Are we witnessing a radical decline of Western influence in the Middle East? What will become the new political geography of the region? Is Obama’s turning to Congress a small victory for international law? CrossTalking with Phyllis Bennis, Cynthia Schneider and Jason Hirthler.
Russia releases key findings on chemical attack near Aleppo indicating similarity with rebel-made weapons
Probes from Khan al-Assal show chemicals used in the March 19 attack did not belong to standard Syrian army ammunition, and that the shell carrying the substance was similar to those made by a rebel fighter group, the Russian Foreign Ministry stated.
RT’s LIVE UPDATES on Syrian ‘chemical weapons’ crisis
A statement released by the ministry on Wednesday particularly drew attention to the “massive stove-piping of various information aimed at placing the responsibility for the alleged chemical weapons use in Syria on Damascus, even though the results of the UN investigation have not yet been revealed.”
By such means “the way is being paved for military action” against Damascus, the ministry pointed out.
But the samples taken at the site of the March 19 attack and analyzed by Russian experts indicate that a projectile carrying the deadly nerve agent sarin was most likely fired at Khan al-Assal by the rebels, the ministry statement suggests, outlining the 100-page report handed over to the UN by Russia.
The key points of the report have been given as follows:
• the shell used in the incident “does not belong to the standard ammunition of the Syrian army and was crudely according to type and parameters of the rocket-propelled unguided missiles manufactured in the north of Syria by the so-called Bashair al-Nasr brigade”;
• RDX, which is also known as hexogen or cyclonite, was used as the bursting charge for the shell, and it is “not used in standard chemical munitions”;
• soil and shell samples contain “the non-industrially synthesized nerve agent sarin and diisopropylfluorophosphate,” which was “used by Western states for producing chemical weapons during World War II.”
The findings of the report are “extremely specific,” as they mostly consist of scientific and technical data from probes’ analysis, the ministry stressed, adding that this data can “substantially aid” the UN investigation of the incident.
While focusing on the Khan al-Assal attack on March 19, in which at least 26 civilians and Syrian army soldiers were killed, and 86 more were injured, the Russian Foreign Ministry also criticized the “flawed selective approach” of certain states in reporting the recent incidents of alleged chemical weapons use in August.
The hype around the alleged attack on the eastern Damascus suburb of Ghouta showed “apparent attempts to cast a veil over the incidents of gas poisoning of Syrian army soldiers on August 22, 24 and 25,” the ministry said, adding that all the respective evidence was handed to the UN by Syria.
The condition of the soldiers who, according to Damascus, suffered poisoning after discovering tanks with traces of sarin, has been examined and documented by the UN inspectors, the ministry pointed out, adding that “any objective investigation of the August 21 incident in eastern Ghouta is impossible without the consideration of all these facts.”
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday said the UN investigators are set to return to Syria to investigate several other cases of alleged chemical weapons use, including the March 19 incident in Khan al-Assal.
BREAKING NEWS, Senate Foreign Relations Panel Approves Resolution on Military Action in Syria
The New York Time reporting
A divided Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday approved an authorization of force against the Syrian regime, setting up a showdown next week in the full Senate on whether President Obama should have the authority to strike.
The 10-7 vote showed bipartisan support for a strike, but bipartisan opposition as well. Yes votes included Senators John McCain, Republican of Arizona, Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee, and Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona. No votes included Democratic Senators Tom Udall of New Mexico and Chris Murphy of Connecticut. The Senate’s newest member, Edward Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, voted present.
READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/world/middleeast/divided-senate-panel-approves-resolution-on-syria-strike.html?emc=edit_na_20130904
Chemical Evidence: German Lab to Analyze Samples from Syria
Samples the UN team collected in Syria were sent to laboratories around Europe to check them for traces of poison gas.
Samples collected by UN chemical weapons experts in Syria have been brought to Germany for analysis, according to a German newspaper. The information comes as Russian President Vladimir Putin says he will not rule out military action against Syria.
A German military laboratory is reportedly analyzing evidence collected by UN inspectors in Syria to determine whether chemical weapons have been used in the civil war there, a German newspaper reported on Wednesday.
ANZEIGE
The Scientific Institute for Defense Technologies (WIS) in the small town of Münster, about 70 kilometers (43 miles) south of Hamburg, is the only large-scale German institute that researches defense against nuclear, biological and chemical warfare. The Munich-based Süddeutsche Zeitung reported that the institute had received samples of concrete and textiles collected in Syria to search for traces of poison gas.
There was no immediate confirmation of the report because the locations of the analyses were meant to be kept secret. However the WIS is one of several labs across the globe associated with the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, one of the main collaborators in the UN investigation.
