlier affirmative decision, refused to lend the iconic symbol of American and Armenian shared heritage to the museum.
Washington Post staff writer and Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Philip Kennicott, reported, “There was hope that the carpet, which has been in storage for almost 20 years, might be displayed December 16th as part of a Smithsonian event that would include a book launch for Hagop Martin Deranian’s ‘President Calvin Coolidge and the Armenian Orphan Rug.’ But on September 12th, the Smithsonian scholar who helped organize the event canceled it, citing the White House’s decision not to loan the carpet. In a letter to two Armenian American organizations, Paul Michael Taylor, director of the institution’s Asian cultural history program, had no explanation for the White House’s refusal to allow the rug to be seen and said that efforts by the U.S. ambassador to Armenia, John A. Heffern, to intervene had also been unavailing.”
Kennicott described the controversy as “a sign of the Obama administration’s dismal reputation in the Armenian American community that everyone assumes… must be yet another slap in the face for Armenians seeking to promote understanding of one of the darkest chapters in 20th-century history.”
The White House response thus far has been vague – with National Security Staff Assistant Press Secretary Laura Magnuson offering the following comment to the Asbarez Armenian Newspaper: “The Ghazir rug is a reminder of the close relationship between the peoples of Armenia and the United States. We regret that it is not possible to loan it out at this time.” A statement with the same exact wording was released by the White House last week and included in Kennicott’s article.
“The White House should simply come clean,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “It’s time for the White House to open up about Turkey’s role, and lay out all the facts about its decision to block the Smithsonian’s exhibit of the Armenian Orphan Rug – a historic, Armenian Genocide-era work of art that speaks powerfully to the common values and shared experiences of the American and Armenian peoples.”
In a letter sent to President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian reminded the White House that “upon receiving the rug, President Coolidge wrote, ‘The rug has a place of honor in the White House where it will be a daily symbol of goodwill on earth.’ I ask you, in this spirit, to remove any obstacles to the Smithsonian’s display of this historic artwork and to secure a prominent and permanent public home for this powerful symbol of America’s humanitarian values and friendship with the Armenian people,” continued Hachikian.
Placing this latest controversy in context, Hachikian noted that: “since taking office, President Obama has not only failed to recognize the Armenian Genocide, but has actively blocked Congressional legislation (H.Res.252, 111th Congress) to commemorate this atrocity and, through his Solicitor General, officially opposed efforts in the U.S. courts (Arzoumanian v. Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG) to allow American citizens to pursue Genocide-era property claims. In addition, the Administration has regularly sent senior officials to speak at events organized by Armenian Genocide deniers, while refusing repeated invitations to simply attend Congressional observances of this atrocity. In these areas, and, sadly, many more, the President has not simply failed to honor his pledge, but rather – in both letter and spirit – worked to fundamentally undermine and reverse the very policies he pledged to pursue.”
According to Dr. Hagop Deranian, the Armenian orphan rug measures 11′7″ x 18′5″ and is comprised of 4,404,206 individual knots. It took the Armenian girls in the Ghazir Orphanage of the Near East Relief Society 10 months to weave. A label on the back of the rug, in large hand-written letters, reads “IN GOLDEN RULE GRATITUDE TO PRESIDENT COOLIDGE.”
Legislators Send Valadao-Schiff Letter Urging White House To Reject Turkey’s Veto On Display Of Armenian Orphan Rug
Earlier this month, a bipartisan group of over 30 U.S. Representatives – including House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA), joined with Congressmen Adam Schiff (D-CA) and David Valadao (R-CA) in calling upon the White House to reverse its decision to block the public display of a rug woven by Armenian orphans and gifted to President Calvin Coolidge in appreciation for U.S. humanitarian assistance following Ottoman Turkey’s genocide of over 1.5 million Armenians between 1915-1923.
The Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region is the largest and most influential Armenian American grassroots advocacy organization in the Western United States. Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters throughout the Western United States and affiliated organizations around the country, the ANCA-WR advances the concerns of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.
BALLOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ELECTIONS OF DEPUTIES TO THE PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN ARMENIA
VAN BELGIÔ /Banque Nationale to vote for the first time in the history of Western Armenia, the Armenian people is invited to participate in the legislative elections in order to form a Parliament of Western Armenia.
It is truly an honor and a pride of power together constitute the beginnings of a State structure already consists of a National Council and a government, even when our ancestral territories are under-occupation.
The voting procedure is simplified in order to allow the greatest number of participate:
http://www.western-armenia-election.org/votes/consultation2013.php
1) Click on the list of candidates in order to discover.
2) To register and participate in the vote by clicking if you are for or against this list of candidates.
3) You can you refrain from you pronounce, your vote will also be recorded. The elections will take place the November 22, 2013 at 08h00 until 1 December 2013 at 00h00. The results of the elections approved by the Elections Commission Central will be published the Tuesday, December 17, 2013.
http://www.western-armenia-election.org/
Source: Western Armenia News
HAS broadcast without moderation
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 346
- 347
- 348
- 349
- 350
- …
- 371
- Next Page »