Source SPIEGEL ONLINE
Turkey’s Kurds Seek Forgiveness For 1915 Armenian Tragedy
Orobik Eminian, 98, who was the only member of her family to escape the World War I killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks, joins others in commemorating the 95th anniversary of the killings and a call for it to be termed a genocide in New York City, April 25, 2010. (photo by REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi)
By: Amberin Zaman for Al-Monitor
“The Armenian population is melting.”
This bleak assessment was pronounced by Sahak Mashalyan, an Armenian Orthodox priest, during a recent Sunday mass at the Asdvadzadzin church in Istanbul. Reeling off the statistics: 482 funerals, 236 baptisms and 191 weddings, the black-robed cleric solemnly intoned, “These figures point to a community … that is dying.”
Little over a century ago, the Armenian Patriarchate put Anatolia’s Armenian population at more than two million. In 1915, tragedy struck. Estimated figures vary, but between 800,000 and a million Armenians are thought to have been slaughtered by Ottoman forces and their Kurdish allies in what many respected historians call the first genocide of the 20th century. Turkey vehemently denies any genocidal intent. The official line is that most of the Armenians died from hunger and disease, as they were forcibly deported to the deserts of Syria amid the upheaval of the collapsing empire.
The ruling Islamic Justice and Development Party has done more than any of its pro-secular predecessors to improve the lot of Christian minorities and to encourage freer debate of the horrors that befell them. Yet it has also showered millions of dollars on international lobbying firms in a vain effort to peddle the official version of events. A steady trickle of nations continue to recognize the events of 1915 as genocide. Turkey’s biggest worry is that on the centenary in 2015, the United States will risk wrecking relations and follow suit.
In Turkey’s mainly Kurdish southeastern province of Diyarbakir, global diplomacy does not figure in the calculations of Abdullah Demirbas, the mayor of the city’s ancient Sur district. A maze of narrow cobbled streets lined with decrepit stone houses, Sur used to be known as the “neighborhood of the infidels” because of the large number of Armenians, Syrian Orthodox Christians and Jews who once lived there. Since being twice elected to office on the ticket of Turkey’s largest pro-Kurdish party, Peace and Democracy (BDP), Demirbas, a stocky former schoolteacher with an easy smile, has thrown himself wholeheartedly into making amends for the past.
“As Kurds, we also bear responsibility for the suffering of the Armenians,” he told Al-Monitor over glasses of ruby-red tea. “We are sorry, and we need to prove it.” As a first step, Demirbas launched free Armenian-language classes two years ago at the municipality offices. “They were an instant hit,” Demirbas said. Many of those who enrolled were thought to be “hidden Armenians” or the descendants of those who converted to Islam to survive.
One such “hidden Armenian,” a gnarled octogenarian called Ismail, confided to Al-Monitor that his father’s real name was Leon.
“They wiped out his entire family, out in the fields,” he said as he awaited an audience with Demirbas. The old man’s voice cracked with emotion. “My father was rescued by a Turkish officer and became a Muslim. But though, praise God, I am a good Muslim too, praying five times a day, I know I am not accepted,” he added. “In their minds, I am always the son of the unbeliever.”
The Kurds’ role in the killings has been well documented, increasingly now by the Kurds themselves.
Egged on by their Ottoman rulers, Kurdish tribal chieftains raped, murdered and pillaged their way through the southeast provinces where for centuries they had co-existed, if uneasily, with the Armenians and other non-Muslims. Henry Morgenthau, who served as US ambassador in Constantinople at the height of the bloodshed, described the Kurds’ complicity in his chilling 1918 memoir Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story thusly:
“The Kurds would sweep down from their mountain homes. Rushing up to the young girls, they would lift their veils and carry the pretty ones off to the hills. They would steal such children as pleased their fancy and mercilessly rob all the rest of the throng. … While they were committing these depredations, the Kurds would freely massacre, and the screams of women and old men would add to the general horror.”
Osman Koker, a Turkish historian who has chronicled Armenian life through a rich collection of postcards and photographs predating 1915, reckons more than half of Diyarbakir’s population was non-Muslim before the violence began.
“Most of them were Armenians, now there are none,” Koker told Al-Monitor in an interview. Hashim Hashimi, a former member of parliament and a Sunni Muslim spiritual leader with a robust following, told Al-Monitor, “Sadly, many imams were convincing people that if they killed an infidel they would find their place in heaven and be rewarded with beautiful girls.” This meant that thousands of Syrian Orthodox and other Christians were not spared, either.
In 2009 Demirbas and Osman Baydemir, a fellow BDP politician and the mayor of Greater Diyarbakir, decided to help with the restoration of an Armenian Orthodox church that had lay in ruins for decades in Sur. Baydemir donated a third of the costs of restoring Surp Giragos to its former magnificence. In 2011 the church, said to be the largest Armenian church in the Middle East, opened its doors as a fully functioning house of worship.
Ergun Ayik, an Armenian entrepreneur and philanthropist who runs the Surp Giragos Foundation, told Al-Monitor that the BDP mayors “went out of their way to help us,” even providing the church with free utilities and security guards. A new museum of Armenian culture that is due to open by the end of 2013 within the Surp Giragos complex under the sponsorship of the Greater Diyarbakir municipality should also help draw tourists, not to mention thousands of “hidden Armenians” thought to be scattered across the southeast.
Silva Ozyerli, an Armenian activist from Diyarbakir who left for Istanbul in the 1970s, has agreed to donate some family treasures, including a silk nightshirt, several finely embroidered tablecloths and a pair of engraved copper bowls to the museum. Ozyerli voiced her enthusiasm for the project in an interview with Al-Monitor.
“You know why it is dear to me?” she asked a tinge of defiance creeping into her voice. “It is because everything in that museum will show people that not too long ago, Diyarbakir was every bit as Armenian as it was Kurdish, if not more so.”
Amberin Zaman is an Istanbul-based writer who has covered Turkey for The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Daily Telegraph and the Voice of America. A frequent commentator on Turkish television, she is currently Turkey correspondent for The Economist, a position she has retained since 1999. On Twitter: @amberinzaman
Putin doesn’t rule out supporting Syria action as U.S. strike confidence grows
Russia does not rule out agreeing to a military operation in Syria, provided Damascus’ responsibility for using chemical weapons is proven – but only with United Nations approval, President Vladimir Putin said Wednesday, September 4, according to RIA Novosti.
In an interview with the Associated Press and Russia’s state TV network Channel 1, the Russian president stressed there is still no “exact information” about what exactly happened in Syria, or even that chemical weapons were used at all.
The Russian president described video footage of dead children allegedly killed by the chemical attacks as “horrible,” but said the footage did not provide any answers to his questions about who was responsible. He claimed the video could have been produced by militants linked to al-Qaeda, “which has always been noted for its brutality.”
Putin said if the UN analysis revealed “clear proof” that the Syrian government was responsible for a chemical weapon attack, Russia “would be ready to act in the most decisive and serious manner,” but stressed that military action could only be taken against Damascus following a joint decision by the UN Security Council.
“Any other methods to justify use of force against an independent and sovereign state are unacceptable, and can only be qualified as aggression,” he said.
National Security Advisor Susan Rice told NBC News the Obama administration has “no expectation of losing the vote in Congress” on whether to authorize U.S. military action against Syria, the news agency reported.
In an exclusive interview with Brian Williams on NBC Nightly News, Rice said the White House is “quite confident” that Congress will approve Obama’s plan to launch punitive cruise missile strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime.
“We think that the Congress of the United States and the American people understand that we have compelling national interests at stake here,” said Rice, the former U.S. ambassador to the U.N.
Egyptian Foreign Ministry and Al-Azhar Oppose Syria Attack, Egyptians shout slogans against Turkish Prime Minister
Egyptians shout slogans against Turkish Prime Minister and US President as they demonstrate in Cairo on 1 September 2013 against a possible US attack on Syria in response to alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government. (Photo: AFP – Mohamed Abdelmeniem)
By: Iman Ibrahim
Published Monday, September 2, 2013
Cairo – There is no doubt that the current administration in Egypt and the political figures that support it are against a US-led military strike on Syria. This is only further reinforced by the fact that the current regime in Syria shares the Egyptian administration’s hostility to the Muslim Brotherhood, considered a Western-backed terrorist group by both sides.
Al-Azhar echoed this position on Sunday, September 1, proclaiming that a strike on Syria would be “an assault on the Arab and Islamic nation.” In a statement, al-Azhar declared its “strong rejection and condemnation of the US president’s decision to direct a military strike against Syria, which would be an assault and a threat to the Arab and Islamic nation, while also putting international peace and security at risk.”
Al-Azhar also stressed “the right of the Syrian people to self-determination and choosing their leaders in total freedom and transparency,” and denounced at the same time “the use of chemical weapons, no matter by which party.”
Speaking to Al-Akhbar, Egyptian ambassador and former assistant foreign minister, Hussein Haridi, said that US threats against Syria were groundless and only reflected Western plans and greed in the Arab countries.
“The talk about the Syrian crisis approaching the crater of a volcano has nothing to do with the regime of Bashar al-Assad or the mercenary groups in the Free Syrian Army, but it has a toll on a humanitarian crisis affecting millions of Syrians within their country’s borders and beyond. This requires further deliberation, because what we are possibly dealing with is the emergence of a new disaster that would devour innocents,” he said.
At a time when the US and its Western allies are considering a military strike against this country, we see that Arab silence has reigned supreme on the diplomatic and political arenas,” Aasar told Al-Akhbar. Regarding the severing of Egyptian-Syrian diplomatic relations, Haridi said, “Egyptian action on Syria has nothing to do with the move to sever relations made by impeached president Mohamed Mursi.” He noted the need to restore Egypt’s longstanding diplomatic role by sending Egyptian diplomatic delegations to Syria and exchanging ambassadors as soon as possible. Haridi also called for Egypt to withdraw from the “Friends of Syria Group,” which he said was a Turkish-French invention developed under former French president Nicolas Sarkozy to systematically destroy Syria and its people.
Haridi also told Al-Akhbar that “Egypt will stand by Syria whether the West likes it or not. We will not abandon our strategic role in the region, but the movements of the two countries will be fraught with risks and will be extremely sensitive.” He then denied that the recent reshuffle in the Egyptian diplomatic corps was to blame for the delay in showing solidarity with Syria, but acknowledged that the Muslim Brotherhood was planning to appoint party members to diplomatic posts in certain countries.
Haridi said, “The posts that Mursi deliberately left empty included the Egyptian ambassadorship in Ankara, because the Muslim Brotherhood was planning to nominate a member of the group to represent it there.”
The strongly worded statement of the Egyptian Foreign Ministry vehemently opposed a military strike against Syria. But according to Hani al-Aasar, security affairs expert at al-Ahram Strategic Center, this was the only statement of its kind to be issued by an Arab country.
“At a time when the US and its Western allies are considering a military strike against this country on the back of the alleged chemical attack the regime is accused of perpetrating, we see that Arab silence has reigned supreme on the diplomatic and political arenas,” Aasar told Al-Akhbar.
Aasar then stressed that Egypt’s stance was clear and unequivocal, and that it would not take part in any military strike. Egypt, he said, strongly opposes all escalatory steps being made by the US.
It is worth noting that Ambassador Nabil Fahmy, in the Foreign Ministry’s statement, made it clear that Egypt strongly believes “the use of force in international relations is unacceptable except in the case of self defense or under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.”
Fahmy also called on the UN Security Council to exert all efforts to investigate the incidents and take necessary measures on what he called a heinous crime, stressing at the same time the need to find a political solution to the conflict in Syria.
Report- Bandar Bush & the Syrian Subversion (VIDEO) and Audio
by Sibel Edmonds
It has long been acknowledged that the Saudis have been one of the key players funding, arming, training and smuggling terrorists into Syria during the conflict. But the Saudi connection to the fighting in Syria took on a new dimension in the wake of last month’s chemical attack on Ghouta. The Saudis are now being blamed for supplying the chemical weapons that the rebels used in the attack. In one key report,
veteran AP correspondent Dale Gavlak and on-the-ground reporter Yahyah Ababneh interviewed rebels in Ghouta who alleged that the weapons had been supplied by Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi intelligence chief. Find out more about the Bandar Bush and the Syrian Subversion in this week’s EyeOpener report with James Corbett. Watch the Preview Clip Here:
James Corbett interview Sharmine Narwani
Writer and political analyst Sharmine Narwani joins us to break down the geopolitics behind the Syrian war. We discuss the main players in the Syrian conflict and their
competing agendas and explore her new article, “Bandar ibn Israel,” detailing Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud’s strange disappearance and reappearance in the thick of the Syrian war.
Liston to Audio Sharmine Narwani exposing Bandar Bush Subversion
Congress moves to approve Syria strike
BREAKING NEWS Tuesday, September 3, Boehner Says He Supports Obama’s Call for Action on Syria
New York Time Report:
Speaker John A. Boehner said on Tuesday he would “support the president’s call to action” in Syria after meeting with President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., giving the president a crucial ally in the quest for votes in the House.
Mr. Obama summoned Mr. Boehner and other Republican and Democratic leaders to the White House as he intensified his push for Congressional approval of an attack on Syria. Conservative House Repubicans have expressed deep reluctance about the president’s strategy, and winning Mr. Boehner’s approval could help the president make inroads with a group thta has not supported him on most issues in the past.,
For Mr. Obama, who leaves on Tuesday evening for a three-day trip to Sweden and Russia, it is the next phase in a White House lobbying campaign that will have to extend beyond hawks like Mr. McCain to persuade lawmakers who are reluctant to get involved militarily in Syria.
READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/04/us/politics/obama-administration-presses-case-on-syria.html?emc=edit_na_20130903
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 620
- 621
- 622
- 623
- 624
- …
- 673
- Next Page »